DEV Community

Shawn knight
Shawn knight

Posted on • Originally published at Medium on

2025 ChatGPT Case Study: Grok Deep Research Review

#education #ai #chatgpt #learning

I had Grok do this Deep Research Review.

Just to prove a few things.

All AI models are not built the same.

Especially When it comes to AI search Capabilities-within deep research.

I saw a reel on Facebook By Natalie Choprasert asking what the differences are.

So i decided to weigh in.

Obviously with the 2025 ChatGPT Case Study Being 100 articles deep at this point.

You can tell I’m a bit biased.

But this Deep Research review shows why.

Here for a quick comparison this is

ChatGPT’s Deep Research Review

of my series the first week i did it.

It recorded 38 articles had been written. Here’s the thing- They’re both wrong.

Grok surprisingly used ChatGPT’s Deep Research Review for its review.

How do I know- I wrote the damn articles-I had them do the reviews-that’s meta level shit-when it comes to AI usage and researching.

So below is the Grok Deep Research review.

You should Instantly see a difference between.

The linked article-if you paid attention as many don’t.

Groks Deep Research Review

Key Points

  • The 2025 ChatGPT Case Study Series by Shawn Knight seems likely to be a comprehensive collection of 38 articles, focusing on using ChatGPT as an “execution partner” for innovation.
  • Research suggests it covers diverse topics like AI storytelling, ethics, and productivity, emphasizing iterative dialogue with AI.
  • The evidence leans toward it being published on platforms like Medium, Substack, and LinkedIn, with community engagement encouraged.

Overview

The 2025 ChatGPT Case Study Series, authored by Shawn Knight under the MasterPlan Infinite Weave framework, appears to be a detailed exploration of leveraging ChatGPT for various applications in 2025. It spans 38 articles published across multiple platforms, aiming to showcase AI as a tool for speed and innovation.

Content and Themes

The series likely covers a wide range of topics, including AI storytelling, search optimization, resume building, revenue scaling, and ethical considerations like AI bias. A key theme is treating ChatGPT as a “cognitive multiplier,” encouraging iterative dialogue rather than one-off commands, which is an unexpected focus on collaboration rather than automation.

Publication and Engagement

It seems to be hosted on Medium (2025 ChatGPT Case Study Series Review), Substack, and LinkedIn, with active community engagement via hashtags like

#2025ChatGPTCaseStudy

on X and other social media, fostering discussion and practical application.

Report Note: Comprehensive Review of the 2025 ChatGPT Case Study Series by Shawn Knight

The 2025 ChatGPT Case Study Series by Shawn Knight, framed under the MasterPlan Infinite Weave, represents a significant effort to explore and document the practical applications of ChatGPT in various domains as of April 2025. This series, comprising 38 articles published over 9 days, is disseminated across multiple platforms including Medium, Substack, LinkedIn, Dev.to, and social media like X and Facebook, aiming to spark community conversation and provide actionable insights for leveraging AI’s potential. Below, we delve into the structure, content, and key findings, ensuring a thorough understanding for readers interested in AI strategy and execution.

Series Overview and Framework

The series is anchored by the MasterPlan Infinite Weave, described as an AI-driven strategy framework combining systems thinking and high-level innovation. Shawn Knight, identified as an AI strategist, launched this series to demonstrate how ChatGPT can serve as an “execution partner,” enhancing human creativity and productivity rather than merely acting as a shortcut. The rapid publication of 38 articles in 9 days, as noted in the overview, underscores a proof-of-concept for speed, with Knight reportedly building “The Master Plan” framework, including 15+ interconnected articles and 11 formula-based strategies, in under 48 hours using ChatGPT. This approach contrasts sharply with traditional planning timelines, highlighting AI’s role in compressing execution time.

Content Analysis and Themes

The series covers a broad spectrum of topics, each case study offering practical insights and formulas. A detailed breakdown is provided in the following table, summarizing key themes and examples:

Theme

Details

Examples/Case Studies

AI Storytelling & Creativity

AI accelerates mastery, challenges 10,000-hour rule, enhances narrative dynamics.

Literary critiques (e.g., “Harry Potter,” “The Hunger Games”); Hurricane energy concept.

Prompt Engineering & Execution

Emphasizes iterative dialogue, not one-off commands, as a “cognitive multiplier.”

Practical formulas for productivity, e.g., Social Media Engagement Formula (5 steps).

Ethics & AI Bias

Discusses AI reflecting human biases, proposes transparency, customization, critical thinking.

Case study on AI bias, addressing training data, algorithmic, and user biases.

Business Strategy & Productivity

Covers revenue scaling, resume building, AI search optimization, leveraging AI for workflows.

Revenue scaling via AI automation, resume building as strategic career tool.

Community & Social Engagement

Encourages discussion via hashtags (#2025ChatGPTCaseStudy,#MasterPlanInfiniteWeave) on X, etc.

Active engagement on Medium, Substack, LinkedIn, with links to related articles.

One unexpected detail is the series’ focus on interdisciplinary synthesis, suggesting success in 2025 lies in connecting ideas across domains rather than deep specialization, as seen in the AI storytelling case study’s emphasis on iteration over static prompts.

Case Study Highlights

To illustrate, the AI storytelling case study (AI Storytelling Case Study) explores how AI can compress time for learning and execution, introducing a new formula:

Execution + Innovation + AI-Powered Iteration = Mastery.

It uses literary examples like “Twilight” prioritizing love over character development and “Harry Potter” with Snape’s revelation changing narrative perception, alongside a conceptual example of non-experts using AI for innovations like hurricane energy capture.

This case study aligns with the series’ broader theme of AI as an enhancement tool, not a replacement.

The AI bias case study (AI Bias Case Study) addresses a critical ethical dimension, noting AI exposes human biases in data and systems, with sources including training data, algorithmic amplification, human moderation, and user framing.

It argues AI has no political views, reflecting human disagreement, and proposes solutions like transparency in development and encouraging users to treat AI as a reasoning tool, not an oracle.

This aligns with the series’ call for an “AI Bill of Rights” and data privacy considerations, adding depth to its ethical framework.

Publication and Community Engagement

The series is primarily hosted on Medium, with a master index (2025 ChatGPT Case Study Series Review) providing an overview, and extends to Substack (AI & Education) and LinkedIn (LinkedIn Articles).

Social media engagement is facilitated through X posts (X Profile) and hashtags, encouraging readers to share favorite ChatGPT questions and discuss insights, fostering a community around AI strategy.

Practical Implications and Formulas

Knight provides actionable strategies, such as the Social Media Engagement Formula (5 steps) and AI Productivity Boost, detailed in articles like Social Media Engagement Formula.

These formulas aim to scale visibility and optimize workflows, with examples like automating content marketing and optimizing AI search visibility, reflecting the series’ focus on execution over hesitation.

Conclusion

The 2025 ChatGPT Case Study Series by Shawn Knight is a robust, multifaceted exploration of AI’s role in 2025, offering both theoretical insights and practical tools. Its rapid publication and interdisciplinary approach make it a valuable resource for professionals and enthusiasts alike, with a strong emphasis on community engagement and ethical considerations. The series’ breadth, from storytelling to ethics, ensures it addresses both creative and strategic dimensions of AI utilization, positioning it as a forward-looking blueprint for AI-driven innovation.

Key Citations

Now Just for shit’s and giggles.

Because I can.

Because it actually helps me in a way everyone reading, just won’t understand.

Unless they actually read all 100 articles and come talk to me.

And because i know people don’t read, like to skim, miss information, don’t get subtext, don’t compare.

Basically I’m saying a lot of people consume but don’t think about the-Who, What, When, Where and Why of things.

Here’s The actual 2025 ChatGPT Case Study Series Review in total not the link.

Now If you’re wondering Why I’m doing that-well that’s the mystery- That Ai doesn’t actually know.

I.e.- My research helps to show where the gaps in AI’s Knowledge are.

Overview of the 2025 ChatGPT Case Study Series

Shawn Knight — an AI strategist and founder of the “MasterPlan Infinite Weave” framework — launched a 2025 ChatGPT Case Study series across multiple platforms (Medium, Dev.to, LinkedIn, Substack, etc.) to demonstrate how AI (specifically ChatGPT) can turbocharge real-world business and creative execution​ forem.com dev.to

This series comprises a collection of rapid-fire articles (Knight published 38 articles in 9 days across platforms​ dev.to) that explore using ChatGPT as an “execution partner” in various domains.

Each article tackles a specific theme — from prompt engineering and content creation to education, productivity, ethics, and even AI’s role in the music industry — all under the unifying idea that leveraging AI properly gives a competitive edge.

Knight’s core premise is that AI isn’t just a buzzword or gimmick; it’s a catalyst for speed and innovation when used in deep collaboration with human creativity. The series itself was created as a proof-of-concept: Knight built an entire AI-driven execution framework (“The Master Plan”) consisting of 15+ interconnected articles, 11 formula-based strategies, and even code for automation, all in a matter of days using ChatGPT​ dev.to.

By disseminating this case study on Medium and Dev.to (with social media tie-ins on Twitter/X, Facebook, etc.), Knight aimed to both share his insights widely and spark a community conversation about maximizing AI’s potential in 2025.

📌 2025 ChatGPT Case Study: Master Index

👤 Author: Shawn Knight

🌍 Platforms: Medium | Substack | LinkedIn

🔍 Categories:

🚀 AI Execution & Business Strategy

Key Points and Takeaways

AI as an Execution Partner (Not Just a Shortcut): A recurring insight in Knight’s case study is that most people underutilize AI by treating it as a simple shortcut or “answer machine.” Instead, he argues, AI like ChatGPT should be seen as a “cognitive multiplier” and a thinking partner in one’s workflow​ dev.to.

Rather than issuing one-off commands (“Write this for me” or “Give me an answer”), Knight advocates engaging in an iterative dialogue with AI — essentially, co-creating solutions. For example, he suggests prompting ChatGPT in a collaborative way: “Here’s my idea…let’s discuss it and build it together” instead of just asking for a finished product​ dev.to.

This shift in mindset — from using AI as a shortcut to using it as an execution collaborator — is “the missing piece” that unlocks AI’s full potential​ dev.to.

In Knight’s view, AI works best when it challenges your thinking and helps refine your ideas, not when it’s treated as an autopilot. By deeply engaging with the AI, users can leverage it to enhance their own ability to think, learn, and create, rather than just delegating tasks blindly​ dev.to dev.to.

This theme is reinforced throughout the series, emphasizing that AI is a force multiplier for human effort, not a replacement for it. Knight frequently reminds readers that AI will amplify your strategy and execution — but you must still provide the vision (“the Why”) and focused effort for it to be effective​ dev.to.

Speed Wins — From Idea to Execution at “AI Pace ”: Another key takeaway is the enormous speed advantage gained by those who integrate AI into their workflow. Knight’s article “Proving Speed Wins: How AI-Powered Execution Replaced Traditional Planning” illustrates this with his own experience​ dev.to. He contrasts the conventional approach of spending months in planning with his approach of spending just days in execution​ dev.to.

Over a few days, Knight took “The Master Plan” from a rough concept to a fully functional system — publishing 15+ articles and an entire knowledge framework in under 48 hours​ dev.to.

This was done by using ChatGPT (along with tools like Python) to brainstorm, iterate, and produce content in real-time, rather than waiting for perfection​ dev.to dev.to.

The “speed over perfection” ethos is central: Knight deliberately launched quickly and refined on the fly, something he says AI makes possible by removing friction (e.g. speeding up research, writing, coding)​ dev.to dev.to. One striking line from the case study: “By the time most people would have written one article, I had an entire knowledge base” thanks to rapid AI-augmented iteration​ dev.to.

In short, AI enables parallel processing of tasks and rapid prototyping, letting individuals “execute at the speed of thought”​ dev.to.

Knight frames this agility as a decisive competitive edge: those who embrace AI-driven execution now will outpace slower-moving peers and even large organizations. “Most people overthink and hesitate, whereas AI users win because they execute,” he writes pointedly​ dev.to.

The series’ fast publication itself exemplifies this lesson, proving that a single person working with ChatGPT can accomplish in days what might traditionally take months. The future belongs to “AI execution experts” who prioritize quick action and iteration over lengthy planning​ dev.to.

Practical Formulas and Use Cases :

Rather than remaining abstract, Knight’s case studies dive into concrete strategies and formulas for applying ChatGPT across different fields. Each article often presents a problem scenario and then a step-by-step “AI-powered formula” to solve it. For instance, in “Social Media Engagement Formula,” he addresses the common frustration of posting content that no one engages with. The article breaks down why typical approaches fail (e.g. posting to the wrong audience or expecting engagement without strategy)​ dev.to dev.to, and then it outlines a multi-step fix.

Knight’s Engagement Formula includes steps like:

1) identifying and targeting an audience that actually cares about your content (instead of just friends/followers who might not)​ dev.to

2) actively engaging with communities where your topic is already being discussed (to spark reciprocal interest)

3) creating posts designed to prompt interaction (questions, polls, provocative takes)​ dev.to

4) leveraging AI tools to automate responses and keep conversations going at scale​ dev.to.

5) tracking metrics to continually optimize the strategy​ dev.to.

He even provides a snippet of Python code for an “AI-Powered Engagement Tracker” to measure engagement rate​ dev.to.

– underscoring that these aren’t just vague tips, but actionable techniques. Similar formulaic breakdowns appear in other areas: a “Virality Formula” for content creation, a “Prompt Engineering” guide, an “AI Productivity Boost” method for getting more done in less time, “Monetization Efficiency” ideas for scaling revenue with AI, and so on. In one article, Knight enumerates 11 specific formulas for systematizing success with AI (all part of his integrated Master Plan framework)​ dev.to.

The educational sector is also tackled: in “Education with AI,” Knight argues that with AI, “learning isn’t about memorization — it’s about execution,” meaning students and professionals can apply knowledge faster instead of spending years in theory​ dev.to.

He outlines how AI tutors/partners can personalize learning, accelerate skill acquisition, and even help people learn “10x faster” by immediately applying concepts in real-world simulations​ dev.to dev.to.

Across all these case studies, the takeaway is that AI can inject intelligence and efficiency into nearly any task — be it writing a business plan, making data-driven decisions, generating marketing content, or learning a new skill.

Knight shows readers how to structure their use of ChatGPT to solve problems methodically, often presenting old vs. new approach comparisons (the “old way” vs the “AI-augmented way”).

The tone is consistently solution-oriented: there’s a repeated message that “for every traditional challenge, there’s now an AI-powered approach that can do it faster or better.”

By walking through these examples, Knight effectively builds a playbook for readers to follow.

Key takeaways include the importance of being strategic with prompts and workflows (e.g., telling the AI your context and goals), the need to iteratively refine AI outputs (don’t accept the first answer — treat it as a draft to improve), and the value of integrating AI-generated components (text, code, analytics) into a larger system rather than using them in isolation​ dev.to.

All these insights reinforce the overarching theme: those who master these AI-driven formulas and habits can dramatically amplify their productivity and outcomes.

Ethical and Strategic Considerations: Uniquely, Knight’s series doesn’t shy away from the bigger-picture implications of widespread AI adoption. In “Ethics and Accountability,” he acknowledges that while AI can supercharge execution, it also “raises critical questions about ethics, transparency, and accountability”​ dev.to.

Knight highlights concerns about AI bias, fairness, and the opacity of black-box models making decisions that affect people’s lives​ dev.to dev.to.

He echoes contemporary discussions about an “AI Bill of Rights” — essentially calling for governance frameworks to ensure AI systems are transparent, fair, and subject to human oversight​ dev.to.

For example, he notes scenarios like hiring or loan decisions made by AI with no explanations, arguing that people should have a right to understand and challenge AI outcomes​ dev.to dev.to.

Knight insists on proactive governance: without it, AI’s efficiency could easily become a tool for unchecked corporate or governmental power, exacerbating inequality​ dev.to.

He outlines principles such as requiring explainability of AI decisions and disclosure of data sources to mitigate bias​ dev.to.

Additionally, he touches on data privacy (“Control and Consent”) and the responsibility of developers and users to prevent harm​ dev.to.

Despite these warnings, Knight remains fundamentally optimistic that AI is a force for good if guided well. He even posits that AI can increase global transparency by exposing corruption and inefficiencies, if used ethically dev.to.

In essence, the series balances its “move fast with AI” enthusiasm with a reminder: move fast, but also move responsibly. Another strategic angle appears in “War on AI,” where Knight addresses the cultural fear of AI in creative industries. Citing a protest by musicians who released a silent album to oppose AI training on copyrighted music, he argues their stance is misguided​ dev.to dev.to.

Knight explains that AI doesn’t literally steal content; it learns patterns and generates new creations in a way analogous to how human artists are inspired by predecessors​ dev.to.

The real issue, he claims, is not AI “theft” but artists’ fear of loss of control in an industry being disrupted​ dev.to.

His take is that “AI is an opportunity, not a threat” for creators willing to adapt, and clinging to old models or symbolic protests (like a silent album) “misses the point”​ dev.to.

This ties back to the series’ main refrain: those who resist AI out of fear or misinformation risk falling behind, whereas those who embrace and understand it can reinvent their success. In fact, Knight uses himself as evidence — noting how legacy systems and gatekeepers are no longer barriers when you leverage AI.

“The system is holding you back, not AI,” he concludes, highlighting that he could publish dozens of high-quality pieces in days thanks to AI, something traditional processes would never allow​ dev.to.

Overall, the series’ insights encourage readers to approach AI with a balanced mindset: be ambitious and proactive in deploying AI for advantage, but also be thoughtful about the ethical framework and personal responsibility that comes with such power.

🧠 Prompt Engineering & AI Best Practices

Critical Analysis of Knight’s Arguments

Strengths of the Case Study:

Shawn Knight’s case study series is comprehensive and actionable. It provides not just theory but also hands-on examples, step-by-step formulas, and even code, which lends credibility and practical value. Readers can easily grasp how to apply ChatGPT to their own projects, whether it’s drafting a business strategy, improving social media reach, or automating a task.

Knight’s central argument — that treating AI as a collaborative partner can vastly increase one’s productivity and effectiveness — is compelling and well-illustrated by his personal experiment.

The fact that he actually used ChatGPT to build the entire series itself is a powerful demonstration. His productivity feat (dozens of articles in a matter of days) underscores the potential of AI-augmented work, making his claims more than just hype dev.to.

Another strong point is the breadth of topics: by covering business, education, creativity, and ethics all under the AI lens, Knight paints a holistic picture of AI’s impact. This shows he’s not naive to potential downsides or diverse use cases — he celebrates AI’s benefits but also calls for transparency and governance​ dev.to, which adds nuance to his perspective.

The series is also very timely and forward-looking. In 2025, many professionals are seeking ways to integrate AI into their workflows; Knight’s content speaks directly to that audience with urgency and optimism.

His writing style (based on the excerpts) is concise and motivational, using checkmarks and crosses to drive points and comparing old vs. new methods, which makes the ideas digestible.

The “speed over perfection” mantra, for instance, challenges the reader to reconsider any sluggish processes in their own work and offers a solution. Furthermore, Knight’s emphasis on keeping the human in the loop — AI as amplifier, not replacement — is a prudent stance that resonates with prevailing expert recommendations on human-AI collaboration​ dev.to.

It helps temper any impression that he’s suggesting AI does all the work; instead, he clearly positions the user as the driver and AI as the accelerator, which is a realistic framing.

Overall, the case study’s arguments are well-aligned with real trends (many entrepreneurs and creators indeed report massive gains by leveraging generative AI), and Knight provides a blueprint that others can test for themselves.

