I sent the same link to three Slack channels last Tuesday and realized I had zero way of knowing which one drove the 47 signups I saw that morning. Honestly, I was pretty surprised - I'd only sent out a few test links the day before, and I wasn't expecting that kind of response. Look, I know I should've been using some kind of link tracking, but I just hadn't gotten around to setting it up yet.
Why Manual Tracking Failed Me
I was trying to track link clicks manually, using a combination of Google Analytics and some custom JavaScript code to log clicks on my website. I'd set up a few different links with UTM parameters, so I could track which ones were driving the most traffic - but it was a real pain to set up, and I was still having trouble getting accurate numbers. For example, I was using a script like this to log clicks:
ga('send', 'event', 'link', 'click', 'slack-link-1');
But even with that in place, I was still having trouble figuring out which link was driving the most conversions.
The Spreadsheet that Saved My Sanity
I was getting frustrated with the whole process, so I decided to try something different. I started using a URL shortener called LinkCut, which gave me a lot more insight into who was clicking on my links. I was looking at the device breakdown in LinkCut and noticed that a lot of my traffic was coming from mobile devices - which made sense, given that I'd posted the link in a few different Slack channels. (I'm not sure why, but I always assume that most of my traffic comes from desktops - I guess that's just a leftover from the old days.) Anyway, using LinkCut made it a lot easier to see which links were actually driving traffic, and which ones were just sitting there doing nothing.
Results - What I Actually Learned
So, after using LinkCut for a few days, I started to get a better sense of which links were actually driving traffic. And honestly, the results were a bit surprising - I'd expected that the link I posted in the biggest Slack channel would be the one driving the most traffic, but it turned out that one of the smaller channels was actually performing way better. I didn't expect this, but it made sense in retrospect - the smaller channel was more targeted, and the people in it were more likely to be interested in what I was offering. This was weird, because I'd always assumed that the biggest channel would be the best one to post in - but I guess that's not always the case.
When This Approach Falls Apart
The thing is, using a URL shortener like LinkCut isn't always the right choice. If you're dealing with a huge volume of traffic, you might need something more robust - and if you're trying to track really complex behavior, you might need something more sophisticated. I'm not sure this is the best approach for everyone, but it worked for me - and I'm not sure I'd want to go back to trying to track links manually. For example, if you're running a big marketing campaign, you might want to use a more advanced analytics tool to get a better sense of what's working and what's not.
Look, I'm still not sure I fully understand the best way to track link clicks - but using LinkCut definitely made it easier for me to get a sense of what was going on. And honestly, that's all I can really ask for - I just want to know what's working, so I can do more of it. Has anyone else hit this exact wall, and if so, how did you get past it?
Top comments (0)