Remember when Googling something was as natural as breathing?
I've been tracking my own behavior lately — and I noticed something uncomfortable: I haven't typed a query into Google in three days. Not because I forgot it exists. Because ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity just... answered faster.
And I'm not alone.
A recent shift is happening at infrastructure level. OpenAI's search traffic is growing faster than any search engine in history. Meanwhile, Google's click-through rates are quietly dropping as AI Overviews eat the top of every SERP.
The real question isn't "is Google dying?"
It's: what happens to the open web when nobody clicks through anymore?
- Publishers lose traffic → less incentive to produce original content
- AI trains on that content → quality degrades over time
- Users get worse answers → loop closes
Some call this the AI content collapse. Others call it evolution.
I write about this stuff at PublicTechNews.com — but I'm genuinely curious what developers think. You build for the web. Does this shift change how you think about SEO, discoverability, or even why you publish?
Drop your take below 👇
Top comments (1)
Maybe the future isn't Google vs AI.
Maybe it's:
Google = navigation
AI = information
I still use Google when I need a website.
I use AI when I need an answer.
If that's true, most SEO playbooks from the last decade become partially obsolete.
Are we preparing for that shift fast enough?