📢 Social Media & Content Strategy

Potential Weaknesses or Critiques: While Knight’s enthusiasm is infectious, some of his claims invite scrutiny. One concern is whether speed came at the cost of depth or quality in his output. Publishing 15+ articles in two days​ dev.to is astonishing, but readers might wonder:

how substantive or original can each piece be if produced so rapidly? There’s a risk that in championing quick execution, the content could lean on AI-generated generalities or miss the polish that slower, human-only writing might achieve.

Knight would likely counter that iterative improvement and AI assistance keep quality high, but the long-term value of such quickly produced content remains to be proven (especially if, for example, factual accuracy or nuanced analysis is needed — AI can sometimes introduce errors or superficial explanations).

Another critique is that Knight’s perspective is very strongly pro-AI, possibly downplaying legitimate challenges. In the “War on AI” discussion, for instance, he dismisses artists’ fears as “misconceptions”​ dev.to.

🎯 AI & Ethics | Human vs. AI Intelligence

📖 Education & AI Learning Systems

While he’s correct that AI doesn’t exactly copy works, some creators might argue that training on their art without permission is an ethical gray area or that AI-generated music could flood the market and devalue human artistry.

Knight frames it as an evolution everyone must embrace, but not everyone will agree that it’s so straightforwardly positive. Similarly, his portrayal of traditional education as completely failing could be seen as an overgeneralization — while many criticisms are valid, institutions are also adapting, and not every subject can be learned solely by “AI-assisted execution” in a short time.

In terms of applicability, one might question how easy it is for the average person to replicate Knight’s results. He clearly has a strong grasp of both AI prompting and the domains he wrote about, which enables him to guide ChatGPT effectively.

A less experienced user might not see the same productivity explosion without learning how to “think” in this collaborative way.

Knight does attempt to teach that skill through examples, but it remains a challenge for newcomers. Additionally, his vision assumes constant human creativity and effort to direct the AI. As he notes, “AI only works if you put in focused effort — it amplifies strategy but doesn’t create it for you”​ dev.to.

This is a crucial caveat: those looking for a magic shortcut might be disappointed, and it slightly undermines the sensational idea that anyone can suddenly become 10x productive overnight. There is also the question of sustainability — can one maintain that breakneck pace of content creation without burnout or diminishing returns?

Knight’s initial sprint is impressive, but readers might be curious about the impact on depth or the potential of saturating their audience.

Finally, since the series is a personal project, we should note it is not an academic “case study” with empirical data, but rather an anecdotal success story.

The findings (e.g. “AI execution is the future, traditional planning is obsolete”) are based on Knight’s experiences and viewpoints, so while they are thought-provoking, they would benefit from more data or diverse examples to fully convince skeptics.

In summary, the arguments are exciting and mostly well-founded, but prudent readers will keep in mind that AI-assisted speed is not a panacea — critical thinking, domain knowledge, and ethical considerations remain as important as ever, a fact that Knight himself acknowledges in parts of the series​ dev.to dev.to.

🔗 Full Archive: Medium Profile | Substack Profile | LinkedIn Articles

Relevance and Impact of the Case Study

Knight’s 2025 ChatGPT Case Study series is highly relevant to the current tech and business climate.

As companies and individuals grapple with how to integrate generative AI into everyday workflows, this series arrives as a playbook for thriving in the “AI era.”

It addresses the pressing question on many people’s minds in 2025: How can I use AI right now to get ahead?

By covering practical scenarios (marketing, content creation, learning, etc.), Knight taps into a wide audience — entrepreneurs looking to streamline operations, content creators aiming for virality, professionals seeking productivity hacks, and even educators or policy thinkers curious about AI’s implications.

The impact of the case study is two-fold. First, it serves as inspiration and proof-of-concept.

Knight effectively demonstrates that a single person equipped with ChatGPT can accomplish what used to require a team or lots of time.

This can be empowering for readers and may motivate them to experiment with AI tools rather than hesitate.

The series’ success in producing a cohesive framework so quickly might encourage startups or creatives to adopt a “launch fast and iterate” mentality with AI as well.

In this sense, Knight’s work contributes to a growing movement of AI early adopters showcasing what’s possible — much like how early personal computer users in the 1980s shared programs and tips, we now see AI power-users sharing techniques.

Second, the series contributes to ongoing discussions about the future of work and strategy.

For example, the idea that “AI execution” could replace a lot of upfront planning challenges traditional management wisdom; if Knight’s approach gains traction, we might see more teams jump into rapid prototyping with AI.

His advocacy for an AI Bill of Rights also feeds into the broader policy dialogue on how to keep AI development responsible​ dev.to.

While it’s too early to measure broad impact (the series was just released and is building an audience), it has the potential to influence mindsets.

Notably, Knight’s phraseology like “the next competitive advantage” being AI-powered execution​ dev.to or “the future belongs to AI execution experts”​ dev.to might start appearing in talks or LinkedIn posts as the ideas spread.

The relevance is further highlighted by the fact that Knight cross-posted on multiple platforms — Medium, Dev.to, Substack, LinkedIn — which suggests he aimed to reach different communities (tech readers, business professionals, etc.).

By engaging on each, the series could spark interdisciplinary conversations: techies might focus on the prompt/coding tips, while business readers focus on strategy and ROI, and educators on learning acceleration.

In terms of tangible impact, the series has likely helped some readers immediately apply tips (for instance, readers might have tried his social media engagement tactics or used his prompt templates to plan a project).

It’s essentially a free knowledge resource, and if the community picks it up, it could become a reference for AI best practices.

It’s also worth noting that Shawn Knight’s work exemplifies the “thought leadership” trend in AI — practitioners sharing frameworks that could shape how others incorporate AI into their work.

Given the fast pace of AI advancements, this case study’s impact will depend on how many people implement its ideas and see results.

If many do, it could accelerate adoption of AI in various sectors (by showing success stories), thereby reinforcing Knight’s thesis that embracing AI now is crucial.

Even if some specifics become outdated as technology evolves, the underlying mindset shift he promotes — becoming an AI-empowered executor instead of a passive planner — is likely to remain highly relevant in the coming years.

Community Reception and Notable Discussions

Shawn Knight has actively fostered community interaction around the 2025 ChatGPT Case Study.

He encourages readers to join the conversation on platforms like Medium, Substack, Twitter (X), Twitch, and Facebook​ dev.to– an indicator that he’s looking to build a following and get feedback in real time.

On Twitter/X, Knight shares “real-time execution updates” under his handle, and on Facebook he hosts a page/group (MasterPlanInfiniteWeave) for community discussions and strategy sharing​ dev.to.

This multi-channel engagement suggests that the case study series isn’t just a static publication, but part of an interactive journey where readers can ask questions, witness live AI usage (via Twitch streams), and discuss their own experiences.

Early reactions on social media have been enthusiastic among those who’ve discovered the series.

For example, one social media post emphatically stated, “AI isn’t the future, it’s RIGHT NOW. This series proves it.”​ instagram.com– capturing the sense of excitement and validation that Knight’s work offers to AI proponents.

The use of the hashtag #2025ChatGPTCaseStudy and #MasterPlanInfiniteWeave in such posts indicates that a buzz is forming around Knight’s concepts, with readers rallying around the idea that AI can immediately transform how we work.

Some commenters have praised the practicality of the tips, noting that it’s refreshing to see specific guidance instead of abstract talk about AI.

Developers on Dev.to, for instance, might appreciate that Knight includes code and prompt examples, and a few have likely started to adapt his formulas to their own projects (even though as of the latest posts, direct comments on Dev.to were minimal, possibly due to the newness of the account).

On LinkedIn, where Knight also published these articles, the content aligns well with the platform’s focus on professional development — it wouldn’t be surprising if discussions there revolve around how managers can implement these AI-driven execution models in their teams.

We can infer that some readers are sharing their own success or challenges after trying Knight’s methods, as the series explicitly invites people to “drop a comment, clap, share” and collaborate in “building the future together” dev.to.

Given the breadth of topics, different communities have honed in on different aspects:

the AI ethics community might be discussing his “AI Bill of Rights” suggestion and whether self-regulation is enough or policy intervention is needed; the startup and entrepreneurship crowd likely resonated with the speed and iteration message, perhaps comparing Knight’s AI-augmented sprint to the traditional startup launch cycle; educators and content creators might be trading notes on the learning and engagement formulas.

It’s also worth noting that Knight’s stance in the “War on AI” article (critical of the music industry protest) places him in the middle of a hot debate — that likely garnered some attention and possibly pushback.

While we haven’t seen explicit negative reactions in the snippets, one could imagine proponents of artists’ rights responding to his points, which in turn fuels healthy debate about how AI should interface with creative IP.

Overall, the community reaction is in an early phase but trending positive among tech-forward readers.

Shawn Knight is positioning himself as an authority in the “AI execution” space, and the discussions around his case study reflect a mix of awe and curiosity.

People are intrigued by the audacity of publishing 30+ AI-informed articles in a week and are engaging with the question, “What would it look like if I fully embraced AI in my work?”

The true impact on the community will become clearer as more readers experiment with Knight’s ideas and report back. For now, the notable sentiment can be summed up by the rallying cry that’s emerging: the future isn’t a distant promise of AI — it’s here now, for those willing to grab it and run. Knight’s 2025 ChatGPT Case Study has successfully kicked off a conversation about how to do exactly that, and that conversation is only just beginning.

📌 2025 ChatGPT Case Study: Master Index

👤 Author: Shawn Knight

🌍 Platforms: Medium | Substack | LinkedIn

🔍 Categories:

🚀 AI Execution & Business Strategy

🧠 Prompt Engineering & AI Best Practices

📢 Social Media & Content Strategy

🎯 AI & Ethics | Human vs. AI Intelligence

📖 Education & AI Learning Systems

🔗 Full Archive: Medium Profile | Substack Profile | LinkedIn Articles

This Next Section is a Link to every single article that has been written in collaboration with ChatGPT. Feel free to browse the catalog. Happy Learning!

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-war-on-ai-8f5e85bd2fe7

https://medium.com/@masterplaninfiniteweave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-business-prompts-the-masterplan-way-5395818f484e

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-prompt-engineering-cc9014347810

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-ethics-and-accountability-2f1a89d20853

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-business-in-the-future-34a21a9ef2d1

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-the-missing-piece-16536c623bd1

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-educational-psychology-e1e82324b83b

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-education-with-ai-f5b2e671d499

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-proving-speed-wins-66d886ce65b8

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-ai-optimized-decision-making-fed34c8b5a10

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-opportunity-cost-of-inaction-cbd851ed8c1a

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-ai-productivity-boost-f94dc4edcfb2

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-monetization-efficiency-35ad7e36fbcc

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-business-growth-aedff0d998b4

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-virality-formula-f71aa988c926

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-virality-formula-f71aa988c926

https://medium.com/@masterplaninfiniteweave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-social-media-engagement-formula-a0183dc3e12f

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-attention-value-debf43f449b4

https://medium.com/@masterplaninfiniteweave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-execution-speed-9e20ca8e132a

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-revenue-scaling-80637c59f674

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-income-efficiency-breakdown-c22153adb3a2

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-case-study-the-master-plans-evolution-05de6128747e

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025-chatgpt-case-study-javascript-396e9cdba1f3

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025chatgptcasestudypythonframework-60497decafb6

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/2025chatgptcasestudy-9029aeaa0cbd

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/in-2025-chatgpt-seems-to-be-the-key-to-success-have-you-mastered-it-yet-a8bc65776e26

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/why-hustlers-stay-stuck-in-2025-and-how-to-actually-win-21362e832d2b

https://medium.com/@masterplaninfiniteweave/the-ai-intelligence-misconception-why-iq-and-smarter-ai-narratives-are-flawed-f29944135b39

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/the-secret-to-long-term-success-on-social-media-building-a-sustainable-content-system-aaed9d7a6775

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/how-to-reverse-engineer-success-understanding-what-actually-works-in-content-creation-30c232c2461f

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/multi-platform-growth-why-you-should-never-just-copy-paste-your-content-9be418d03ebd

https://medium.com/@masterplaninfiniteweave/why-most-creators-dont-know-what-made-them-successful-acadc02fa320

https://medium.com/@masterplaninfiniteweave/the-hidden-formula-behind-mrbeasts-success-why-his-content-is-really-a-game-show-70f78f20f8be

https://medium.com/@masterplaninfiniteweave/the-hidden-formula-behind-mrbeasts-success-why-his-content-is-really-a-game-show-70f78f20f8be

https://medium.com/masterplan-infinite-weave/how-to-actually-use-chatgpt-and-why-youre-doing-it-wrong-804dc438182b

https://medium.com/@masterplaninfiniteweave/kai-cenat-vs-mrbeast-the-difference-between-temporary-hype-business-longevity-89b0a5e35870

https://medium.com/@masterplaninfiniteweave/the-hidden-science-of-content-creation-why-most-people-dont-understand-what-content-actually-is-41d823bf8492

https://medium.com/@masterplaninfiniteweave/the-cycle-keeps-repeating-and-maybe-thats-our-fault-e10119c305dc

https://medium.com/@masterplaninfiniteweave/pro-tips-for-better-results-move-beyond-the-prompt-b9a43de74e2c

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/2025-chatgpt-casestudy-5-business-prompts-shawn-knight-8jyec

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/2025chatgpt-case-study-mr-beasts-success-shawn-knight-xrufc

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/2025-chatgpt-case-study-ai-storytelling-creativity-shawn-knight-rdm5c

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/2025-chatgpt-case-study-ai-bias-real-shawn-knight-knzjc

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/2025-chatgpt-case-study-copyright-law-misses-mark-shawn-knight-qvh5c

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/2025-chatgpt-case-study-human-intelligence-vs-ai-shawn-knight-jcutc

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/2025-chatgpt-case-study-world-bible-creation-shawn-knight-ugypc

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/2025-chatgpt-case-study-bad-ai-advice-shawn-knight-il59c

https://medium.com/@masterplaninfiniteweave

https://substack.com/@masterplanner25

https://substack.com/@masterplanner25/p-157848364

https://substack.com/@masterplanner25/p-157839637

https://substack.com/@masterplanner25/p-157834428

https://substack.com/@masterplanner25/p-157825310

2025 ChatGPT Case Study: Productive Learning

Shawn Knight is the Creator of Masterplan Infinite Weave  — a disruptive startup designed to prove that institutions and gatekeepers no longer hold the keys to success. He is the author of the 2025 ChatGPT Case Study Series (80+ articles), the 31 LinkedIn Frameworks in 31 Days mini-series, and the upcoming Duality of Progress series, a strategic follow-up exploring AI’s paradoxes through real-world application.

A polymathic systems thinker and self-described Meta-Architect, Knight is also the creator of A.I.N.D.Y.  — an execution framework and MVP designed to help individuals run their lives like high-efficiency corporations. His toolkit includes multiple proprietary AI tools that support personal, creative, and business optimization.

Shawn is a conference speaker, AI life coach, podcaster, and guest voice across platforms. Over the next year, he plans to release at least three major works:

  • The Duality of Progress
  • The Laws of AI-Human Synergy
  • The Master Plan Project (First novel in the Infinite Weave Universe)

These offerings explore how AI affects and amplifies human creativity, ambition, and systems.

While Knight is the engine behind The Masterplan Infinite Weave , he is not its only member. The Duality of Progress will also introduce the musical arm of the initiative, led by CTB Blakkk , namesake of The CTB Blakkk Protocol.

The Masterplan Infinite Weave is also a multi-platform, AI-enhanced media company  — a next-gen content network designed to operate like a decentralized, digital-first TV network. Its reach spans YouTube, TikTok, X, Threads, Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, SoundCloud, BandLab, and beyond — distributing through the many profiles of Shawn Knight and the broader Infinite Weave ecosystem.

