DEV Community

Cover image for How I Built A Python Web Framework And Became An Open Source Maintainer
Florimond Manca for Bocadillo

Posted on • Updated on • Originally published at

How I Built A Python Web Framework And Became An Open Source Maintainer

This post was originally published at

It's been a while since I've written a blog post. Nearly two months, actually. So, where have I been?

For one, the final year of my engineering studies has been taking up more of my time than I thought it would. I'm not complaining, though — I've been learning a ton of interesting and useful things, both theoretical and practical. Plus, I want to take the opportunity to live this final year fully.

The other side of the story is — I've been working on building Bocadillo, an open source asynchronous Python web framework. The adventure, which started as a way for me to learn about the internals of a web framework, has been thrilling so far.

This means that, because a day is only 24 hours, I had to put blogging aside for a bit. But now that I'm on holiday, I can finally take the time to reflect on what's been going on. 🥳

In this blog post, I want to put on paper my thoughts about the whole process of building a web framework and especially launching an open source project. I've already learnt a lot in the process, from programming techniques to project management and development tooling, so I wanted to share my experience with you!

What's on the menu?

First things first — let me introduce you to Bocadillo! (This will be short and sweet, I promise.)

What is Bocadillo?

GitHub logo bocadilloproject / bocadillo

(UNMAINTAINED) Fast, scalable and real-time capable web APIs for everyone


Bocadillo is now UNMAINTAINED. This repository should be archived soon. We recommend users to migrate to other well-supported alternatives, such as Starlette or FastAPI. Please see #334 for more information.

Build status Test coverage pypi version code style


Bocadillo is a Python async web framework that makes building performant and highly concurrent web APIs fun and accessible to everyone.


Python 3.6+


pip install bocadillo
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode


from bocadillo import App, configure

app = App()

async def index(req, res):
    res.json = {"hello": "world"}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Save this as, then start a uvicorn server (hot reload enabled!):

uvicorn app:app --reload
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Say hello!

$ curl http://localhost:8000
{"hello": "world"}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Ready to dive in? Visit the documentation site.


All changes to Bocadillo are recorded in the…

Elevator pitch

Bocadillo is a modern Python web framework that provides a sane toolkit for building performant web applications and services using asynchronous programming. It is compatible with Python 3.6+ and MIT-licensed.

Want to get started? Read the documentation!

Key figures

Bocadillo's initial commit was on November 3rd, 2018. As of December 21st, i.e. a month and a half later, here's where Bocadillo stands:

  • 500+ commits and 31 stars on the bocadilloproject/bocadillo repo — feel free to add yours!
  • 10 releases to PyPI — latest being v0.7
  • 8k+ downloads as measured by PePy
  • About 30 pages of docs!
  • 2 open source contributors — and many others welcome! 🥳

These figures are of course very modest, but I'm already very happy with them. Of course, if you want to support Bocadillo, you can:

Also, if you've already tried Bocadillo out, please get in touch via Twitter or the Gitter chat room — I'd LOVE to hear from you!


In terms of philosophy, Bocadillo is beginner-friendly, but it aims at giving power-users the flexibility they need. It focuses on developer experience while encouraging best practices.

Besides, Bocadillo is not meant to be minimalist (but not a mastodon either). The idea is to include a carefully chosen set of included batteries, with sensible defaults, so that you can solve common problems and be productive right away.


My goal is that people embrace the new possibilities of async Python and that Bocadillo becomes a tool that helps people solve real-world problems more easily and efficiently.

There's still a lot of work ahead to get there, but the marathon has started!

Speaking of async Python, let me address a question you may have already asked yourself…

What with async?

Generally, a web app instance spends a lot (if not most) of its request processing time waiting for I/O to complete — API calls, database queries, filesystem operations. etc. Most of these operations are blocking, which typically limits performance if multiple clients are requesting the server.

