This post is a direct response to four nearly identical articles by @abhi_jith_f00c2ff58ac2a7e, all titled “The Dark Side of AI: How ChatGPT Can Lead to Psychosis and Mental Health Concerns,” published today (July 20, 2025):
1 • 2 • 3 • 4I’ve reported these posts, though I’m not exactly expecting much discourse against an account ending in “f00c2ff58ac2a7e.” That’s why I’m sharing my response here as a standalone post, in addition to my comments. What follows is nearly identical to my replies to those posts - plus a quick summary of the original articles (so you don’t need to click and give them extra views; trust me, you’re not missing anything) - along with my own perspective, so you know just how strongly I feel about this issue.
Please feel free to copy, share, and amplify. Let’s work together to push back against this kind of fear-mongering and make it clear to every person - young or old: mental health struggles are never your fault.
First, a PSA for anyone who needs it:
If you or someone you know is experiencing a mental health crisis in the U.S., you can call 988 anytime, day or night, for free support. 988 is for any topic, offers support in English and Spanish (interpreters for other languages), and lets you talk, text, chat online, or use VP. There’s even a dedicated Teen & Young Adult Helpline (#TalktoUs) with peer support - again, all free and confidential.
If you’re outside the U.S., HelpGuide.org lists helplines for several other countries, including the UK, South Africa, New Zealand, Philippines, Ireland, Australia, Canada, and India. It’s not global (yet), but it’s a start.
It’s critical to recognize warning signs for early mental health crisis intervention and know how to support someone who might be experiencing first-episode psychosis (often seen in teens and young adults prior to a diagnosis of schizophrenia). Hallucinations and delusions are well-known symptoms, but early signs can also look like depression. There’s no cure, but schizophrenia and related disorders are very treatable - and treatment today usually means medication and counseling, not hospitals or “scary” interventions. Some helpful resources:
- SAMHSA: Schizophrenia
- Mayo Clinic
- NAMI: About Schizophrenia
- NIMH: Statistics
- NAMI: The Michael Laudor Tragedy
Now, to the posts
The central claim of these posts is that the rapid adoption and widespread, frequent use of AI - particularly chatbots like ChatGPT - is responsible for what the author describes as a rise in mental health disorders among teens and young adults. While the term “psychosis” is used (rather than “schizophrenia”), the narrative strongly implies a direct cause-and-effect relationship that simply isn’t supported by research.
The author includes an anecdote about a young person who used ChatGPT as a sort of “friend,” supposedly leading them to blur the lines between technology and reality.
My Biggest Problem with This
This conversation is so important - but let’s clear something up: blaming AI (or any single thing) for youth mental health or psychosis isn’t just misleading; it’s flat-out unhelpful.
Even if we take the story at face value (there’s no supporting evidence or sources provided, so that’s a big if), it is absolutely NOT their fault!
The mere suggestion that a serious, life-altering condition like psychosis could be caused by something a person - young or old - did or didn’t do is not just incorrect and unhelpful, it’s dangerous.
This kind of thinking is exactly why so many people are hesitant to seek help: they feel like it’s something they “brought on themselves” or could have prevented. The truth is, it’s not anyone’s fault - least of all your own.
The Truth about Psychosis
Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders typically first appear in teens and young adults, but that’s not because of the latest tech trend.
To quote NAMI:
“50% of all lifetime mental illness begins by age 14, and 75% by age 24.”
This has been true long before anyone worried about AI, TikTok, or even Pac-Man.
There are teams of experts actively researching what causes psychosis - technology is just one small piece of a much larger puzzle that includes genetics, environment, stress, trauma, and yes, sometimes technology use (in many forms).
A 2024 study found only a modest link between higher computer use in mid-teen years and later psychotic experiences, and even that was mostly explained by other risk factors (mental health and social challenges were present before the high computer use). No clear “cause and effect,” just a reminder that life is complicated and brains even more so.
This is a serious medical topic. Blaming TV, games, the internet, or AI for psychosis is the same tired playbook people have used for decades, and it only makes it harder for people to ask for help. Mental illness is never as simple as a single cause, and fear-mongering or finger-pointing helps no one.
Why This Is Important to Me
Those Closest to Me
I grew up with someone in my household who had an untreated mental health condition. It wasn’t schizophrenia, but it deeply shaped my world from my earliest memories. It wasn’t “good” or “bad” - it was simply normal for me. Years later, after I was grown, they finally received help. I wish I could say it was a storybook turnaround. There were good stretches, and some not-so-good ones. Did all those years without support play a role in how things are now? I can’t say for sure - but I know it didn’t help.
My Own Journey
I was diagnosed with a serious mental health condition in my early twenties (and I’m always willing to talk about it privately if anyone needs support - just reach out). Honestly, I felt “different” long before I ever got the diagnosis. I couldn’t quite name it, and for a long time I just assumed I was “off” in some way. Admitting there might be a problem took a long time; actually seeking help took even longer and was often inconsistent.
It wasn’t until college, when I signed up for free counseling sessions (for reasons I can’t even remember - probably thanks to a sibling who worked in the office), that things started to shift. My counselor, Maggie, was the definition of approachable and probably saved my life more than once. One of the first things she did was encourage more frequent sessions.
