🔥Firebase vs ⚡Supabase in 2025: Which one actually scales with 🫵 you?

Both promise instant backends, realtime magic, and built-in auth. But once you scale past the MVP stage, only one keeps up without boxing you in. Here’s my take.

TL;DR:

• Firebase is fantastic for fast MVPs and tight integration with Google’s ecosystem.
• Supabase gives you SQL, open standards, and Postgres under the hood meaning control, visibility, and long-term flexibility.
• Firebase can feel magical at first… until it becomes unreasonably hard to scale or debug.
• Supabase asks you to think a bit more upfront but pays off when your app grows.
• Choose Firebase if you need push notifications and can live with opinionated defaults.
• Choose Supabase if you care about control, backend visibility, and avoiding vendor lock-in.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Why the comparison still matters

If you’re building anything beyond a weekend side project in 2025, chances are you’ve stared at two tabs: Firebase and Supabase. Both offer the backend holy trinity: auth, database, and real-time sync with zero infrastructure babysitting.

I’ve built production apps with both. Firebase felt like magic… until it didn’t. Supabase felt slower… until it clicked.

This isn’t just a feature-by-feature checklist. It’s a developer’s perspective on what it actually feels like to scale with each when your project grows, when bugs hit, when users are waiting, and you’re debugging a blank screen at 2 a.m.

Core philosophy

Firebase is Magic. Supabase is Muscle.

When you first spin up Firebase, it feels like cheating.
Auth works out of the box. Realtime sync is magical. You don’t write backend logic you just connect frontends to services.

But that simplicity comes at a cost: you trade control for speed.
Firebase abstracts almost everything. Your data lives in NoSQL blobs, and when you need something outside their predefined workflows like complex joins, transactional logic, or custom rules you start hitting walls.

Supabase flips that experience.

You get full SQL, exposed Postgres, and standard APIs. Nothing’s hidden. But that means you actually have to think about schemas, permissions, migrations.

Firebase says: “Don’t worry about the backend.”
Supabase says: “You own the backend. Let’s build it right.”

Both are valid, but depending on your timeline, team size, and long-term plans, one will save you weeks and the other will cost you.

Auth, realtime, storage: Who does it better?

1. Authentication

Firebase:

• Battle-tested, supports email, phone, social logins, anonymous sessions.
• UI widgets are plug-and-play, but customization is limited.
• Rules engine is powerful… and confusing.
• Identity Platform integration if you want enterprise auth (but at a price).

Supabase:

• Email/password, magic links, OAuth, SSO — all supported.
• Built on GoTrue (open-source), and easy to self-host or tweak.
• Auth policies feel like writing SQL conditions — great once you get the hang of it.
• Dev-friendly but not as polished as Firebase’s ecosystem (yet).

Winner:
Firebase for polished UX and scale. Supabase for control and transparency.

2. Realtime

Firebase:

• Realtime Database and Firestore give blazing-fast sync.
• Event-based, but lacks flexibility for custom filters and queries.
• Great for chat apps, dashboards, or presence indicators.

Supabase:

• Uses Postgres’ LISTEN/NOTIFY under the hood + websockets.
• Full SQL filters on live queries = way more precise.
• Works better for complex state or selective syncing.

Winner:
Firebase is smoother out of the box. Supabase is better for nuanced use cases.

3. Storage

Firebase:

• Firebase Storage (backed by Google Cloud) is fast, secure, and deeply integrated.
• Access rules are confusing but flexible once configured.
• Supabase:
• Object storage built on S3-compatible layer, with role-based access policies.
• Not as tightly integrated as Firebase, but more customizable.

Winner:
Firebase for production-grade media storage. Supabase for better integration with SQL roles.

What breaks when you scale

You don’t notice limitations when you’re prototyping.
But once your app grows users, data, contributors cracks appear.

Here’s how Firebase and Supabase hold up under pressure:

Firebase’s problems at scale

1. Lock-in is real

• Firebase isn’t just a tool. It’s an ecosystem.
• Your backend logic lives in Cloud Functions, your data in Firestore or Realtime DB, your auth rules in a custom DSL.
• Migrating anything becomes painful.

2. Querying Firestore gets weird fast

• No joins. Limited where clauses. You start doing gymnastics with data duplication and client-side merging.
• Performance suffers — and so does your sanity.

3. Debugging is painful

• Ever tried debugging a Firebase rule mismatch at 2 a.m.? Good luck.
• Logs are spread across tools. Testing access control becomes trial-and-error.

Supabase’s problems at scale

1. You own the ops (even if they hide it)

• Sure, Supabase is “hosted,” but you’re closer to the DB.
• Bad queries = bad performance.
• You’ll need to think like a backend dev eventually (indexes, auth layers, rate limits).

2. DevEx gaps still exist

• The dashboard UI and auth workflows aren’t as frictionless as Firebase.
• Docs are good, but edge cases can take digging.
• Community is smaller (but growing fast).

What saves you (long-term)

1. Supabase’s schema-first model scales naturally.

• You don’t hit the “NoSQL wall.”
• Want to move to your own Postgres? Easy.
• Want to self-host? No problem.

2. Firebase requires workarounds once you’re past MVP stage.

• Data modeling becomes duct tape.
• Custom logic = more Cloud Functions = more cold starts, more latency.

What I’d pick in 2025 (and why)

After building apps with both, here’s my honest take:

When Firebase wins

• You’re launching a mobile app fast, need auth + sync instantly.
• Your team has no backend developers.
• You’re okay with the Google lock-in for the short term.
• Your app doesn’t need complex querying or relational data.

Think: MVPs, hackathons, solo founder prototypes, client demos.

When Supabase wins

• You want Postgres-level power without spinning up your own backend.
• You need SQL joins, views, RLS (Row-Level Security), or triggers.
• You value open-source infrastructure and want a clear migration path.
• You plan to grow your team or app complexity over time.

Think: SaaS dashboards, internal tools, startups aiming to scale without rebuilds.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Final verdict..

Firebase feels like magic… until it doesn’t.
Supabase feels like work… until it pays off.

In 2025, Supabase has matured enough to be a real backend. Not a toy, not a mock. A production-ready alternative that scales with you not against you.

If you want to build fast, go Firebase 🔥.
If you want to build forever, go Supabase ⚡.