Technical debt is a common challenge in Angular development that, if left unmanaged, can slow progress and complicate maintenance. Developers must decide whether to refactor legacy code progressively or rewrite it entirely - a choice influenced by code complexity, test coverage, timelines, and the Angular version used. For instance, tangled components might benefit from refactoring, while outdated AngularJS apps may require a full rewrite. Successful management involves adhering to coding standards, maintaining robust tests, modularizing code, and using tools like Angular CLI and linters to catch issues early. Balancing technical debt reduction with ongoing feature work ensures the codebase remains clean, maintainable, and adaptable over time.
Understanding Technical Debt in Angular
Technical debt refers to the hidden costs of quick fixes and outdated practices that slow down future development. In Angular projects, it builds up as the framework evolves and codebases age.
What is Technical Debt in Angular?
Technical debt is the extra work caused by choosing easier but less optimal solutions. In Angular, common causes include old coding patterns, rushed work, and neglecting updates. Because Angular changes quickly, failing to keep code current leads to debt.
Key Takeaway 1: Quick fixes create long-term maintenance challenges.
Key Takeaway 2: Angular's fast evolution means ongoing updates are essential.
How Angular's Changes Increase Technical Debt
New Angular versions bring better features and patterns, but legacy code can lag behind. Delaying migration to newer approaches like RxJS or Angular CLI tools results in brittle code that's hard to maintain.
Key Takeaway 1: Regular refactoring prevents legacy build-up.
Key Takeaway 2: Adopting modern Angular practices improves code health.
Examples of Angular Anti-Patterns Creating Debt
// Avoid manual DOM manipulation
ngAfterViewInit() {
document.getElementById('myElement').style.color = 'red';
}
// Use Angular binding instead
@Component({
template: `<div [style.color]="color()">Text</div>`
})
export class Sample {
protected color = signal('red');
}
// Non-reactive service causing issues
@Injectable({providedIn: 'root'})
export class DataApi {
readonly data: Data | null = null;
}
// Reactive service using BehaviorSubject
@Injectable({providedIn: 'root'})
export class DataApi {
private dataSubject = new BehaviorSubject<Data | null>(null);
data$ = this.dataSubject.asObservable();
updateData(data: Data): void {
this.dataSubject.next(data);
}
}
Key Takeaway 1: Avoid direct DOM access; use bindings.
Key Takeaway 2: Use reactive state management with RxJS.
Technical debt in Angular comes from shortcuts and outdated code as the framework evolves. Staying up-to-date and refactoring early keeps projects maintainable and scalable.
When to Refactor Angular Code
Knowing when to refactor Angular code is key to maintaining a clean, efficient, and scalable application. This chapter guides you on spotting the right moments and strategies for refactoring without interrupting your development flow.
🚀 Ready to elevate your frontend code quality? Download the FREE 10-Step Frontend Code Review Checklist now and start catching bugs early, boosting performance, and improving collaboration today! 📋✨ DOWNLOAD NOW!
Indicators for Refactoring
Refactor when your code shows signs of technical debt that hinder upkeep or performance. Look for:
Duplicate code or repeated logic.
Overly large or complex components/services.
Rising bugs from tangled dependencies.
Challenges in adding features without breaking things.
Early detection means you can improve your code gradually.
Key Takeaway 1: Duplications and complexity are red flags.
Key Takeaway 2: Regular reviews help catch debt early.
Benefits of Incremental Improvement
Small, continuous refactoring ensures safer, steady progress:
Minimizes risk of bugs or regressions.
Makes it easier to track enhancements.
Supports learning and adapting best Angular practices.
This approach balances improvements with application stability.
Key Takeaway 1: Incremental changes are safer than big rewrites.
Key Takeaway 2: They keep development smooth and consistent.
Best Practices in Angular Refactoring
Follow these steps for effective refactoring:
Have solid tests to protect functionality.
Change one part at a time.
Preserve behavior; improve structure only.
Use Angular CLI tools for consistency.
Get peer reviews and document updates.
Code Example: Refactoring a Component
Before:
export class UserProfile implements OnInit {
protected isLoading = signal(false);
protected error = signal<string | null>(null);
protected userProfile = signal<UserProfile | null>(null);
readonly #httpClient = inject(HttpClient);
ngOnInit(): void {
this.getUserProfile();
}
getUserProfile(): void {
this.isLoading.set(true);
this.error.set(null);
this.#httpClient
.get<UserProfile>('api/users/1')
.pipe(
take(1),
tap((userProfile) => {
this.userProfile.set(userProfile);
}),
catchError((error) => {
this.error.set(error.message || 'Failed to load user profile');
return of(null); // Return null or empty observable to continue the stream
}),
finalize(() => this.isLoading.set(false)),
)
.subscribe();
}
}
After separating logic into a service:
@Injectable({ providedIn: 'root' })
export class UserProfileApi {
readonly #httpClient = inject(HttpClient);
#isLoading = signal(false);
#error = signal<string | null>(null);
#userProfile = signal<UserProfile | null>(null);
isLoading = this.#isLoading.asReadonly();
error = this.#error.asReadonly();
userProfile = this.#userProfile.asReadonly();
getUserProfile(): void {
this.#isLoading.set(true);
this.#error.set(null);
this.#httpClient
.get<UserProfile>('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/users/1')
.pipe(
take(1),
tap((userProfile) => {
this.#userProfile.set(userProfile);
}),
catchError((error) => {
this.#error.set(error.message || 'Failed to load user profile');
return of(null); // Return null or empty observable to continue the stream
}),
finalize(() => this.#isLoading.set(false)),
)
.subscribe();
}
}
@Component({
selector: 'app-user-profile',
templateUrl: './user-profile.html',
})
export class UserProfile implements OnInit {
readonly #userProfileApi = inject(UserProfileApi);
protected isLoading = this.#userProfileApi.isLoading;
protected error = this.#userProfileApi.error;
protected userProfile = this.#userProfileApi.userProfile;
ngOnInit() {
this.#userProfileApi.getUserProfile();
}
}
This split improves code clarity and testability.
