Top code editors: How have they evolved, and which are the best ones now?

From punch cards to VS Code, developers have shaped their tools, and now those tools are about to shape us back.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Editors aren’t just tools they’re mirrors

Code editors are the most personal tool in a developer’s stack.

You can follow someone’s tutorial, fork their GitHub repo, use the same framework but the moment you open your editor, that’s you. Your keybindings, your theme, your linters, that one plugin you swear by and nobody else understands it’s all a fingerprint. A dev’s editor config is as revealing as their Spotify playlist.

But here’s the twist: for most of programming history, editors evolved around how we code. They were shaped by our habits, our limitations, our desire to do more with less.

Now? They’re starting to shape us back.

With AI creeping into autocomplete, suggesting functions, writing entire files, even summarizing pull requests we’re entering an era where the editor isn’t a passive tool. It’s becoming a collaborator. Or a boss. Or a code genie that sometimes gives you gold and sometimes gives you trash, and you’re not sure which until prod goes down.

This shift might be bigger than most devs realize. Not just in how we code, but in how we learn, think, and define what it means to be a “good developer” in the first place.

And like every big shift in tech, it didn’t start with ChatGPT or Copilot. It started 50 years ago with blinking cursors and modal editing.

Let’s rewind.

Table of Contents

1. A short timeline of editor evolution
2. What editors reveal about dev culture
3. The AI editor isn’t the future it’s already here
4. What changes when editors think for you
5. What we might lose
6. What we can gain (if we’re intentional)
7. Final thought: Tools are never neutral

A short timeline of editor evolution

You can’t talk about modern code editors without appreciating the war stories behind them. The command-line gods didn’t wake up one day and decide, “Let’s build VS Code and slap some AI in it.” It was a slow, stubborn evolution shaped by hardware limits, sysadmin nightmares, and a lot of keyboard smashing.

Here’s how we got from blinking terminals to editors that whisper suggestions like a sentient Stack Overflow.

1976: VI the pure keyboard warrior

Born from the constraints of early Unix terminals, VI was written by Bill Joy and designed for one purpose: efficiency under pain. No mouse. No menus. Just modes insert, command, visual. Every keystroke mattered.

Some devs still use it today to edit production configs over SSH no GUI, no forgiveness. One wrong character in nginx.conf and you’re the reason prod is down.

Fun fact: VI is built into almost every Unix-based system. Even now, it lurks in /usr/bin/vi, waiting for someone to mistype git commit.

1985: EMACS the everything machine

Richard Stallman and Guy Steele built EMACS not as an editor, but as a way of life. It could send email, play Tetris, run shell commands, and even play music all from the terminal.

It was infinitely hackable thanks to its built-in Lisp interpreter. People say EMACS is a great operating system it just lacks a good text editor.

Reference: EMACS introduced extensibility long before VS Code made it cool.

1991: Vim VI, but better

Bram Moolenaar’s Vim (VI Improved) added syntax highlighting, multi-level undo, and a powerful plugin system. For many Linux users, it’s the first thing installed even before Git.

Vim became a movement. Entire workflows emerged that rejected the mouse as weak and unnecessary. If you didn’t remap Caps Lock to Escape, were you even trying?

Pro tip: If you’ve never gotten stuck in Vim and Googled “how to quit,” congrats you’re a liar.

1999–2015: Nano, Sublime, Atom the accessibility era

As devs got tired of wrestling with modal editing and memorizing keystroke spells, editors like Nano emerged for simple CLI tasks. You didn’t need a manual to write a cronjob.

Then came Sublime Text fast, gorgeous, and lightweight. It hit the sweet spot between performance and customization. Entire plugin ecosystems were born just to theme your brackets.

Atom, backed by GitHub, pushed the idea of a “hackable text editor.” It brought extensions to the masses and also paved the way for what came next.

Culture shift: These editors democratized coding. No steep learning curves. No flame wars about tabs vs spaces just open, type, and build.

2015–Today: VS Code, JetBrains, Codespaces dev environment as a platform

Then VS Code happened. Built on Electron (yeah, the same thing that runs Slack), VS Code quickly became the editor.

• Massive extension marketplace
• Built-in Git integration
• Powerful LSP (Language Server Protocol) support
• Tightly coupled with GitHub (owned by Microsoft)

It wasn’t just about editing text — it was about integrating the entire dev workflow.

