How a ChatGPT outage taught me the importance of AI tool redundancy and context portability
The 6 AM Crisis
It was June 10th, 2025. A crucial day with multiple deliverables, client presentations, and my team waiting for technical specifications. I opened ChatGPT Plus—my trusted AI companion that had learned my communication style, technical preferences, and business context over two years of daily interactions.
Error: "Hmm...something seems to have gone wrong."
As a CTO, I've experienced my share of system failures. But this felt different. This wasn't just a server going down—it was like losing a highly trained assistant who knew exactly how I work.
The Vendor Lock-in Trap
Here's what hit me: I had created an invisible single point of failure in my workflow. Two years of:
- Fine-tuned responses to my communication style
- Context about DoozieSoft's tech stack and processes
- Understanding of my role as CTO and decision-making patterns
- Knowledge of ongoing projects like our ThinkLoom pivot
All locked inside one service that was now unavailable on the day I needed it most.
Sound familiar? As technologists, we preach redundancy, failover systems, and disaster recovery. Yet here I was, caught in the same trap with my AI toolchain.
The Systems Thinking Solution
Instead of panicking or waiting for the service to recover, I applied the same principles I use for system architecture:
1. Immediate Triage
- Checked ChatGPT 4o-mini (still accessible during the main outage)
- Identified alternative AI services (Claude, in this case)
- Assessed what was truly urgent vs. what could wait
2. Context Export Strategy
I realized my two years of ChatGPT interactions weren't properly documented. So I quickly generated what I called a "Context Primer"—a structured document containing:
- Personal & professional profile
- Company overview & strategic vision
- Technical stack & operations
- Team & workflow management
- Communication preferences
- Current priorities
3. Tool Migration Protocol
With the context primer, I could onboard any AI service in minutes rather than months. It was like having a well-documented API specification for my working style.
The Unexpected Win
What started as a frustrating outage became a significant process improvement:
Before: Implicit context locked in one tool
After: Portable, documented context that works anywhere
This approach delivered immediate benefits:
- Zero downtime: Switched to Claude and maintained productivity
- Better documentation: Finally had my working preferences documented
- Team scalability: Can now quickly context-switch any team member to AI tools
- Vendor independence: No longer locked into any single AI provider
The CTO Lesson: AI Tool Architecture
Just like we design resilient technical systems, we need resilient AI workflows:
1. Document Your Context
Create a living "AI Context Primer" that includes:
- Your role and decision-making style
- Technical preferences and constraints
- Current projects and priorities
- Communication patterns
2. Maintain Tool Redundancy
- Have accounts with multiple AI services
- Test failover scenarios periodically
- Keep context documentation updated
3. Treat AI as Infrastructure
- Monitor service status of your AI tools
- Have backup workflows for critical processes
- Document dependencies and switching costs
Implementation Strategy
Here's how to build AI resilience into your workflow:
Phase 1: Context Documentation
- Export key conversations from your primary AI tool
- Create a structured context primer
- Test it with alternative AI services
Phase 2: Redundancy Setup
- Set up accounts with 2-3 different AI providers
- Create standardized prompts and templates
- Train your team on multiple tools
Phase 3: Process Integration
- Incorporate AI tool status into your incident response
- Regular backup testing (quarterly)
- Update context documentation as priorities change
The Bottom Line
That morning's outage cost me 30 minutes of frustration but delivered a permanent improvement to my operational resilience.
As CTOs, we're responsible for building systems that can handle failure gracefully. Our AI workflows deserve the same architectural thinking we apply to our production systems.
The question isn't whether your AI tools will go down—it's whether you'll be ready when they do.
Key Takeaways:
- AI tool vendor lock-in is a real operational risk
- Context portability is as important as data portability
- Redundancy principles apply to AI workflows, not just infrastructure
- Documentation discipline pays dividends during crisis
What's your AI disaster recovery plan? Share your strategies in the comments.
Akshay Joshi is CTO and Co-Founder of DoozieSoft, a Bangalore-based software solutions company. He specializes in HRMS, ERP systems, and AI-enabled business tools. Connect with him on LinkedIn or follow DoozieSoft's journey toward AI-native product development.
Top comments (0)
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.