Key Takeaway 1: Move data logic to services for separation of concerns.
Key Takeaway 2: Ensure tests cover your refactors.
Refactoring at the right time keeps Angular apps healthy and scalable. Spot indicators early, embrace incremental changes, and stick to best practices for smooth improvements without breaking your code.
When to Rewrite Angular Code
Knowing when to rewrite Angular code is vital for maintaining scalable and maintainable applications. This chapter covers key signs that indicate a rewrite, the associated risks and costs, and strategic planning tips to guide developers in making informed decisions.
Signs That a Rewrite Is Necessary
A rewrite is often needed when the application runs on outdated Angular versions (like AngularJS or Angular 2), suffers from technical debt, has architectural limitations, or experiences poor performance. Early recognition of these signs helps prevent costly setbacks.
Key Takeaway 1: Outdated versions and architectural issues are strong reasons for rewrites.
Key Takeaway 2: Detecting technical debt early saves time and effort later.
Risks and Costs of Rewriting
Rewriting code demands significant time and resources, may introduce new bugs, and requires managing team learning curves and stakeholder expectations. Balancing innovation with operational stability is crucial.
Key Takeaway 1: Rewrite risks include delays and potential bugs.
Key Takeaway 2: Planning and team readiness reduce costs and risks.
Strategic Considerations and Planning a Rewrite
A strategic rewrite involves assessing the current codebase, prioritizing incremental changes, setting clear goals like improved performance, and investing in team training and testing. This approach minimizes disruption and maximizes benefits.
Key Takeaway 1: Incremental rewrites lower risks and sustain delivery.
Key Takeaway 2: Clear objectives and proper resources are essential for success.
Code Examples: Legacy vs. Modern Angular Rewrite
Legacy AngularJS code uses controllers and scopes, whereas modern Angular employs TypeScript, components, and decorators for better structure and maintainability.
Legacy AngularJS example:
angular.module('app', [])
.controller('MainCtrl', function($scope) {
$scope.message = "Hello from AngularJS";
});
Modern Angular rewrite:
import { Component } from '@angular/core';
@Component({
selector: 'app-feature',
template: `<h1>{{ message() }}</h1>`
})
export class Feature {
message = signal('Hello from modern Angular');
}
Key Takeaway 1: Modern Angular uses TypeScript and components for cleaner code.
Key Takeaway 2: Rewrites boost maintainability and scalability.
Deciding to rewrite Angular code requires balancing signs of outdated code and technical debt against risks and costs. With careful planning and incremental strategies, developers can successfully modernize applications for improved performance and maintainability.
Conclusion
Deciding whether to refactor or rewrite Angular code depends on maintainability, technical debt, team skills, and project needs. Refactoring improves the existing code's structure without changing its behavior, ideal for manageable codebases needing enhancement. Rewriting is suited for outdated or deeply flawed code that hinders progress. Regularly review your code, follow Angular style guides, use linting and testing tools to control technical debt, and apply changes incrementally to reduce risks. Balancing immediate effort with long-term benefits enables scalable, maintainable Angular applications ready for future growth.
Thanks for Reading 🙌
I hope these tips help you ship better, faster, and more maintainable frontend projects.
🛠 Explore My Developer Resources
Save time and level up your code reviews, architecture, and performance optimization with my premium Angular & frontend tools.
👉 Browse on Gumroad
💬 Let's Connect on LinkedIn
I share actionable insights on Angular & modern frontend development - plus behind‑the‑scenes tips from real‑world projects.
👉 Connect with me here
📣 Follow Me on X
Stay updated with quick frontend tips, Angular insights, and real-time updates - plus join conversations with other developers.
👉 Follow me on X
Your support fuels more guides, checklists, and tools for the frontend community.
Let's keep building together 🚀
Top comments (2)
I’ve usually leaned toward refactoring unless the app is really ancient or held together with duct tape. Breaking stuff into smaller, testable pieces while still shipping features has worked better for me than hitting pause for a full rewrite. Full rewrites always sound nice in theory but usually end up dragging way longer than planned.
Thanks, David! Totally agree—refactoring bit by bit while still pushing out features usually works way better than hitting the brakes for a full rewrite. Big rewrites sound great in theory, but they often take way longer and cause more headaches. Breaking things down into smaller, testable parts keeps the code cleaner and makes life easier in the long run. Appreciate your perspective!