So far in this series, we’ve covered why AI app security matters, how to model threats, and how to protect your training and inference data. But now we’re getting into the heart of the system: the model itself.
Whether you’re calling a hosted LLM API or deploying your own fine-tuned transformer, there are ways models can be abused, manipulated, or even stolen, often without leaving obvious traces.
Let’s break down what kind of attacks target the model itself, and what you can do to mitigate them.
What is a “Model-Level” Attack?
Unlike prompt injection (which manipulates input), model-level attacks aim to:
- Extract private data the model memorized
- Reverse-engineer the model or its weights
- Force the model to misbehave (deliberately or subtly)
- Replicate a model’s outputs through query flooding
These attacks can happen even if your code is solid and your data is clean.
Common Model-Level Attacks
1. Membership Inference
Attackers guess whether a specific data point was in your training set. This is especially risky for medical or legal datasets.
Example:
“Was this patient case used to train the diagnosis model?”
2. Model Inversion
Attackers reconstruct training samples by repeatedly querying the model and analyzing outputs.
Example:
Pulling out full names, email addresses, or summaries of private conversations the model saw.
3. Model Extraction
Aimed at replicating the behavior of your model by flooding it with queries and using the outputs to train a copycat.
Example:
Someone clones your expensive fine-tuned model by asking it thousands of questions and training their own LLM on the responses.
4. Adversarial Inputs
Inputs that look normal but are crafted to confuse the model, cause toxic output, or trick classification models into incorrect predictions.
Why Are These Hard to Detect?
Because these attacks don’t always “crash” your app.
They work within the system, slowly extracting or manipulating — and they’re especially tricky when:
- You log too much output
- You don’t rate-limit users
- Your model is overfitted
- Your responses are too deterministic (too predictable)
Defense Strategies That Actually Work
1. Rate limiting + Usage monitoring
Prevent brute-force model extraction and inference abuse by setting limits:
- Requests per user/IP
- Token count limits
- Detection of suspicious query patterns (repeated probing)
2. Randomized output (temperature, top-p)
By adding randomness to generation, it becomes harder for attackers to train replicas or extract fixed outputs.
3. Differential privacy during training
Makes it harder to determine if a specific datapoint was in the training set.
Libraries: Opacus (PyTorch), TensorFlow Privacy
4. Watermarking
Embed hidden patterns in your model’s output to prove ownership and detect misuse. Useful if your model is leaked or cloned.
5. Output filtering and toxicity guards
Prevent certain outputs from being returned — especially in public-facing applications.
Tools: Detoxify, Perspective API, or custom regex filters
6. Entropy-based monitoring
Low-entropy outputs may signal memorized content. If the same sequence keeps showing up, it may be worth investigating.
Example Scenario: Internal LLM for Legal Document Summarization
Say you’re running a private LLM that summarizes legal contracts.
Risks:
- The model might memorize and leak phrases from NDAs.
- A malicious user inside the org could repeatedly query the model with reconstruction prompts.
Defenses:
- Add a summary layer that only returns allowed information (no full quote generation).
- Enable differential privacy in training.
- Disable logging for sensitive requests.
- Randomize responses slightly to reduce cloning risk.
Bonus Tip: Don’t Rely on “Closed” APIs Alone
Even if you’re using OpenAI, Gemini, or Anthropic via API, you’re still responsible for input/output safety.
Prompt logs, user analytics, or generated content can still create liability or leakage if mishandled.
Final Thoughts
Models aren’t invincible — they’re just very good at mimicking patterns. And if someone understands those patterns deeply enough, they can use them against you.
Security here isn’t just patching holes — it’s about limiting what a model can remember, reveal, and repeat.
In the next post, we’ll tackle one of the most popular and misunderstood risks in AI today: Prompt Injection and Jailbreaking — what it is, how it happens, and what you can actually do about it.
Connect & Share
I’m Faham — currently diving deep into AI and security while pursuing my Master’s at the University at Buffalo. Through this series, I’m sharing what I learn as I build real-world AI apps.
If you find this helpful, or have any questions, let’s connect on LinkedIn and X (formerly Twitter).
This is blog post #4 of the Security in AI series. Let's build AI that's not just smart, but safe and secure.
See you guys in the next blog.
Top comments (0)