JetBrains IDEs (like IntelliJ and PyCharm) continued to cater to language-specific power users. Meanwhile, GitHub Codespaces and StackBlitz brought entire dev environments to the browser.

Onboarding today: Instead of cloning repos and setting up environments, many companies just spin up Codespaces. “Works on my machine” is dying a well-deserved death.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

What editors reveal about dev culture

The code editor you choose says more about you than your GitHub profile ever will.

It’s not just about ergonomics or performance it’s about values. Each era of editors reflects what developers prioritized at that time. You could almost write a personality test based on your editor setup.

Let’s break it down.

VI: Mastery over interface

Using VI is like playing a fighting game on hard mode with a blindfold. It was built when terminals were dumb and keyboards were king. There’s no hand-holding you learn the keystrokes or suffer.

Choosing VI meant you valued total control, speed, and discipline. It wasn’t just an editor it was a dojo.

EMACS: Control over complexity

If VI was a dojo, EMACS was a research lab.

You could do everything in EMACS write Lisp macros, send emails, compile your kernel, even launch a Tetris break. It was the choice of devs who wanted to bend the machine to their will.

In an era of single-tasking, EMACS users said: why not run an entire ecosystem in one terminal window?

Vim: Speed over ease

Vim users are the F1 drivers of text navigation.

They remap keys. They script their own workflows. They toggle between normal and insert mode faster than most people alt-tab. Choosing Vim meant you valued performance and elegance over simplicity.

If you ever met someone who uses Vim and colemak, run you’re talking to a machine.

Sublime / Atom: Minimalism over power

As dev tools spread beyond old-school engineers, Sublime and Atom brought clarity. Fast, lightweight, pretty. For the first time, an editor didn’t look like a boot menu it looked like a product.

This era emphasized accessibility. You didn’t have to memorize macros. You just typed, and it worked.

VS Code: Flexibility over purity

VS Code didn’t pick a side it just did everything.

Want Vim keybindings? Install the extension. Need Git integration? Built-in. Want to debug Python, run Docker, and talk to Copilot? No problem. VS Code became the default not because it was opinionated but because it was adaptive.

Choosing VS Code is like choosing a mech suit. It does what you want, when you want, and asks: “More plugins?”

JetBrains: Introspection over speed

JetBrains IDEs (like IntelliJ, PyCharm, GoLand) are the choice for devs who like to be understood. These tools read your code like a novel. They’ll autocomplete based on context, suggest refactors, warn about bugs before you’ve even noticed the typo.

You sacrifice speed for smarts. It’s like pairing with an engineer who’s always right, slightly smug, and lives in your IDE.

So what does today’s dev culture value?

In 2025, our editors reflect some key truths:

• We code in teams, not silos
• We care about standardization and shared conventions
• We rely on tools to think with us, not just for us
• And increasingly, we want AI that assists, not overwhelms

Example: On many frontend teams today, extensions like ESLint, Prettier, GitLens, and Copilot Chat aren’t optional they’re required. They don’t just help; they enforce the coding culture.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

The AI editor isn’t the future it’s already here

Autocomplete isn’t what it used to be. What started as mild keyword suggestions is now full-on code generation, refactoring, scaffolding, and explanation. Your editor isn’t just “helping” anymore it’s actively coding with you.

And yeah, sometimes it codes better than you.

Let’s talk about the current lineup of AI-native and AI-enhanced editors that are redefining what it even means to “edit” code.

Cursor: The AI-native power tool

If VS Code had an AI sibling that was built from scratch for fast solo devs, it’d be Cursor. It’s based on VS Code under the hood, but every inch is optimized for working with an LLM.

• Understands your whole project
• Lets you refactor with commands like: “Make this a React hook”
• Remembers context between prompts
• Popular with indie hackers, startup CTOs, and fast-moving prototypes

Use it if: You work solo and want to move at the speed of thought.

Image suggestion: Cursor UI with inline AI prompt + file context sidebar

GitHub Copilot the mainstream default

If you’re in the Microsoft ecosystem (aka VS Code, GitHub, Azure), Copilot is the easiest way to inject AI into your workflow. It does:

• Inline suggestions while you type
• Chat-based code questions (“What’s this function doing?”)
• Test generation and doc summaries
• Works inside PRs and diffs (via Copilot for Pull Requests)

Use it if: You’re already in VS Code and want solid AI help without switching tools.