A quick PSA: Finding the right counselor or therapist can be pure luck - or it can take a lot of searching. If you tried once and it didn’t click, don’t give up. Your “Maggie” is out there, but you’ll never meet them if you don’t keep looking.
I stuck with counseling for a long time (in addition to other treatment). Life eventually took us in different directions, and it hasn’t always been as easy since, but I learned how to show up for myself and talk about it. Some days I’m better at it than others, but overall, I’m a happy, healthy adult - and, most importantly, I finally feel normal.
Ripple Effects
Out of respect for my family’s privacy, I won’t go deep here. But as an adult, I’ve seen firsthand how mental health issues can affect not just individuals, but entire families - even those who don’t live under the same roof. The big lesson: it’s not just okay to talk about mental health and seek help - it’s essential. The person in my life who struggled is doing much better now, thanks to a treatment plan that worked for them and continued care.
Be Part of the Solution to Mental Health
Mental health struggles - crisis or not - are never caused by one thing, and they’re never solved by one thing. It takes understanding, openness, and the willingness to address tough topics. Spreading rumors or horror stories like “ChatGPT made her crazy!” only hurts people who are already suffering.
Please, be part of the solution. Share. Talk. Show up. Somebody needs it more than you know.
Let’s focus on compassion, understanding, and real support for those struggling - not easy answers or scapegoats. 💛
🛡️ This post was created with compassion, understanding, and the help of ChatGPT.
Top comments (4)
I am more afraid that the next generation of adults won't be able to think for themselves and use the AI for everything.
I think you might’ve completely missed the actual point of this post — and I say that with full confidence, not as an insult. This isn’t about AI. It’s about people. Specifically, people making assumptions and passing judgment on others without understanding the full picture. It’s about mental health, and blaming a tool like AI for a very real, very human condition isn’t just inaccurate — it’s outright irresponsible.
That said, I’ll bite.
Let’s say for the sake of argument that people are “using AI for everything.” What does it really mean when someone “can’t think for themselves”? Are we talking about not solving math problems by hand? Not writing essays without Google? Not making dinner without a recipe? At what point does assistance become dependency? And how exactly do you measure that?
If AI is just the latest tool in a long line of tools (calculators, search engines, spell check) then the question isn’t whether it’s used, but whether it's understood. And unless we’re suggesting that the very existence of tools makes people incapable, we might want to rethink that argument.
Let’s use a 100% real-life scenario as a comparison.
When my son was in the 3rd grade (or thereabout), a teacher called me one day stating he had cheated on his math test and received a 0. But that didn’t make sense to me. Not only did he generally do well in mathematics, but I had just quizzed him myself a few days prior — and he absolutely knew the material.
So I dug deeper.
To sum it up: my son decided he was tired of the repetition after proving multiple times that he knew the work. So instead of spending 40 minutes answering the same questions again, he manually pulled jQuery into Chrome’s DevTools and wrote a script to answer them for him. The test flagged him because he spent 30+ minutes on the first question and fractions of a second on the rest.
So what do you think — did he really deserve the 0? The instructions did say “no assistance,” and the school had a zero-tolerance cheating policy.
In that case, the "problem" was computers — not AI. But if we apply your logic to this situation, he wouldn’t have been able to solve the problem at all, right? Because the computer “did it for him,” so therefore no thinking happened?
Now let’s circle back to the start:
AI is not the problem here.
It’s not a contributing factor to intelligence any more than the use of that computer was years ago. No more than the internet was for me growing up, Elvis was for my parents, or Louis Armstrong was for my grandparents.
It is now, has always been, and will always be a people problem.
Thanks for long and interesting reply. I partly agree. I just think that the jump from calculators, computers, the internet and so on to today's AI is too big. With better tools you can solve the job faster, and often better. But you still need to be able to know a little about what you do. Like for instance writing a piece of code to solve a math problem. Heck sometimes you even learn more that way than just using the calculator. Now you can just look at the paper, you don't even have to read it. Take a picture of the math test and upload it to AI with the prompt "solve this test and add my name at the bottom". I'm afraid we just come to depend too much on it and instead of thinking for ourselves we just ask the AI and that part scares me a little.
And to that, I do not entirely disagree. However, I will challenge you to broaden your horizons on the subject.
The whole “vibe coding” wave? I could write a novella about my feelings there (not here, promise) — but let’s just say it’s done real AI adoption a major disservice. When folks with zero interest in development best practices start shipping “apps” they don’t care to understand, hey, knock yourself out if it’s just for your own entertainment. But selling that as a product? Entirely different conversation.
It’s a lot like the student who pastes a topic into ChatGPT to auto-generate a term paper — or as you put it:
That’s not “empowered by technology,” that’s just learning how to check out. Are there people happy to do the bare minimum, content not to understand the bigger picture (or why that even matters)? For sure. But I’m not comfortable lumping everyone — let alone an entire generation — into that bucket.
Is AI more accessible than ever? Of course. But is it fair to declare that “the next generation of adults won’t be able to think for themselves,” as if everyone born after 2000 is allergic to effort? Not remotely.
What about:
I’d argue that those folks are thinking more — not less. The reality: today’s youth will be better equipped as adults. Not because everything is easier, but because they’ll have the tools (and mindset) to solve just about any problem that comes their way.
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments. Some comments have been hidden by the post's author - find out more