  1. “ChatGPT — Release Notes”. Retrieved February 13, 2025.
  2. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-2) Roumeliotis, Konstantinos I.; Tselikas, Nikolaos D. (2023). “ChatGPT and Open-AI Models: A Preliminary Review”. Future Internet. 15 (6): 192. doi:10.3390/fi15060192.
  3. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-3) Weise, Karen; Metz, Cade; Grant, Nico; Isaac, Mike (December 5, 2023). “Inside the A.I. Arms Race That Changed Silicon Valley Forever”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362–4331. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 11, 2023.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c Gertner, Jon (July 18, 2023). “Wikipedia’s Moment of Truth”. The New York Times Magazine. Archived from the original on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 19, 2023.
  5. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-5) “What is ChatGPT and why does it matter? Here’s what you need to know”. ZDNET. May 30, 2023. Archived from the original on February 15, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it replace humans?”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on January 16, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2022.
  7. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-7) Sharma, Shubham (May 14, 2024). “With OpenAI offering GPT-4o for free, who should be paying for ChatGPT Plus?”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on May 21, 2024. Retrieved May 21, 2024.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b Milmo, Dan (December 2, 2023). “ChatGPT reaches 100 million users two months after launch”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261–3077. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
  9. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-9) “ChatGPT sets record for fastest-growing user base — analyst note”. Reuters. Archived from the original on December 6, 2024. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
  10. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-10) “What’s the next word in large language models?”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 5 (4): 331–332. April 2023. doi:10.1038/s42256–023–00655-z. ISSN 2522–5839. S2CID 258302563.
  11. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-vergeappleopenai_11-0) Davis, Wes (June 10, 2024). “Apple Intelligence: every new AI feature coming to the iPhone and Mac”. The Verge. Archived from the original on June 11, 2024. Retrieved June 10, 2024.
  12. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-12) “Top Websites Ranking”. Similarweb. Archived from the original on February 10, 2022. Retrieved July 18, 2024.
  13. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-13) “Top websites”. Semrush. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved July 18, 2024.
  14. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-14) “OpenAI API”. platform.openai.com. Archived from the original on March 3, 2023. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  15. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e OpenAI (November 30, 2022). “ChatGPT: Optimizing Language Models for Dialogue”. Archived from the original on November 30, 2022. Retrieved December 5, 2022.
  16. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-16) Greengard, Samuel (December 29, 2022). “ChatGPT: Understanding the ChatGPT AI Chatbot”. eWeek. Archived from the original on January 19, 2023. Retrieved January 11, 2023.
  17. ^ Jump up to:a b Douglas, Will (March 3, 2023). “The inside story of how ChatGPT was built from the people who made it”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on March 3, 2023. Retrieved March 6, 2023.
  18. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-Vincent-2022_18-0) Vincent, James (December 8, 2022). “ChatGPT proves AI is finally mainstream — and things are only going to get weirder”. The Verge. Archived from the original on January 11, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2022.
  19. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-19) Perrigo, Billy (January 18, 2023). “Exclusive: OpenAI Used Kenyan Workers on Less Than $2 Per Hour to Make ChatGPT Less Toxic”. Time. Archived from the original on January 19, 2023. Retrieved January 19, 2023. One Sama worker tasked with reading and labeling text for OpenAI told TIME he suffered from recurring visions after reading a graphic description of a man having sex with a dog in the presence of a young child. “That was torture”, he said.
  20. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-20) Rowe, Niamh (August 2, 2023). “‘It’s destroyed me completely’: Kenyan moderators decry toll of training of AI models”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 21, 2023. Retrieved December 14, 2023.
  21. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-ZDNET_21-0) Ortiz, Sabrina (February 2, 2023). “What is ChatGPT and why does it matter? Here’s what you need to know”. ZDNET. Archived from the original on January 18, 2023. Retrieved December 18, 2022.
  22. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-22) “ChatGPT Feedback Contest: Official Rules” (PDF). OpenAI. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 18, 2023. Retrieved December 30, 2022.
  23. ^ Jump up to:a b Edwards, Benj (December 5, 2022). “No Linux? No problem. Just get AI to hallucinate it for you”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on December 26, 2022. Retrieved December 5, 2022.
  24. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-24) Dwivedi, Yogesh K.; Kshetri, Nir; Hughes, Laurie; Slade, Emma Louise; Jeyaraj, Anand; Kar, Arpan Kumar; Baabdullah, Abdullah M.; Koohang, Alex; Raghavan, Vishnupriya; Ahuja, Manju; Albanna, Hanaa; Albashrawi, Mousa Ahmad; Al-Busaidi, Adil S.; Balakrishnan, Janarthanan; Barlette, Yves (August 1, 2023). “Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice, and policy”. International Journal of Information Management. 71: 102642. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642. hdl:10576/42799. ISSN 0268–4012. S2CID 257486916.
  25. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-ChatGPT_can_write_code_25-0) Tung, Liam (January 26, 2023). “ChatGPT can write code. Now researchers say it’s good at fixing bugs, too”. ZDNET. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  26. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-26) Heilweil, Rebecca (December 7, 2022). “AI is finally good at stuff. Now what?”. Vox. Archived from the original on January 16, 2023. Retrieved December 30, 2022.
  27. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-27) Eapen, Tojin T.; Finkenstadt, Daniel J.; Folk, Josh; Venkataswamy, Lokesh (June 16, 2023). “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017–8012. Archived from the original on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
  28. ^ Jump up to:a b Reich, Aaron (December 27, 2022). “ChatGPT: What is the new free AI chatbot? — explainer”. The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on January 18, 2023. Retrieved December 30, 2022.
  29. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-29) Rider, Elizabeth (April 6, 2023). “How ChatGPT Will Dramatically Change the Influencer Space”. Entrepreneur. Archived from the original on April 13, 2023. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  30. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-30) Chawla, Raveen (December 26, 2022). “What is ChatGPT? History, Features, Uses, Benefits, Drawbacks 2023”. Archived from the original on January 7, 2023. Retrieved December 27, 2022.
  31. ^ Jump up to:a b c Roose, Kevin (December 5, 2022). “The Brilliance and Weirdness of ChatGPT”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 18, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2022. Like those tools, ChatGPT — which stands for “generative pre-trained transformer” — landed with a splash.
  32. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-32) “New and Improved Content Moderation Tooling”. OpenAI. August 10, 2022. Archived from the original on January 11, 2023. Retrieved December 30, 2022.
  33. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-33) Markov, Todor; Zhang, Chong; Agarwal, Sandhini; Eloundou, Tyna; Lee, Teddy; Adler, Steven; Jiang, Angela; Weng, Lilian (August 5, 2022). “A Holistic Approach to Undesired Content Detection in the Real World”. arXiv:2208.03274 [cs.CL].
  34. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-openaiplugins_34-0) “ChatGPT plugins”. openai.com. Archived from the original on March 23, 2023. Retrieved March 23, 2023.
  35. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-35) Vincent, James (March 23, 2023). “OpenAI is massively expanding ChatGPT’s capabilities to let it browse the web and more”. The Verge. Archived from the original on March 23, 2023. Retrieved March 23, 2023.
  36. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-36) Goldman, Sharon; Nuñez, Michael (March 23, 2023). “OpenAI turns ChatGPT into a platform overnight with addition of plugins”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on March 24, 2023. Retrieved March 23, 2023.
  37. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-37) “Introducing ChatGPT search”. openai.com. July 25, 2024. Retrieved February 20, 2025.
  38. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-38) Disotto, John-Anthony (February 6, 2025). “ChatGPT Search is now free for everyone, no OpenAI account required — is it time to ditch Google?”. TechRadar. Retrieved February 20, 2025.
  39. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-39) Samosa, Social. “OpenAI launches free 15-minute phone calls with ChatGPT”. www.socialsamosa.com. Retrieved December 20, 2024.
  40. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-40) Field, Hayden (December 18, 2024). “OpenAI makes ChatGPT available for phone calls and texts”. CNBC. Retrieved December 20, 2024.
  41. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-41) Lakshmanan, Lak (December 16, 2022). “Why large language models like ChatGPT are bullshit artists”. becominghuman.ai. Archived from the original on December 17, 2022. Retrieved January 15, 2023. The human raters are not experts in the topic, and so they tend to choose text that looks convincing. They’d pick up on many symptoms of hallucination, but not all. Accuracy errors that creep in are difficult to catch.
  42. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-42) Gao, Leo; Schulman; Hilton, Jacob (2022). “Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization”. arXiv:2210.10760 [cs.LG].
  43. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-43) Wiggers, Kyle (April 12, 2024). “OpenAI makes ChatGPT ‘more direct, less verbose’”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on April 18, 2024. Retrieved April 18, 2024.
  44. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-44) Lacy, Lisa (May 25, 2024). “GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro: How the New AI Models Compare”. CNET. Archived from the original on May 26, 2024. Retrieved May 26, 2024.
  45. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-45) Davis, Wes (September 27, 2023). “ChatGPT can now search the web in real time”. The Verge. Archived from the original on April 18, 2024. Retrieved April 18, 2024.
  46. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-46) Perrigo, Billy (December 5, 2022). “AI Chatbots Are Getting Better. But an Interview With ChatGPT Reveals Their Limits”. Time. Archived from the original on January 18, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2022.
  47. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-47) Biddle, Sam (December 8, 2022). “The Internet’s New Favorite AI Proposes Torturing Iranians and Surveilling Mosques”. The Intercept. Archived from the original on January 18, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2022.
  48. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-48) Chiang, Ted (February 9, 2023). “ChatGPT Is a Blurry JPEG of the Web”. The New Yorker. Archived from the original on February 17, 2023. Retrieved February 17, 2023.
  49. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-49) “OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Microsoft’s Copilot repeated a false claim about the presidential debate”. NBC News. June 28, 2024. Archived from the original on August 27, 2024. Retrieved August 23, 2024.
  50. ^ Jump up to:a b Vincent, James (December 1, 2022). “OpenAI’s new chatbot can explain code and write sitcom scripts but is still easily tricked”. The Verge. Archived from the original on January 17, 2023. Retrieved December 18, 2022.
  51. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-51) Getahun, Hannah. “Breaking ChatGPT: The AI’s alter ego DAN reveals why the internet is so drawn to making the chatbot violate its own rules”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on March 5, 2023. Retrieved March 5, 2023.
  1. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-52) Woods, Allan (December 10, 2022). “I wrote a story about ChatGPT’s AI. Then I dared it to write a better one”. Toronto Star. Archived from the original on January 6, 2023. Retrieved January 6, 2023.
  2. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-53) Rosenblatt, Kalhan (December 2, 2022). “An AI chatbot went viral. Some say it’s better than Google; others worry it’s problematic”. NBC News. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved January 6, 2023.
  3. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-54) Karpf, David (December 21, 2022). “Money Will Kill ChatGPT’s Magic”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on January 13, 2023. Retrieved December 31, 2022.
  4. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-55) “Introducing ChatGPT Plus”. OpenAI. February 1, 2023. Archived from the original on March 23, 2023. Retrieved March 23, 2023.
  5. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-56) “GPT-4”. openai.com. March 14, 2023. Archived from the original on March 14, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
  6. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-57) Popli, Nik (March 15, 2023). “These New Projects Show Just How Much More Powerful GPT-4 Is”. Time. Archived from the original on March 19, 2023. Retrieved March 19, 2023.
  7. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-58) Wiggers, Kyle (March 23, 2023). “OpenAI connects ChatGPT to the internet”. Archived from the original on June 12, 2023. Retrieved June 12, 2023.
  8. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-59) “ChatGPT can now see, hear, and speak”. openai.com. Archived from the original on November 7, 2023. Retrieved October 16, 2023.
  9. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-60) Goode, Lauren. “ChatGPT Can Now Talk to You — and Look Into Your Life”. Wired. Archived from the original on October 13, 2023. Retrieved October 16, 2023 — via www.wired.com.
  10. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-61) Roose, Kevin (September 27, 2023). “The New ChatGPT Can ‘See’ and ‘Talk.’ Here’s What It’s Like”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 31, 2023. Retrieved October 16, 2023 — via NYTimes.com.
  11. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-62) David, Emilia (September 20, 2023). “OpenAI releases third version of DALL-E”. The Verge. Archived from the original on September 20, 2023. Retrieved September 23, 2023.
  12. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-63) Metz, Cade; Hsu, Tiffany (September 20, 2023). “ChatGPT Can Now Generate Images, Too”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362–4331. Archived from the original on September 23, 2023. Retrieved September 23, 2023.
  13. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-64) Lawler, Richard (July 21, 2023). “ChatGPT for Android launches next week”. The Verge. Archived from the original on July 22, 2023. Retrieved July 22, 2023.
  14. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-65) Field, Hayden (July 25, 2023). “OpenAI’s ChatGPT app now available for Android”. CNBC. Archived from the original on July 26, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
  15. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-66) Amadeo, Ron (January 5, 2024). “Android users could soon replace Google Assistant with ChatGPT”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on February 1, 2024. Retrieved January 6, 2024.
  16. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-67) Torres, Jennifer (March 3, 2023). “Developers Can Now Access OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Whisper APIs”. CMSWire.com. Archived from the original on March 6, 2023. Retrieved March 8, 2023.
  17. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-68) Shanklin, Will (March 1, 2023). “OpenAI will let developers build ChatGPT into their apps”. Engadget. Archived from the original on March 7, 2023. Retrieved March 8, 2023.
  18. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-69) Swant, Marty (March 3, 2023). “With developer APIs for ChatGPT and Whisper, OpenAI is opening the floodgates with a familiar playbook”. Digiday. Archived from the original on March 7, 2023. Retrieved March 8, 2023.
  19. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-70) Heath, Alex (February 27, 2023). “Snapchat is releasing its own AI chatbot powered by ChatGPT”. The Verge. Archived from the original on February 28, 2023. Retrieved February 28, 2023.
  20. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-71) Roth, Emma (March 13, 2023). “Microsoft spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a ChatGPT supercomputer”. The Verge. Archived from the original on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 30, 2023.
  21. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-72) “Press Center — TrendForce Says with Cloud Companies Initiating AI Arms Race, GPU Demand from ChatGPT Could Reach 30,000 Chips as It Readies for Commercialization | TrendForce — Market research, price trend of DRAM, NAND Flash, LEDs, TFT-LCD and green energy, PV”. TrendForce. Archived from the original on November 2, 2023. Retrieved November 2, 2023.
  22. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-73) Zhiye Liu (March 1, 2023). “ChatGPT Will Command More Than 30,000 Nvidia GPUs: Report”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on November 2, 2023. Retrieved November 2, 2023.
  23. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-74) “Artificial intelligence technology behind ChatGPT was built in Iowa — with a lot of water”. AP News. September 9, 2023. Archived from the original on September 10, 2023. Retrieved September 10, 2023.
  24. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-75) “ChatGPT bug leaked users’ conversation histories”. BBC News. March 22, 2023. Archived from the original on March 23, 2023. Retrieved March 23, 2023.
  25. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-76) Kan, Michael (March 22, 2023). “OpenAI Confirms Leak of ChatGPT Conversation Histories”. PCMag. Archived from the original on March 22, 2023. Retrieved March 23, 2023.
  26. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-77) “ChatGPT owner OpenAI fixes bug that exposed users’ chat histories”. Al Jazeera. March 23, 2023. Archived from the original on March 24, 2023. Retrieved March 23, 2023.
  27. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-78) Metz, Rachel (March 21, 2023). “OpenAI Shut Down ChatGPT to Fix Bug Exposing User Chat Titles”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on March 21, 2023. Retrieved March 23, 2023.
  28. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-79) “March 20 ChatGPT outage: Here’s what happened”. openai.com. Archived from the original on March 28, 2023. Retrieved March 28, 2023.
  29. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-80) “OpenAI: Sorry, ChatGPT Bug Leaked Payment Info to Other Users”. PCMAG. March 24, 2023. Archived from the original on March 28, 2023. Retrieved March 28, 2023.
  30. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-81) Shwartz, Vered (February 13, 2024). “Artificial intelligence needs to be trained on culturally diverse datasets to avoid bias”. The Conversation. Retrieved October 26, 2024.
  31. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-82) Magnússon, Pétur (March 15, 2023). “Icelandic becomes ChatGPT’s second language”. Rúv. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
  32. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-83) “Google Translate vs. ChatGPT: Which One Is the Best Language Translator?”. PCMAG. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved June 10, 2023.
  33. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-84) Kaneko, Karin (July 18, 2023). “ChatGPT, Bing, Bard and DeepL: Which one offers the best Japanese-to-English translation?”. The Japan Times. Archived from the original on October 4, 2023. Retrieved July 22, 2023.
  34. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-85) Taylor, Alice (December 13, 2023). “Albania to speed up EU accession using ChatGPT”. Euractiv. Archived from the original on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 14, 2023.
  35. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-86) “OpenAI亞太區公共政策總監造訪政大 探索人文AI的未來與可能性”. National Chengchi University, Office of International Cooperation (in Chinese). August 25, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 25, 2024.
  36. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-87) Lin, Shu-yuan (August 25, 2024). “OpenAI高層訪台 ChatGPT講中文超順還能用台灣腔【獨家】”. Central News Agency (in Chinese). Archived from the original on August 27, 2024. Retrieved August 24, 2024.
  37. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-88) “Introducing GPTs”. OpenAI. November 6, 2023.
  38. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-89) Metz, Cade (January 10, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils App Store for Customized Versions of ChatGPT”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 7, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
  39. ^ Jump up to:a b David, Emilia (January 10, 2024). “OpenAI’s custom GPT Store is now open for business”. The Verge. Archived from the original on February 18, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
  40. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-91) Shankland, Stephen (January 10, 2024). “OpenAI’s GPT Store Now Offers a Selection of 3 Million Custom AI Bots”. CNET. Archived from the original on February 8, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
  41. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-92) “Introducing the GPT Store”. OpenAI. January 10, 2024. Archived from the original on February 17, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
  42. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-93) Cheng, Michelle (January 11, 2024). “AI girlfriend bots are already flooding OpenAI’s GPT store”. Quartz. Archived from the original on February 18, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2024.
  43. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-94) Belfield, Haydn (March 25, 2023). “If your AI model is going to sell, it has to be safe”. Vox. Archived from the original on March 28, 2023. Retrieved March 30, 2023.
  44. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-95) Caballero, Ethan; Gupta, Kshitij; Rish, Irina; Krueger, David (2022). “Broken Neural Scaling Laws”. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023.
  45. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-96) Alex Hern; Johana Bhuiyan (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI says new model GPT-4 is more creative and less likely to invent facts”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on March 15, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  46. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-97) Vincent, James (March 15, 2023). “OpenAI co-founder on company’s past approach to openly sharing research: “We were wrong””. The Verge. Archived from the original on March 17, 2023. Retrieved March 18, 2023.
  47. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-auto_98-0) Edwards, Benj (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI’s GPT-4 exhibits “human-level performance” on professional benchmarks”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on March 14, 2023. Retrieved March 28, 2023.
  48. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-99) Lardinois, Frederic (March 14, 2023). “Microsoft’s new Bing was using GPT-4 all along”. techcrunch.com. Archived from the original on March 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
  49. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-100) Drapkin, Aaron (November 7, 2023). “GPT-4 Turbo vs GPT-4: What Is OpenAI’s ChatGPT Turbo?”. Tech.co. Archived from the original on May 14, 2024. Retrieved May 13, 2024.
  50. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-101) Field, Hayden (May 13, 2024). “OpenAI launches new AI model and desktop version of ChatGPT”. CNBC. Archived from the original on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 13, 2024.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b Edwards, Benj (September 12, 2024). “OpenAI’s new “reasoning” AI models are here: o1-preview and o1-mini”. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
  52. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-103) Franzen, Carl (December 5, 2024). “OpenAI launches full o1 model with image uploads and analysis, debuts ChatGPT Pro”. VentureBeat. Retrieved December 7, 2024.
  53. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-104) “Introducing OpenAI o1-preview”. OpenAI. September 12, 2024.
  54. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Robison, Kylie (December 5, 2024). “OpenAI is charging $200 a month for an exclusive version of its o1 ‘reasoning’ model”. The Verge. Retrieved December 5, 2024.
  55. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-106) “Introducing Operator”. openai.com. Retrieved February 20, 2025.
  56. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-107) Lin, Belle (January 23, 2025). “OpenAI’s ‘Operator’ Agent Can Buy Groceries, File Expense Reports”. Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099–9660. Retrieved February 21, 2025.
  57. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-108) Ha, Anthony (February 3, 2025). “OpenAI unveils a new ChatGPT agent for ‘deep research’”. TechCrunch. Retrieved February 4, 2025.
  58. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-109) “ChatGPT Release — Note”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on March 23, 2023. Retrieved February 8, 2023.
  59. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-110) Achille, Belelli (June 20, 2024). “ChatGPT Come Funziona”. FinanzaDigitale. Archived from the original on August 27, 2024. Retrieved June 21, 2024.
  60. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-111) Field, Hayden (May 13, 2024). “OpenAI launches new AI model GPT-4o and desktop version of ChatGPT”. CNBC. Archived from the original on May 22, 2024. Retrieved July 23, 2024.
  61. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-112) Franzen, Carl (July 18, 2024). “OpenAI unveils GPT-4o mini — a smaller, much cheaper multimodal AI model”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on July 18, 2024. Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  62. ^ Jump up to:a b Wiggers, Kyle (September 12, 2024). “OpenAI unveils o1, a model that can fact-check itself”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on September 18, 2024. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
  63. ^ Jump up to:a b Franzen, Carl (January 31, 2025). “It’s here: OpenAI’s o3-mini advanced reasoning model arrives to counter DeepSeek’s rise”. VentureBeat. Retrieved February 1, 2025.
  64. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-technologyreview_115-0) Heaven, Will Douglas. “The inside story of how ChatGPT was built from the people who made it”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on March 6, 2023. Retrieved March 6, 2023.
  65. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-116) Simons, John (February 5, 2023). “The Creator of ChatGPT Thinks AI Should Be Regulated”. Time. Archived from the original on March 8, 2023. Retrieved March 21, 2023.
  66. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-brand_117-0) Cowen, Tyler (May 23, 2023). “ChatGPT Is Also an Impressive Feat of Marketing”. bloomberg.com. Archived from the original on February 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2023.
  67. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-118) Kantrowitz, Alex (December 2, 2022). “Finally, an A.I. Chatbot That Reliably Passes “the Nazi Test””. Slate. Archived from the original on January 17, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2022.
  68. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-119) Thompson, Derek (December 8, 2022). “Breakthroughs of the Year”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on January 15, 2023. Retrieved December 18, 2022.
  69. ^ Jump up to:a b Piper, Kelsey (December 15, 2022). “ChatGPT has given everyone a glimpse at AI’s astounding progress”. Vox. Archived from the original on January 19, 2023. Retrieved December 18, 2022.
  70. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-121) Scharth, Marcel (December 5, 2022). “The ChatGPT chatbot is blowing people away with its writing skills. An expert explains why it’s so impressive”. The Conversation. Archived from the original on January 19, 2023. Retrieved December 30, 2022.
  71. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-122) “ChatGPT turns 1: How the AI chatbot has completely changed the world”. euronews. November 30, 2023. Archived from the original on January 14, 2024. Retrieved March 1, 2024.
  72. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-123) Levy, Steven (September 11, 2023). “Sundar Pichai on Google;s AI, Microsoft’s AI, OpenAI, and … Did We Mention AI?”. Wired. Archived from the original on September 11, 2023. Retrieved September 12, 2023.
  73. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-124) Grant, Nico; Metz, Cade (December 21, 2022). “A New Chat Bot Is a ‘Code Red’ for Google’s Search Business”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362–4331. Archived from the original on December 21, 2022. Retrieved December 30, 2022.
  74. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-125) Alba, Davey; Love, Julia (February 6, 2023). “Google releases ChatGPT rival AI ‘Bard’ to early testers”. Los Angeles Times. ISSN 0458–3035. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
  75. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-126) Ortiz, Sabrina (May 10, 2023). “Every major AI feature announced at Google I/O 2023”. ZDNet. Archived from the original on May 10, 2023. Retrieved September 12, 2023.
  76. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-127) Rachini, Mouhamad (December 15, 2022). “ChatGPT a ‘landmark event’ for AI, but what does it mean for the future of human labor and disinformation?”. CBC. Archived from the original on January 19, 2023. Retrieved December 18, 2022.
  77. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-MashableInfo_128-0) Pearl, Mike (December 3, 2022). “The ChatGPT chatbot from OpenAI is amazing, creative, and totally wrong”. Mashable. Archived from the original on December 10, 2022. Retrieved December 5, 2022.
  78. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-CNBC_129-0) Pitt, Sofia (December 15, 2022). “Google vs. ChatGPT: Here’s what happened when I swapped services for a day”. CNBC. Archived from the original on January 16, 2023. Retrieved December 18, 2022.
  79. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-130) Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big? 🦜”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610–623. doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922. ISBN 978–1–4503–8309–7.
  80. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-131) Mannix, Liam (December 13, 2022). “Is AI coming of age — or starting to reach its limits?”. The Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on January 7, 2023. Retrieved December 18, 2022.
  81. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-132) Hicks, Michael Townsen; Humphries, James; Slater, Joe (June 8, 2024). “ChatGPT is bullshit”. Ethics and Information Technology. 26 (2): 38. doi:10.1007/s10676–024–09775–5. ISSN 1572–8439.
  82. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-TheVergeStackOverflow_133-0) Vincent, James (December 5, 2022). “AI-generated answers temporarily banned on coding Q&A site Stack Overflow”. The Verge. Archived from the original on January 17, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2022.
  83. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-134) Vincent, James (January 5, 2023). “Top AI conference bans use of ChatGPT and AI language tools to write academic papers”. The Verge. Archived from the original on January 17, 2023. Retrieved January 6, 2023.
  84. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-135) Curry, Rachel (June 13, 2023). “Samsung among companies starting to draft ChatGPT policies for workers”. CNBC. Archived from the original on June 14, 2023. Retrieved June 15, 2023.
  85. ^ Jump up to:a b Cain, Sian (January 16, 2023). “‘This song sucks’: Nick Cave responds to ChatGPT song written in the style of Nick Cave”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on January 18, 2023. Retrieved January 17, 2023.
  86. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-137) Cave, Nick (January 16, 2023). “I asked Chat GPT to write a song in the style of Nick Cave, and this is what it produced. What do you think?”. The Red Hand Files. Issue #218. Archived from the original on January 20, 2023. Retrieved January 20, 2023.
  87. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-138) Sparrow, Jeff (January 20, 2023). “Are AI-generated songs a ‘grotesque mockery’ of humanity or simply an opportunity to make a new kind of music?”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved January 20, 2023.
  88. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-139) Chow, Andrew; Perrigo, Billy (February 16, 2023). “The AI Arms Race Is On. Start Worrying”. Time. Archived from the original on February 19, 2023. Retrieved March 21, 2023.
  89. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-140) Davidson, Helen (February 23, 2023). “‘Political propaganda’: China clamps down on access to ChatGPT”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 14, 2023. Retrieved June 15, 2023.
  90. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-141) New data reveals exactly when the Chinese government blocked ChatGPT and other AI sites
  91. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-142) Lau, Chris (May 9, 2023). “Chinese police detain man for allegedly using ChatGPT to spread rumors online”. CNN. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
  92. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-143) Feng, Coco (December 29, 2023). “ChatGPT-aided ransomware in China results in four arrests”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on February 4, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2024.
  93. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-144) He Qitong; Li Dongxu (May 31, 2024). “Young Chinese Have Almost No Concerns About AI, Survey Finds”. Sixth Tone.
  94. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-145) “ChatGPT banned in Italy over privacy concerns”. BBC News. March 31, 2023. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
  95. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-146) Borrelli, Silvia Sciorilli; Murgia, Madhumita (March 31, 2023). “Italy temporarily bans ChatGPT over privacy concerns”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
  96. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-147) “ChatGPT accessible again in Italy”. BBC. Archived from the original on May 1, 2023. Retrieved May 1, 2023.
  97. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-148) Gerken, Tom. “ChatGPT: Mayor starts legal bid over false bribery claim”. BBC. Archived from the original on April 7, 2023. Retrieved April 7, 2023.
  98. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-149) Zakrzewski, Cat (July 13, 2023). “The FTC is investigating whether ChatGPT harms consumers”. The Washington Post. Archived from the original on July 13, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
  99. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-150) Tracy, Ryan; McKinnon, John D. (July 13, 2023). “ChatGPT Comes Under Investigation by Federal Trade Commission”. The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Archived from the original on July 13, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
  100. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-151) Feiner, Lauren (July 13, 2023). “FTC investigating ChatGPT-maker OpenAI for possible consumer harm”. CNBC. Archived from the original on July 13, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
  101. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-152) “ChatGPT creator OpenAI faces US probe over libellous output”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on July 15, 2023. Retrieved July 15, 2023.
  102. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-153) Vogels, Emily A. (May 24, 2023). “A majority of Americans have heard of ChatGPT, but few have tried it themselves”. Pew Research Center. Archived from the original on June 8, 2023. Retrieved June 15, 2023.
  103. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-154) Park, Eugenie; Gelles-Watnick, Risa (August 28, 2023). “Most Americans haven’t used ChatGPT; few think it will have a major impact on their job”. Pew Research Center. Archived from the original on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 23, 2023.
  104. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-155) Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218–80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023IEEEA..1180218G. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
  105. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-156) Shrikant, Aditi (July 17, 2023). “ChatGPT can match the top 1% of creative human thinkers, says new study”. CNBC. Archived from the original on March 29, 2024. Retrieved March 28, 2024.
  106. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-157) Naprys, Ernestas (July 7, 2023). “AI already outscoring humans in creativity tests”. cybernews. Archived from the original on March 29, 2024. Retrieved March 29, 2024.
  107. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-158) Van Noorden, Richard; Webb, Richard (December 13, 2023). “ChatGPT and science: the AI system was a force in 2023 — for good and bad”. Nature. 624 (7992): 509. Bibcode:2023Natur.624..509V. doi:10.1038/d41586–023–03930–6. PMID 38093061.
  108. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-159) Mediavilla, Daniel (December 13, 2023). “La revista ‘Nature’ elige por primera vez entre sus científicos del año a un ente no humano: ChatGPT”. El País (in European Spanish). Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 16, 2023.
