When a SaaS company wakes up to an active security incident, there’s no luxury of time, only the quality of your first moves; the approach below draws on field-tested practices and perspectives such as this overview on AI-assisted breach response to help you act fast, stay honest, and limit blast radius while preserving evidence for forensics and regulators.
Hour 0–1: Detection Without Denial
The first hour decides the next hundred. Declare an incident the moment your signals cross a known threshold—ambiguous data is normal; indecision is fatal. Stand up an incident channel, page a small triage team, assign a single incident commander, and start a plain-English timeline (UTC). Your goal isn’t to be perfect; it’s to be coherent and reversible.
AI earns its place right away by accelerating signal triage. Large log sets are a maze; pattern-matching models can cluster correlated spikes, surface unusual token usage, and help differentiate noisy automation from targeted behavior. Treat AI as a second pair of eyes, not an oracle: its summaries can structure your search space, but your controls and evidence must drive decisions.
At this stage you decide severity and scope: affected tenants, data classes, identities, and infrastructure edges. If you’re not sure, pick the conservative option—over-scope early, then prune with facts. Meanwhile, begin evidence capture on the most perishable traces (volatile memory, ephemeral containers, hot logs with short retention).
Hour 1–4: Contain While Preserving Evidence
Containment is a scalpel, not a sledgehammer. Kill attacker paths, not your business. Rate-limit or geofence suspicious routes, rotate exposed keys, invalidate sessions for impacted tenants, and enable stricter WAF rules that you’ve pre-tested in shadow mode. Avoid irreversible changes until you snapshot what matters.
- Essential telemetry to capture in the first hour: gateway/WAF request IDs, authentication and token issuance logs, IAM change history, container images and hashes, database audit trails, outbound DNS and egress metadata, build pipeline activity, and any artifact involved in hotfixes (including who pushed them and when).
Use AI as a forensic accelerant: generate candidate timelines out of log fragments, translate arcane service events into plain English for stakeholders, and enrich indicators of compromise with context from threat intel. But keep the chain of custody clean: store model prompts/outputs alongside the raw data they summarize, and never let an LLM be the sole source of truth for attribution or impact.
Hour 4–12: Investigate Like Scientists
Now you’re past firefighting and into root cause. Enumerate hypotheses openly: compromised CI secrets, deserialization bug in an edge service, S3 pre-signed URL misuse, OAuth misuse, or a malicious dependency. Evaluate each with disconfirming tests. If your org practices reliability engineering, hook your flow into incident roles and handoffs aligned with Google’s SRE incident management principles. The rigor translates well: one commander, clear comms, continuous status timestamps, and a focus on user impact.
AI’s best role here is scope modeling. For example, feed it structured slices (redacted) of identity logs and change histories; ask for a graph of principal → permission → resource traversals observed during the window. You’ll catch lateral movement patterns humans overlook under fatigue. Also consider anomaly detection on secrets usage (new regions, off-hours, impossible travel).
Be paranoid about false certainty. If you can’t conclusively prove data access, message externally in terms of potential exposure and what you’re doing about it. If you do confirm access, switch immediately to data-class-specific playbooks (PII versus source code versus credentials).
Hour 12–24: Communicate With Clocks, Not Vibes
Trust evaporates when silence stretches. Publish time-boxed updates (e.g., every 2–4 hours) to customers and employees, even if the update is “no material change; containment holding; next at 16:00 UTC.” Share facts, actions, and next steps. Avoid speculating about attackers or motives. If regulators or contracts impose notification obligations, follow them precisely.
Anchor your phases to a canonical framework like NIST’s Computer Security Incident Handling Guide: preparation, detection & analysis, containment, eradication & recovery, and post-incident activity. Mapping your actions to these stages keeps teams aligned and reduces legal ambiguity later.
Inside the company, communicate asymmetrically: a crisp executive summary for leadership, a technical deep-dive for engineers, and a human-centric note for support and customer-facing teams. Keep all three synchronized to the same timeline.
After 24 Hours: Recovery You Can Defend
When you’re confident the threat actor is out and blast radius is measured, move from containment to eradication & hardening: rotate credentials at scale, re-image suspect workloads from known-good artifacts, re-sign packages, validate build provenance, and close any temporary compensating controls you introduced. Only then should you restore normal traffic levels.
Write the public post-mortem before the week ends, even if it’s versioned and redacted. Show what happened, what you fixed, and how customers can validate their own safety. Offer concrete follow-ups (e.g., tenant-level access logs for the incident period, webhooks for unusual login patterns). It’s not performative; it’s how you rebuild confidence.
A Minimal AI Stack for Breach-Day Readiness
You don’t need a research lab to put AI to work; you need guardrails and context.
Data products: Segment logs by sensitivity, apply deterministic redaction, and keep a sidecar store of prompt/response artifacts tied to the incident timeline. Use retrieval-augmented pipelines so models answer with your vocabulary (service names, alert codes, runbooks).
Workflows that matter: automatic IOC enrichment, identity anomaly scoring (e.g., sudden privilege escalations), log summarization with citations to raw events, and a timeline builder that ingests commits, tickets, alerts, and chat messages, producing a single, searchable sequence you can hand to legal or auditors.
Human in the loop: require analyst approval for any model-suggested control change; treat model outputs as hypotheses to test, not instructions to execute.
What “Good” Looks Like in 30 Days
You’ve closed the immediate incident when: customers have verifiable guidance, credentials are rotated, vulnerable components are patched, and external monitoring shows no recurrence. But you’ve learned when: alert thresholds reflect the real attack path, your CI/CD secrets are provably minimized, your token lifetimes are right-sized, your AI summaries are integrated into training, and your metrics moved.
Aim to track and improve:
Time to Detect (TTD) — how fast you saw the abnormal pattern.
Time to Contain (TTC) — how fast you cut off attacker paths.
Time to Clarity (TTCl) — how fast you could state impact in plain English.
Evidence Completeness — whether you could reconstruct the sequence without guesswork.
Customer Confidence — response rates to your updates and support queues returning to baseline.
Final Thought
AI won’t save a team that doesn’t practice; but a practiced team with AI can move like it trained for this day—which, if you run a SaaS at any meaningful scale, you have. Build your muscle memory, wire AI in where speed and pattern recognition matter, and keep your storytelling tight and truthful. The next 24 hours will arrive; decide today how you’ll meet them.
Top comments (0)