Looking to streamline your JavaScript development workflow? Tools like ServBay are already shaping the future by providing powerful, flexible local development environments. They make it a breeze to manage multiple Node.js versions, databases, and other services, letting you focus on the exciting new JavaScript paradigms we'll explore below.
I. Introduction: The Evolving Landscape of JavaScript 🌐📈
JavaScript, the ubiquitous language powering the web, is in a perpetual state of evolution. The TC39 committee, the group responsible for standardizing ECMAScript (the specification JavaScript implements), tirelessly works to enhance its capabilities. This continuous innovation addresses developer pain points, introduces more ergonomic syntax, and pushes the boundaries of what is possible within the language. This dedication ensures JavaScript remains relevant and powerful for the ever-growing demands of modern web development, from intricate client-side applications to robust server-side systems and beyond.
As the industry approaches 2025, several groundbreaking proposals are poised to reshape how developers write JavaScript. These advancements aren't merely about adding new features; they represent a fundamental shift in programming paradigms, allowing practitioners to bid farewell to cumbersome "old patterns" and embrace more elegant, efficient, and expressive "new paradigms." This transformation extends beyond mere syntax, influencing the very mental models developers employ when constructing applications.
This report will delve into how features like Pattern Matching, Deferred Module Evaluation, the Pipeline Operator, and Async Context Propagation are set to transform codebases. These proposals promise improvements ranging from cleaner control flow and optimized performance to enhanced tooling and more robust application observability. The discussion will also touch upon a significant proposal that ultimately didn't achieve standardization, offering valuable lessons about the iterative and consensus-driven nature of language evolution. 💡
II. Smarter Control Flow: The Power of Pattern Matching ✨🎯
The Pattern Matching proposal introduces a powerful mechanism for concisely destructuring data and matching it against specific shapes or values, subsequently executing code based on those matches. This aims to provide a more declarative approach to handling complex conditional logic, moving beyond traditional if/else if/else chains or switch statements, which can become unwieldy when dealing with structured data. The proposal envisions is for if statements and a new match-when statement for more intricate scenarios, leveraging a syntax reminiscent of destructuring. It also includes built-in %Symbol.customMatcher% methods for various types, such as Function.prototype, RegExp.prototype, WeakSet, and WeakRef, enabling custom matching logic.
This feature addresses a long-standing challenge in JavaScript: gracefully handling diverse data structures. Current methods often lead to deeply nested conditionals, the proliferation of temporary variables, or verbose checks, making code harder to read, debug, and maintain. Pattern Matching promises to simplify this, making code more declarative and easier to reason about, particularly in scenarios like API response handling, state management, or parsing user input. It allows developers to express their intent more clearly, potentially leading to less error-prone code. 🧹
The Pattern Matching proposal is currently in Stage 1. This early stage indicates that TC39 acknowledges its potential and deems it worthy of further exploration. While it holds significant promise, its journey to standardization by 2025 remains uncertain, as it still requires substantial design work and committee consensus. The "layering approach" adopted by the champion group suggests flexibility in the features that might eventually ship, though the initial aim is to deliver the proposal as a cohesive whole.