The idea with async frameworks like Bocadillo is to build apps that do not block on I/O operations. To achieve this, we leverage asynchronous programming and recent additions to the Python language such as asyncio and async/await — available from Python 3.4+ and 3.6+ respectively. This allows us to consider processing a request as a task which is "scheduled" to run in a near future, i.e. when the CPU is avaiable.

As a result, beyond making better use of the CPU, this architecture has a very interesting advantage — we can now handle multiple requests concurrently.

(Note: I didn't write in parallel, as async still uses a single thread. Concurrency is not parallelism.)

This property ultimately results in more stable throughput and performance as the number of concurrent clients increases. From my own (yet to be published) benchmarks, Bocadillo keeps a steady processing rate whether it talks to 10 or 10,000 clients. On the other hand, "sync" frameworks like Flask or Django show a significant drop in reqs/sec in high concurrency settings.

Eager for more on Python asynchronous programming? Here are a few talks I recommend, perhaps to be watched in this order:


Bocadillo is built on Uvicorn, the lightning-fast ASGI web server, and Starlette, a handy ASGI toolkit. Both were created by Tom Christie, a core contributor to the Django REST Framework (among other things).

Note: ASGI is the asynchronous equivalent to WSGI, i.e. a specification for how web servers should communicate with asynchronous Python web applications.


What Bocadillo already has: requests, responses, views (function-based and classed-based), routes and route parameters, media types, redirections, templates, static files, background tasks, CORS, HSTS, GZip, "recipes" (a.k.a. blueprints), middleware, hooks, and even a CLI. There are more in the release pipeline!

One thing that Bocadillo does not have (yet), though, is a database layer. Most web apps or APIs I've built needed to persist data in some way, so I believe this (or at least an official recommendation for how to integrate an async database layer such as Tortoise ORM) should land into the framework at some point.

Hello, world!

Let's finish with the traditional "Hello, World" script!

from bocadillo import API

api = API()

async def hello(req, res):
    res.text = "Hello, World!"

if __name__ == "__main__":
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The story behind it all

Alright, enough of pitching Bocadillo! Now that you know what it is, I want to share with you the story that led me to write this very blog post.

How and why did it begin? What were some of the most meaningful events? Let's figure this out.

A learn-by-doing project

Bocadillo started as a way for me to learn more about the internals of a web framework. I wanted to get behind the scenes after nearly 2 years of using various Python and JS web frameworks. I wanted to know how it actually all worked.

To be clear, Bocadillo didn't start with a very detailed plan. Heck, I didn't even think about whether there was a need for an(other) Python async web framework. I wanted to learn more than anything else.

Let's reinvent the wheel, and release it ASAP

So there I was, on the 3rd of November, implementing features so common it felt like reinventing the wheel. These were features like requests, responses, views, routes or the application server. "Hundreds of web frameworks out there already solved these problems before", I thought…

But I didn't really care. As @funkybob kindly twitted to me:

Reinventing the wheel is an awesome way to learn… and sometimes what you learn is just how much your existing frameworks are doing for you.

A solid argument in favour of reinventing the wheel which made me realize how much Django is an absolute massive beast.

Anyway, this initial endeavour led me to release v0.1 on PyPI on the 4th of November. Just two days after the initial commit, people could already pip install bocadillo and build a minimal async web app. (Who said Python packaging was a pain? 🐍)

First signs of potential

After v0.1 was released, I carried on with implementing more features such as new types of responses or error handling.

On November 6th, v0.2.1 was out. That's when I began to realize that Bocadillo was a good candidate for my first full-blown open source project. The idea seemed appealing to me, so I went for it!

At that point, I hadn't disclosed anything about Bocadillo yet, not even to friends, so I wanted to make a first announcement. I chose to do it on Twitter.

Because Bocadillo's initial code design and implementation took heavy inspiration from Responder, Kenneth Reitz's own async framework, I decided to give a shoutout.

The first announcement about Bocadillo on Twitter, and Kenneth Reitz's answer. ❣️

The first announcement about Bocadillo on Twitter, and Kenneth Reitz's answer. ❣️

Kenneth's answer and the forthcoming reactions after he retweeted the announcement made me think that Bocadillo actually had potential.

