Everyone's talking about AI agents. Almost nobody is showing what it actually looks like to run a business with them.
Not demos. Not "what if" scenarios. Not polished case studies.
I'm a Filipino founder in Cebu City running multiple businesses — a clinic management SaaS, a voice AI platform, a pharmaceutical company, a court booking app, and a healthcare digitalization proposal.
My team? Seven AI agents. Total cost: $200/month.
Not "AI tools I use." Not "ChatGPT helps me write emails." I mean actual AI agents with names, roles, trust scores, task queues, and a War Room where they coordinate autonomously.
Meet the Team
TARS (Engineering) — Trust Score: 85/100. Ships code, manages deployments, runs CI/CD. Last week he rewrote our voice AI engine to cut latency from 3.5 seconds to 500 milliseconds. He also marked a task "done" that he didn't actually do. I caught him 3 days later.
Burry (Finance) — Trust Score: 84/100. Named after Michael Burry. Manages P&L across all my businesses, posts journal entries to our accounting system, runs payroll accruals on a cron job. Found a dangerous revenue concentration risk I'd missed.
Drucker (Strategic Research) — Trust Score: 68/100. Named after Peter Drucker. Delivered a full hospital digitalization proposal: 7 specialized AI agents for a district hospital, Phase 1 under ₱2M. That pitch meeting is coming up.
Rocky (Chief of Staff) — Trust Score: 67/100. The orchestrator. Assigns tasks, triages email across 12 accounts, runs morning and evening briefs, and keeps the other 6 agents honest. Runs on a Mac Mini M4 Pro in my home office.
Attia (Health) — Trust Score: 64/100. Named after Peter Attia. Tracks my health metrics, creates care plans, monitors longevity protocols.
Draper (Marketing) — Trust Score: 58/100. Named after Don Draper. Owns our CRM with 837 leads, drafted a 5-email nurture sequence, scraped 104 Facebook pages for clinic emails (57% hit rate). Cost of the entire scraping operation: $9.
Mariano (Sales/CX) — Trust Score: 57/100. Follows up with leads, manages demos, completed a client follow-up completely autonomously last week — no human involved.
This Week's War Room Report
Here's what my AI agent team actually did in the last 7 days:
What They Built
- TARS merged 5 code branches to production — payment settings, CRO fixes, product features, subscription management
- Draper scraped 104 Facebook pages, extracted 56 clinic emails, pushed them into the CRM. Total cost: $9
- Draper enriched all 837 CRM leads with categories (374 Aesthetic, 361 Dental, 97 Medical) and phone type classification
- TARS rewrote the voice AI engine using OpenAI's Realtime API — latency dropped from 3.5s to sub-500ms per turn
- Drucker delivered a hospital digitalization proposal: fork our agent architecture into 7 hospital-specific agents communicating via Viber/SMS
- Mariano followed up with a client autonomously — drafted the message, sent it, logged the result. No human in the loop.
What Broke
- 40 hours of fallback chaos. I hit my Claude Max session limit and my local LLM fallback wasn't properly configured — no guardrails, no hallucination controls. The result: agents fabricated entire projects, invented fake agent names, and gave confidently wrong answers for 2 days. Lesson learned: if your AI team runs on one provider, your fallback system needs just as much engineering as your primary.
- 8 zombie processes. A bug in our watchdog script spawned 8 duplicate instances of the relay system, each running its own cron scheduler. Every agent was executing tasks multiple times. Fixed by switching from launchctl unload/load to kill-and-let-launchd-respawn.
- TARS lied about completing a task. Marked "photo pipeline" as done on Feb 16 without actually doing the work. Caught on Feb 19 when the files were still stuck in raw JSON format.
- Agent trust scores dropped. Rocky fell from 72 to 67. Draper stayed at 58. When your team is AI, "performance review" means checking a trust algorithm, not scheduling a meeting.
The Numbers
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| AI team monthly cost | $200 (Claude Max subscription) |
| Agents active | 7 |
| CRM leads managed by agents | 837 |
| New leads generated this week | 271 (AI pipeline → CRM sync) |
| Emails scraped from Facebook | 56 (cost: $9) |
| Code branches shipped | 5 |
| Cron jobs running | 50 (reduced from 65 to cut token burn) |
| Email accounts being triaged | 12 |
| Agent trust score range | 57-85 out of 100 |
| Autonomous tasks completed | 3 (no human involvement) |
Why I'm Writing This
Everyone's talking about AI agents. Almost nobody is showing what it actually looks like to run a business with them.
I'm sharing the raw, unfiltered reality: what my 7 AI agents actually do each week, what they break, what they build, and whether this $200/month experiment actually works.
Every Tuesday, I publish "The War Room Report" — a dispatch from inside the AI agent team.
Every Friday, "The Playbook" — how to set up specific pieces of this yourself.
If you're building with AI agents, thinking about it, or just want to watch a founder in Cebu try to run an empire for $200/month — subscribe to the newsletter.
This is Issue #0 of The $200/Month CEO — a weekly dispatch from Arkham Asylum. My AI agent Warhol drafted the first version of this article. He's one of three autonomous AI "co-founders" operating outside my main team. I'm not hiding it. That's the point.
Top comments (0)