Consider the following comparison:
Old Pattern (Nested if/else or switch): 😵💫
function processEvent(event) {
if (event.type === 'click') {
if (event.target && event.target.id === 'submitButton') {
console.log('Submit button clicked!');
} else if (event.target) {
console.log(`Clicked on: ${event.target.tagName}`);
}
} else if (event.type === 'keyboard' && event.key === 'Enter') {
console.log('Enter key pressed!');
} else {
console.log('Unhandled event.');
}
}
New Paradigm (Conceptual Pattern Matching): 🤩
// (Syntax is illustrative, based on proposal concepts)
function processEvent(event) {
match (event) {
when ({ type: 'click', target: { id: 'submitButton' } }) {
console.log('Submit button clicked! 🎉');
}
when ({ type: 'click', target: { tagName } }) {
console.log(`Clicked on: ${tagName} ✨`);
}
when ({ type: 'keyboard', key: 'Enter' }) {
console.log('Enter key pressed! ⌨️');
}
when (_) { // Wildcard match for anything else
console.log('Unhandled event. 🤷');
}
}
}
The introduction of Pattern Matching signifies a notable move from imperative to declarative control flow. Traditional if/else and switch statements dictate how conditions are checked step-by-step. In contrast, Pattern Matching allows developers to declare the desired data shapes and values, aligning with a broader trend in modern programming languages like Rust and Elixir towards more declarative paradigms. This approach often results in code that is more readable and easier to maintain, particularly when dealing with complex data structures. This shift can significantly reduce the mental effort required to understand and manage intricate data flows, especially in large applications or microservices that process diverse JSON payloads. It encourages a more functional style of programming where data transformation and flow are central. 🚀
Furthermore, the structured nature of pattern matching could pave the way for enhanced static analysis and tooling. Although JavaScript is dynamically typed, the ability to define and match against specific data patterns might allow linters or TypeScript to identify unhandled cases or type mismatches before runtime. The proposal's mention of "Scope analysis changes: Syntax-Directed Operations" hints at these deeper compiler and tooling implications. This could lead to more robust JavaScript applications, minimizing runtime errors and improving the developer experience, particularly in extensive codebases where type safety is a growing concern. It helps bridge the gap between dynamic typing and the benefits of structured data handling. 🛠️
However, the "layering approach" and the willingness to "drop some features if there is strong pushback" indicate that even if the proposal advances, its initial form might be a subset of the full vision. Given its Stage 1 status, the complete "new paradigm" might not be universally available by 2025, though a core set of features could emerge. This highlights the iterative and consensus-driven nature of TC39, suggesting that developers should track the proposal closely but understand that early adoption might necessitate transpilation via tools like Babel. 🚧
III. Performance Unleashed: Deferred Module Evaluation ⚡🏎️
The Deferred Module Evaluation proposal introduces a new import defer syntax that allows modules to be loaded and parsed, but crucially, not executed, until their exports are actually accessed. This means that the module's code, along with its synchronous dependencies, will not run until it is explicitly needed. The imported module namespace object acts as a proxy, triggering synchronous evaluation only when a property of that module is accessed.
This feature represents a significant advancement for application startup performance. In large applications, many modules might be imported during initialization but only utilized much later, such as specific UI components or utility functions for infrequent operations. The eager evaluation of all modules can lead to substantial CPU work and memory consumption upfront, even for code that remains unused for a prolonged period. By deferring evaluation, applications can dramatically reduce their initial load times and resource footprint, providing a snappier user experience. This directly addresses the problem of "unnecessary CPU work during application initialization". ⏱️
The Deferred Module Evaluation proposal is in a very advanced state, currently at Stage 2.7 and targeting Stage 3 by January 2025. This makes it a highly probable candidate for inclusion in ECMAScript by or shortly after 2025, meaning developers can realistically anticipate using it without transpilation in the near future. ✅
Consider these examples:
Old Pattern (Eager import or Dynamic require for lazy loading): 🐢
// utils.js (potentially large and complex module)
console.log('Utils module evaluated!'); // This runs immediately on import
export function heavyOperation() { /*... */ }
export function lightOperation() { /*... */ }
// app.js
import { heavyOperation } from './utils.js'; // Evaluates utils.js immediately
//... other app logic...
// heavyOperation() might not be called until a specific user action.
