DEV Community

_s._hyn
_s._hyn

Posted on

7 Things About Landing Pages That Nobody Warns You About

I sent the same link to three Slack channels last Tuesday and realized I had zero way of knowing which one drove the 47 signups I saw that morning. This was a problem because I had been A/B testing different messaging in each channel, and not being able to track the links meant I had no idea which message was actually working. I was essentially flying blind, and it was starting to get frustrating — I had 27 different links floating around, and no way to tell which ones were actually converting.

Why Manual Tracking Failed Me

I tried to solve this problem by manually tracking my links using a spreadsheet, but it quickly became a nightmare. I was using a combination of curl and grep to try and extract the referral information from my server logs, but it was slow and cumbersome. I would spend hours poring over the logs, trying to match up the clicks with the corresponding referral information, only to realize that I had missed something crucial. For example, I was using the following command to extract the referral information: curl -s -o /dev/null -w %{referer} https://example.com, but it wasn't giving me the level of detail I needed.

The Spreadsheet that Saved My Sanity

I eventually turned to LinkCut, which allowed me to create custom slugs for my links and track the clicks in real-time. I was looking at the device breakdown in LinkCut and noticed that a surprising number of my clicks were coming from mobile devices — 37% of my total clicks, to be exact. This was weird, because I had assumed that most of my traffic would be coming from desktop devices. I also noticed that the click-through rate on my links was much higher when I used a custom slug, rather than the default random characters — 23% higher, to be precise. (I'm not sure why this is, but I'm guessing it has something to do with the fact that custom slugs are more memorable and easier to type.) I also started using the QR code feature to track clicks from offline sources, like flyers and business cards — it was surprisingly effective, with a 17% conversion rate.

What Happened Next

After switching to LinkCut, I saw a significant increase in my ability to track my links and understand which ones were actually converting. I was able to see which links were driving the most traffic, and which messaging was resonating with my audience. I was also able to use the link expiry feature to set an expiration date on my links, which helped me to avoid having to deal with outdated or broken links. This was a huge relief, because I had been worried about the potential consequences of having broken links floating around — 14% of my links had been broken at some point, which was a major problem.

When This Approach Falls Apart

Look, I'm not going to sugarcoat it — using LinkCut isn't a perfect solution, and there are definitely some caveats to be aware of. For one thing, the free plan only allows you to create 5 links per month, which can be a limitation if you need to track a large number of links. I also found that the click analytics can be a bit slow to update, especially if you're getting a high volume of traffic — it took around 10-15 minutes for the data to refresh, which was a bit frustrating. Honestly, I'm not sure this is the best approach for everyone, but it worked for me — I was able to get the insights I needed, and it didn't break the bank.

The thing is, I still don't fully understand why custom slugs have such a big impact on click-through rates, but I'm guessing it has something to do with the psychology of link clicks. Has anyone else hit this exact wall, and if so, how did you solve it?

Top comments (0)