DEV Community

Cover image for State Management for Large Internal Tools: Redux, Context API, or Alternatives?
SHIBAM
SHIBAM

Posted on • Originally published at linkedin.com

State Management for Large Internal Tools: Redux, Context API, or Alternatives?

State Management for Large Internal Tools: Redux, Context API, or Alternatives?

Among the biggest challenges developers face while building large internal tool applications is state management. With the plethora of libraries/frameworks available, this can be quite daunting. In this blog we will dissect the three most widely-used state management strategies, Redux vs Context API vs Other solutions, and help you pick the best strategy for your application. This guide’s purpose is also to demystify state management whether you’re a developer or it’s less familiar territory for you.

What Is State Management?

State management is about how an app keeps track of its data and updates it when things change. Think of it as the app's memory, helping it remember what it needs to show or do at any given time.

In web apps, "state" is like a snapshot of the app’s current data that helps display the right information on the screen. For instance, in a tool for managing customer orders, the state might include:

  • Who’s logged in (current user session).
  • A list of all customer orders.
  • Results from a search filter (e.g., only showing "pending orders").

If you don’t have a clear way to manage this state, keeping everything updated and consistent across different parts of the app can become a mess—especially when the app gets bigger or more complex. That’s why using a good state management system is crucial.

Core Considerations for Choosing a State Management Tool

Before selecting a state management tool, evaluate these technical considerations:

  1. State Complexity: Assess whether your app’s state has simple structures or involves intricate relationships and interdependencies between components.
  2. Update Frequency: Determine how often state updates occur and whether real-time or high-frequency updates are required.
  3. Team Expertise: Consider the team's proficiency with existing tools and libraries, such as Redux, Context API, or others, to minimize learning curves.
  4. Scalability: Ensure the chosen solution can accommodate potential growth in application size, data volume, and feature set.
  5. Performance Impact: Evaluate the importance of optimizing renders to avoid unnecessary re-renders and maintain high application performance.

These criteria help align the state management choice with the application's technical requirements and future scalability.

Context API

The Context API is a native feature of React and is often the first choice for smaller-scale applications. It allows you to share data across components without prop drilling (manually passing props through each level of the component tree).

Use:

  • Simple state sharing, such as theme toggles or user authentication.
  • Apps where state does not change frequently or is limited in scope.

Advantages

  • Native to React: No need to install additional libraries.
  • Lightweight and easy to implement.
  • Perfect for small to medium-sized apps.

Disadvantages

  • Not designed for high-frequency updates.
  • Performance issues arise when multiple components depend on the same context.

Example Code

import React, { createContext, useContext, useState } from 'react';

// Create a context  
const UserContext \= createContext();

function App() {  
  const \[user, setUser\] \= useState({ name: 'John Doe', role: 'Admin' });
  return (  
    \<UserContext.Provider value={{ user, setUser }}\>  
      \<Dashboard /\>  
    \</UserContext.Provider\>  
  );  
}

function Dashboard() {  
  const { user } \= useContext(UserContext);  
  return \<h1\>Welcome, {user.name}\!\</h1\>;  
}

export default App;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Explanation:

  • createContext: This creates a Context object, UserContext, which allows you to pass data through the component tree without explicitly passing props to each level.
  • App component:
    • useState is used to manage the user state (name and role).
    • The UserContext.Provider component wraps the child component Dashboard and provides user and setUser as the value. This means any child component inside Provider can access this data.
  • Dashboard component:
    • useContext(UserContext) is used to access the user data from the UserContext and display the user's name.

This setup allows you to share the user state across different components in the app without prop drilling, especially useful when the app grows.

Redux

Redux is a powerful state management library commonly used in larger, more complex applications. It uses a centralized store to manage state across the entire app.

Use

  • Large-scale apps with complex state interdependencies.
  • High-frequency state updates, such as real-time data syncing.
  • Applications requiring a predictable state container.

Advantages

  • Centralized state management.
  • Strong debugging tools via Redux DevTools.
  • Predictable state updates due to strict rules.

