This is Post 2 from my “Accessible Links & SEO” series — based on the paper I presented at SIU 2025.
If you missed Part 1 (about unique links being punished by bots), you might want to check it out.
Now let’s talk contrast — and what happens when you're just… too accessible?
Quick Setup
We know accessibility matters.
We know WCAG 2.0 suggests a minimum contrast ratio of 4.5:1 for readable links.
So naturally, I expected better contrast to mean better SEO ranking.
I built a labeled dataset using real-world shopping websites, gathered link features like contrast ratio (contrast_ratio
), and paired them with SERP positions from both Google and Bing.
Then this happened:
Higher contrast didn’t improve ranking.
Sometimes, it even correlated negatively.
Let me rephrase that:
I had links with perfect, 12:1 contrast.
And they ranked lower than links with 6:1.
Data Snapshot:
Feature: contrast_ratio
Average contrast (ranked): 12.04
Average contrast (not ranked): 12.43
So the higher contrast group actually performed worse in visibility terms.
It wasn’t huge — but it was consistent across both search engines.
What gives?
Here are two thoughts:
Accessibility isn’t the only game in town.
Search engines likely weigh link context, site architecture, crawlability, internal references, etc.
High contrast alone isn’t enough to signal value.Overengineering for bots ≠ better visibility.
You might pass every Lighthouse audit, and still get ghosted by Google.
Bonus Visual:
Here’s the ranking distribution against contrast ratio:
(This is where you could insert a simple contrast histogram or scatter plot — let me know if you want one generated.)
📂 Resources
- Dataset: goker.dev/datasets/hyperlinks
- Codebase: goker.dev/codes/hyperlinks
TL;DR
You passed WCAG. Great.
But Google didn’t clap. Not even once.
Accessibility helps users.
But in the messy reality of SEO, it’s only one part of a complex signal soup.
So by all means — meet contrast requirements.
Just don’t expect that to carry your page to the top.
Next up: Link Clarity — and why “Click Here” still haunts the SERPs.
Top comments (4)
This was such a well-written and thoughtful post—I really enjoyed the way you explained your ideas and offered a fresh perspective. Looking forward to reading more from you!
Great insights! Sometimes we over-optimize design choices for SEO while forgetting user experience. At DataOnMatrix, we also focus on balancing SEO with clean and user-friendly designs, ensuring both search engines and visitors are satisfied. Thanks for sharing this perspective!
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.