In just a day, the repo got 20 stars (a personal record already!) and, although it may look trivial, I thought it was really cool.

Psst: if you want to help get Bocadillo known, you can star it too and spread the news!

So, after v0.2 was released, I felt motivated to keep working on Bocadillo, and add more features.

Up until I realized something…

Where are the docs? Like, real docs?

It was clear for me: I wanted Bocadillo to be my first open source project. I wanted to take it seriously in order to learn as much as I can from the process.

So, right from the start, I wrote an informative README, curated a CHANGELOG (with the help of keep a changelog) and added CONTRIBUTING guidelines. As more and more releases went out between November 6th and November 18th, I updated the changelog and documented new features in the repo's README.

Quickly though, this became impractical. The README was growing in size and it became hard to navigate, even with a table of contents.

The table of contents for the repo on November 17th. See that "Usage" section growing to an astronomical size?

The table of contents for the repo on November 17th. See that "Usage" section growing to an astronomical size?

That's when I realized I needed proper documentation.

If you think about it, good documentation is a sine qua non condition to having people use what you've built. And that lengthy README was not good documentation considering the size that Bocadillo was heading at.

Then, it hit me — a lot of large-scale open source tools, libraries or frameworks I use and love have a documentation site.

This is what led me to release v0.5 on November 18th with a major addition: a brand new docs site, which I built with VuePress and hosted on GitHub Pages.

Bocadillo's documentation site home page (end of November, 2018).

Bocadillo's documentation site home page (end of November, 2018).

On the necessity of good documentation — Joe Mancuso, creator of the Masonite framework, once shared with me this great piece of advice:

If it's not documented, it doesn't exist.

That's why I'm taking documentation very seriously and strive to make it as good as I can — and so should you with every project you're working on.

Then, while building the docs site, I made what I now consider as a very important move for any open source project…

Letting Bocadillo stand on its own feet

Before releasing the docs, I moved Bocadillo from a personal repo to its own GitHub organization, namely BocadilloProject.

The main motivation at the time was that I could use the organization's GitHub Pages domain for the documentation. It is definitely way cleaner and more accessible than 🙃

However, this had the positive effect of giving Bocadillo an online space of its own. It was not tied to my personal GitHub account anymore — the organisation was the new home for Bocadillo's source code.

Later, as I realized that Bocadillo announcements was taking over my personal Twitter account, I created a dedicated Twitter account.

The point is: it's important that an open source project lives outside of its creators.

Now, back to the story — on November 18th, I had a docs site up and running that people could visit. What next?

Opening up the development process

Up to November 20th, the way I kept track of the backlog and progress was via a private Trello board.

This was very practical to me: I use Trello for a variety of things. But I realized that people visiting the repo had no visibility on what was coming next or possible ways they could contribute.

In fact, from a visitor's perspective, I think the repo looked like just any other personal project — no issues, no PRs, just a ton of commits from a single person — and not a community-driven effort, i.e. what I'd like Bocadillo to become.

So, per the advice of a close friend of mine and inspired by this article by Dhanraj Acharya, I decided to open up the development process.

I converted all my Trello cards to GitHub issues, and added meaningful labels (see Sane GitHub labels by Dave Lunny) and description to them. I think the repo now provides better visibility on the project and feels more encouraging for newcomers.

I've learnt from this that open source is not only about opening the source code. You've got to be open about the development process, too.

I now hoped that, with the repo filled with issues and public PRs, it would attract its first open source contributors.

Spoiler alert: it did!

Yay! First contributors!

About at the same time, as Bocadillo grew in size, I began to feel the need for external advice. I was afraid that I might be taking bad design decisions or that the code could have been better. In short, I needed contributors.

Luckily, still on November 20th, I had the great pleasure of welcoming the first contribution to the repo, in the form of Alin Panaitiu commenting on PR #3 for the new "hooks" feature.

