Tahmid Bin Taslim Rafi

Posted on Nov 25

Top AI-Powered IDEs for Vibe Coding in 2025

#webdev #programming #ai #vibecoding

Vibe coding, where developers use natural language to guide AI in generating, editing, and testing code, has exploded with agentic tools that handle complex tasks autonomously. Research suggests the leading options balance intuitive AI assistance with robust performance, though no single IDE dominates due to varying user needs and rapid advancements.

Cursor stands out for seamless agentic workflows, making it ideal for developers seeking a balance of speed and control in vibe coding.
Google Antigravity emerges as a strong contender for advanced agent orchestration, especially for those prioritizing free access and multi-model integration, but it may have minor glitches in early previews.
VS Code with GitHub Copilot remains a reliable foundation, offering broad extensibility for AI features, though it requires setup for full agentic capabilities.
Zed excels in performance and collaboration, appealing to teams needing fast, offline AI assistance.
Other notables like Windsurf, Tabnine, PearAI, Trae, and AWS Kiro provide specialized strengths, such as privacy-focused suggestions or structured vibe-to-production pipelines, with free tiers available in many cases.

Key Considerations for Choosing an IDE

When selecting a vibe code IDE, consider your workflow: Beginners might prefer Cursor's intuitive chat modes, while enterprises could lean toward Tabnine's secure, customizable agents. Pricing ranges from free (e.g., Antigravity preview, VS Code) to $40/month for premium features. Always test for compatibility with your languages and hardware, as performance varies.

Emerging Trends

The evidence leans toward agentic IDEs becoming standard, with tools like Antigravity and Kiro addressing "chaos" in casual vibe coding by adding structure. For more, explore official sites like cursor.com for Cursor or antigravity.google for Google's offering.

A Comprehensive Guide to Top Vibe Code IDEs: Comparing AI-Powered Editors in 2025

In the fast-evolving landscape of software development, "vibe coding" has become a buzzword synonymous with intuitive, AI-driven programming. This approach allows developers to describe ideas in natural language, letting AI agents handle the intricacies of code generation, debugging, testing, and deployment. By November 2025, vibe coding has shifted from a niche trend to a mainstream practice, fueled by advancements in large language models (LLMs) and agentic systems. Tools like Google's Antigravity and Cursor are often hailed as pioneers, enabling "flow-state" coding where human creativity meets AI execution.

This in-depth comparison draws from recent reviews, official documentation, and community discussions on platforms like X (formerly Twitter). We'll evaluate nine leading IDEs: Visual Studio Code (with GitHub Copilot), Cursor, Google Antigravity, Zed, Windsurf (formerly associated with Codeium), Tabnine, PearAI, Trae, and AWS Kiro. Criteria include features, AI integration, performance, pricing, supported languages and environments, pros/cons, and suitability for vibe coding. While VS Code provides a solid baseline, newer agentic IDEs like Antigravity and Kiro push boundaries by automating entire workflows, though they introduce complexities like model dependency and occasional glitches.

Understanding Vibe Coding and Its Role in Modern Development

Vibe coding emphasizes casual, descriptive inputs over traditional syntax-heavy programming. For instance, a user might say, "Build a responsive webpage with a login form and test it in the browser," and the IDE's agents would plan, code, execute, and verify. Discussions on X highlight its appeal for rapid prototyping, with posts noting how tools like Antigravity enable "developer superpowers" by integrating browser control and artifact generation. However, critics point to potential "chaos" in unstructured vibe sessions, which IDEs like Kiro address through automated planning and checks.

This style suits solo developers, teams, and even non-coders entering tech, but it requires reliable AI to avoid errors. In 2025, most top IDEs support multiple LLMs (e.g., Gemini 3 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5), allowing flexibility. Community feedback suggests vibe coding boosts productivity by 30-50% in prototyping but demands verification for production code.

Detailed Comparisons of Top IDEs

1. Visual Studio Code (VS Code) with GitHub Copilot

VS Code, Microsoft's free, open-source editor, serves as the foundation for many AI-enhanced workflows. With GitHub Copilot, it transforms into a vibe coding powerhouse.