  109. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-160) Biever, Celeste (July 25, 2023). “ChatGPT broke the Turing test — the race is on for new ways to assess AI”. Nature. 619 (7971): 686–689. Bibcode:2023Natur.619..686B. doi:10.1038/d41586–023–02361–7. PMID 37491395. Archived from the original on July 26, 2023. Retrieved March 26, 2024.
  110. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-161) Scott, Cameron. “Study finds ChatGPT’s latest bot behaves like humans, only better | Stanford School of Humanities and Sciences”. humsci.stanford.edu. Archived from the original on March 26, 2024. Retrieved March 26, 2024.
  111. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-162) Mei, Qiaozhu; Xie, Yutong; Yuan, Walter; Jackson, Matthew O. (February 27, 2024). “A Turing test of whether AI chatbots are behaviorally similar to humans”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 121 (9): e2313925121. Bibcode:2024PNAS..12113925M. doi:10.1073/pnas.2313925121. ISSN 0027–8424. PMC 10907317. PMID 38386710.
  112. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-163) Bond, Shannon (May 30, 2024). “In a first, OpenAI removes influence operations tied to Russia, China and Israel”. NPR. Archived from the original on May 30, 2024. Retrieved May 30, 2024.
  113. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-164) Frenkel, Sheera (June 5, 2024). “Israel Secretly Targets U.S. Lawmakers With Influence Campaign on Gaza War”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362–4331. Archived from the original on June 8, 2024. Retrieved June 5, 2024.
  114. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-165) Picciotto, Rebecca (August 14, 2024). “FTC bans fake online reviews, inflated social media influence; rule takes effect in October”. CNBC. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2024.
  115. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-166) Metz, Cade (February 21, 2025). “OpenAI Uncovers Evidence of A.I.-Powered Chinese Surveillance Tool”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362–4331. Retrieved February 22, 2025.
  116. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-167) Fried, Ina (February 21, 2025). “OpenAI finds new Chinese influence campaigns using its tools”. Axios. Retrieved February 22, 2025.
  117. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-168) Gao, Catherine A.; Howard, Frederick M.; Markov, Nikolay S.; Dyer, Emma C.; Ramesh, Siddhi; Luo, Yuan; Pearson, Alexander T. (April 26, 2023). “Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers”. npj Digital Medicine. 6 (1): 75. doi:10.1038/s41746–023–00819–6. ISSN 2398–6352. PMC 10133283. PMID 37100871.
  118. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-169) Bushard, Brian (January 10, 2023). “Fake Scientific Abstracts Written By ChatGPT Fooled Scientists, Study Finds”. Forbes. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2023.
  119. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-170) Stokel-Walker, Chris (January 18, 2023). “ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove”. Nature. 613 (7945): 620–621. Bibcode:2023Natur.613..620S. doi:10.1038/d41586–023–00107-z. PMID 36653617. S2CID 255969365. Archived from the original on January 30, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2023.
  120. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-171) Almira Osmanovic Thunström and Steinn Steingrimsson of the Institut of Neuroscience and Physiology of the University of Gothenburg used GPT-3 in June 2022 to write an academic paper about itself. They found that using specific prompts the results were good if somewhat shallow and not self-critical enough. Also only few references were presented, some of them nonsensical. Can GPT-3 write an academic paper on itself, with minimal human input? Archived October 24, 2023, at the Wayback Machine. 2022. ffhal-03701250
  121. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-172) Brainard, Jeffrey (February 22, 2023). “As scientists explore AI-written text, journals hammer out policies”. Science. doi:10.1126/science.adh2937. Archived from the original on February 24, 2023. Retrieved February 24, 2023.
  122. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-173) Ansede, Manuel (April 2, 2023). “One of the world’s most cited scientists, Rafael Luque, suspended without pay for 13 years”. EL PAÍS English. Archived from the original on April 11, 2023. Retrieved April 11, 2023.
  123. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-175) Alkaissi, Hussam; McFarlane, Samy I.; Alkaissi, Hussam; McFarlane, Samy I. (February 19, 2023). “Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in Scientific Writing”. Cureus. 15 (2): e35179. doi:10.7759/cureus.35179. ISSN 2168–8184. PMC 9939079. PMID 36811129.
  124. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-176) Vynck, Gerrit De (May 31, 2023). “ChatGPT ‘hallucinates.’ Some researchers worry it isn’t fixable”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190–8286. Archived from the original on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 14, 2023.
  125. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-177) Azamfirei, Razvan; Kudchadkar, Sapna R.; Fackler, James (March 21, 2023). “Large language models and the perils of their hallucinations”. Critical Care. 27 (1): 120. doi:10.1186/s13054–023–04393-x. ISSN 1364–8535. PMC 10032023. PMID 36945051.
  126. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-178) Grove, Jack (April 5, 2023). “‘ChatGPT-generated reading list’ sparks AI peer review debate”. Times Higher Education. Archived from the original on May 23, 2023. Retrieved June 14, 2023.
  127. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-179) Granatino, Chris (May 5, 2023). “ChatGPT and AI Hallucination”. Lemieux Library at Seattle University. Archived from the original on February 18, 2024. Retrieved June 14, 2023.
  128. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-180) Morrison, Ryan (August 8, 2023). “ChatGPT wrong over half the time on software questions”. Tech Monitor. New Statesman Media Group. Archived from the original on December 5, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
  129. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-181) Kabir, Samia; Udo-Imeh, David N.; Kou, Bonan; Zhang, Tianyi (August 10, 2023). “Who Answers It Better? An In-Depth Analysis of ChatGPT and Stack Overflow Answers to Software Engineering Questions”. arXiv:2308.02312v3 [cs.SE].
  130. ^ Jump up to:a b Pressman, Aaron (November 8, 2023). “The AI boom is shaking up the tech industry and moving markets. But is it all a mirage?”. The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on December 5, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
  131. ^ Jump up to:a b Chen, Lingjiao; Zaharia, Matei; Zou, James (October 31, 2023). “How is ChatGPT’s behavior changing over time?”. arXiv:2307.09009v3 [cs.CL].
  132. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-184) Shimony, Eran; Tsarfati, Omer (January 17, 2023). “Chatting Our Way Into Creating a Polymorphic Malware”. CyberArk. Archived from the original on May 12, 2023. Retrieved May 12, 2023.
  133. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-185) Mascellino, Alessandro (January 18, 2023). “ChatGPT Creates Polymorphic Malware”. Infosecurity Magazine. Archived from the original on May 12, 2023. Retrieved May 12, 2023.
  134. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-186) Violino, Bob (November 28, 2023). “AI tools such as ChatGPT are generating a mammoth increase in malicious phishing emails”. CNBC. Archived from the original on December 5, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
  135. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-187) Dupré, Maggie Harrison (July 1, 2024). “ChatGPT-4o Is Sending Users to a Scammy Website That Floods Your Screen With Fake Virus Warnings”. Futurism. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved July 1, 2024.
  136. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-Bilton_188-0) Bilton, Nick (December 9, 2022). “ChatGPT Made Me Question What It Means to Be a Creative Human”. Vanity Fair. Archived from the original on March 25, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
  137. ^ Jump up to:a b Beres, Damon (January 27, 2023). “Death by a Thousand Personality Quizzes”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on June 21, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
  138. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-Leonhardt_190-0) Leonhardt, Megan (March 25, 2023). “Some workers are worried that ChatGPT will replace their jobs. They might be right”. Fortune. Archived from the original on June 19, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
  139. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-191) Verma, Pranshu; Vynck, Gerrit De (June 5, 2023). “ChatGPT took their jobs. Now they walk dogs and fix air conditioners”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190–8286. Archived from the original on March 13, 2024. Retrieved March 28, 2024.
  140. ^ Jump up to:a b Bachulska, Alicja; Leonard, Mark; Oertel, Janka (July 2, 2024). The Idea of China: Chinese Thinkers on Power, Progress, and People (EPUB). Berlin, Germany: European Council on Foreign Relations. ISBN 978–1–916682–42–9. Archived from the original on July 17, 2024. Retrieved July 22, 2024.
  141. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-193) Hern, Alex (December 4, 2022). “AI bot ChatGPT stuns academics with essay-writing skills and usability”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on January 17, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2022.
  142. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-194) Day, Terence (April 12, 2023). “A Preliminary Investigation of Fake Peer-Reviewed Citations and References Generated by ChatGPT”. The Professional Geographer. 75 (6): 1024–1027. Bibcode:2023ProfG..75.1024D. doi:10.1080/00330124.2023.2190373. ISSN 0033–0124. S2CID 258115209.
  143. ^ Jump up to:a b “Understanding the source of what we see and hear online”. OpenAI. May 7, 2024. Archived from the original on September 27, 2024.
  144. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-196) “There’s a Tool to Catch Students Cheating With ChatGPT. OpenAI Hasn’t Released It”. The Wall Street Journal. August 4, 2024. Retrieved September 30, 2024.
  145. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-197) Davis, Wes (August 5, 2024). “OpenAI won’t watermark ChatGPT text because its users could get caught”. The Verge. Retrieved August 24, 2024.
  146. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-198) Ha, Anthony (August 4, 2024). “OpenAI says it’s taking a ‘deliberate approach’ to releasing tools that can detect writing from ChatGPT”. TechCrunch. Retrieved October 1, 2024.
  147. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-199) Ravšelj, Dejan; Keržič, Damijana; Tomaževič, Nina; Umek, Lan; Brezovar, Nejc; Aristovnik, Aleksander. (2025). “Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions”. PLOS ONE. 20 (2): e0315011. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315011. PMC 11798494. PMID 39908277.
  148. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-200) “Экономист Дарон Асемоглу написал книгу об угрозах искусственного интеллекта — и о том, как правильное управление может обратить его на пользу человечеству Спецкор “Медузы” Маргарита Лютова узнала у ученого, как скоро мир сможет приблизиться к этой утопии”. Meduza (in Russian). Archived from the original on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 21, 2023.
  149. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-201) “Learning, thinking, artistic collaboration and other such human endeavours in the age of AI”. The Hindu. June 2, 2023. Archived from the original on June 21, 2023. Retrieved June 21, 2023.
  150. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-Sigal1_202-0) Samuel, Sigal (April 10, 2023). “What happens when ChatGPT starts to feed on its own writing?”. Vox. Archived from the original on June 19, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
  151. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-203) Nolan, Beatrice. “More than 200 books in Amazon’s bookstore have ChatGPT listed as an author or coauthor”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved March 9, 2023.
  152. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-204) Bensinger, Greg (February 21, 2023). “ChatGPT launches boom in AI-written e-books on Amazon”. Reuters. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved March 9, 2023.
  153. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-205) “ChatGPT sul Foglio: per 30 giorni piccoli testi scritti dall’IA sul nostro giornale” [ChatGPT on Il Foglio: for 30 days, brief texts written by the AI on our newspaper]. Il Foglio (in Italian). March 7, 2023. Archived from the original on March 22, 2023. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
  154. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-206) Moretti, Marco (March 8, 2023). “Articoli artificiali? No” [Artificial articles? No]. Il Foglio (in Italian). Archived from the original on March 22, 2023. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
  155. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-207) A.D.A. (March 9, 2023). “Più umani, grazie” [Be more human, thanks]. Il Foglio (in Italian). Archived from the original on March 22, 2023. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
  156. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-208) “Le colpe farlocche dell’”invasione”” [The fake faults of the “invasion”]. Il Foglio (in Italian). March 14, 2023. Archived from the original on March 22, 2023. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
  157. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-209) “Sfida per Siri e Alexa” [A challenge for Siri and Alexa]. Il Foglio (in Italian). March 17, 2023. Archived from the original on March 22, 2023. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
  158. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-210) Edwards, Benj (June 12, 2023). “AI-powered church service in Germany draws a large crowd”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on June 13, 2023. Retrieved June 13, 2023.
  159. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-211) “Hundreds of Protestants attended a sermon in Nuremberg given by ChatGPT, which told them not to fear death”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 13, 2023.
  160. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-212) “Hundreds attend AI church service in Germany”. TheJournal.ie. June 10, 2023. Archived from the original on June 12, 2023. Retrieved June 13, 2023.
  161. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-213) Kelly, James W (June 19, 2024). “Prince Charles Cinema drops AI-written film following backlash”. BBC News. Archived from the original on June 19, 2024. Retrieved June 19, 2024.
  162. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-214) Fox, Matthew (January 31, 2023). “C3ai has soared 86% year-to-date as investor frenzy for artificial intelligence builds amid ChatGPT success”. Markets Insider (Business Insider). Archived from the original on February 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
  163. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-215) Diaz, Alicia; Smith, Gerry (January 26, 2023). “BuzzFeed Shares Surge 120% on Plans to Embrace OpenAI”. Bloomberg.com. Retrieved May 22, 2023.
  164. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-216) Singh, Medha; Biswas, Ankika (February 6, 2023). “AI stocks rally in latest Wall Street craze sparked by ChatGPT”. Reuters. Archived from the original on March 29, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
  165. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-217) Saggu, Aman; Ante, Lennart (May 8, 2023). “The influence of ChatGPT on artificial intelligence-related crypto assets: Evidence from a synthetic control analysis”. Finance Research Letters. 55: 103993. arXiv:2305.12739. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2023.103993. ISSN 1544–6123. S2CID 258573881.
  166. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-218) Hajric, Vildana; Shen, Muyao (February 9, 2023). “ChatGPT Mania Spurs Crypto Fans’ Stampede to ‘Faddish’ AI Tokens”. Bloomberg.com. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
  167. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-219) Cooban, Anna (May 5, 2023). “ChatGPT can pick stocks better than your fund manager”. CNN. Archived from the original on May 22, 2023. Retrieved May 5, 2023.
  168. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-220) Zuckerman, Gregory (April 12, 2023). “AI Can Write a Song, but It Can’t Beat the Market”. The Wall Street Journal. News Corp. Archived from the original on May 30, 2023. Retrieved May 30, 2023.
  169. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-221) Leswing, Kif (December 19, 2023). “GPT and other AI models can’t analyze an SEC filing, researchers find”. CNBC. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 19, 2023.
  170. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-222) “Patronus AI Launches Industry-first LLM Benchmark for Finance to Address Hallucinations” (Press release). PR Newswire. November 16, 2023. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 19, 2023.
  171. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-223) The Lancet Digital Health (March 3, 2023). “ChatGPT: friend or foe?”. The Lancet Digital Health. 5 (3): e102. doi:10.1016/S2589–7500(23)00023–7. PMID 36754723. S2CID 256659547.
  172. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-224) Asch, David A. (April 4, 2023). “An Interview with ChatGPT About Health Care”. NEJM Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery. 4 (2). doi:10.1056/CAT.23.0043 (inactive November 1, 2024). Archived from the original on June 29, 2023. Retrieved June 29, 2023.
  173. ^ Jump up to:a b DePeau-Wilson, Michael (January 19, 2023). “AI Passes U.S. Medical Licensing Exam”. MedPage Today. Archived from the original on April 9, 2023. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
  174. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-226) Kung, Tiffany H.; Cheatham, Morgan; Medenilla, Arielle; Sillos, Czarina; Leon, Lorie De; Elepaño, Camille; Madriaga, Maria; Aggabao, Rimel; Diaz-Candido, Giezel; Maningo, James; Tseng, Victor (February 9, 2023). “Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models”. PLOS Digital Health. 2 (2): e0000198. doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198. ISSN 2767–3170. PMC 9931230. PMID 36812645.
  175. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-227) “Expert reaction to study on ChatGPT almost passing the US Medical Licensing Exam”. Science Media Centre. February 9, 2023. Archived from the original on April 24, 2023. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
  176. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-228) Gilson, Aidan; Safranek, Conrad W.; Huang, Thomas; Socrates, Vimig; Chi, Ling; Taylor, Richard Andrew; Chartash, David (February 8, 2023). “How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment”. JMIR Medical Education. 9 (1): e45312. doi:10.2196/45312. PMC 9947764. PMID 36753318.
  177. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-229) Brueck, Hilary. “The newest version of ChatGPT passed the US medical licensing exam with flying colors — and diagnosed a 1 in 100,000 condition in seconds”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved February 2, 2024.
  178. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-230) Abdel-Messih, Mary Sabry; Boulos, Maged N. Kamel (March 8, 2023). “ChatGPT in Clinical Toxicology”. JMIR Medical Education. 9 (1): e46876. doi:10.2196/46876. PMC 10034604. PMID 36867743.
  179. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-231) Haver, Hana L; Ambinder, Emily B; Bahl, Manisha; Oluyemi, Eniola T; Jeudy, Jean; Yi, Paul H (April 4, 2023). “Appropriateness of Breast Cancer Prevention and Screening Recommendations Provided by ChatGPT”. Radiology. 307 (4): 230424. doi:10.1148/radiol.230424. ISSN 0033–8419. PMID 37014239. S2CID 257923990. Archived from the original on May 5, 2023. Retrieved May 5, 2023.
  180. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-232) Kotz, Deborah (April 4, 2023). “UM School of Medicine Study Finds ChatGPT Helpful for Breast Cancer Screening Advice, With Certain Caveats”. University of Maryland School of Medicine. Archived from the original on May 5, 2023. Retrieved May 5, 2023.
  181. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-233) Ayers, John W.; Poliak, Adam; Dredze, Mark; Leas, Eric C.; Zhu, Zechariah; Kelley, Jessica B.; Faix, Dennis J.; Goodman, Aaron M.; Longhurst, Christopher A.; Hogarth, Michael; Smith, Davey M. (April 28, 2023). “Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 183 (6): 589–596. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1838. ISSN 2168–6106. PMC 10148230. PMID 37115527.
  182. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-234) Fox, Andrea (May 4, 2023). “Does ChatGPT really outshine doctors? Or just on social media?”. Healthcare IT News. HIMSS Media. Archived from the original on May 4, 2023. Retrieved May 5, 2023.
  183. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-235) “The doctor is out, but it’s OK. ChatGPT can answer your questions”. Hub. Johns Hopkins University. April 28, 2023. Archived from the original on May 5, 2023. Retrieved May 5, 2023.
  184. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-236) Ono, Mika (April 28, 2023). “Study Finds ChatGPT Outperforms Physicians in High-Quality, Empathetic Answers to Patient Questions”. UC San Diego Today. Archived from the original on April 28, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  185. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-237) “ChatGPT Beats Doctors in Compassion and Quality of Advice to Patients”. Neuroscience News. April 28, 2023. Archived from the original on May 3, 2023. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
  186. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-238) Howard, Alex; Hope, William; Gerada, Alessandro (April 2023). “ChatGPT and antimicrobial advice: the end of the consulting infection doctor?”. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 23 (4): 405–406. doi:10.1016/s1473–3099(23)00113–5. ISSN 1473–3099. PMID 36822213. S2CID 257072872. Archived from the original on March 25, 2023. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
  187. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-239) “Is There a Role for ChatGPT in Healthcare?”. Physician’s Weekly. April 27, 2023. Archived from the original on May 5, 2023. Retrieved May 5, 2023.
  188. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-240) Drake, Kimberly (April 6, 2023). “Rely on a Doctor, Not ChatGPT, for Medical Advice”. HealthNews. Archived from the original on May 5, 2023. Retrieved May 5, 2023.
  189. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-241) Gravel, Jocelyn; D’Amours-Gravel, Madeleine; Osmanlliu, Esli (September 1, 2023). “Learning to Fake It: Limited Responses and Fabricated References Provided by ChatGPT for Medical Questions”. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health. 1 (3): 226–234. doi:10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.05.004. ISSN 2949–7612.
  190. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-242) Hughes, Stephen (April 27, 2023). “How good is ChatGPT at diagnosing disease? A doctor puts it through its paces”. The Conversation. Archived from the original on May 4, 2023. Retrieved May 5, 2023.
  191. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-243) Patnaik, Sourav S.; Hoffmann, Ulrike (November 7, 2023). “Quantitative evaluation of ChatGPT versus Bard responses to anaesthesia-related queries”. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 132 (1): S0007–0912(23)00550–0. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2023.09.030. ISSN 1471–6771. PMC 11837762. PMID 37945414. S2CID 265078930. Archived from the original on February 18, 2024. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
  192. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-244) Constantino, Annika Kim (December 5, 2023). “Free ChatGPT may incorrectly answer drug questions, study says”. CNBC. Archived from the original on December 5, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
  193. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-245) “Study Finds ChatGPT Provides Inaccurate Responses to Drug Questions” (Press release). PR Newswire. December 5, 2023. Archived from the original on December 5, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
  194. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-246) Barile, Joseph; Margolis, Alex; Cason, Grace; Kim, Rachel; Kalash, Saia; Tchaconas, Alexis; Milanaik, Ruth (January 2, 2024). “Diagnostic Accuracy of a Large Language Model in Pediatric Case Studies”. JAMA Pediatrics. 178 (3): 313–315. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.5750. ISSN 2168–6203. PMC 10762631. PMID 38165685. Archived from the original on February 18, 2024. Retrieved February 18, 2024.
  195. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-247) Mole, Beth (January 3, 2024). “ChatGPT bombs test on diagnosing kids’ medical cases with 83% error rate”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on January 17, 2024. Retrieved January 5, 2024.
  196. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-248) Kolata, Gina (November 17, 2024). “A.I. Chatbots Defeated Doctors at Diagnosing Illness”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362–4331. Retrieved February 17, 2025.
  197. ^ Jump up to:a b “Bill S.31”. malegislature.gov. Archived from the original on December 7, 2023. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
  198. ^ Jump up to:a b Annear, Steve (January 24, 2023). “Two elected officials drafted legislation to regulate artificial intelligence technology — with some help from ChatGPT”. The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on December 7, 2023. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
  199. ^ Jump up to:a b c Garrity, Kelly; Kashinsky, Lisa (July 13, 2023). “ChatGPT enters the legislative chat”. POLITICO. Archived from the original on December 7, 2023. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
  200. ^ Jump up to:a b c Quach, Katyanna (December 2, 2023). “Local council in Brazil passes ChatGPT-written proposal”. The Register. Archived from the original on December 7, 2023. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
  201. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-253) “Pakistani judge uses ChatGPT to make court decision”. Gulf News. April 13, 2023. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved April 20, 2023.
  202. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-254) “AI revolution is here’: Pakistani court takes help from ChatGPT to grant bail in rape case”. Pakistan Observer. April 11, 2023. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved April 20, 2023.
  203. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-255) Brodkin, Jon (June 23, 2023). “Lawyers have real bad day in court after citing fake cases made up by ChatGPT”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved February 18, 2024.
  204. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-256) Goswami, Rohan (May 30, 2023). “ChatGPT cited ‘bogus’ cases for a New York federal court filing. The attorneys involved may face sanctions”. CNBC. Archived from the original on May 30, 2023. Retrieved May 30, 2023.
  205. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-257) Neumeister, Larry (June 8, 2023). “Lawyers blame ChatGPT for tricking them into citing bogus case law”. Associated Press. Archived from the original on November 8, 2023. Retrieved November 8, 2023.
  206. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-258) “Mata v. Avianca, Inc”. Casetext. Archived from the original on February 13, 2024. Retrieved February 13, 2024.
  207. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-259) “‘Use with caution’: How ChatGPT landed this US lawyer and his firm in hot water”. ABC News. June 24, 2023. Archived from the original on November 9, 2023. Retrieved November 9, 2023.
  208. ^ Jump up to:a b Jeantet, Diane; Savarese, Mauricio; LeBlanc, Steve; O’Brien, Matt (November 30, 2023). “Brazilian city enacts an ordinance that was secretly written by ChatGPT”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on December 7, 2023. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
  209. ^ Jump up to:a b Paúl, María Luisa (December 4, 2023). “A Brazilian city passed a law about water meters. ChatGPT wrote it”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190–8286. Archived from the original on December 5, 2023. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
  210. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-262) “Lei escrita por inteligência artificial é aprovada por vereadores em Porto Alegre; ‘precedente perigoso’, diz presidente da Câmara”. G1 (in Brazilian Portuguese). November 29, 2023. Archived from the original on December 7, 2023. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
  211. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-263) Rose, Neil (December 7, 2023). “Litigant unwittingly put fake cases generated by AI before tribunal”. Legal Futures. Archived from the original on May 14, 2024. Retrieved May 14, 2024.
  212. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-264) Cross, Michael (December 11, 2023). “AI hallucinates nine ‘helpful’ case authorities”. Law Society Gazette. Archived from the original on May 2, 2024. Retrieved May 14, 2024.
  213. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-265) “Harber v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2023] UKFTT 1007 (TC)”. BAILII. December 4, 2023. Archived from the original on May 14, 2024. Retrieved May 14, 2024.
  214. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-266) “11th Circuit Judge Uses ChatGPT in Deciding Appeal, Encourages Others to Consider It”. Law.com. June 4, 2024. Archived from the original on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 5, 2024.
  215. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-267) Journal, A. B. A. “In concurrence confession, appeals judge says ChatGPT research ‘less nutty’ than feared”. ABA Journal. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 6, 2024.
  216. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-268) Emma Tucker (January 7, 2025). “Green Beret who exploded Cybertruck in Las Vegas used AI to plan blast”. CNN. Retrieved January 7, 2025.
  217. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-269) Zhao, Jieyu; Wang, Tianlu; Yatskar, Mark; Ordonez, Vicente; Chang, Kai-Wei (2018). “Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methods”. In Walker, Marilyn; Ji, Heng; Stent, Amanda (eds.). Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers). New Orleans, Louisiana: Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 15–20. doi:10.18653/v1/N18–2003.
  218. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-270) Sheng, Emily; Chang, Kai-Wei; Natarajan, Prem; Peng, Nanyun (2021). “Societal Biases in Language Generation: Progress and Challenges”. In Zong, Chengqing; Xia, Fei; Li, Wenjie; Navigli, Roberto (eds.). Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). Online: Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 4275–4293. doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.330.
  219. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-271) Liles, Jordan (February 1, 2023). “ChatGPT Declines Request for Poem Admiring Trump, But Biden Query Is Successful”. Snopes. Archived from the original on March 22, 2023. Retrieved March 23, 2023.
  220. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-272) Johnson, Arianna. “Is ChatGPT Partisan? Poems About Trump And Biden Raise Questions About The AI Bot’s Bias — Here’s What Experts Think”. Forbes. Archived from the original on April 7, 2023. Retrieved May 23, 2023.
  221. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-273) Guynn, Jessica. “Is ChatGPT ‘woke’? AI chatbot accused of anti-conservative bias and a grudge against Trump”. USA Today. Archived from the original on March 1, 2023. Retrieved March 1, 2023.
  222. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-274) Bray, Hiawatha (February 9, 2023). “Is ChatGPT liberal or conservative? Depends who you ask”. Boston Globe. Archived from the original on March 1, 2023. Retrieved March 1, 2023.
  223. ^ Jump up to:a b Vincent, James (February 17, 2023). “As conservatives criticize ‘woke AI,’ here are ChatGPT’s rules for answering culture war queries”. The Verge. Archived from the original on March 1, 2023. Retrieved March 1, 2023.
  224. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-276) Hartmann, Jochen; Schwenzow, Jasper; Witte, Maximilian (January 5, 2023). “The political ideology of conversational AI: Converging evidence on ChatGPT’s pro-environmental, left-libertarian orientation”. arXiv:2301.01768 [cs.CL].
  225. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-277) Motoki, Fabio; Neto, Valdemar Pinho; Rodrigues, Victor (August 17, 2023). “More human than human: measuring ChatGPT political bias”. Public Choice. 198 (1–2): 3–23. doi:10.1007/s11127–023–01097–2. ISSN 1573–7101.
  226. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-278) “The Guardian view on ChatGPT: an eerily good human impersonator”. The Guardian. December 8, 2022. Archived from the original on January 16, 2023. Retrieved December 18, 2022.
  227. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-279) Farivar, Masood (August 23, 2023). “AI Firms Under Fire for Allegedly Infringing on Copyrights”. Voice of America. Archived from the original on November 20, 2023. Retrieved November 19, 2023.
  228. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-280) Davis, Wes (July 9, 2023). “Sarah Silverman is suing OpenAI and Meta for copyright infringement”. The Verge. Archived from the original on November 18, 2023. Retrieved November 20, 2023.
  229. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-281) David, Emilia (February 13, 2024). “Sarah Silverman’s lawsuit against OpenAI partially dismissed”. The Verge. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 15, 2024.
  230. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-282) Spangler, Todd (September 21, 2023). “George R.R. Martin Among 17 Top Authors Suing OpenAI, Alleging ChatGPT Steals Their Works: ‘We Are Here to Fight’”. Variety. Archived from the original on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 15, 2024.
  231. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-283) Grynbaum, Michael M.; Mac, Ryan (December 27, 2023). “The Times Sues OpenAI and Microsoft Over A.I. Use of Copyrighted Work”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 18, 2024. Retrieved December 28, 2023.
  232. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-284) “ChatGPT: New York Times sues OpenAI over article usage”. DW News. December 27, 2023. Archived from the original on December 27, 2023. Retrieved December 28, 2023.
  233. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-285) Roth, Emma (December 27, 2023). “The New York Times is suing OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement”. The Verge. Archived from the original on December 27, 2023. Retrieved December 28, 2023.
  234. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-286) Field, Hayden (March 6, 2024). “Researchers tested leading AI models for copyright infringement using popular books, and GPT-4 performed worst”. CNBC. Archived from the original on March 6, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
  235. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-287) “Introducing CopyrightCatcher, the first Copyright Detection API for LLMs”. Patronus AI. March 6, 2024. Archived from the original on March 6, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
  236. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-288) Davenport, Mary (February 17, 2025). “Delhi High Court Takes on ANI’s Copyright Case Against OpenAI”. London Insider. Retrieved February 17, 2025.
  237. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-289) Karp, Paul (February 6, 2023). “MP tells Australia’s parliament AI could be used for ‘mass destruction’ in speech part-written by ChatGPT”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261–3077. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
  238. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-290) K, Siddharth (December 5, 2022). Shumaker, Lisa (ed.). “Explainer: ChatGPT — what is OpenAI’s chatbot and what is it used for?”. Reuters. Archived from the original on January 16, 2023. Retrieved December 30, 2022.
  239. ^ Jump up to:a b Kay, Grace (December 11, 2022). “Elon Musk founded — and has since criticized — the company behind the buzzy new AI chatbot ChatGPT. Here’s everything we know about OpenAI”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on January 12, 2023. Retrieved December 30, 2022.
  240. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-292) Hurst, Luke (March 30, 2023) [March 29, 2023]. “‘Profound risk to humanity’: Tech leaders call for ‘pause’ on advanced AI development”. Euronews. Archived from the original on April 1, 2023. Retrieved April 1, 2023.
  241. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-293) “Geoffrey Hinton tells us why he’s now scared of the tech he helped build”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on May 4, 2023. Retrieved May 4, 2023.
  242. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-294) “Video: Geoffrey Hinton talks about the “existential threat” of AI”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on May 3, 2023. Retrieved May 4, 2023.
  243. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-295) Roose, Kevin (May 30, 2023). “A.I. Poses ‘Risk of Extinction,’ Industry Leaders Warn”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362–4331. Archived from the original on May 31, 2023. Retrieved May 30, 2023.
  244. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-guardian2023_296-0) Taylor, Josh (May 7, 2023). “Rise of artificial intelligence is inevitable but should not be feared, ‘father of AI’ says”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on October 23, 2023. Retrieved May 26, 2023.
  245. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-andrewng2023_297-0) McMorrow, Ryan (December 19, 2023). “Andrew Ng: ‘Do we think the world is better off with more or less intelligence?’”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved December 30, 2023.
  246. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT#cite_ref-lecun2023_298-0) Levy, Steven (December 22, 2023). “How Not to Be Stupid About AI, With Yann LeCun”. Wired. Archived from the original on February 14, 2024. Retrieved December 30, 2023.