Disadvantages

  • Boilerplate-heavy: Redux can be verbose, especially for newcomers.
  • Overkill for simple applications.

Example Code

// Install Redux dependencies: npm install @reduxjs/toolkit react-redux  
import { configureStore, createSlice } from '@reduxjs/toolkit';  
import { Provider, useSelector, useDispatch } from 'react-redux';

// Create a slice  
const userSlice \= createSlice({  
  name: 'user',  
  initialState: { name: 'John Doe', role: 'Admin' },  
  reducers: {  
    setUser: (state, action) \=\> {  
      state.name \= action.payload.name;  
      state.role \= action.payload.role;  
    },  
  },  
});

const store \= configureStore({ reducer: { user: userSlice.reducer } });  
const { setUser } \= userSlice.actions;

function App() {  
  return (  
    \<Provider store={store}\>  
      \<Dashboard /\>  
    \</Provider\>  
  );  
}

function Dashboard() {  
  const user \= useSelector((state) \=\> state.user);  
  const dispatch \= useDispatch();

  return (  
    \<div\>  
      \<h1\>Welcome, {user.name}\!\</h1\>  
      \<button onClick={() \=\> dispatch(setUser({ name: 'Jane Doe', role: 'User' }))}\>  
        Change User  
      \</button\>  
    \</div\>  
  );  
}

export default App;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Explanation:

  • createSlice: This function from Redux Toolkit creates a "slice" of the state. In this case, the slice is named user and contains the initial state with a name and role, as well as a setUser action to modify that state.
  • configureStore: This sets up the Redux store, and the user slice reducer is added to the store.
  • Provider: The Provider component is used to pass the Redux store to the rest of the app. This makes the store available to all components that are wrapped in the Provider.
  • useSelector: This hook is used to access the current user state from the Redux store. It listens to the store and re-renders the component whenever the state changes.
  • useDispatch: This hook is used to dispatch actions to modify the Redux state. In this example, when the button is clicked, it dispatches the setUser action to update the user's name and role.

In this setup, Redux manages global state and provides a way to dispatch actions that change state, which is particularly useful for larger applications with more complex state logic.

Alternatives

Beyond Context API and Redux, several other state management libraries and patterns are worth considering:

Zustand

Zustand is a lightweight state management library with a simpler API compared to Redux. It’s well-suited for both small and medium-scale apps.

Example Code


import create from 'zustand';

const useStore \= create((set) \=\> ({  
  user: { name: 'John Doe', role: 'Admin' },  
  setUser: (user) \=\> set({ user }),  
}));

function App() {  
  const { user, setUser } \= useStore();  
  return (  
    \<div\>  
      \<h1\>Welcome, {user.name}\!\</h1\>  
      \<button onClick={() \=\> setUser({ name: 'Jane Doe', role: 'User' })}\>  
        Change User  
      \</button\>  
    \</div\>  
  );  
}
export default App;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

MobX

MobX simplifies state management by leveraging observable objects. It’s great for apps with complex UIs that need automatic updates.

Recoil

Recoil provides fine-grained state management and is designed for React. It allows you to manage independent pieces of state (atoms) and derive computed state (selectors).


Choosing the Right Tool

Here’s a quick summary to guide your decision:

Feature Context API Redux Alternatives (Zustand, MobX, etc.)
Best For Simple apps Large, complex apps Small-to-medium apps
Setup Complexity Low High Low to Medium
Performance for High Updates Moderate Excellent Excellent
Boilerplate Minimal High Minimal to Medium

Conclusion

Building scalable internal tools requires state management, which is a major challenge. Context API is recommended for small apps where as Redux is used for large apps with too many states and its need to be communicated with each other. Solutions like Zustand or MobX offer a middle-ground solution, targeting flexibility with a short learning curve.

We can have confidence in the decision we made on state management strategy for our application when — we understand how our application manages states and the strengths of each of the tools.

Top comments (0)

👋 Kindness is contagious

If this article connected with you, consider tapping ❤️ or leaving a brief comment to share your thoughts!

Okay