What's missing in PRs & code reviews?

What's something you feel is missing in Code Reviews & PRs?

Comments

[Didier Hoarau]

I feel that we have the basics already well covered like test automation. One thing that is possible but rarely implemented is to be able to connect to a temporary running environment that would have the changes introduced by the PR.

[Paweł Świątkowski]

I have it in my current job and had it in the previous. Honestly, it's a bit hard for me to imagine living without it now (maybe not for every PR, but at least for some of them).

[manojlingala]

imo the ideal PR should have a summary description of what the change is about .So, that ppl(even non-tech) can understand without drilling down to the respective task and it should have a snapshot embedded image /script to show the test coverage of the implementation for a decent change.

With the advancement of open ai fine tuning models these things can be fully automated.😎

[Fyodor]

Self review. Nobody does that.