DEV Community

Cover image for Engineering a Backdoor for Global Payments
theresa moyo
theresa moyo

Posted on

Engineering a Backdoor for Global Payments

The Problem We Were Actually Solving

We were trying to sell stock photos to customers worldwide. Our business model was built on providing high-quality images to anyone who needed them, regardless of their location. But when the major payment gateways shut us out, we were faced with an impossible decision: abandon our customers or find a way to keep the payment system running.

What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)

We tried using alternative payment solutions like Payoneer, TransferWise, and even PayPal's personal account option (despite their official stance against merchants in restricted countries). But these alternatives had severe drawbacks. They charged exorbitant transaction fees, had complicated setup processes, or were just plain hard to integrate with our existing platform. We experimented with various workarounds, like using a VPN to pretend to be from a different country, but these were short-lived solutions that eventually ended in failed transactions, cancelled sales, and worse – lost customer trust.

The Architecture Decision

After months of experimenting with various payment gateways and workarounds, I made the tough decision to engineer a custom payment processor using local payment methods popular in our region. This change required significant architectural overhauls: reconfiguring our database, tweaking our APIs to accommodate local payment networks, and rewriting critical sections of our payment flow logic to accommodate the intricacies of this new system. We also invested time in retraining our customer support team on these new payment options, which, naturally, took some getting used to. The effort paid off when we finally launched our custom payment solution and started processing transactions once more – this time with a success rate of over 97%.

What The Numbers Said After

Our sales increased by 35% in the first month after deploying our custom payment processor. In fact, the number of transactions processed increased fourfold – with fewer failed transactions and a noticeable decrease in customer complaints about payment processing. But the most interesting number was our customer retention rate, which jumped from 68% to 85% in the same timeframe.

What I Would Do Differently

Looking back, I would've done one thing differently: engaged with the payment gateways and regulatory bodies earlier on to plead our case for reinstatement. The cat-and-mouse game we played – trying to outsmart the gatekeepers, only to be constantly shut down – drained significant resources and time. In hindsight, forging stronger relationships with our payment providers and advocating for our clients' needs might have saved us months of development, stress, and wasted effort.

In the end, our story serves as a powerful reminder that, in the world of engineering, adapting to the evolving landscape of technology and regulations can make all the difference. When platform restrictions knock on your door, it's time to dig in, adapt, and create new paths forward. As engineers, we must recognize that sometimes, being restricted is not a limitation – it's an opportunity to innovate and develop fresh solutions that change the game for those left behind.


Learning to build without platform dependencies is a career skill as much as a technical one. This is the payment infrastructure reference I share: https://payhip.com/ref/dev5


Top comments (0)