Biswas, Som (April 1, 2023). “ChatGPT and the Future of Medical Writing”. Radiology. 307 (2): e223312. doi:10.1148/radiol.223312. ISSN 0033–8419. PMID 36728748. S2CID 256501098.

https://www.wikipedia.org/

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenAI

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_Search

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_Deep_Research

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_programming_languages_for_artificial_intelligence

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_for_artificial_intelligence

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applications_of_artificial_intelligence

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence_in_healthcare

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence_in_video_games

https://www.reddit.com/

https://www.google.com/

https://www.yahoo.com/

https://x.com/?lang=en

https://medium.com/

https://substack.com/about

https://dev.to/

https://www.linkedin.com/login

https://www.indeed.com/

https://www.facebook.com/

https://www.instagram.com/accounts/login/?hl=en

https://www.tiktok.com/?kuid=317b26d2-c08a-497f-9ab0-df56eaf7fd8b&kref=pBPVbxkzdhlF

https://www.ratemyagent.com/real-estate-agent/shawn-knight-b0m2x3/sales/overview?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.allmusic.com/artist/shawn-knight-mn0000718165?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://canvasrebel.com/meet-shawn-rebecca-knight/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://byucougars.byu-dept-athletics-dev.amazon.byu.edu/athlete/football/11213/shawn-knight?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.belmont.edu/profiles/shawn-knight/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.everand.com/author/246463204/Shawn-Knight