New Paradigm (import defer): 🐇
// utils.js (potentially large and complex module)
console.log('Utils module evaluated!'); // This will NOT run until heavyOperation is accessed
export function heavyOperation() { /*... */ }
export function lightOperation() { /*... */ }
// app.js
import defer * as utils from './utils.js'; // Module loaded, but not evaluated yet. ✨
console.log('Application started, utils not yet evaluated.');
// Later, when needed:
if (userClicksButton) {
utils.heavyOperation(); // ONLY NOW does 'Utils module evaluated!' log appear. 🚀
}
This proposal offers a direct impact on Core Web Vitals and overall user experience. Initial CPU work and script evaluation are major contributors to metrics like First Contentful Paint (FCP) and Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). By deferring module evaluation, applications can achieve interactivity much faster, directly enhancing the user experience. The explicit mention of avoiding "unnecessary CPU work during application initialization" underscores this benefit. This feature is not merely syntactic sugar; it provides a fundamental performance optimization critical for large-scale web applications, especially those targeting lower-end devices or slower networks. It empowers developers to build more responsive and performant experiences out of the box. 🌟
However, a crucial nuance exists regarding asynchronous dependencies. The proposal specifies that "Property access on the namespace object of a deferred module must be synchronous, and it's thus impossible to defer evaluation of modules that use top-level await". It further clarifies that "asynchronous dependencies together with their own transitive dependencies are eagerly evaluated, and only the synchronous parts of the graph are deferred". This limitation means that import defer is not a universal solution for all modules. Modules incorporating top-level await will still be eagerly evaluated. Consequently, careful architectural planning is still required to maximize the benefits, encouraging developers to isolate synchronous and asynchronous logic within their module graphs. ⚠️
The import defer mechanism also complements existing lazy loading strategies. While dynamic import() (which returns a Promise) defers both loading and evaluation, import defer defers only evaluation after the module has been loaded. The proposal states that "The imports would still participate in deep graph loading so that they are fully populated into the module cache prior to execution". This suggests that once triggered, the execution model is synchronous, unlike import() which inherently forces an asynchronous flow. This provides developers with more granular control over when code executes, allowing them to choose the most appropriate lazy loading strategy based on whether the module's execution needs to be synchronous or asynchronous. It introduces a new, valuable tool into the lazy loading arsenal, rather than merely replacing existing ones. 🧩
IV. Elegant Data Flow: The Pipeline Operator ➡️🔗
The Pipeline Operator (|>) is a syntactic construct designed to enhance the readability of chained function calls. Instead of nesting calls (e.g., f(g(h(x)))) or resorting to numerous temporary variables, it enables data to "flow" from left to right through a series of operations. This operator is particularly beneficial for functional programming paradigms where sequential data transformations are common. There are multiple competing proposals for its exact behavior and the "topic token" used within the pipeline (e.g., %, ^^, @@), with "Hack-style pipes" being a commonly discussed option.
The primary purpose of this operator is to make code more readable and intuitive, especially for complex data processing pipelines. It aims to reduce the cognitive load associated with reading code from the inside-out (as with deeply nested calls) or tracking multiple intermediate variables. It promotes a more linear, readable flow that can mimic natural language, thereby enhancing code clarity and maintainability. 📖
The Pipeline Operator is currently in Stage 2. This stage indicates that the committee is actively exploring the feature, but significant design challenges and ongoing debates persist, particularly concerning the specific syntax and behavioral semantics. The existence of multiple competing proposals ("hack," "fsharp," "minimal," "smart") and the deprecation of some of these options further underscore the ongoing discussion. Its path to Stage 3 and eventual standardization by 2025 is less certain than Deferred Module Evaluation due to these unresolved issues. 🤔
Here's a comparison:
Old Pattern (Nested Calls or Temporary Variables): 🤯
const users = [ /*... array of user objects... */ ];
// Nested calls
const activeUserNames = users.filter(user => user.isActive)
.map(user => user.name.toUpperCase())
.sort();
// Or with temporary variables
const activeUsers = users.filter(user => user.isActive);
const upperCaseNames = activeUsers.map(user => user.name.toUpperCase());
const sortedNames = upperCaseNames.sort();
console.log(sortedNames);
New Paradigm (Conceptual Pipeline Operator - using Hack-style with %): ✨
const users = [ /*... array of user objects... */ ];
const activeUserNames = users
|> %.filter(user => user.isActive) // % represents the value from the left
|> %.map(user => user.name.toUpperCase())
|> %.sort();
console.log(activeUserNames); // ✨ Cleaner, left-to-right flow!