Features: Built-in Git support, customizable UI, remote development, multibuffer editing. Copilot adds autocomplete, code generation from comments, chat for explanations, and agent mode for multi-step tasks like refactoring or endpoint implementation.
AI Integration: Supports extensions like Copilot, Claude Code, and Gemini. Agent sessions handle codebase indexing, terminal commands, and cloud delegation for async tasks.
Performance: Lightweight and fast, with low latency; excels in large codebases via GPU acceleration.
Pricing: Free for VS Code; Copilot: Free for students/open-source, $10/month Individual, $19/user/month Business.
Supported Languages/IDEs: Nearly all languages; runs on macOS, Windows, Linux, and web (vscode.dev).
Pros/Cons: Pros: Vast ecosystem, reliable for enterprises; Cons: Requires extension setup for full agentic features, less "out-of-the-box" than dedicated AI IDEs.
Vibe Coding Suitability: Excellent entry point; natural language chats enable intuitive edits, though not as agent-focused as Cursor.

2. Cursor

Cursor, a fork of VS Code, is tailored for AI-first coding and often tops lists for vibe workflows.

Features: Three modes (Agent, Ask, Manual); chat interface, multi-file editing, bug identification, terminal autocompletion. Includes codebase embeddings for context recall and custom commands (e.g., code-review).
AI Integration: Delegates tasks to agents using models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, xAI; supports scoped changes and multi-line predictions.
Performance: Smooth and responsive, with rapid autocomplete; built for productivity in complex projects.
Pricing: 14-day Pro trial; Pro: $20/month; Business: $40/user/month; API key integration for custom models.
Supported Languages/IDEs: All major languages; macOS, Windows, Linux; integrates with Slack and mobile.
Pros/Cons: Pros: Clean interface, powerful for understanding codebases; Cons: Learning curve for modes, manual copy-paste in some setups.
Vibe Coding Suitability: High; agentic modes allow natural language delegation, making it a "game-changer" for flow-state coding.

3. Google Antigravity

Launched in late 2025, Antigravity is Google's agent-first IDE, built for Gemini 3 Pro and positioned as a "Cursor killer."

Features: Editor view for tab completions, Manager surface for agent orchestration, task delegation (e.g., feature writing, bug fixes), artifacts (screenshots, plans) for verification, knowledge base for learning.
AI Integration: Autonomous agents handle editor, terminal, browser tasks; supports Gemini 3 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-OSS.
Performance: Cross-platform; smooth for most, but early glitches in browser subagent noted.
Pricing: Free in public preview.
Supported Languages/IDEs: Broad support; macOS, Windows, Linux.
Pros/Cons: Pros: Free, superior models, elegant agent management; Cons: Some glitches, requires Google account.
Vibe Coding Suitability: Exceptional; enables "next-level" vibe coding with browser integration and verifiable outputs.

4. Zed

Zed focuses on speed and collaboration, integrating AI without vendor lock-in.

Features: Multiplayer editing, built-in terminal, Vim bindings, outline view, custom snippets, Markdown preview.
AI Integration: LLM support for code generation/transform/analysis; works with any agent, including local Ollama models.
Performance: Blazing-fast (Rust-based), offline-first, low latency.
Pricing: Free; paid APIs for premium models.
Supported Languages/IDEs: Via Language Server Protocol; macOS, Linux, Windows.
Pros/Cons: Pros: Exceptional speed, collaborative; Cons: Less feature-rich for non-AI tasks.
Vibe Coding Suitability: Strong for teams; context-aware AI aids intuitive editing.

5. Windsurf (Codeium IDE)

Windsurf, evolving from Codeium, offers "agentic" assistance in a VS Code fork.

Features: Cascade agent for scripts/iterations, AI Flows, live previews, MCP support, drag-and-drop images.
AI Integration: Modes (Write, Chat, Legacy); anticipates needs, runs tests.
Performance: Feature-rich but with a learning curve.
Pricing: Free with 2-week Pro; Pro: $15/month.
Supported Languages/IDEs: Major languages; JetBrains integration.
Pros/Cons: Pros: Advanced automation; Cons: Complex interface.
Vibe Coding Suitability: Ideal for synchronized workflows; "agentic" features enhance vibe sessions.

6. Tabnine

Tabnine emphasizes privacy and enterprise customization as an AI assistant.