Case study: A developer at Shopify used Copilot to auto-generate unit tests for a huge React component. The task went from 2 days → 3 hours.

Ghostwriter (Replit) the in-browser learning buddy

Ghostwriter is built into Replit’s browser-based IDE, which makes it especially useful for:

• New devs and students
• Quick prototypes or scripting
• Learning new languages with real-time AI explanations

It’s not enterprise-grade, but it’s ideal for getting started or teaching.

Use it if: You’re early in your dev journey or love coding in the browser.

Codeium the open-source, privacy-first challenger

Want something like Copilot but free, local-friendly, and non-Microsoft? That’s Codeium. It’s making waves in:

• Enterprises that care about data sovereignty
• Regulated industries
• Teams who want fast AI suggestions but keep full control

It works in many editors from JetBrains to VS Code to Vim and is often praised for being surprisingly good despite being free.

Use it if: You want AI assistance with fewer corporate strings attached.

Link: https://codeium.com

CodeWhisperer (AWS) The backend’s best friend

Built by AWS, CodeWhisperer is tuned for backend-heavy work:

• Great at generating IAM policies, Lambda functions, and CLI scripts
• Integrated with AWS Toolkit
• Plays well with infrastructure-as-code stacks like Terraform

Use it if: You’re deep in the AWS ecosystem and want an AI that speaks fluent cloud.

So which one should you use?

Let’s keep it simple:

Press enter or click to view image in full size

The bottom line?
AI editors aren’t a novelty anymore.
They’re a standard part of the stack just like Git, linting, or dark mode.

What changes when editors think for you?

Let’s be real: the way we write code is already changing. Fast.

It used to be that your editor waited for you to tell it what to do. Now it finishes your thoughts, explains your code, and occasionally invents solutions you weren’t even looking for.

That’s not just helpful it’s a fundamental shift in how we build software.

Here’s what changes when your editor doesn’t just wait for instructions… but has ideas of its own:

1. Your code becomes the output, not the input

Coding is slowly becoming less about typing and more about steering.

Instead of crafting every line, you now highlight a block and tell your editor:

“Convert this to a React hook”
“Add error handling here”
“Make this function async-safe”

And boom it does it. Or at least tries.

Example: In Cursor, you can select code and chat with it like you’re doing code review… with yourself.

2. You debug more than you write

AI speeds things up but it also guesses. Sometimes wrong. Sometimes dangerously wrong.

You’ll spend more time reviewing generated code than writing it yourself. Especially for:

• Security-sensitive logic
• Edge cases the AI can’t infer
• Code with architectural context the LLM doesn’t know

Stat: A GitHub study found that Copilot boosted productivity by 55% but also introduced subtle logic bugs when left unchecked.

3. Prompt fluency > syntax fluency

Knowing JavaScript or Python is still useful but not enough.

Now you also need to know:

• How to prompt clearly
• How to scope the AI’s task
• How to evaluate the result

Writing good code is still important. But writing a good prompt to get the code? That’s the new meta-skill.

Workshop: The AI.dev conference recently held a full session titled “Prompt Engineering for Pair Programming.” Yes, that’s a real thing now.

4. Your editor becomes your pair

AI editors aren’t “smart tools.” They’re your co-pilots. Your rubber duckies. Your confused-but-trying teammates.

Cursor literally calls itself an “AI pair programmer.” And they’re not wrong the interface feels more like ChatGPT than VS Code at times.

This means the editor UX is evolving too:

• Less emphasis on sidebars
• More focus on chat and command palette
• Contextual awareness across files, tabs, repos

The editor isn’t just where you write code. It’s where you talk to it.

5. Syntax mastery is optional tooling mastery is essential

You might forget the exact reduce() callback syntax, but you’ll know how to tell your editor:

“Summarize this reducer function”
“Add TypeScript types to this component”
“Make this thread-safe”

The focus shifts from memorization → orchestration.

Can you:

• Chain tasks across files?
• Prompt cleanly?
• Catch subtle AI bugs before they reach staging?

That’s the new craft.

So yeah, we’re still coding.
But now it’s a conversation and your editor has opinions.

What we might lose

For all the speed and convenience AI editors bring, there’s a quiet cost and not just in the form of another monthly subscription.

The deeper we let AI handle the small stuff, the more we risk losing the things that make great devs… well, great.

Craftsmanship

Remember when mastering Vim felt like unlocking the Matrix? When perfectly aligned indentation was a point of pride?