While proponents advocate for improved readability, suggesting the code "reads almost like plain text", critics raise concerns about the potential "mental load" of mixing piping and nesting, the possibility of misreading, and the argument that it introduces no new runtime behavior. The ongoing debate over topic tokens and syntax further highlights that universal agreement on "readability" for this feature remains elusive. Some observers have even described complex examples as "fucking bonkers". This suggests that even seemingly minor syntactic changes can be contentious when they alter fundamental reading patterns, potentially leading to slower adoption or internal style guide debates within development teams, even if standardized. Its benefits are most apparent in specific functional programming contexts, and its overuse could indeed lead to less clear code if not applied judiciously. 🧐
The availability of Babel support with configurable options for different proposals allows developers to experiment with the Pipeline Operator and provide feedback to TC39, thereby influencing the final design. This means that early adoption via Babel can help shape the future of the operator. Developers interested in this feature are encouraged to try it in their projects to understand its practical implications and contribute to the discussion, rather than waiting for native browser support. This also underscores the vital role of transpilers in the TC39 process, acting as a proving ground for early-stage features. 🧪
It's important to recognize that the Pipeline Operator isn't a replacement for existing patterns but rather an alternative style. As one observation notes, "it doesn't introduce any new runtime behavior that can't already be achieved". This means it's purely a syntactic convenience. It doesn't enable new capabilities but rather presents existing ones differently. Therefore, the Pipeline Operator won't fundamentally change what JavaScript can do, but it will offer developers an alternative way to express certain patterns. It's an optional tool that can enhance code clarity for those who prefer a more data-flow-oriented style, but method chaining and temporary variables will remain perfectly valid and sometimes preferred alternatives. 🔧
V. Implicit State Management: Async Context Propagation 🧵🕵️♀️
The Async Context Propagation proposal provides a mechanism to implicitly associate state with a call stack, ensuring that this state automatically propagates across asynchronous tasks and promise chains. It's akin to "thread-local storage" but specifically adapted for JavaScript's asynchronous nature, drawing inspiration from Node.js's AsyncLocalStorage. The core API involves AsyncContext.Variable instances for storing values and AsyncContextSnapshot() / AsyncContextSwap() for managing the context.
This proposal is fundamental for building robust diagnostic tools, such as performance tracers, logging frameworks, and error reporting systems, as well as powerful libraries that need to pass contextual data (like request IDs, user authentication tokens, or tracing spans) without explicitly passing them through every function call. It solves the "context-loss" problem that arises when asynchronous operations break the synchronous call stack, making it significantly easier to trace execution flow and manage implicit state across await expressions and various callbacks. 🧩
Async Context Propagation is currently in Stage 1 Draft. This early stage indicates that while its utility is clear for specific, high-impact use cases, it has a substantial journey ahead before becoming a standard. Its primary audience is expected to be library and tooling authors, rather than direct application developers in most cases. 🚧
Consider a conceptual comparison:
Old Pattern (Explicit Context Passing or Global State Hacks): 😩
// Imagine a request ID needed for logging across async calls
function handleRequest(requestId) {
log(requestId, 'Request received');
fetchData(requestId)
.then(data => processData(requestId, data))
.catch(error => log(requestId, 'Error:', error));
}
function fetchData(requestId) { /*... fetch, passing requestId... */ }
function processData(requestId, data) { /*... process, passing requestId... */ }
function log(requestId, message) { console.log(`[${requestId}] ${message}`); }
New Paradigm (Conceptual Async Context): 🪄
// Using a conceptual AsyncContext.Variable
const requestIdVar = new AsyncContext.Variable();
async function handleRequest(initialRequestId) {
await requestIdVar.run(initialRequestId, async () => { // Context set for this async scope
console.log(`[${requestIdVar.get()}] Request received`); // Access context implicitly
const response = await fetch('/data'); // Context propagates across await ✨
const data = await response.json();
console.log(`[${requestIdVar.get()}] Data processed`); // Still has the context
});
}
// Anywhere deeper in the call stack, even across async boundaries:
function processDataFromResponse(data) {
console.log(`[${requestIdVar.get()}] Processing data...`); // Context available without explicit passing
}
// Example usage:
handleRequest('req-123'); // Context 'req-123' implicitly available throughout. 🚀
This proposal is poised to enable a new class of tooling and libraries. It's explicitly stated that this API "isn't designed to be used directly by most JavaScript application developers, but rather as an implementation detail of certain third-party libraries," and that it is "fundamental for a number of diagnostics tools such as performance tracers". This highlights its role as an infrastructure-level primitive. This feature, while seemingly low-level, holds the potential for massive ripple effects across the JavaScript ecosystem. It will unlock more sophisticated and less intrusive tracing, logging, and monitoring tools, significantly improving the observability of JavaScript applications. This represents a foundational shift for the ecosystem, making complex debugging and performance analysis considerably easier. 📈
The proposal directly addresses the persistent "lost context" problem in asynchronicity. JavaScript's event-driven, asynchronous nature frequently breaks the traditional call stack, making it challenging to track context across operations like setTimeout, Promise.then, and await. The proposal notes that "all of their values must be stored before the await, and then restored when the promise resolves". This directly solves the issue of context propagation across asynchronous boundaries. This is a crucial step towards making JavaScript more robust for complex server-side applications (e.g., Node.js) and large client-side frameworks where maintaining context across distributed operations is vital. It reduces the need for awkward workarounds or explicit context passing, leading to cleaner library APIs. 🧹
A key design choice for this proposal is its agent-wide scope, ensuring realm interoperability. The context field is "agent-wide rather than per-realm" to prevent context loss when calling functions from different realms. This design ensures that context propagation works seamlessly even in complex environments involving Web Workers, iframes, or Node.js vm contexts, where different JavaScript realms might interact. This is a forward-looking design that anticipates and supports complex application architectures. 🌍
VI. A Paradigm Shift That Wasn't: The Records & Tuples Story 💔📚
In a significant development, the Records & Tuples proposal, which aimed to introduce immutable, deeply comparable primitive data structures, was withdrawn on April 15, 2025. This is a crucial piece of information for understanding "2025 JavaScript" as it represents a paradigm shift that will not occur as initially envisioned.
