š¦ I survived the hackathon, caught up on sleep (mostly), and the AI debate? Still going strongāat least in my head. If my last posts seemed like a soapbox, letās try a new approach. This isnāt just for the devs or the writersāitās anyone online trying to build, break, or create something honest.
Background (because the story matters) āļø
Hereās what gets me: people still treat all AI content the sameāwhether itās auto-generated fluff or a post like this, with actual thought, stubbornness, and a few creative detours baked in. I use AI as a tool, but Iām the one steering; itās got my fingerprints and my voice all over it because I wrote intentional AI instructions.
š At least, unless GPT-5 has decided to rewrite the rules again. Then it takes a bit of wrangling first.
The sad part? Both the creative writing and the fluff get the same knee-jerk reaction. Iām not worried about myselfāI know how to handle criticism and donāt mind being upfront. But not everyoneās ready to jump into the ring, and a lot of good AI assisted work gets buried because creators just donāt want to deal with the drama that comes with disclosure.
Hang out in the writers+AI corners of the internet for five minutes and youāll hear: āJust donāt discloseāwhy invite the hassle?ā Thatās not me. Iād rather own it, even if it means the occasional argument.
š„ Integrity first, sparring match secondāand my matches usually come with a grin and a little happy dance.
So letās walk through what we actually know about AI, what weāre still sorting out, and how we might just learn to disagree without burning the place down before it's sorted. š„š©āš
1. Whoās Really at the Table? šļø
Platforms, publishers, workplaces, classrooms, and every Discord mod with a badge gets to set their own boundaries. But the thing that always gets me isnāt if they do it, itās how. When āboundariesā become a one-size-fits-all firewall, thatās where I have a problem.
For example: KoFiās Discord rules are directā
āAll forms of AI-generated content (eg. art/music/writing/ChatGPT), including links to such content, and discussion thereof is not allowed in this server.ā
So, of course, I checked. āDoes that mean my stuff is banned?ā Turns out, nope. As long as I skip the preview images, weāre golden. Honest, straightforward, no drama. Awesome.
Medium, though? (If you missed the post, catch up here.) They talked about gray areas... then built a giant penalty box for every AI-assisted creator, regardless of intent or craft.
šµ For me, thatās about as thoughtful as banning all musicians because someone played Wonderwall one too many times at open mic night.
I canāt rewrite the rulebook, but I can refuse to act like these blanket rules donāt erase good, thoughtful people. Those of us who are trying to follow guidelines that don't really existāand perhaps set a few new ones in the processādon't deserve to have our work lumped together with the slop.
2. AI Content ā Equal š„
Thereās AI content, and then thereās AI content. Some of it is shallow, spammy filler that's cranked out for clicks with zero thought or care. The rest of us? Itās a tool wielded well: organized, rewritten, and given a real voice.
Bad actors werenāt invented along with AI; the existing ones just found a different shortcut.
There are tools out thereāZeroGPT and friendsāthat claim theyāll catch every AI post. But hereās the thing: Iāve actually tested this. I picked three or four posts at random, ran them through different detectors, and my highest score was 18%.
š¦ Itās not because Iām hiding anything or using some secret hack. Itās the process.
I dictate most posts on the fly. Then I hand it off to the AIāto organize, to reword, sometimes to rewrite completelyābut always under my set of rules. And it never, ever ends as a copy-paste job. Iām editing the whole time. Thereās always a humanāmeāin the loop, every single time.
3. Will AI Improve Productivity? šāāļø
Sometimes. Sometimes Not.
Thereās always a promise: AI will make you ten times faster, smarter, better, insert-your-buzzword-here. And maybe itās true... sometimes. Documentation? Absolutely. I can roll out a draft in secondsāclean, organized, done. Drafting proposals? Donāt even get me started; Iām pretty sure the principals are getting sick of how fast I can toss together a pitch.
š If they arenāt yet, give it time because I have more.
But sometimes AI just saves you from the jobs nobody wants. Like, digging through a decadeās worth of legacy code for a spike because itās finally time to rebuild that app and nobody remembers what it's actually doing or why it was even there to begin with.
𫤠I know I donāt want to do that. You donāt want to do that. Nobody wants to do that. AI doesn't care and is pretty good at it!
Honestly, sometimes it sees connections I might miss. But that doesnāt mean you can skip the whole process and trust whatever it finds. You still have to check. Maybe it saves you three days in the depths of the code mines, but the human review isnāt optional.
