Boosting Security Excellence: How OKRs Drive Results in Application Security and DevSecOps

Introduction to OKRs: The Framework That Powers Tech Giants

In the fast-paced world of technology and cybersecurity, staying focused on what truly matters can make the difference between preventing a major breach and suffering catastrophic consequences. Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) have emerged as a powerful goal-setting framework used by some of the world's most successful organizations including Google, Amazon, Netflix, and LinkedIn to align teams, drive ambitious outcomes, and measure what matters most .

Originally developed at Intel by Andy Grove and popularized by John Doerr who introduced them to Google in 1999, OKRs have transformed how organizations set and execute their strategies . The framework's beauty lies in its simplicity: an Objective is a qualitative, inspirational goal that describes what you want to achieve, while Key Results are 3-5 measurable outcomes that track how you'll achieve that objective . Unlike traditional performance indicators, OKRs are designed to be ambitious—with Google expecting a 60-70% completion rate for stretch goals—encouraging teams to reach beyond business-as-usual targets .

For security professionals working in Application Security (AppSec) and DevSecOps, where threats evolve rapidly and resources are often constrained, OKRs provide a framework to focus efforts on security initiatives that deliver genuine risk reduction rather than simply tracking routine activities. This article explores how security teams can leverage OKRs to translate security strategy into measurable action, with practical examples you can adapt for your organization.

Why OKRs Matter for Security Teams

In many organizations, security teams struggle to demonstrate their value in business-relevant terms. They may report on technical metrics like vulnerabilities patched or scans completed, but these rarely connect to broader business objectives. OKRs solve this challenge by forcing teams to think about outcomes rather than outputs—not just what we're doing, but why it matters .

The F.A.C.T.S. framework summarizes the benefits of OKRs: Focus, Alignment, Commitment, Tracking, and Stretching . For security leaders, this means:

• Focus: Prioritizing the few critical security initiatives that deliver disproportionate risk reduction
• Alignment: Ensuring application security, product teams, and infrastructure groups are working toward shared security goals
• Commitment: Creating shared accountability for security outcomes across engineering and security teams
• Tracking: Measuring progress with leading indicators rather than lagging security metrics
• Stretching: Encouraging ambitious goals that move security beyond compliance to genuine resilience

OKR Examples for Application Security and DevSecOps

Here are six practical OKR examples tailored for security teams in software development organizations. These examples balance ambitious security goals with measurable outcomes, drawing from industry best practices and the specific characteristics of effective OKRs .

1. Reducing Critical Vulnerabilities in Production

Table: OKR for Vulnerability Reduction

Component	Description	Target
Objective	Dramatically reduce exposure to critical vulnerabilities in production applications
Key Result 1	Reduce critical-severity vulnerabilities in production by 75%	0.0-1.0 scale
Key Result 2	Achieve 95% remediation of critical vulnerabilities within SLA	0.0-1.0 scale
Key Result 3	Decrease mean time to remediate (MTTR) critical vulnerabilities from 30 to 7 days	0.0-1.0 scale

Grading: Score each KR on a 0.0-1.0 scale where 1.0 = 100% target achievement. Total OKR score = average of KR scores. A score of 0.7 would be considered successful for this stretch goal.

2. Shifting Left Security Testing

Objective: Successfully shift security left into the development lifecycle

• KR1: Increase code scanned by SAST in CI/CD from 50% to 90%
• KR2: Reduce security-related bugs found in production by 60%
• KR3: Achieve 80% of developers completing secure coding training

3. Improving Dependency Management

Objective: Ensure third-party dependencies don't introduce unacceptable risk

• KR1: Reduce critical vulnerabilities in dependencies by 80%
• KR2: Achieve 95% of applications with software bill of materials (SBOM)
• KR3: Decrease mean time to patch vulnerable dependencies from 45 to 14 days

4. Enhancing Security Culture

Objective: Make security everyone's responsibility in the engineering organization

• KR1: Increase developer participation in security champions program by 200%
• KR2: Achieve 85% positive response on "security is prioritized" in developer survey
• KR3: Double the number of security bug reports from engineers