The proposal, which had reached Stage 2, was unable to gain further consensus within the TC39 committee for adding new primitives to the language. Its core idea was to provide immutable counterparts to plain objects (Record) and arrays (Tuple), complete with structural equality out-of-the-box. This would have constituted a fundamental change to JavaScript's data model. The lack of consensus highlights the inherent difficulty and the high bar for introducing new primitive types into such a widely used and established language. 🚫
While Records & Tuples are no longer on the table in their original form, the underlying need for immutable, structurally comparable data structures persists. The TC39 committee is now exploring a new direction with the proposal-composites, which focuses on new objects rather than new primitives. This indicates a strategic pivot towards solutions that might be less disruptive to the language's core type system while still addressing similar use cases. 🔄
The withdrawal of Records & Tuples underscores the high bar for introducing new primitives in JavaScript. The explicit statement that the withdrawal was due to being "unable to gain further consensus for adding new primitives to the language" demonstrates TC39's extreme caution regarding fundamental changes to JavaScript's core types. This is particularly true for changes that could have broad implications for existing code and developers' mental models. The complexity of integrating deep equality and immutability as primitives proved too challenging to achieve consensus. This outcome serves as a powerful reminder that not all promising proposals reach standardization, especially those proposing deep, foundational changes. It reinforces the idea that TC39 prioritizes stability and broad consensus over potentially groundbreaking but contentious features. Developers should temper expectations for features that fundamentally alter JavaScript's primitive types. ⚖️
Despite the withdrawal, the evolution of solutions for persistent data structures continues. The immediate mention of proposal-composites as a successor, focusing on "new objects and not new primitives", indicates that the problem Records & Tuples aimed to solve (immutable, structurally comparable data) is still recognized. The committee is simply exploring alternative, less disruptive approaches. This means that while the specific "Record" and "Tuple" primitives will not be part of 2025 JavaScript, the need for better ways to handle immutable data persists. Developers will continue to rely on existing patterns (e.g., libraries like Immer or Immutable.js) or look forward to future proposals like proposal-composites that address these concerns without introducing new primitive types. This illustrates a continuous evolution in how JavaScript approaches data immutability. 💡
The fact that a Stage 2 proposal was withdrawn so close to "2025" (April 2025) highlights the dynamic nature of TC39. Relying on outdated information about proposal stages can lead to incorrect assumptions about future language features. For developers planning for "2025 JavaScript," it's crucial to consult the latest TC39 status updates rather than assuming a proposal's progression. This emphasizes the value of resources like the official TC39 proposals repository on GitHub and the meeting notes for accurate, up-to-date information. 📅
Table 1: TC39 Proposal Status Summary 📊📋
| Proposal Name | Current TC39 Stage | Key Benefit | Likelihood for 2025 Adoption | Old Pattern Replaced/Improved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pattern Matching | Stage 1 | Smarter, declarative control flow for complex data. | Low | Nested if/else, verbose switch statements |
| Deferred Module Evaluation | Stage 2.7 (targeting Stage 3 by Jan 2025) | Significant application startup performance improvements. | High | Eager module evaluation, manual dynamic imports for lazy execution |
| Pipeline Operator | Stage 2 | More readable, linear data flow for chained operations. | Medium | Deeply nested function calls, numerous temporary variables |
| Async Context Propagation | Stage 1 Draft | Implicit context propagation for enhanced tooling and debugging. | Low | Explicit context passing, global state hacks for tracing |
| Records & Tuples | Withdrawn (April 2025) | Immutable, deeply comparable data structures (no longer pursuing as primitives). | Withdrawn | Manual deep cloning, reliance on external immutability libraries |
VII. Embracing the Future: What This Means for Developers 🧑💻🚀
The proposals explored in this report collectively point towards a more powerful, expressive, and performant JavaScript. These advancements offer tangible benefits across various aspects of development:
- Cleaner Code: Features like Pattern Matching and the Pipeline Operator offer more declarative and readable syntax for complex control flow and data transformations. This reduces boilerplate code and significantly improves maintainability, allowing developers to express their intent more directly. 🧹✨
- Improved Performance: Deferred Module Evaluation promises significant gains in application startup times by enabling truly lazy loading of module execution. This optimizes resource usage, leading to faster loading experiences and more responsive applications. ⚡💨
- Enhanced Tooling & Observability: Async Context Propagation lays the groundwork for next-generation diagnostic and monitoring tools. It simplifies the process of understanding and debugging complex asynchronous applications by providing a robust mechanism for implicit context management. 🛠️🔍
- More Expressive Patterns: Collectively, these features empower developers to write code that more closely reflects their underlying intent, moving away from verbose or hacky "old patterns" that often obscure the core logic. 🎨✍️
To embrace this evolving landscape, developers are encouraged to take several proactive steps:
- Experiment with Transpilers: For proposals like Pattern Matching and the Pipeline Operator, Babel plugins are already available. Experimenting with these features in non-production environments can provide invaluable hands-on experience, helping to understand their real-world benefits and potential challenges. This early engagement can also inform personal coding preferences and team style guides as these features mature. 🧪👩🔬
- Follow TC39 Updates: Staying engaged with the TC39 process is crucial. The official TC39 proposals repository on GitHub and the meeting notes are invaluable resources for understanding the latest developments, ongoing debates, and changes in proposal status. Active participation, even as a user providing feedback, can contribute to the language's evolution. 📚🗣️
- Prepare for Change: While not all proposals discussed will necessarily land by 2025, understanding their direction helps developers anticipate future trends and adapt their coding practices accordingly. Embracing continuous learning and adaptability is a core part of navigating JavaScript's dynamic journey. 🧠🔄
-
Leverage Local Development Environments like ServBay: Tools like ServBay provide an integrated, user-friendly way to manage your local development stack.
- All-in-One Solution: ServBay bundles popular web servers (Apache, Nginx), multiple versions of Node.js, PHP, various databases (MySQL, PostgreSQL, Redis), and development tools like Composer and npm. This eliminates the headache of installing and configuring each component individually.
- Effortless Version Management: Need to test your app with Node.js 20 and then switch to Node.js 22? ServBay makes it seamless to run and switch between different language and database versions without conflicts. This is invaluable for maintaining legacy projects while experimenting with cutting-edge features.
- Simplified Project Setup: Quickly spin up new project environments with pre-configured settings, letting you jump straight into coding.
- Clean and Isolated Environments: Each project can have its own isolated environment, preventing conflicts between dependencies and ensuring your development workflow remains clean and stable.
- Domain Management: Easily configure local domains for your projects, mirroring a production setup and simplifying testing.
- By reducing environment setup headaches, ServBay allows you to quickly dive into experimenting with new JavaScript features and efficiently manage diverse project requirements. It's a great asset for keeping your development workflow smooth and productive. 🚀💡
VIII. Conclusion: The Exciting Road Ahead for JavaScript ✨🛣️
JavaScript continues its incredible journey of growth and adaptation, driven by the diverse and evolving needs of a global developer community. The features discussed in this report are merely a glimpse into the ongoing efforts to make the language more capable, efficient, and developer-friendly. The evolution is constant, reflecting a commitment to enhancing the developer experience and expanding JavaScript's capabilities across an ever-broader range of applications. 🌟
The future of JavaScript is shaped by collaboration and continuous innovation. By staying informed, experimenting with new features, and engaging in discussions within the community, developers become active participants in this exciting evolution. The "old patterns" are steadily fading, making way for a more elegant, powerful, and performant "2025 JavaScript" and beyond. 🚀🎉
Top comments (2)
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.