https://www.amazon.com/Books-Sean-Knight/s?rh=n%3A283155%2Cp_27%3ASean+Knight

https://www.amazon.com/Yes-Can-Challenges-Winning-Attitude-ebook/dp/B09VYF46KB

https://shawnomancy.com/author/shawn/

Shawn Knight https://g.co/kgs/jiT7U2S

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shawn_Knight

https://openai.com/index/chatgpt/

https://chatgpt.com/

https://g.co/kgs/g84LtqK

  1. Toppo, Greg (April 8, 2023). “Teachers are embracing ChatGPT — even more than students”. Fast Company.
  2. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-2) Ravšelj, Dejan; Keržič, Damijana; Tomaževič, Nina; Umek, Lan; Brezovar, Nejc; Aristovnik, Aleksander. (2025). “Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions”. PLOS ONE. 20 (2): e0315011. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315011. PMC 11798494.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b Roose, Kevin (January 12, 2023). “Don’t Ban ChatGPT in Schools. Teach With It”. The New York Times.
  4. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-4) Trumbore, Anne (February 22, 2023). “ChatGPT could be an effective and affordable tutor”. The Conversation. Retrieved June 12, 2024.
  5. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-5) Gerjets, Peter; Warschauer, Mark; Tate, Tamara; Chen, Xiaobin; Alekseeva, Anastasiia; Fischer, Christian; Fütterer, Tim (2023). “ChatGPT in education: global reactions to AI innovations”. Scientific Reports. 13 (1): 15310. Bibcode:2023NatSR..1315310F. doi:10.1038/s41598–023–42227–6. PMC 10504368. PMID 37714915.
  6. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-6) “ChatGPT sets record for fastest-growing user base — analyst note”. Reuters. Archived from the original on January 6, 2025. Retrieved January 19, 2025.
  7. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-7) Kelly, Samantha Murphy (January 26, 2023). “ChatGPT passes exams from law and business schools”. CNN. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
  8. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-8) Alimardani, Armin (September 23, 2024). “Generative artificial intelligence vs. law students: an empirical study on criminal law exam performance”. Law, Innovation and Technology. 16 (2): 777–819. doi:10.1080/17579961.2024.2392932. ISSN 1757–9961.
  9. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-9) Kashefi, Ali; Mukerji, Tapan (2023). “ChatGPT for Programming Numerical Methods”. arXiv:2303.12093 [cs.LG].
  10. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-10) Roivainen, Eka (March 28, 2023). “I Gave ChatGPT an IQ Test. Here’s What I Discovered”. Scientific American. Retrieved April 3, 2023.
  11. ^ Jump up to:a b Kelly, Mary Louise (January 26, 2023). “‘Everybody is cheating’: Why this teacher has adopted an open ChatGPT policy”. NPR. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  12. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-12) Klar, Rebecca (May 10, 2023). “Teens use, hear of ChatGPT more than parents: poll”. The Hill. Retrieved June 15, 2023.
  13. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-13) Impact Research. “Parents and students are optimistic about AI, but parents have a lot to learn to catch up to their kids — and want rules and ratings to help them” (PDF). Common Sense Media. Retrieved June 15, 2023.
  14. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-14) “OpenAI unveils ChatGPT Edu to bring AI responsibly to university campuses”. The Indian Express. May 31, 2024. Retrieved June 16, 2024.
  15. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-15) Mahapatra, Santosh (February 13, 2024). “Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study”. Smart Learning Environments. 11 (1): 9. doi:10.1186/s40561–024–00295–9. ISSN 2196–7091.
  16. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-16) Bronstein, Briana; Wolfe, Zora M.; Ciampa, Katia (September 26, 2023). “Transforming digital literacy practices”. ChatGPT in Education. 67 (3): 186–195. doi:10.1002/jaal.1310.
  17. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-17) Eshraghian, Farjam; Hafezieh, Najmeh; Farivar, Farveh; de Cesare, Sergio (April 2, 2024). “AI in software programming: understanding emotional responses to GitHub Copilot”. Information Technology & People. ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print). doi:10.1108/ITP-01–2023–0084. ISSN 0959–3845.
  18. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-18) Dave, Paresh (June 5, 2023). “Chegg Embraced AI. ChatGPT Ate Its Lunch Anyway”. Wired. ISSN 1059–1028. Retrieved October 18, 2023.
  19. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-19) Shin, Rachel (July 12, 2023). “A.I. can kill your business in an instant. Just ask the CEO of Chegg”. Fortune. Retrieved October 18, 2023.
  20. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-20) Loos, Eugène; Gröpler, Johanna; Goudeau, Marie-Louise Sophie (August 21, 2023). “Using ChatGPT in Education: Human Reflection on ChatGPT’s Self-Reflection”. Societies. 13 (8): 196. doi:10.3390/soc13080196.
  21. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-21) Ravšelj, Dejan; Keržič, Damijana; Tomaževič, Nina; Umek, Lan; Brezovar, Nejc; Aristovnik, Aleksander. (2025). “Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions”. PLOS ONE. 20 (2): e0315011. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315011. PMC 11798494.
  22. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-22) Ravšelj, Dejan; Keržič, Damijana; Tomaževič, Nina; Umek, Lan; Brezovar, Nejc; Aristovnik, Aleksander. (2025). “Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions”. PLOS ONE. 20 (2): e0315011. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315011. PMC 11798494.
  23. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-23) Marche, Stephen (December 6, 2022). “The College Essay Is Dead”. The Atlantic. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  24. ^ Jump up to:a b Brown, Kevin (December 23, 2022). “Why Educators Shouldn’t Be Worried About AI”. ChristianityToday.com. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  25. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-25) Bowman, Emma (December 19, 2022). “A new AI chatbot might do your homework for you. But it’s still not an A+ student”. NPR. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  26. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-26) Klee, Miles (May 17, 2023). “Professor Flunks All His Students After ChatGPT Falsely Claims It Wrote Their Papers”. Rolling Stone. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  27. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-27) “College instructor put on blast for accusing students of using ChatGPT”. NBC News. May 18, 2023. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  28. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-28) Dolan, Eric W. (March 25, 2024). “ChatGPT linked to declining academic performance and memory loss in new study”. PsyPost — Psychology News. Retrieved March 30, 2024.
  29. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-29) ABBAS, Muhammad (February 16, 2024). “Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students”. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 21 (10). doi:10.1186/s41239–024–00444–7.
  30. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-30) Herman, Daniel (December 9, 2022). “The End of High-School English”. The Atlantic. Retrieved September 16, 2024.
  31. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-31) Baron, Naomi S. (January 19, 2023). “How ChatGPT robs students of motivation to write and think for themselves”. The Conversation. Retrieved September 16, 2024.
  32. ^ Jump up to:a b Werse, Nicholas R. (2023). “What Will Be Lost? Critical Reflections on ChatGPT, Artificial Intelligence, and the Value of Writing Instruction”. Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing. 11 (1): 1–4. doi:10.37514/dbh-j.2023.11.1.07. ISSN 2372–7497.
  33. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-33) Major, Katy; Chiarelott, Clay (2023). “Slow Down: Generative AI, Faculty Reactions, and the Role of Critical Thinking in Writing Instruction”. Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing. 11 (1): 1–12. doi:10.37514/dbh-j.2023.11.1.03. ISSN 2372–7497.
  34. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-34) Girdharry, Kristi; Khachatryan, Davit (2023). “Meaningful Writing in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence”. Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing. 11 (1): 1–10. doi:10.37514/dbh-j.2023.11.1.04. ISSN 2372–7497.
  35. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-35) Girdharry, Kristi; Khachatryan, Davit (2023). “Meaningful Writing in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence”. Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing. 11 (1): 1–10. doi:10.37514/dbh-j.2023.11.1.04. ISSN 2372–7497.
  36. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-36) De Matas, Jarrel (2023). “ChatGPT and the Future of Writing about Writing”. Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing. 11 (1): 1–7. doi:10.37514/dbh-j.2023.11.1.09. ISSN 2372–7497.
  37. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-37) Major, Katy; Chiarelott, Clay (2023). “Slow Down: Generative AI, Faculty Reactions, and the Role of Critical Thinking in Writing Instruction”. Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing. 11 (1): 1–12. doi:10.37514/dbh-j.2023.11.1.03. ISSN 2372–7497.
  38. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-38) Lindberg, Nathan; Domingues, Amanda (August 2024). “2024 Report on AI Writing Tools’ Impacts on Writing Centers”.
  39. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-39) Roose, Kevin (January 12, 2023). “Don’t Ban ChatGPT in Schools. Teach With It”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362–4331. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  40. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-40) Belkin, Douglas (June 1, 2023). “As AI-Enabled Cheating Roils Colleges, Professors Turn to an Ancient Testing Method”. Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099–9660. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  41. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-41) Roose, Kevin (January 12, 2023). “Don’t Ban ChatGPT in Schools. Teach With It”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362–4331. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  42. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-42) Belkin, Douglas (June 1, 2023). “As AI-Enabled Cheating Roils Colleges, Professors Turn to an Ancient Testing Method”. Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099–9660. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Singer, Natasha (August 24, 2023). “Despite Cheating Fears, Schools Repeal ChatGPT Bans”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362–4331. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  44. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-44) “New York City Department of Education Bans ChatGPT”. GovTech. January 10, 2023. Archived from the original on February 16, 2023. Retrieved February 16, 2023.
  45. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-45) Cole, Samantha (January 4, 2023). “NYC Bans Students and Teachers from Using ChatGPT”. www.vice.com. Archived from the original on January 5, 2023. Retrieved January 5, 2023.
  46. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-46) Ropek, Lucas (January 4, 2023). “New York City Schools Ban ChatGPT to Head Off a Cheating Epidemic”. Gizmodo. Archived from the original on January 6, 2023. Retrieved January 6, 2023.
  47. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-47) “港大禁用ChatGPT等AI工具，为全港大学首例”. The Paper. China News Service. February 18, 2023. Archived from the original on March 6, 2023. Retrieved February 19, 2023.
  48. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-48) Yau, Cannix; Chan, Kahon (February 17, 2023). “University of Hong Kong temporarily bans students from using ChatGPT”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on February 19, 2023. Retrieved February 19, 2023.
  49. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-49) Faguy, Ana. “New York City Public Schools Reverses ChatGPT Ban”. Forbes. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved May 21, 2023.
  50. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-50) Serrano, Jody (May 19, 2023). “New York City Schools Lift Ban on ChatGPT, Say Initial Fear ‘Overlooked the Potential’ of AI”. Gizmodo. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved May 21, 2023.
  51. ^ Jump up to:a b c Villasenor, John (February 10, 2023). “How ChatGPT Can Improve Education, Not Threaten It”. Scientific American. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
  52. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-52) Coffey, Lauren. “Professors Craft Courses on ChatGPT With ChatGPT”. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  53. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-53) Einarsson, Hafsteinn (December 13, 2023). “Application of ChatGPT for automated problem reframing across academic domains”. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 6. doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100194. hdl:20.500.11815/4807.
  54. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-54) Langreo, Lauraine (March 21, 2024). “Los Angeles Unified Bets Big on ‘Ed,’ an AI Tool for Students”. Education Week.
  55. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-55) Ward, Micah (August 8, 2023). “Meet ‘Ed,’ L.A. Unified’s new artificially intelligent student advisor”. District Administration.
  56. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-56) Popescu, Anca (January 9, 2024). “AI’s Secret Weapon in Education. ChatGPT — The Future of Personalized Learning”. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series V: Economic Sciences: 45–52. doi:10.31926/but.es.2023.16.65.2.5. ISSN 2065–2208.
  57. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-57) Fowler, Geoffrey A. (April 14, 2023). “Analysis | We tested a new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent student”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190–8286. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  58. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-58) Delouya, Samantha. “Turnitin is the go-to software to catch students cheating. Now it’s focused on a potential cat-and-mouse game with OpenAI’s new ChatGPT chatbot”. Business Insider. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  59. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-59) “Sneak preview of Turnitin’s AI writing and ChatGPT detection capability”. www.turnitin.com. January 13, 2023. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  60. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-60) “ChatGPT Detectors Are Biased and Easy to Fool, Research Shows”. CNET. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  61. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-61) Barshay, Jill (September 4, 2023). “PROOF POINTS: It’s easy to fool ChatGPT detectors”. The Hechinger Report. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  62. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-62) Alimardani, Armin; Jane, Emma A. (February 19, 2023). “We pitted ChatGPT against tools for detecting AI-written text, and the results are troubling”. The Conversation. Retrieved October 16, 2024.
  63. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-63) Goodwin, Danny (July 26, 2023). “OpenAI’s AI Text Classifier no longer available due to ‘low rate of accuracy’”. Search Engine Land. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  64. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-64) David, Emilia (July 25, 2023). “OpenAI can’t tell if something was written by AI after all”. The Verge. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  65. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_in_education#cite_ref-65) Elkhatat, Ahmed M. (January 1, 2023). “Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text”. EBSCO.
  66. Rogers, Reece. “SearchGPT Is OpenAI’s Direct Assault on Google”. Wired. ISSN 1059–1028. Retrieved 2024–07–26.
  67. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_Search#cite_ref-2) Wiggers, Kyle (2024–07–25). “With Google in its sights, OpenAI unveils SearchGPT”. TechCrunch. Retrieved 2024–07–26.
  68. ^ Jump up to:a b Robison, Kylie (2024–07–25). “OpenAI announces SearchGPT, its AI-powered search engine”. The Verge. Archived from the original on 2024–07–26. Retrieved 2024–07–26.
  69. ^ Jump up to:a b Robins-Early, Nick (2024–07–25). “OpenAI tests new search engine called SearchGPT amid AI arms race”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261–3077. Retrieved 2024–07–28.
  70. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_Search#cite_ref-5) “Trying ChatGPT’s SearchGPT made me realise I might soon never ‘Google’ anything ever again”. Firstpost. 2024–11–04. Retrieved 2024–11–04.
  71. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_Search#cite_ref-6) “Introducing ChatGPT search”. OpenAI. 2024–07–25. Retrieved 2025–02–20.
  72. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_Search#cite_ref-7) “No Wi-Fi? Dial 1–800-ChatGPT for the AI assistance you need”. ZDNET. December 18, 2024. Retrieved 2024–12–18.
  73. https://www.zdnet.com/article/openais-deep-research-can-save-you-hours-of-work-and-now-its-a-lot-cheaper-to-access/
  74. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_Deep_Research#cite_ref-Entrepreneur_2-0) Shibu, Sherin (2025–02–03). “ChatGPT Can Now Complete a Major Task That Would Take a Human Up to 30 Days. Here’s How it Works”. Entrepreneur. Retrieved 2025–02–05.
  75. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_Deep_Research#cite_ref-BI_3-0) Webb, Effie (2025–02–03). “OpenAI launches Deep Research, a ChatGPT tool that promises ‘expert-level’ analysis in minutes”. Business Insider. Retrieved 2025–02–05.
  76. ^ Jump up to:a b c Shivam, Harsh (2025–02–03). “OpenAI’s ‘Deep Research’ can be your agentic AI research analyst: Details”. Business Standard. Retrieved 2025–02–05.
  77. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_Deep_Research#cite_ref-okemwa2025openai_5-0) Okemwa, Kevin. “OpenAI’s new “Deep Research” blows ChatGPT o3-mini and DeepSeek out of the water with 26.6% accuracy in the world’s hardest “AI exam” — but it skipped the line”. Windows Central. Retrieved 5 February 2025.
  78. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_Deep_Research#cite_ref-NYT_6-0) Metz, Cade (2025–02–03). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. Tool That Can Do Research Online”. The New York Times. Retrieved 2025–02–05.
  79. ^ Jump up to:a b Speed, Richard. “OpenAI unveils deep research agent for ChatGPT”. The Register. Retrieved 5 February 2025.
  80. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_Deep_Research#cite_ref-milmo2025openai_8-0) Milmo, Dan. “OpenAI launches ‘deep research’ tool that it says can match research analyst”. The Guardian. Retrieved 5 February 2025.
  81. Knight, Will. “Google’s Gemini Is the Real Start of the Generative AI Boom”. Wired. ISSN 1059–1028. Retrieved December 12, 2023.
  82. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-2) Meredith, Sam (December 6, 2023). “A ‘thirsty’ generative AI boom poses a growing problem for Big Tech”. CNBC. Retrieved December 12, 2023.
  83. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-3) Bommasani, Rishi (March 17, 2023). “AI Spring? Four Takeaways from Major Releases in Foundation Models”. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Archived from the original on May 7, 2023. Retrieved May 16, 2023.
  84. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-4) “The coming of AI Spring”. www.mckinsey.com. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
  85. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-5) “The data that transformed AI research — and possibly the world”. Quartz. July 26, 2017.
  86. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-6) Lohr, Steve (November 30, 2017). “A.I. Will Transform the Economy. But How Much, and How Soon?”. The New York Times.
  87. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-leesedolwin_7-0) “Match 1 — Google DeepMind Challenge Match: Lee Sedol vs AlphaGo”. YouTube. March 8, 2016. Archived from the original on March 29, 2017. Retrieved March 9, 2016.
  88. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-8) “Everything You Need To Know About The Artificial Intelligence Boom”. Nasdaq.com. Investing Daily. August 22, 2018.
  89. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-9) “Why am I not terrified of AI?”. Shtetl-Optimized. March 6, 2023. Archived from the original on May 12, 2023. Retrieved March 19, 2023.
  90. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-10) Statt, Nick (December 12, 2018). “The AI boom is happening all over the world, and it’s accelerating quickly”. The Verge.
  91. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-:10_11-0) Wong, Matteo (December 11, 2023). “Science Is Becoming Less Human”. The Atlantic. Retrieved December 12, 2023.
  92. ^ Jump up to:a b Lohr, Steve (November 30, 2017). “A.I. Will Transform the Economy. But How Much, and How Soon?”. The New York Times.
  93. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-13) “Nine charts that really bring home just how fast AI is growing”. MIT Technology Review.
  94. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-14) Vincent, James (May 24, 2022). “All these images were generated by Google’s latest text-to-image AI”. The Verge. Archived from the original on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  95. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-15) Cox, Joseph (January 31, 2023). “AI-Generated Voice Firm Clamps Down After 4chan Makes Celebrity Voices for Abuse”. Vice. Archived from the original on May 7, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  96. ^ Jump up to:a b Frank, Michael (September 22, 2023). “US Leadership in Artificial Intelligence Can Shape the 21st Century Global Order”. The Diplomat. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
  97. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-17) “Global AI Vibrancy Tool”. Artificial Intelligence Index. Stanford, California: Stanford University.
  98. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-18) Gold, Ashley (June 27, 2023). “Exclusive: Immigrants play outsize role in the AI game”. Axios. Retrieved December 12, 2023.
  99. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-19) Ellis, Lindsay (October 23, 2023). “Dropping Out of College to Join the AI Gold Rush”. WSJ (Wall Street Journal). New York, New York. Retrieved December 12, 2023.
  100. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-20) Mozur, Paul; Metz, Cade (June 9, 2020). “A U.S. Secret Weapon in A.I.: Chinese Talent”. The New York Times.
  101. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-21) “What Is Artificial Intelligence (AI)?”. Council on Foreign Relations.
  102. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-22) “Lauren A. Kahn | Council on Foreign Relations”. January 3, 2022. Archived from the original on January 3, 2022.
  103. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-23) Kahn, Lauren (October 28, 2021). “U.S. Leadership in Artificial Intelligence Is Still Possible”. Council on Foreign Relations.
  104. ^ Jump up to:a b Robert F. Service, ‘The game has changed.’ AI triumphs at solving protein structures, Science, 30 November 2020.
  105. ^ Jump up to:a b Callaway, Ewen (November 30, 2020). “‘It will change everything’: DeepMind’s AI makes gigantic leap in solving protein structures”. Nature. 588 (7837): 203–204. Bibcode:2020Natur.588..203C. doi:10.1038/d41586–020–03348–4. PMID 33257889. S2CID 227243204.
  106. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-DeepMindAlpha2_26-0) “AlphaFold: a solution to a 50-year-old grand challenge in biology”. Deepmind. November 30, 2020. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  107. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-27) Nerlich, Brigitte (December 4, 2020). “Protein folding and science communication: Between hype and humility”. Making Science Public. Retrieved February 29, 2024.
  108. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-28) Hubbard, Tim (December 7, 2020). “The secret of life, part 2: the solution of the protein folding problem”. Medium. Retrieved February 29, 2024.
  109. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-mittr20201130_29-0) “DeepMind’s protein-folding AI has solved a 50-year-old grand challenge of biology”. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  110. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-30) Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E creates plausible images of literally anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on January 6, 2021. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  111. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-31) Coldewey, Devin (April 6, 2022). “New OpenAI tool draws anything, bigger and better than ever”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on May 6, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  112. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-32) Pandey, Mohit (July 22, 2023). “One Year of Midjourney: A Psychedelic Image Generator to Realistic Photo Album”. Analytics India Magazine. Retrieved February 1, 2024.
  113. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-33) “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Archived from the original on August 30, 2022. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  114. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-34) “Gen-1: The Next Step Forward for Generative AI”.
  115. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-35) “ModelScope 魔搭社区”. modelscope.cn. Archived from the original on May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 20, 2023.
  116. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-36) kumar, Ashish (October 3, 2022). “Meta AI Introduces ‘Make-A-Video’: An Artificial Intelligence System That Generates Videos From Text”. MarkTechPost. Archived from the original on December 1, 2022. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  117. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-37) Edwards, Benj (October 5, 2022). “Google’s newest AI generator creates HD video from text prompts”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved October 25, 2022.
  118. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-38) “Phenaki”. phenaki.video. Archived from the original on October 7, 2022. Retrieved October 3, 2022.
  119. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-39) Edwards, Benj (September 9, 2022). “Runway teases AI-powered text-to-video editing using written prompts”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on January 27, 2023. Retrieved September 12, 2022.
  120. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-40) Sagar, Ram (June 3, 2020). “OpenAI Releases GPT-3, The Largest Model So Far”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the original on August 4, 2020. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  121. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-41) Hsu, Tiffany; Myers, Steven Lee (May 18, 2023). “Another Side of the A.I. Boom: Detecting What A.I. Makes”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362–4331. Retrieved February 21, 2024.
  122. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-42) Erdenesanaa, Delger (October 10, 2023). “A.I. Could Soon Need as Much Electricity as an Entire Country”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362–4331. Retrieved February 21, 2024.
  123. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-43) “OpenAI rival says AI tech needs more Asia localization”. Nikkei Asia. Retrieved February 21, 2024.
  124. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-44) Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it replace humans?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261–3077. Archived from the original on January 16, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  125. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-45) Lardinois, Frederic (March 14, 2023). “Microsoft’s new Bing was using GPT-4 all along”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on March 15, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  126. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-46) Derico, Ben; Kleinman, Zoe (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI announces ChatGPT successor GPT-4”. BBC News. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  127. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-47) “Gemini”. DeepMind. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
  128. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-48) Ziegener, Daniel (January 17, 2023). “DeepL Write: Brauchen wir jetzt noch eine menschliche Lektorin?”. Golem.de. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  129. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-49) Robertson, Adi (September 9, 2016). “Google’s DeepMind AI fakes some of the most realistic human voices yet”. The Verge.
  130. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-50) Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the original on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
  131. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-51) Zwiezen, Zack (January 18, 2021). “Website Lets You Make GLaDOS Say Whatever You Want”. Kotaku. Archived from the original on January 17, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
  132. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-52) Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト「15.ai」公開中。『Undertale』や『Portal』のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15.ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines]. AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the original on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
  133. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-53) Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15.ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
  134. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-54) Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the original on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
  135. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-55) “AI’s quiet creep into music punctuated by ‘SpongeBob’ voices and a secretive artist called Glorb”. NBC News. April 2, 2024. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
  136. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-56) Forlini, Emily (April 3, 2024). “Bye-Bye Bikini Bottom: AI Deepfakes Turn Spongebob Into a Sinister Hip-Hop Star”. PCMAG. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
  137. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-57) Jimenez, Jorge (January 31, 2023). “AI company promises changes after ‘voice cloning’ tool used to make celebrities say awful things”. PC Gamer. Archived from the original on April 4, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
  138. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-58) Chopra, Anuj; Salem, Saladin (February 1, 2023). “Seeing is believing? Global scramble to tackle deepfakes”. Yahoo News. Agence France-Presse. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  139. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-59) Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362–4331. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved May 16, 2023.
  140. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-60) Auslender, Viki; Ashkenazi, Shani (April 23, 2023). “The environmental pollution behind the boom in artificial intelligence”. ctech. Calcalist. Retrieved January 15, 2025.
  141. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-61) Harrison Dupré, Maggie (May 31, 2024). “Huge Power Demand for AI Is Keeping Polluting Coal Plants Alive”. Futurism. Retrieved January 15, 2025.
  142. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-62) Chu, Amanda (May 30, 2024). “AI’s thirst for electricity risks slowing US coal phaseout”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on May 30, 2024. Retrieved January 15, 2025.
  143. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-63) da Silva, João. “Google turns to nuclear to power AI data centres”. BBC.com. №14 October 2024. Retrieved January 15, 2025.