AI doesn’t care how you write just that the output runs. But those little details? They used to matter. They still do especially in teams that value clean, expressive code.

Autocomplete might finish your code, but it won’t teach you why something is elegant.

Intuition

The best devs spot bugs before the compiler does. They feel when a function is doing too much, or when a data structure is wrong for the job.

When AI starts taking over the first draft, you’re no longer training that instinct you’re just reviewing guesses. You become the spellchecker, not the writer.

And if you’ve ever nodded along to a Copilot suggestion just to move faster… you know what I mean.

Mentorship

Learning to code isn’t just about syntax it’s about struggling through it.

When juniors lean too hard on AI to solve their problems, they miss the grit. The rubber-duck moments. The forehead-on-desk realizations that eventually click into understanding.

Anecdote: A junior dev once told me they couldn’t explain a single file they wrote because Copilot wrote most of it. It worked… until it didn’t. And in the first real code review? They were completely lost.

The human touch

Code reviews used to be chances to teach and grow. Now, with AI generating whole PRs and summarizing diffs, those human moments are getting trimmed.

AI can explain what code does but not why the original dev chose to write it that way. That nuance gets lost in translation.

Visual Recap

This isn’t about going back to Notepad and swearing off Copilot.
It’s about knowing what you’re trading away when you offload too much thinking to the tool.

Use AI just don’t outsource your growth.

What we can gain (if we’re intentional)

It’s not all doom and dependency.

Used smartly, AI editors can be the best thing to happen to your workflow since Git stopped deleting your branches. The key is intentional use — not blind reliance.

Here’s what we can gain if we stay in the driver’s seat.

Speed (on the boring stuff)

Scaffolding types, converting syntax, writing boilerplate AI loves this stuff. Let it.

You don’t need to handwrite every useEffect cleanup or map a TypeScript interface by hand for the hundredth time.

Real example: I let Copilot write 80% of my GraphQL schema types… and I spent my energy optimizing the actual data model.

Focus (on what actually matters)

The less time you spend remembering the right method signature, the more you can focus on:

• Architecture
• Security
• Performance
• Business logic

The real thinking part of coding.

AI helps you stop worrying about syntax, and start thinking about structure.

Creativity (in how you solve problems)

When your editor becomes an idea machine, you start experimenting more.

You can ask it:

• “What’s a cleaner way to write this loop?”
• “Can I memoize this differently?”
• “How would this look in a functional style?”

It won’t always get it right but it sparks the exploration.

Think of it like pair programming with a junior dev that read the internet but hasn’t touched prod.

Custom workflows that reflect your values

Want full privacy? Use Codeium locally.
Need GitHub integration and AI linting? Stick with Copilot.
Want an AI-first editor that feels like magic? Cursor.

The point is: you get to choose.
AI doesn’t just flatten workflows it lets you customize how you build.

Link list for deeper exploration:

• Prompt Engineering Guide
• Continue.dev Open-source AI extension for VS Code
• Codeium Docs Use AI with local context
• Copilot Labs Experimental AI tools from GitHub

This isn’t about replacing developers. It’s about enhancing them — if we don’t forget how to code without the magic wand.

Final thought: Tools are never neutral

Every tool we use trains us.

Vim trained your fingers.
EMACS trained your mind.
Copilot? It’s training your prompts.

That’s not bad unless you don’t notice it happening.

Your editor is no longer just a text box.
It’s a co-author, a reviewer, sometimes a therapist, and increasingly, a decision-maker. And like any teammate, it brings its own biases, blind spots, and default behaviors.

If you let your tools optimize for speed, they’ll make you faster.
If you let them optimize for clarity, they’ll make you more readable.
But if you don’t know what they’re optimizing for… you’ll become something you didn’t choose.

The devtip

You don’t need to ditch VS Code for Vim to prove you’re a “real dev.”
You just need to know what your editor is doing on your behalf and whether you’re okay with that.

Sometimes it’s helping.
Sometimes it’s hiding things you need to see.
Either way: you’re still the one accountable when it hits prod.

Let’s keep this going

If this helped you see your tools in a new light, hit that save button. Future-you might thank you when you’re deep in a weird AI-generated bug.

And I’d love to hear it in the comments:

What editor do you use and what do you think it says about you?
Are you still Vim-maxxing or prompting like a wizard?

Press enter or click to view image in full size