10,623 views looks impressive — until you realise how little that number actually tells you. The real story, the one that matters, is everything underneath that number.
After writing 48 posts and collecting hundreds of reactions and comments, I realised something surprising: the view metrics barely reflect what drives engagement on DEV.
This is the honest breakdown of what worked, what didn’t, and what I wish I knew.
What Actually Worked — The Surface That Everyone Sees
1. Posts With a Story Outperform Pure Tutorials
Every time I mixed narrative and technical insight, the posts took off. Developers love seeing the why behind the build, not just the code. When I wrote about building a tool, solving a real problem, or reacting to news, engagement spiked.
Pattern: Story → Insight → Code → Takeaway.
2. Clear Formatting & Readability Matter More Than Expected
Short paragraphs. Strong headings. Bullets. Clean code.
Any post where I spent extra time formatting performed better. Readers don’t reward complexity; they reward clarity.
3. Specific, Real-World Use Cases Always Outperform Abstractions
Posts that explained actual problems I ran into or tools I use pulled more engagement than abstract theory.
Developers want:
- practical examples
- concrete outcomes
- something they can try today
Not philosophical essays.
Not generic walkthroughs.
What Shockingly Doesn’t Work — The Hidden Iceberg Below
1. Purely Technical Posts Without Context Underperform Hard
Some of my most “impressive” technical posts were also the lowest performing. Not because the content was bad, but because there was no emotional or conceptual hook.
If your title doesn’t create curiosity…
If readers don’t know why the solution matters…
If it doesn’t tie to a real problem…
It sinks instantly.
2. Inconsistent Posting Kills Momentum
I noticed something subtle:
When I posted consistently for a week, views on older posts climbed. When I went silent, everything flatlined.
DEV rewards consistency, not bursts. The algorithm isn’t complex; it simply elevates authors who show up regularly.
Your posting cadence has a greater impact than the quality of individual posts.
3. “Views” Are the Most Misleading Metric on DEV
Total views can feel like growth, but they hide the truth.
A post can get 500 views and only 2 reactions.
A different post can get 120 views, generate 15 comments, and attract new followers.
High-value signals are:
- reactions
- comments
- saves
- new followers
Everything else is vanity.
The posts that matter most aren’t the ones with the largest view count; they’re the ones people talk about, share, and remember.
What I Learned — And What You Can Apply Immediately
These are the rules I now follow before writing anything:
- Tell a story. Even a technical article should feel like a journey.
- Solve a real problem. If I can’t explain why the article matters in one sentence, I don’t write it.
- Use emotional hooks. Curiosity drives clicks; clarity retains readers.
- Post consistently. The algorithm amplifies momentum.
- Evaluate posts by engagement, not views. Views are the weather — engagement is the climate.
The Real Lesson From 10,623 Views
Those views are just the tip of the iceberg.
What matters is buried underneath: clarity, storytelling, consistency, and solving real pain points.
If you want your posts to grow, forget the vanity metrics and focus on one question:
Would I share this if someone else wrote it?
If the answer is yes, you've already won.
BONUS: The Framework I Now Use for Every Post
Use this as a checklist before publishing:
1. The Hook (Title + Opening Section)
- Is the title curiosity-driven or outcome-driven?
- Does the first paragraph pull readers in emotionally?
- Does it promise a transformation?
2. The Story (Why the Post Exists)
- What problem triggered this post?
- Why should the reader care?
- What is the “human angle”?
3. The Value (Practical Takeaways)
- Am I solving a real problem?
- Are there actionable examples?
- Is there a clear payoff for reading?
4. The Readability Layer
- Short paragraphs
- Strong headings
- Skimmable sections
- Clean code blocks
5. The Viral Factor
Does the article contain at least one of these?
- a strong opinion
- an unexpected insight
- a relatable struggle
- a surprising result
- a transparent breakdown
If yes → publish.
If no → rewrite.
Top comments (5)
Thanks for your insight! It was interesting, especially for me (with 35+ years of experience on social networks, before the word was even invented, but who is new on this platform).
There is always something to learn!
Happy you found it insightful!
Hello Nikoloz, you are correct about one thing: posting cadence plays a big role in user engagement. Superficial things, such as an article title, are more important than the article itself. Another important thing is a familiar audience; most engagement actually comes from users the author actually knows. These readers are rarely just topic consumers; they often stick to the author's content.
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.