What's something you feel is missing in Code Reviews & PRs?
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Eliminate Context Switching and Maximize Productivity
Pieces Copilot is your personalized workflow assistant, working alongside your favorite apps. Ask questions about entire repositories, generate contextualized code, save and reuse useful snippets, and streamline your development process.
Read next
AI System Fills Missing Parts in Casual Photos to Create Complete 3D Scenes
Mike Young -
New AI System Can Detect and Explain Deepfake Voices with 90% Accuracy
Mike Young -
UV Package Manager: Better Python Dependency Management
Cloud Native Engineer -
Study: Medium-Sized AI Models Match Larger Ones for Multi-Language Translation When Properly Prompted
Mike Young -
Top comments (4)
I feel that we have the basics already well covered like test automation. One thing that is possible but rarely implemented is to be able to connect to a temporary running environment that would have the changes introduced by the PR.
I have it in my current job and had it in the previous. Honestly, it's a bit hard for me to imagine living without it now (maybe not for every PR, but at least for some of them).
imo the ideal PR should have a summary description of what the change is about .So, that ppl(even non-tech) can understand without drilling down to the respective task and it should have a snapshot embedded image /script to show the test coverage of the implementation for a decent change.
With the advancement of open ai fine tuning models these things can be fully automated.😎
Self review. Nobody does that.