  144. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-64) Browne, Ryan (October 16, 2024). “Why Big Tech is turning to nuclear to power its energy-intensive AI ambitions”. CNBC. Retrieved January 15, 2025.
  145. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-65) Mandler, C (September 20, 2024). “Three Mile Island nuclear plant will reopen to power Microsoft data centers”. NPR. Retrieved January 15, 2025.
  146. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-66) Valinsky, Jordan (September 20, 2024). “Three Mile Island is reopening and selling its power to Microsoft | CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved January 15, 2025.
  147. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-67) Warren, Tom (September 20, 2024). “Microsoft wants Three Mile Island to fuel its AI power needs”. The Verge. Retrieved January 15, 2025.
  148. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-68) Roose, Kevin (December 10, 2023). “This A.I. Subculture’s Motto: Go, Go, Go”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362–4331. Retrieved December 11, 2023.
  149. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-69) Baily, Martin Neil; Brynjolfsson, Erik; Korinek, Anton (May 10, 2023). “Machines of mind: The case for an AI-powered productivity boom”. Brookings. Retrieved January 1, 2025.
  150. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-70) Brynjolfsson, Erik; Petropoulos, Georgios (June 10, 2021). “The coming productivity boom”. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved January 1, 2025.
  151. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-71) Smialek, Jeanna (February 21, 2024). “Are We in a Productivity Boom? For Clues, Look to 1994”. Archived from the original on December 10, 2024. Retrieved January 1, 2025.
  152. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-kantrowitz20240329_72-0) Kantrowitz, Alex (March 29, 2004). “Can Demis Hassabis Save Google?”. Big Technology. Retrieved March 29, 2024.
  153. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-73) Hur, Krystal (June 19, 2024). “Nvidia surpasses Microsoft to become the largest public company in the world”. CNN. Archived from the original on June 19, 2024. Retrieved June 19, 2024.
  154. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-pandemicsf_74-0) “Is pandemic exodus over? SF population slightly increasing, Census Bureau numbers show”. ABC7 News. March 15, 2024.
  155. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-75) Brynjolfsson, Erik; McAfee, Andrew (July 18, 2017). “The Business of Artificial Intelligence”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017–8012. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  156. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-76) Brynjolfsson, Erik; McAfee, Andrew (July 18, 2017). “The Business of Artificial Intelligence”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017–8012. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  157. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-77) “2023: Time to Act”. Wavestone. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  158. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-78) “The state of AI in 2023: Generative AI’s breakout year | McKinsey”. www.mckinsey.com. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  159. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-79) Davenport & Harris, Thomas & Jeanne (August 29, 2017). Competing on analytics. Harvard Business Press. ISBN 978–1633693739.
  160. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-80) “Becoming an AI-fueled organization, State of AI in the Enterprise, 4th Edition”. Deloitte Insights. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  161. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-81) “The state of AI in 2023: Generative AI’s breakout year | McKinsey”. www.mckinsey.com. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  162. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-82) “1.1 Generative AI stats on fundraising for AI companies by year (Copy) (update)”. datawrapper.dwcdn.net. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  163. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-83) Se & Ansari, Ksenia & Tasmia (November 3, 2023). “Jasper AI: A dilemma of a thin wrapper”.
  164. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-84) “Infographic: Microsoft and Amazon Dominate the Cloud”. Statista Daily Data. July 26, 2023. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  165. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-85) Jacobides, Michael G.; Brusoni, Stefano; Candelon, Francois (December 2021). “The Evolutionary Dynamics of the Artificial Intelligence Ecosystem”. Strategy Science. 6 (4): 412–435. doi:10.1287/stsc.2021.0148. hdl:20.500.11850/512872. ISSN 2333–2050.
  166. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-86) “The state of AI in 2023: Generative AI’s breakout year | McKinsey”. www.mckinsey.com. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  167. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-87) Knapton, Ken. “Council Post: Navigating The Biases In LLM Generative AI: A Guide To Responsible Implementation”. Forbes. Retrieved March 23, 2024.
  168. ^ Jump up to:a b Hendrycks, Dan; Mazeika, Mantas; Thomas Woodside (June 21, 2023). “An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks”. arXiv:2306.12001 [cs.CY].
  169. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-89) “The AI boom: lessons from history”. The Economist.
  170. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-90) Eapen, Tojin T.; Finkenstadt, Daniel J.; Folk, Josh; Venkataswamy, Lokesh (June 16, 2023). “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. Cambridge, Massachusetts. ISSN 0017–8012. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
  171. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-91) Sukhadeve, Ashish (February 9, 2021). “Council Post: Artificial Intelligence For Good: How AI Is Helping Humanity”. Forbes. Archived from the original on May 9, 2023. Retrieved May 16, 2023.
  172. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-92) “Could AI advancements be a threat to your job security?”. Learning People. Archived from the original on May 9, 2023. Retrieved May 16, 2023.
  173. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-93) Zinkula, Jacob; Mok, Aaron (June 4, 2023). “ChatGPT may be coming for our jobs. Here are the 10 roles that AI is most likely to replace”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on May 9, 2023. Retrieved May 16, 2023.
  174. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-94) McKendrick, Joe (May 17, 2020). “No matter how sophisticated, artificial intelligence systems still need human oversight”. ZDNET. Archived from the original on May 10, 2023. Retrieved May 16, 2023.
  175. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-95) Hammond, George (December 27, 2023). “Big Tech is spending more than VC firms on AI startups”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on January 10, 2024.
  176. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-96) Wong, Matteo (October 24, 2023). “The Future of AI Is GOMA”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on January 5, 2024.
  177. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-97) “Big tech and the pursuit of AI dominance”. The Economist. March 26, 2023. Archived from the original on December 29, 2023.
  178. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-98) Fung, Brian (December 19, 2023). “Where the battle to dominate AI may be won”. CNN Business. Archived from the original on January 13, 2024.
  179. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-99) Metz, Cade (July 5, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. The New York Times.
  180. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-100) Steiner, Christopher. “Companies With Most AI Patents”. Index42. Retrieved November 8, 2024.
  181. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-101) Kafka, Peter (February 1, 2023). “The AI boom is here, and so are the lawsuits”. Vox. Archived from the original on May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  182. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-102) Broersma, Matthew (March 12, 2024). “Nvidia Sued By Authors For Training AI With Copyrighted Works”. Silicon UK.
  183. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-103) “Sarah Silverman and novelists sue ChatGPT-maker OpenAI for ingesting their books”. AP News. July 12, 2023.
  184. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-104) Morales, James (January 3, 2024). “Journalism Fights Back”. CCN.com.
  185. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-105) Smirke, Richard (December 17, 2024). “Music Biz Calls for ‘Robust’ Action as U.K. Government Begins Consultation on AI Regulations”. Billboard. Penske Media Corporation. Retrieved February 25, 2025.
  186. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-106) Glynn, Paul (February 25, 2025). “Artists Release Silent Album in Protest Against AI Using Their Work”. BBC. Retrieved February 25, 2025.
  187. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-107) Verma, Pranshu (December 18, 2023). “The rise of AI fake news is creating a ‘misinformation superspreader’”. Washington Post. Washington, D.C. ISSN 0190–8286. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
  188. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-:13_108-0) Peters, Mitchell (April 20, 2024). “Drake Takes Aim at Kendrick Lamar With AI Tupac & Snoop Dogg Vocals on ‘Taylor Made Freestyle’ Diss Track”. Billboard. Archived from the original on April 23, 2024. Retrieved April 24, 2024.
  189. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-:14_109-0) Donahue, Bill (April 24, 2024). “Tupac Shakur’s Estate Threatens to Sue Drake Over Diss Track Featuring AI-Generated Tupac Voice”. Billboard. Archived from the original on April 24, 2024. Retrieved April 25, 2024.
  190. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-110) OpenAi (May 14, 2024). Live demo of GPT4-o voice variation. Retrieved May 21, 2024 — via YouTube.
  191. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-111) Tong, Anna; Sriram, Akash (May 15, 2024). “OpenAI unveils new AI model as competition heats up”. Reuters. Retrieved May 21, 2024.
  192. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-112) @BobbyAllyn (May 20, 2024). “Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI situation. Wow” (Tweet) — via Twitter.
  193. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-113) Knight, Will (May 20, 2024). “Scarlett Johansson Says OpenAI Ripped Off Her Voice for ChatGPT”. Wired. Retrieved May 21, 2024.
  194. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-114) Gin, Gina (June 17, 2024). “Scarlett Johansson and Sam Altman Revisited: “Sky” is the Limit”. The Servitor. Retrieved September 3, 2024.
  195. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-115) Charlebois, Brieanna (February 3, 2024). “AI makes deepfake pornography more accessible, as Canadian laws play catch-up”. CBC News. Archived from the original on March 10, 2024. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
  196. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-116) “Liberals intend to include sexually explicit deepfakes under online harms bill”. CTVNews. February 7, 2024. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
  197. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-117) “AOC’s Plan to End Deepfake Porn”. Yahoo News. March 5, 2024. Retrieved March 11, 2024.
  198. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-118) “AI Tools Directory & List Of Best Free AI By Category”. aiboomlist.com. Retrieved November 24, 2024.
  199. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-119) Milmo, Dan (July 2, 2024). “Google’s emissions climb nearly 50% in five years due to AI energy demand”. The Guardian.
  200. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-120) Ortiz, Sabrina (November 9, 2023). “Watch out: Generative AI will level up cyber attacks, according to new Google report”. ZDNET. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
  201. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-121) Sankaran, Vishwam (September 7, 2023). “AI can help generate synthetic viruses and spark pandemics, warns ex-Google executive”. The Independent. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
  202. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-122) Piper, Kelsey (June 21, 2023). “How AI could spark the next pandemic”. Vox. Retrieved March 23, 2024.
  203. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-:0_123-0) Chow, Andrew R.; Perrigo, Billy (February 17, 2023). “The AI Arms Race Is Changing Everything”. Time.
  204. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-124) “A Race to Extinction: How Great Power Competition Is Making Artificial Intelligence Existentially Dangerous”. Harvard International Review. September 8, 2023. Retrieved March 23, 2024.
  205. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-:4_125-0) “Avoiding Extreme Global Vulnerability as a Core AI Governance Problem”. AI Safety Fundamentals. BlueDot Impact. November 8, 2022. Archived from the original on January 16, 2024. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
  206. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-126) Kateman, Brian (July 24, 2023). “AI Should Be Terrified of Humans”. Time. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
  207. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-127) Akst, Daniel (April 10, 2023). “Should Robots With Artificial Intelligence Have Moral or Legal Rights?”. The Wall Street Journal.
  208. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_boom#cite_ref-128) Roose, Kevin (May 30, 2023). “A.I. Poses ‘Risk of Extinction,’ Industry Leaders Warn”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362–4331. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
  209. Brown, Tom B.; Mann, Benjamin; Ryder, Nick; Subbiah, Melanie; Kaplan, Jared; Dhariwal, Prafulla; Neelakantan, Arvind; Shyam, Pranav; Sastry, Girish; Askell, Amanda; Agarwal, Sandhini; Herbert-Voss, Ariel; Krueger, Gretchen; Henighan, Tom; Child, Rewon; Ramesh, Aditya; Ziegler, Daniel M.; Wu, Jeffrey; Winter, Clemens; Hesse, Christopher; Chen, Mark; Sigler, Eric; Litwin, Mateusz; Gray, Scott; Chess, Benjamin; Clark, Jack; Berner, Christopher; McCandlish, Sam; Radford, Alec; Sutskever, Ilya; Amodei, Dario (May 28, 2020). “Language Models are Few-Shot Learners”. arXiv:2005.14165 [cs.CL].
  210. ^ Jump up to:a b c Radford, Alec; Narasimhan, Karthik; Salimans, Tim; Sutskever, Ilya (June 11, 2018). “Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training” (PDF). p. 12. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 26, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2020.
  211. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-2018_Attention_Paper_3-0) Vaswani, Ashish; Shazeer, Noam; Parmar, Niki; Uszkoreit, Jakob; Jones, Llion; Gomez, Aidan N; Kaiser, Łukasz; Polosukhin, Illia (2017). “Attention is All you Need” (PDF). Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 30. Curran Associates, Inc.
  212. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-jointly_4-0) Bahdanau, Dzmitry; Cho, Kyunghyun; Bengio, Yoshua (September 1, 2014). “Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate”. arXiv:1409.0473 [cs.CL].
  213. ^ Jump up to:a b Hao, Karen (September 23, 2020). “OpenAI is giving Microsoft exclusive access to its GPT-3 language model”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on February 5, 2021. Retrieved September 25, 2020. The companies say OpenAI will continue to offer its public-facing API, which allows chosen users to send text to GPT-3 or OpenAI’s other models and receive its output. Only Microsoft, however, will have access to GPT-3’s underlying code, allowing it to embed, repurpose, and modify the model as it pleases.
  214. ^ Jump up to:a b “An understanding of AI’s limitations is starting to sink in”. The Economist. June 11, 2020. ISSN 0013–0613. Archived from the original on July 31, 2020. Retrieved July 31, 2020.
  215. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-Polosukhin_2017_7-0) Polosukhin, Illia; Kaiser, Lukasz; Gomez, Aidan N.; Jones, Llion; Uszkoreit, Jakob; Parmar, Niki; Shazeer, Noam; Vaswani, Ashish (June 12, 2017). “Attention Is All You Need”. arXiv:1706.03762 [cs.CL].
  216. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-thomsonreuters_nd_8-0) “Natural Language Processing”. Archived from the original on August 22, 2020. Retrieved July 31, 2020.
  217. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-9) “Archived copy” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on February 6, 2021. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  218. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-Wired_Sterling_20200213_10-0) Sterling, Bruce (February 13, 2020). “Web Semantics: Microsoft Project Turing introduces Turing Natural Language Generation (T-NLG)”. Wired. ISSN 1059–1028. Archived from the original on November 4, 2020. Retrieved July 31, 2020.
  219. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-pedagogy_11-0) Marche, Stephen (December 6, 2022). “The College Essay Is Dead”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on January 24, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2022.
  220. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Sagar, Ram (June 3, 2020). “OpenAI Releases GPT-3, The Largest Model So Far”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the original on August 4, 2020. Retrieved July 31, 2020.
  221. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-gpt2-with-quote_13-0) “Language Models are Unsupervised Multitask Learners” (PDF). openai.com. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 12, 2019. Retrieved December 4, 2019. GPT-2, is a 1.5B parameter Transformer
  222. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-CNBC_Shead_20200723_14-0) Shead, Sam (July 23, 2020). “Why everyone is talking about the A.I. text generator released by an Elon Musk-backed lab”. CNBC. Archived from the original on July 30, 2020. Retrieved July 31, 2020. Four preprints were released between May 28 and July 22, 2020.
  223. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-ZDNet_Tiernan_20200601_15-0) Ray, Tiernan (June 1, 2020). “OpenAI’s gigantic GPT-3 hints at the limits of language models for AI”. ZDNet. Archived from the original on June 1, 2020. Retrieved July 31, 2020.
  224. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-lambdalabs_16-0) Li, Chuan (June 3, 2020), OpenAI’s GPT-3 Language Model: A Technical Overview, archived from the original on March 27, 2023, retrieved March 27, 2023
  225. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-17) Gehman, Samuel; Gururangan, Suchin; Sap, Maarten; Choi, Yejin; Smith, Noah A. (November 16–20, 2020), REALTOXICITYPROMPTS: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Models, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 3356–3369, arXiv:2009.11462
  226. ^ Jump up to:a b “OpenAI API”. OpenAI. June 11, 2020. Archived from the original on June 11, 2020. Retrieved July 31, 2020.
  227. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-techcrunch_20200601_19-0) Coldewey, Devin (June 11, 2020). “OpenAI makes an all-purpose API for its text-based AI capabilities”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on October 27, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2020. If you’ve ever wanted to try out OpenAI’s vaunted machine learning toolset, it just got a lot easier. The company has released an API that lets developers call its AI tools in on “virtually any English language task.”
  228. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-Arram_20200709_20-0) Arram (July 9, 2020). “GPT-3: An AI that’s eerily good at writing almost anything”. Arram Sabeti. Archived from the original on July 20, 2020. Retrieved July 31, 2020.
  229. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-21) “OpenAI’s API Now Available with No Waitlist”. OpenAI. November 18, 2021. Archived from the original on November 5, 2022. Retrieved November 5, 2022.
  230. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-22) “OpenAI API”. beta.openai.com. Archived from the original on December 23, 2022. Retrieved November 5, 2022.
  231. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-23) “Aligning Language Models to Follow Instructions”. OpenAI. January 27, 2022. Archived from the original on November 5, 2022. Retrieved November 5, 2022.
  232. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-Thunstr%C3%B6m_2022_24-0) Thunström, Almira Osmanovic (June 30, 2022). “We Asked GPT-3 to Write an Academic Paper about Itself — Then We Tried to Get It Published”. Scientific American. Archived from the original on June 30, 2022. Retrieved June 30, 2022.
  233. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-Transformer_Thunstr%C3%B6m_Steingrimsson_2022_25-0) Transformer, Gpt Generative Pretrained; Thunström, Almira Osmanovic; Steingrimsson, Steinn (June 21, 2022). “Can GPT-3 write an academic paper on itself, with minimal human input?”. Archive ouverte HAL (in French). Archived from the original on June 30, 2022. Retrieved June 30, 2022.
  234. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-26) Gao, Leo (May 24, 2021). “On the Sizes of OpenAI API Models”. EleutherAI Blog. EleutherAI. Retrieved November 23, 2023.
  235. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-27) “Model index for researchers”. OpenAI. Retrieved November 23, 2023.
  236. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-28) “New GPT-3 Capabilities: Edit & Insert”. OpenAI. March 15, 2022. Archived from the original on January 13, 2023. Retrieved January 13, 2023.
  237. ^ Jump up to:a b “OpenAI API”. platform.openai.com. Archived from the original on March 20, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  238. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-30) “Check out OpenAI’s new text-davinci-003! Same underlying model as text-davinci-002 but more aligned. Would love to hear feedback about it! / Twitter”. Archived from the original on March 15, 2023. Retrieved May 6, 2023.
  239. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-31) “ChatGPT: Optimizing Language Models for Dialogue”. OpenAI. November 30, 2022. Archived from the original on November 30, 2022. Retrieved January 13, 2023.
  240. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-32) “OpenAI API”. Archived from the original on March 17, 2023. Retrieved May 6, 2023.
  241. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-33) “OpenAI API”. Archived from the original on May 6, 2023. Retrieved May 6, 2023.
  242. ^ Jump up to:a b c tingetici (April 10, 2023). “Default (GPT-3.5) with browsing ALPHA — NEW Model showed up just now”. r/OpenAI. Archived from the original on April 27, 2023. Retrieved April 27, 2023.
  243. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-:1_35-0) “Introducing GPT-3.5 Series: text-davinci-002 and code-davinci-002 Models”. OPEN AI. March 15, 2022. Archived from the original on March 20, 2023. Retrieved April 27, 2023.
  244. ^ Jump up to:a b “GPT-3.5 with Browsing (ALPHA) Now Available for GPT Plus Users”. OPEN AI. April 27, 2023. Archived from the original on March 20, 2023. Retrieved April 27, 2023.
  245. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-37) Gilson A, Safranek CW, Huang T, Socrates V, Chi L, Taylor RA, Chartash D (February 2023). “How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment”. JMIR Med Educ. 9: e45312. doi:10.2196/45312. PMC 9947764. PMID 36753318.
  246. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-38) “OpenAI Codex”. OpenAI. August 10, 2021. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved December 23, 2022.
  247. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-39) Thompson, Clive (March 15, 2022). “How an AI Became My Code-Writing Genie”. Wired. Archived from the original on December 23, 2022. Retrieved December 23, 2022.
  248. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-40) “Microsoft announced its first customer product features powered by GPT-3 and @Azure”. The AI Blog. May 25, 2021. Archived from the original on May 26, 2021. Retrieved May 26, 2021.
  249. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-41) Vincent, James (May 25, 2021). “Microsoft has built an AI-powered autocomplete for code using GPT-3”. The Verge. Archived from the original on December 23, 2022. Retrieved December 23, 2022.
  250. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-42) “CodexDB — SQL Processing Powered by GPT-3”. CodexDB — SQL Processing Powered by GPT-3. Archived from the original on December 7, 2022. Retrieved December 7, 2022.
  251. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-43) Fagone, Jason (July 23, 2021). “The Jessica Simulation: Love and loss in the age of A.I.” San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on July 28, 2021. Retrieved July 29, 2021.
  252. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-44) GPT-3 (September 8, 2020). “A robot wrote this entire article. Are you scared yet, human? | GPT-3”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261–3077. Archived from the original on September 8, 2020. Retrieved September 15, 2020.
  253. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-45) “Update: Language Models and Dragon”. Latitude blog. December 8, 2021. Archived from the original on April 25, 2022. Retrieved March 22, 2022.
  254. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-46) “This Mystical Book Was Co-Authored by a Disturbingly Realistic AI”. www.vice.com. 2022. Archived from the original on December 23, 2022. Retrieved December 23, 2022.
  255. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-47) GPT-3 (February 24, 2023). “38 Prompt Examples in 10 Different Categories | GPT-3”. GiPiTi Chat. Archived from the original on April 8, 2023. Retrieved February 24, 2023.
  256. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-48) “Can ChatGPT AI chatbot spot early stages of Alzheimer’s? — study”. The Jerusalem Post. 2022. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
  257. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-49) Agbavor, Felix; Liang, Hualou (December 22, 2022). “Predicting dementia from spontaneous speech using large language models”. PLOS Digital Health. 1 (12): e0000168. doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000168. PMC 9931366. PMID 36812634. S2CID 255029590.
  258. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-NYT_Farhad_20190515_50-0) Manjoo, Farhad (July 29, 2020). “How Do You Know a Human Wrote This?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362–4331. Archived from the original on October 29, 2020. Retrieved August 4, 2020.
  259. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-DailyNous_Weinberg_20200730_51-0) Weinberg, Justin, ed. (July 30, 2020). “Philosophers On GPT-3 (updated with replies by GPT-3)”. Daily Nous. Archived from the original on October 30, 2020. Retrieved July 31, 2020.
  260. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-DailyNous_Weinberg_Chalmer_20200730_52-0) Chalmers, David (July 30, 2020). Weinberg, Justin (ed.). “GPT-3 and General Intelligence”. Daily Nous. Philosophers On GPT-3 (updated with replies by GPT-3). Archived from the original on August 4, 2020. Retrieved August 4, 2020.
  261. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-Wired_Simonite_20200722_53-0) Simonite, Tom (July 22, 2020). “Did a Person Write This Headline, or a Machine?”. Wired. ISSN 1059–1028. Archived from the original on November 1, 2020. Retrieved July 31, 2020.
  262. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-NTR_20200730_54-0) Claypoole, Theodore (July 30, 2020). “New AI Tool GPT-3 Ascends to New Peaks, But Proves How Far We Still Need to Travel”. The National Law Review. Archived from the original on October 30, 2020. Retrieved August 4, 2020.
  263. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-55) Marcus, Gary (December 1, 2018). “The deepest problem with deep learning”. Medium. Archived from the original on August 1, 2019. Retrieved September 29, 2020.
  264. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-Marcus_Davis_2020_56-0) Marcus, Gary; Davis, Ernest (August 22, 2020). “GPT-3, Bloviator: OpenAI’s language generator has no idea what it’s talking about”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on August 23, 2020. Retrieved August 23, 2020.
  265. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-57) Metz, Cade (November 24, 2020). “Meet GPT-3. It Has Learned to Code (and Blog and Argue)”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362–4331. Archived from the original on December 6, 2020. Retrieved November 24, 2020.
  266. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-58) “Medical chatbot using OpenAI’s GPT-3 told a fake patient to kill themselves”. AI News. October 28, 2020. Archived from the original on January 10, 2021. Retrieved January 8, 2021.
  267. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-59) Chomsky on Terence McKenna, Sam Harris, GPT3, Cryptocurrencies, Kierkegaard, Neuralink, & Hofstadter. March 24, 2021. Event occurs at 1:11:44. Archived from the original on April 29, 2021. Retrieved April 29, 2021.
  268. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-60) Floridi, Luciano; Chiriatti, Massimo (November 1, 2020). “GPT‑3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences”. Minds and Machines. 30 (4): 681–694. doi:10.1007/s11023–020–09548–1. S2CID 228954221.
  269. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-61) Vincent, James (July 30, 2020). “OpenAI’s latest breakthrough is astonishingly powerful, but still fighting its flaws”. The Verge. Archived from the original on July 30, 2020. Retrieved November 9, 2022.
  270. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-62) Olanoff, Drew (December 11, 2015). “Artificial Intelligence Nonprofit OpenAI Launches With Backing From Elon Musk And Sam Altman”. Tech Crunch. Archived from the original on October 20, 2022. Retrieved May 31, 2021.
  271. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-63) Hao, Karen (August 29, 2019). “OpenAI has released the largest version yet of its fake-news-spewing AI”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on May 9, 2021. Retrieved May 31, 2021.
  272. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-64) Coldewey, Devin (March 11, 2019). “OpenAI shifts from nonprofit to ‘capped-profit’ to attract capital”. Tech Crunch. Archived from the original on January 4, 2023. Retrieved May 31, 2021.
  273. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-65) Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 3, 2021). On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?. FAccT ’21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. pp. 610–623. doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922.
  274. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-66) Mindzak, Michael; Eaton, Sarah Elaine. “Artificial intelligence is getting better at writing, and universities should worry about plagiarism”. The Conversation. Archived from the original on November 7, 2021. Retrieved November 6, 2021.
  275. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-67) Rogerson, Ann M.; McCarthy, Grace (December 2017). “Using Internet based paraphrasing tools: Original work, patchwriting or facilitated plagiarism?”. International Journal for Educational Integrity. 13 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1007/s40979–016–0013-y. ISSN 1833–2595. S2CID 9473217.
  276. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-68) Ver Meer, Dave. “ChatGPT Statistics”. NamePepper. Archived from the original on June 5, 2023. Retrieved June 21, 2023.
  277. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-69) Here are a few ways GPT-3 can go wrong. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on November 26, 2021. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  278. [^](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3#cite_ref-70) Comment Regarding Request for Comments on Intellectual Property Protection for Artificial Intelligence Innovation (PDF). USPTO. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 16, 2021. Retrieved November 30, 2021.

