In today’s fast-evolving tech landscape, the debate between open source and closed source software continues to spark interest — and for good reason. Whether you're a developer, tech enthusiast, startup founder, or simply a curious user, understanding the difference between these two approaches is essential.
In this blog, we’ll explore what open source and closed source software really are, compare their pros and cons, and discuss notable examples — including the controversial case of OpenAI, which started as an open source initiative.
What is Open Source Software?
Open source software (OSS) is software whose source code is made available to the public. Anyone can inspect, modify, and enhance it. This model promotes transparency, collaboration, and community-driven development so which is why it attracts many programmers around the world to an open-source project.
Examples include:
- Linux – the foundation of many operating systems and servers.
- VS Code – a free, powerful code editor maintained by Microsoft.
- Firefox – the open-source web browser by Mozilla.
- TensorFlow – an open-source machine learning framework developed by Google.
Most OSS projects are hosted on platforms like GitHub or GitLab and licensed under terms like MIT, GPL, or Apache to define how the code can be used or modified.
What is Closed Source Software?
Closed-source software, on the other hand, is proprietary software whose source code is kept secret. Only the original creators — typically companies — can legally view or alter the code.
Examples include:
- Microsoft Windows
- macOS
- Adobe Photoshop
- OpenAI’s GPT models (as of today)
Users of closed-source tools can access the software’s features, but not the internal code that powers it. If you're trying to access the closed-source software, you might face some serious legal penalties.
So... Which Should You Choose for Your Project?
Let’s say you’re building something.
A passion project. A startup. A game. A tool.
Should you go open source… or closed?
Here’s how to think about it:
✅ Choose Open Source if:
- You want to build in public, attract contributors, and grow a community.
- You value transparency, especially for tools used by other developers.
- You’re creating something educational, experimental, or mission-driven.
- You want to earn trust quickly — especially in fields like security or infrastructure.
Or… you simply believe in the philosophy:
“Code should be open, for everyone.”
🔐 Choose Closed Source if:
- You're building a product you plan to monetize or license.
- You need to protect intellectual property or competitive advantages.
- You want full control over features, branding, and distribution.
- You have legal or security obligations to keep the code private.
Or you’re targeting an audience that doesn’t care how the sausage is made — just that it works.
Still not sure?
Many companies today actually choose a hybrid model:
- They open-source parts of their infrastructure to build trust and adoption.
- But they keep the core proprietary to sustain the business.
Think of it this way:
Open source is a great way to build reach. Closed source is a great way to build revenue. And in some cases, you can do both.
So instead of asking “Which is better?”
Maybe the better question is:
“What kind of relationship do I want with my users?”
The OpenAI Controversy: From Open to Closed
One of the most fascinating case studies is OpenAI.
Founded in 2015 as a non-profit research organization, OpenAI's mission was to ensure that artificial general intelligence (AGI) benefits all of humanity. It pledged to make research and code open source — as stated in its founding charter.
In its early years, OpenAI released models like GPT-2 and tools like OpenAI Gym openly. However, in 2020, OpenAI made a pivotal shift. It withheld GPT-3’s code and full model weights, citing concerns over misuse. Later, OpenAI became a “capped-profit” company and began monetizing its models through APIs and partnerships (notably with Microsoft).
“We were wrong to think we could release these powerful models openly without seeing harmful use,” said OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.
Today, OpenAI’s latest models (like GPT-4) are entirely closed source, and even the training data remains secret. This has sparked ongoing debate about transparency, ethics, and the future of AI research.
Conclusion
The open vs. closed source debate isn't just technical — it's philosophical. It's about who gets to innovate, who controls the tools we use, and how we shape the future of technology.
As users and developers, it’s important to stay informed, make conscious choices, and support initiatives that align with your values.
And as OpenAI’s shift shows us, the line between open and closed isn't always fixed — it evolves with power, progress, and responsibility.
Top comments (0)