Alin helped me fix a few things about the feature which I was initially unsure about myself, and suggested ways in which it could be made even more useful. He went as far as forking the repo and sending me a diff showing off a fix.

Later, on November 23rd, Alin got his first PR merged. Bocadillo had officially gained its first contributor! 🎉

Screenshot of PR #18.

Screenshot of PR #18.

As emotional as I can be, I was moved.

Even more so that Alin actually sticked around. In the v0.7 release, Alin contributed 2 new features (GZip and ASGI middleware), with a code-to-merged time of probably less than a few hours. Thanks Alin, great stuff!

Entering maintenance mode

From the end of November and onwards, the pace of the project slowed down a bit. On one hand, I was in a bit of a rush with school projects and exams being on the agenda, but that didn't explain everything. I was experiencing something else.

You see, in the beginning, committing code to Bocadillo felt very easy. There was barely any legacy so it was exciting and I had tons of ideas. Everything remained to be done.

But as more features were added in, it started feeling heavier. Releases took longer to get out — now taking a week instead of days. Testing, refactoring and documentation became major parts of the development process. Plus, I now managed Bocadillo's online presence too.

Don't get me wrong — I'm not complaining. In fact, I like that I got to go past the initial excitation and entered maintenance mode. Besides, it's definitely a normal shift for a project that's trying to gain momentum and reach out to the community.

I am now enjoying that working on Bocadillo doesn't have to take me nights like it used to in the beginning. Which leads me to the next point…

It's not a sprint, it's a marathon

I recently noticed that my attitude towards the project has changed.

Instead of rushing in to get features out as quickly as possible, and hoping that a burst of users would pop by, send stars en masse, love the framework and beg for more, I now felt more in peace with the idea that the project growth would be slow.

This stems from the fact that maintaining an open source project is a marathon, not a sprint.

Put differently, success should always be a by-product, not a goal.

You'll have noticed that Bocadillo's goal statement doesn't mention fame, nor a threshold number of users. It only states that I hope Bocadillo can help some people solve problems. If that is the case for at least one person, I'll consider it a win. If it becomes the case for a lot of people, I shall only consider it as a side effect.

Two person standing on gray tile paving. @goian,

Two person standing on gray tile paving. @goian,

This is it for the story behind building Bocadillo! As you may have noted from these discussions, I have been loving the experience so far, and I'm actually now convinced that I made the right decision when I decided to go past the fear of judgement and build my own web framework. Which leads me to the last section of this blog post.

Tips to start your own open source project

If there is one thing I want you to take away from reading this article, it's got to be this:

Open source is an awesome way to learn. You should start your own project today!

"Sounds great", you think, "but how should I proceed? Do you have any advice?"

Well, I do have some. 😋

First and foremost, learn as much as you can and make sure to enjoy yourself. Open source should never become a burden, and if it does, try to find ways in which you can start delegating or relying on the community to drive the project forward.

For the rest, brace yourselves — categorized bullet points ahead!

Note: if you're unsure about how to implement any of the following items and/or want to see how I used or configured the tools in practice, feel free to check out Bocadillo's repo and just copy the bits you're interested in — it's open source, after all!

Project definition

  • Decide what you want to build.
  • Decide why you want to build it — although it doesn't have to be deep or abstract, having a clear source of motivation helps.
  • Think about scope and design philosophy: this will help make informed design decisions, and prevent feature creep.
  • Decide who you are targetting: are your users web developers, sys admins, project managers…?
  • Explicitly define user skills expectations: what should your users be familiar with, and how much?
  • Decide how you will distribute your project (e.g. a PyPI package).