Features: Code suggestions, test creation, explanations, fixes; Org-Native Agents for SDLC stages.
AI Integration: Context-aware with repository history; supports multiple LLMs.
Performance: Accurate in enterprise settings; secure deployments.
Pricing: Not specified; enterprise-focused.
Supported Languages/IDEs: Wide range, including VS Code, IntelliJ, Eclipse.
Pros/Cons: Pros: Privacy champion, adapts to styles; Cons: Less agentic than IDEs like Cursor.
Vibe Coding Suitability: Good for secure vibe inputs; fine-tuned models align with org standards.

7. PearAI

PearAI is a browser-friendly editor with deep context awareness.

Features: Router for best models, Agent for bug fixes, Creator for projects, Markdown/Jupyter support.
AI Integration: Modes for chat/write/refactor; collaborative intelligence.
Performance: Clean, zen-like; good for onboarding.
Pricing: Free trial; Pro: $15/month.
Supported Languages/IDEs: Broad; downloadable.
Pros/Cons: Pros: Privacy-focused, easy for juniors; Cons: Some features coming soon.
Vibe Coding Suitability: High; acts as an "intellectual collaborator" for natural language tasks.

8. Trae

Trae provides a distraction-free environment with analytical AI.

Features: Explains/refactors code, PR reviews, multi-file support, real-time previews.
AI Integration: Analytical partner for complex problems; handles complete statements.
Performance: Sophisticated but understated.
Pricing: Free.
Supported Languages/IDEs: Major languages.
Pros/Cons: Pros: Robust for research; Cons: Limited details available.
Vibe Coding Suitability: Solid; free AI for debugging and explanations.

9. AWS Kiro

Kiro targets structured vibe coding, moving prototypes to production.

Features: Prompt breakdown, auto-plans/blueprints, MCP support, agentic chat, code checks.
AI Integration: Agents for tasks; steering rules for behavior.
Performance: Reduces boilerplate; excels in team alignment.
Pricing: Free preview (50 interactions/month); Pro: $19/user/month (1,000); Pro+: $39 (3,000).
Supported Languages/IDEs: Broad; AWS ecosystem.
Pros/Cons: Pros: Ends "chaos"; Cons: Interaction limits in free tier.
Vibe Coding Suitability: Excellent for maturing vibe ideas; adds rigor to casual inputs.

Comparative Table: Key Metrics at a Glance

IDE	Pricing (Starting)	AI Focus (Agentic/Autocomplete)	Performance Highlights	Best For Vibe Coding?	Supported Platforms
VS Code + Copilot	Free / $10/mo	Both; multi-step agents	Lightweight, extensible	Entry-level intuition	All major OS
Cursor	$20/mo	High agentic; codebase recall	Responsive, multi-file	Flow-state delegation	macOS/Win/Linux
Antigravity	Free (preview)	Agent orchestration; browser	Smooth with glitches	Advanced automation	All major OS
Zed	Free	Flexible LLM integration	Ultra-fast, offline	Team collaboration	macOS/Linux/Win
Windsurf	$15/mo	Agentic flows; iterations	Feature-rich	Workflow synchronization	JetBrains+
Tabnine	Enterprise-varies	Context-aware suggestions	Secure, accurate	Privacy-sensitive	Multiple IDEs
PearAI	$15/mo	Collaborative agents	Clean, context-deep	Onboarding juniors	Downloadable
Trae	Free	Analytical refactoring	Distraction-free	Research-oriented	Broad
Kiro	Free / $19/mo	Structured prompts; checks	Reduces debt	Prototype to prod	AWS-integrated

Challenges and Future Outlook

While these IDEs empower vibe coding, challenges persist: Dependency on cloud models raises privacy concerns (addressed by Tabnine's air-gapped options), and glitches in new tools like Antigravity highlight preview-stage risks. Community sentiment on X leans positive, with users praising Antigravity for "vibe coding for real" but noting resource usage. Looking ahead, expect deeper on-chain integrations (e.g., InfinityG AI's Web3 vibe coding) and hybrid local-cloud models.

In summary, Cursor and Antigravity lead for pure vibe experiences, while VS Code offers versatility. Test multiple to find your fit—vibe coding's future is bright, but grounded in thoughtful tool selection.

DEV Community