You've been there.
Friday afternoon. Production is broken. The blame game starts. "Who pushed to main?" Everyone's pointing fingers at commit messages that look like archaeological artifacts: "fix", "update stuff", "asdf".
Sound familiar?
Here's the truth most developers won't admit: Your Git workflow isn't just about code—it's about preventing chaos.
The difference between teams that ship reliably and those that constantly fight fires isn't talent. It's discipline. Specifically, one habit that takes 30 seconds but saves 30 hours of debugging.
The Problem Hidden in Plain Sight
We've been conditioned to think Git is a backup system. Something we use to "save our work" before we go home. But that's like using a Ferrari to deliver pizza—you're missing the entire point.
Git isn't just version control. It's your team's memory system. Your communication layer. Your insurance policy against the unknown.
Yet most developers treat it like a digital shoebox. They shove commits in there with zero context, expecting their future selves (or worse, their teammates) to decode what happened.
The cycle repeats. Crisis hits. Everyone scrambles to understand what changed. Hours burn while you dig through vague commit histories trying to reconstruct the story of how things broke.
The One Habit That Changes Everything
Write commits like you're leaving breadcrumbs for someone who needs to find their way home in the dark.
This isn't about following some arbitrary commit message format. It's about building a narrative that connects intention to implementation.
Here's what this looks like in practice:
Instead of: fix login bug
Write: fix: prevent login form submission when email field is empty
Instead of: update user endpoint
Write: refactor: extract user validation logic to separate service class
Instead of: styling changes
Write: style: align pricing cards on mobile devices below 768px
The pattern isn't complicated. But the impact is profound.
Why Your Brain Fights This
Your present self knows exactly what you're doing. The context is crystal clear. Writing detailed commit messages feels redundant.
But here's what your brain doesn't account for: Context decay.
Two weeks from now, you won't remember why you made that "small tweak." Your teammate joining the project next month will spend hours trying to understand your thought process. The new developer trying to debug an issue will curse your name.
You're not writing for who you are today. You're writing for who you'll become when everything goes wrong.
The Framework That Works
Every commit should answer three questions:
What - What specific change did you make?
Why - What problem were you solving?
How - What approach did you take?
Not every commit needs all three. But the critical ones—the ones that change business logic, fix edge cases, or modify integrations—deserve the full treatment.
Here's a real example:
fix: resolve race condition in payment processing
Payment confirmations were occasionally failing due to webhook
processing happening before transaction status updates. Added
500ms delay and retry logic to ensure proper state synchronization.
Closes #2847
This commit message is a time machine. Anyone reading it six months later understands not just what changed, but why it mattered and how the problem was solved.
The Compound Effect
Teams that adopt this habit don't just write better commit messages. They start thinking differently about their work.
You begin to see your code as part of a larger story. Each commit becomes a conscious decision rather than an automatic save. You naturally break work into smaller, more logical chunks.
Your PRs become self-documenting. Code reviews get faster and more thorough. Debugging sessions turn from archaeology expeditions into detective work with actual clues.
Most importantly, you stop being the person who breaks production on Friday afternoons.
Making It Stick
The hardest part isn't learning the technique. It's building the habit when you're in flow state, focused on solving problems, and commit messages feel like bureaucratic overhead.
Start small. Pick one repository. Set a rule: no commit gets pushed without a proper message. Use a commit template if it helps. Crompt's AI Script Writer can even help you craft better commit messages when you're stuck.
After two weeks, the habit becomes automatic. After a month, working any other way feels reckless.
The Real Payoff
This isn't just about preventing disasters—though it absolutely does that. It's about building systems that scale beyond your individual memory and attention.
Great software isn't just well-architected code. It's well-documented decisions. It's context that survives beyond the people who wrote it. It's teams that can move fast because they're not constantly reverse-engineering their own work.
Your future self will thank you. Your teammates will thank you. And when production breaks on a Friday afternoon—which it will—you'll have the breadcrumbs you need to find your way home.
The question isn't whether you have time to write good commit messages.
The question is whether you have time not to.
-Leena:)
Top comments (0)