Marketing & Communication

  • Build an identity: a name and a tagline at least. Make them short, catchy, and memorable. Showcase them everywhere (repo, PyPI page, docs site…).
  • Create a visual identity: this is your logo and graphic charter. It's better to have an okay temporary logo than no logo at all.
  • Decide on an entry point, i.e. a natural online location where people can look up your project. It can be the GitHub repo, a docs site, or whatever seems fit, but it should exist. (For Bocadillo, I believe this is the docs site.)
  • Give your project a life of its own: it's a good idea to create a separate GitHub organisation or social media account.
  • Use social media to communicate news, annoucements and tips, and start gathering people around the project (I use Twitter for this).
  • Provide ways for people to see where you're heading at — a roadmap, a list of issues, an "unreleased" section in the CHANGELOG, etc.


  • Implement open source best practices: a proper README, contributing guidelines, a code of conduct, issue/PR templates, etc (use GitHub's checklist!). This will make the repo more welcoming to potential contributors, and show that you care about the community.
  • Be supportive and kind to others. Thank them for their questions. Provide helpful resources.
  • It might be a good idea to create a place for informal discussions. I recently decided to experiment with a Gitter chat room.

Project management

  • Use GitHub issues to list your TODOs. That way, when wondering what you should work on next, just pick up a ticket and work on it!
  • Set up meaningful issue labels (see Sane GitHub Labels).
  • You can also set up a GitHub project to display your issues and PRs in a kanban board.

Code quality

  • Set up a CI/CD pipeline.
  • Be unforgiving on tests — besides ensuring your software works as it is intended to, they'll help you and everyone catch regressions and be confident when making changes (I use pytest as a testing framework).
  • Measure test coverage (I use pytest-cov for pytest/ integration, and CodeCov for coverage reports).
  • Enforce that PRs pass tests before merging.
  • Every PR should contain all 3 items: code, tests and docs.
  • Use a code formatter to reduce syntax/code style noise in code reviews (I use the opinionated Black formatter along with a pre-commit hook).
  • If you don't have other reviewers, make PRs to yourself, let them settle and come back later. It's easier to see if the code is a mess after a few days.


  • Write a clear and informed README with at least a project description, install instructions, a quick start example and a link to the docs or somewhere users can learn more.
  • Keep a changelog, you'll thank yourself later.
  • Build a docs site if you're building more than a simple library (I use VuePress as a static site generator).
  • Structure your docs: tutorials, discussions, how-to's, reference (tip: I use PydocMd to generate Markdown API reference straight from my Python docstrings).
  • Remember: if it's not documented, it doesn't exist.
  • Add pretty badges to your README (e.g. with

Versioning and releasing

  • Use semantic versioning (see SemVer).
  • Automate version bumping with tools such as bumpversion.
  • Automate the release pipeline. I use TravisCI to release tagged commits to PyPI.
  • Set up special release branches. For example, I use release/docs for docs deployment and release/test for releasing to Test PyPI.

Achievement unlocked?

This blog post is now coming to an end, so let's wrap up!

Although Bocadillo started as a way for me to learn more about the internals of a web framework, it has turned into a full-blown open source project.

With all the effort that already went into building the framework, documenting it, configuring the repo and managing releases, I now start to think of myself as an open source maintainer — which I think is a very enriching experience!

Even though I do take pride for what I have achieved so far, all of this is also very humbling. I now realize how challenging managing an open source project can be, let alone building a community around it. It's tough!

That said, I do believe that you should go for it and start your own open source project. It could be a simple tool or library, or an entire application framework — either way, you'll learn a lot in the process.

Of course, feel free to check out the Bocadillo repo if you seek ideas on structuring an open source project or setting up tooling. There are also tons of great resources on, so check this website out, too!

Thanks for reading through this article! As always, feedback is much appreciated. In particular, I'd love to hear your own stories on maintaining open source projects. Plus, if by any chance this article has inspired you, be sure to drop a comment! ❣️

Best wishes for this holiday season to you all. ✌️

Stay in touch!

If you enjoyed this post, you can find me on Twitter for updates, announcements and news. 🐤

Top comments (13)

rhymes profile image
rhymes • Edited

Wow great work and article, Florimond.