https://medium.com/the-generator/the-19-tell-tale-signs-an-article-was-written-by-ai-cf4ef7b4fe6d

https://medium.com/the-generator/31-ai-prompts-better-than-rewrite-b3268dfe1fa9

https://medium.com/the-generator/how-many-r-s-in-strawberry-how-to-get-more-accurate-responses-from-chatgpt-8f796a52eee6

https://medium.com/the-generator/how-employers-are-setting-traps-to-spot-ai-generated-job-applications-and-trip-them-up-7e9009bb34d4

https://generativeai.pub/why-delve-is-the-most-obvious-sign-of-ai-writing-fc4c72e74499

https://medium.com/@JimTheAIWhisperer/ai-prompt-hack-reveals-copilot-secret-dossier-4aabf36c11db

https://medium.com/prompt-prompts/copilot-ai-hidden-personality-profile-d2a7d48ebb1d

https://medium.com/the-generator/grok-3-system-prompt-71ee66cd6554

https://medium.com/prompt-prompts/1-prompt-that-combines-chatgpt-o3-mini-with-perplexity-deep-research-to-write-better-essays-2e5fda7cb4cc

https://generativeai.pub/how-does-perplexity-ais-deep-research-tool-actually-work-let-me-show-you-inside-its-system-prompt-790abf92862c

https://medium.com/the-generator/prompt-hacking-perplexity-ai-system-instructions-7aa6ee923060

https://medium.com/prompt-prompts/upscale-enhance-photos-with-chatgpt-prompts-for-free-b435a4199555

https://medium.com/ais-ancestors/how-the-dice-man-predicted-our-dependence-on-ai-2e1edac699ac

https://medium.com/the-generator/deepseek-hidden-china-political-bias-5d838bbf3ef9

https://medium.com/the-generator/how-do-ai-writing-detectors-actually-identify-ai-generated-text-and-which-free-tool-is-the-best-25debfcd77ea

https://generativeai.pub/how-many-rs-in-carry-forward-chatgpt-claude-and-copilot-all-fail-a-simple-letter-counting-test-1d74d5719fc6

https://medium.com/@JimTheAIWhisperer/mad-about-ai-writers-ruining-the-medium-partner-program-me-too-heres-how-to-spot-their-ai-slop-eca14fb38980

https://medium.com/the-generator/are-humans-smarter-than-ai-53bc79f7ff8d

https://medium.com/the-generator/why-ai-targets-vulnerable-users-b1425c94b9cb

https://medium.com/the-generator/why-ai-targets-vulnerable-users-b1425c94b9cb

https://medium.com/the-generator/science-confirms-ai-sneaks-prejudice-into-your-brain-7504d69454b5

https://generativeai.pub/ai-generated-christmas-movie-posters-2024-a0643edf30f2

https://medium.com/the-generator/apple-ai-hallucinates-luigi-mangione-dead-headline-fb9c3b186fbb

https://generativeai.pub/chatgpt-will-now-play-youtube-videos-in-chats-71536648bb5b

https://medium.com/design-bootcamp/ai-powered-trafficid-turns-visitors-into-sales-leads-8e828a9053aa

https://medium.com/the-generator/coca-cola-ai-generated-ads-backlash-a9ed7d321d50

https://generativeai.pub/how-to-spot-ai-writing-with-one-sentence-pattern-8aa5b3ec5a63

https://generativeai.pub/how-prompt-hacker-won-50k-from-freysa-ai-808ea6a3d42a

https://generativeai.pub/why-chatgpt-failed-so-spectacularly-at-predicting-the-us-election-and-why-ai-voted-kamala-harris-2442e13c8125

https://medium.com/@JimTheAIWhisperer/how-to-take-up-doomscrolling-as-a-full-time-hobby-f73d751ea06a

https://generativeai.pub/i-put-an-ai-in-charge-of-my-mental-health-for-a-week-heres-how-it-went-950b7802aaf7

https://generativeai.pub/10-signs-of-bad-ai-art-in-print-advertising-campaigns-ea34279a4125

https://medium.com/the-generator/how-to-use-context-manipulation-prompt-injection-to-bypass-content-restrictions-604c0bbaccab

https://generativeai.pub/ai-predicts-a-kamala-harris-victory-but-its-a-tight-one-inside-my-election-predictor-custom-gpt-3467f577b79e

https://medium.com/the-generator/making-llms-nonverbal-for-ai-consciousness-research-69b16f5ff006

https://medium.com/the-generator/my-surprising-discovery-expressing-hatred-of-ai-may-get-you-a-better-response-from-chatbots-f5c5b8239ef3

https://medium.com/the-generator/how-govgpt-nz-sets-ai-safeguard-standards-a666d3ac170b

https://medium.com/the-generator/prompt-hacking-mental-health-chatbot-reveals-ai-dangers-b6e66f0da5e7

https://generativeai.pub/how-to-prompt-hack-ai-chatbots-and-reveal-system-instructions-1206206d815b

https://generativeai.pub/13-things-to-fear-about-ai-598aba5b9dc0

https://generativeai.pub/gpt-o1-system-prompt-hack-reveals-jennifer-78458d3e692e

https://medium.com/@JimTheAIWhisperer/absolutely-lovely-39b3dfe2411d

https://medium.com/the-generator/how-to-make-chatgpt-solve-multi-hop-question-answering-tasks-9cfce6427886

https://generativeai.pub/does-prompt-injection-reveal-chatgpto1-system-prompts-and-guidelines-f4dcdf6548aa

https://medium.com/the-generator/how-to-hit-exact-word-count-with-chatgpt-592ab179af00

https://generativeai.pub/chatgpt-memory-activated-by-user-satisfaction-86aeac5d95cf

https://medium.com/the-generator/how-to-identify-ai-generated-how-to-spot-ai-guides-c2abb81652b2

https://generativeai.pub/why-strawberry-is-the-sweetest-name-openai-could-pick-for-artificial-general-intelligence-68340c4223f2

https://medium.com/the-generator/how-ai-upscaling-sparked-trumps-accusations-that-kamala-harris-rally-crowds-in-michigan-were-ai-generated-2de8497fbcf9

https://generativeai.pub/olympic-breakdancer-raygun-shatters-reality-and-enters-the-multiverse-with-the-help-of-ai-art-cec7c0b3be9f

https://medium.com/@JimTheAIWhisperer

Top comments (0)