Still, not every job should go to the bots, either. That gnarly production bug, that support ticket, the customer callāthey all need a human. AI can be a superpower, but itās not meant to replace the parts of your work that need actual judgment, empathy, or the magic of figuring it out together.
4. AI Is Not Bad (When You Use It Like a Pro) šØāš
AI isnāt some villain lurking in your workflow. Itās a force multiplier. Used right, it makes your voice sharper and your edits fasterāused wrong, it just adds to the noise.
Thatās why every single commit I make defines exactly how much AI was involved and my posts are going to start wearing an āAI-Editedā badge. Not because someone told me to. Not as a disclaimer. Because somebody has to be willing to say there's a difference between generated and assisted.
This is one version (and yesāLeonardo made them):
š¦ And if you want to use the badge yourself, or hand it off to a friend? Donāt copy this little screenshotāthe full one (plus a couple others) are hanging out in my repo. Help yourself!
5. AI Code Is AI Content (Writers, You Too!) š¾
Hereās my rule: disclosure, plain and simple:
- Docs and posts: Add a simple footer like āThis was generated with the help of AI tool.ā
- Code or technical writing: Commit with one of 3 different footers in the commit message:
-
Generated-with: AI tool
means AI did most or all of the work -
Co-authored-by: AI tool
means the content is 50/50 -
Assisted-with: AI tool
means AI helped some, but not close to half
-
š” I started out using an email address in the commits, too ā that I thought I was making upāuntil some random app popped up as a contributor in my repo. Not cool... š
This isnāt about checking boxes. Itās about giving credit, setting an example, and actually being transparent with yourself and the future people who end up needing it.
š Besides, putting one more stamp on a long list of responsible AI use-cases puts a dent in the endless cycle of AI panic and the-world-is-ending doom speak.
6. And What About AI Images or Music? šØ
Same rules, different paint. Some artists pour weeks or months into training models on their own art. (I still havenāt managed to train mine and it's been over a month!) Others take the shortcut: punch in a sentence or two, let the AI āenhanceā it, and call it done.
ā Are they copying someoneās style? I dunnoāmaybe? Should they? I honestly donāt know...
Same applies here as does with writing: artists absolutely have the right to protect their work. But what does that look like, practically? Truth is we donāt really know yet. The laws are behind while the tech is still racing ahead. Weāll catch up. Maybe not soon enough, but eventually, we will.
š¦ I just hope that when we get there, thereās at least one person in the room who actually understands whatās happeningāand what it looks like behind the scenes. We absolutely need better laws, but we do not need people throwing broad rules at some conjured image of āAI training.ā Whatever it ends up being, honesty and fact need to come first.
7. Is AI āStealingā? (No, but...) š§¬
This is where I dig in my heels. No, using AI-generated content is not stealingāunless youāre actively pretending someone elseās work is your own or ignoring copyright on purpose. However, āpublicly availableā isnāt the same as āpublic domain,ā and nobody should lose credit for their work.
Should AI companies pay for certain data? Probably! Should writers and artists get a say? Of course. But āall AI is theftā is just as over-simplified as āall creators are saints.ā
š«” Guess what? Real life and the world around us is messyāAI included. We need smarter laws, better tools, and way less finger-pointing.
UPDATED
This is brilliant! HTTP 402 may come back from the forgotten realms of the internet. I've seen other sites like Credtent.org offer similar setups, as well. Sounds like a solution I can live with... what about you?
8. I Canāt Stay Quiet (and Neither Should You) š ļø
I can't just sit back and watch the insanity and not throw my two cents in. Weāre all still figuring this thing out. Some jumped in headfirst, others are barely dipping a toe. But we wonāt get anywhere by shutting down the conversation or tuning each other outāif thereās a better way, weāre gonna have to find it together.
So, did I miss anything? Add your take belowāwhatās a rule, reality, or tip about AI you wish more people got right? Comment, DM, or write your own story. Iāll keep this list updated.
š And please, when it comes up again, donāt leave yourself (or anyone else) out of the conversation. š«¶
š”ļø This post was AI-edited, human-approved, and finished before the next AI ban drops.
Nuance is mandatory, drama is optional, and the sarcasm is included free of charge.
This Post's ZeroGPT Score š„³
More out of curiosity than anything else...
Top comments (0)