DEV Community

Cover image for AI Won’t Replace Developers Anytime Soon—Here’s Why
Samuel Mutemi
Samuel Mutemi

Posted on

AI Won’t Replace Developers Anytime Soon—Here’s Why

(Critiques of the distant future, please consider the date of publication 😅)

The Promise (and Pitfalls) of AI-Generated Code

AI coding assistants like Cursor and Claude have been game-changers for developer productivity. They can scaffold entire applications, debug tricky issues, and even explain complex concepts in seconds. But can they fully replace software engineers?

Not yet—and here’s a funny (and frustrating) example of why.

The Case of the Broken Countdown Timer

I recently asked Cursor to generate a Next.js landing page with a countdown timer to my product launch. It did most of the work well—the UI looked great, the logic seemed sound, but when I tested it… the timer was stuck.

I alerted the AI, but instead of fixing the issue, it just:

  • Repeated the same code
  • Gave me a generic checklist (e.g., "Check if the date is correct")
  • Missed the glaring problem

Next, I pasted the code into Claude. It thought it was a hydration issue (a reasonable guess in Next.js) and tweaked the code—but the timer still didn’t work.

The Obvious Bug AI Missed

After some manual debugging (thankfully, I know JavaScript), I spotted the issue:

function getTimeLeft() {
  const launchDate = new Date(); // 🚨 Problem: This resets EVERY render!
  launchDate.setDate(launchDate.getDate() + 35); // 5 weeks from today
  const now = new Date();
  const diff = launchDate.getTime() - now.getTime();
  // ... rest of the logic
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The bug? launchDate was being recalculated on every render, meaning the countdown always showed 0 (since now and launchDate were effectively the same time).

The fix? **Make launchDate a static field (From what future date are we counting down?):

const LAUNCH_DATE = new Date("2025-06-01");

function getTimeLeft() {
  const now = new Date();
  const diff = LAUNCH_DATE.getTime() - now.getTime();
  // ... rest of the logic
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Why AI Still Needs Human Oversight

  1. AI Lacks Deep Context

    • It didn’t realize launchDate should be static.
    • It followed patterns but didn’t understand the intent.
  2. Debugging Requires Reasoning, Not Just Repetition

    • Both assistants gave plausible suggestions but didn’t diagnose the root cause.
  3. Trivial Mistakes Are Hard for AI to Spot

    • Humans recognize "obvious" errors faster because we think in terms of goals, not just syntax.

The Verdict: AI is a Powerful Assistant, Not a Replacement

AI has made incredible progress, but it still:

✔ Struggles with nuanced logic

✔ Misses simple but critical bugs

✔ Needs human guidance for real-world scenarios

So, developers, rest easy, your job is safe (for now). AI is a tool, not a replacement. And honestly? That’s a good thing.

Top comments (0)