DEV Community

Aghiles Lounis
Aghiles Lounis

Posted on

3

Why Next.js Beats React + Vite for SPAs (It’s Not Just About SEO)

Let’s debunk a persistent myth: Next.js isn’t just for SEO-obsessed marketing sites. Many teams assume React + Vite is better for single-page applications (SPAs) or highly interactive apps. But Next.js solves critical performance issues that React + Vite can’t address efficiently. Here’s why:

The Double Round-Trip Problem

How React + Vite Fails

In a typical React + Vite setup:

  1. Client downloads JavaScript bundle first
  2. Bundle parses → triggers client-side data fetching
  3. User waits again for data → content renders

This creates a network waterfall:

Download JS → Parse JS → Fetch Data → Render.

Even with lazy loading:

// React + Vite lazy loading example
const Dashboard = lazy(() => import('./Dashboard'));
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
  • Client still fetches route JS first before data requests
  • Double round-trips persist for every lazy-loaded route

Next.js’s Server-Side Solution

// Next.js Server Component (zero client JS)
async function Dashboard() {
  const data = await fetchData(); // Server-side fetch
  return <Chart data={data} />;
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
  • Initial fetch on server: HTML + data sent in one round-trip
  • No client-side waterfalls: Server-rendered HTML arrives ready-to-display
  • Bundle size reduced by ~30-60% (server components don’t ship JS)

Streaming & Progressive Hydration

Wrap slow components in :

export default function Page() {
  return (
    <>
      <Header /> {/* Instantly visible */}
      <Suspense fallback={<SkeletonLoader />}>
        <Dashboard /> {/* Streams when ready */}
      </Suspense>
    </>
  );
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
  • Progressive loading: Users interact with static UI while dynamic parts load

Partial Prerendering (PPR) & Caching

// app/page.js
export const dynamicParams = false; // SSG for static parts
export const revalidate = 3600; // ISR every hour

async function DynamicSection() {
  const data = await fetchPersonalizedData(); // SSR
  return <UserProfile data={data} />;
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
  • Edge caching: Frequently accessed data stored at CDN edge nodes
  • RSC Payloads: Serialized server components cached between navigation

It means you're getting better: FCP, TTFB, TTI basically for FREE.

The Bottom Line

Next.js isn’t just a framework—it’s a performance-first architecture that rethinks how data and components load. Use it for almost any modern web app unless your environment strictly forbids server-side logic (like Chrome extensions). In those rare cases, React + Vite becomes the pragmatic choice.

TL;DR:

  • Next.js for 95% of web apps (better UX, performance, scalability, and much more...)
  • React + Vite in edge cases like Chrome extensions, embeddable widgets or ANY client-only execution environment

Found this helpful? Consider sharing it with your network! 🚀

AWS Security LIVE!

Tune in for AWS Security LIVE!

Join AWS Security LIVE! for expert insights and actionable tips to protect your organization and keep security teams prepared.

Learn More

Top comments (1)

Collapse
 
capjavert profile image
Ante Barić • Edited

You are mixing infrastructure features vs bundler and application data fetching. Don't get me wrong I use Next.js but Next.js being more effective in way you present it has nothing to do with Next.js but with Vercel platform. You can deploy React + Vite and have similar benefits.

A Workflow Copilot. Tailored to You.

Pieces.app image

Our desktop app, with its intelligent copilot, streamlines coding by generating snippets, extracting code from screenshots, and accelerating problem-solving.

Read the docs