5. Accelerating Incident Response

Objective: Significantly improve our capability to detect and respond to application security incidents

• KR1: Reduce mean time to detect (MTTD) application security incidents from 48 to 4 hours
• KR2: Achieve 95% of incidents contained within 1 hour of detection
• KR3: Conduct incident response drills for 100% of critical applications

6. Implementing Security Metrics That Matter

Objective: Establish leading indicators for application security risk

• KR1: Implement security metrics dashboard with 10 key leading indicators
• KR2: Achieve 90% of engineering managers regularly using security metrics
• KR3: Reduce variance between predicted and actual security incidents by 75%

Implementing OKRs in Security Teams: Practical Guidance

Based on successful implementations at companies like Adobe and LinkedIn, here's how to effectively roll out OKRs in your security organization :

Start with Why

Before implementing OKRs, help your team understand why this framework matters. Share examples from organizations like Google, where OKRs have been credited with helping achieve "10× growth, many times over" . Explain how OKRs differ from traditional security metrics: while KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) measure ongoing health of security processes, OKRs are designed to drive change and improvement .

Adoption Strategy

Take a "crawl-walk-run" approach to implementation . Begin with a pilot team—perhaps your application security group or cloud security team—rather than attempting a full-scale deployment across all security functions immediately. Use the first cycle to learn about OKRs, and reserve the second cycle to explore how best to scale the program.

Avoiding Common Pitfalls

Security teams often make these mistakes when implementing OKRs:

• Too many OKRs: Focus on 3-5 objectives per team per quarter
• Business as usual: OKRs should represent change, not routine operations
• Sandbagging: Set ambitious goals that inspire stretched performance
• Measuring outputs rather than outcomes: Focus on risk reduction rather than activities completed

Grading and Assessment

Google grades OKRs on a 0.0-1.0 scale, where 0.6-0.7 is considered successful for stretch goals . Grade your OKRs at the end of each quarter and use this as a learning exercise rather than a performance evaluation. If you consistently score 1.0 on all KRs, your goals aren't ambitious enough. If you're consistently below 0.4, you may be setting unrealistic targets.

Connecting to Larger Business Goals

As the city of Syracuse, NY demonstrated with their fiscal sustainability OKRs , the power of OKRs comes from connecting team objectives to larger organizational goals. Ensure your application security OKRs support broader technology and business objectives, such as product innovation, customer trust, or operational excellence.

Aligning OKRs with Security Frameworks

Your OKRs should complement rather than replace established security frameworks like NIST CSF, ISO 27001, or SOC 2. While these frameworks provide essential guidance on security controls, OKRs help you prioritize which aspects to implement or improve first. For example:

• NIST Identify function → OKR focused on asset management
• NIST Protect function → OKR focused on access control improvements
• NIST Detect function → OKR focused on monitoring capabilities
• NIST Respond function → OKR focused on incident response
• NIST Recover function → OKR focused on resilience

Conclusion: Making Security Measurable and Meaningful

OKRs offer security leaders a powerful framework to translate security strategy into measurable action. By focusing on outcomes rather than activities, AppSec and DevSecOps teams can demonstrate their value in terms that matter to the business—reducing risk, enabling secure innovation, and building customer trust.

As John Doerr emphasizes in Measure What Matters, OKRs are "KPIs with soul" — they add direction, purpose, and context to your security metrics. Whether you're part of a 50-person software company or a large enterprise, OKRs can help align your security efforts with business objectives, create transparency, and drive meaningful improvement in your security posture.

Start by selecting one or two of the OKR examples provided and adapting them to your context. Remember that the ideal OKR score is around 0.6-0.7—if you're achieving perfect scores, you're not stretching enough. Embrace ambitious goals, measure what matters, and watch your security program deliver unprecedented value.

Call to Action

What OKRs is your security team using? Share your experiences and adaptations in the comments below—I'd love to hear what's working (and what isn't) for your organization.

Disclaimer: The OKR examples provided are illustrative and should be adapted to your organization's specific context, risk appetite, and maturity level. Not all OKRs will be appropriate for all organizations.

---