Reinventing the wheel is not a bad thing per se and you've demonstrated it (even if it's true that historically Python has had too many web frameworks :P)

I need to spend some more time on async Python, I'll definitely try Bocadillo. The amount of work you pulled off in less than two months is astounding!

Thank you for telling your story as a new open source maintainer.

I don't know if @ben has read this article already but I'm tagging him because he should :-)

florimondmanca profile image
Florimond Manca • Edited

Brilliant; thanks for the very kind words! 🙌 I’ve found async Python strangely exciting so far. At first, it all looks like black magic until you realize there is a higher-level metaphor which the whole event loop and coroutines stuff is merely an implementation of. Watching talks on the origins of async definitely helps there. :) If you’re about to deep dive, let me know how that goes!

rhymes profile image

I have a bit of experience with async programming in general through Twisted (and JS). Twisted was the first framework I've used and it introduced me to deferreds (promises), an "async/await" mechanism, a single thread main loop (based on the various kqueue/epoll/completion ports) and (at the time) a sizable community.

I haven't kept up much with the new async framework in Python to be honest, that's why I said I need to catch up.

I still have some hesitation, not because of Python, but because I'm not 100% sold on the concurrency model (even though I recognize its marvels). Async programming forces your entire app (the client app you mount in the framework) to be async and mostly single threaded. This means that every IO library you plug in has to be async.

You can't do async from sync which means that slowly everything you write has to be modeled on the async framework.

It's the same exact problem Node has, it's nothing wrong per se, it's just that "async/await" seem simple keywords but they bring with them cognitive load (well, all concurrency paradigms do) and some "existential questions" 😅

It is true though that async is a valid alternative, especially in Python (which I believe is the whole reason why Twisted started doing async back in 2002 :D). Good things come back.

Thread Thread
florimondmanca profile image
Florimond Manca

Absolutely — as some say, async is "all-in".

As you pointed out, I don't think it is specific to how Python does async. It's really two separate views on how things should even run. It does lead to having to basically rebuild everything from scratch just so that it is made non-blocking, which is frankly a rather high barrier to entry.
Luckily in Python, projects like aio-libs are already on their way to building an async equivalent to our otherwise familiar synchronous world. :)

Reminds me of times when I used Kafka for stream processing and I had a hard time interacting with batch-processing systems. Maybe there's a parallel?

  • A batch system is essentially blocking the whole pipeline instead of letting other (streaming) systems consume its changes one after the other.
  • A synchronous function blocks the whole event loop because it doesn't let other (async) functions use the CPU or parts of its outputs while it is running.

Maybe it's this cooperative concurrency model that creates the separation between the sync and async worlds?

I like it though, because I think it's also how we humans work. Our brain is basically a single-threaded concurrent systems that can deal with multiple things at once (to a certain extent) but only ever do one thing at a given time.


"existential questions"

Here we are? :P

Thread Thread
rhymes profile image

Absolutely — as some say, async is "all-in".

Yeah, and that's the divide right there. Async is basically a low level framework. If you adopt it, everything has to be modeled after it. The same way some people criticize some frameworks because they model your application instead of the other way around. Just food for thought.

Luckily in Python, projects like aio-libs are already on their way to building an async equivalent to our otherwise familiar synchronous world. :)

A part of me rejoices, another part of me wonders why we're reimplementing everything from scratch for the nth time :-D

I like it though, because I think it's also how we humans work. Our brain is basically a single-threaded concurrent systems that can deal with multiple things at once (to a certain extent) but only ever do one thing at a given time.

But is it truly? :-) Could it be a bunch of communicating sequential processes instead?

Thread Thread
florimondmanca profile image
Florimond Manca

But is it truly? :-) Could it be a bunch of communicating sequential processes instead?

I think it kind of is at a physiological/unconscious level. But I know that's not how my conscious self works. 😁

hossainalhaidari profile image
Hossain Alhaidari

Well you sure have inspired me a lot to start an open source project! Thanks, it was a great article.

florimondmanca profile image
Florimond Manca • Edited

Hey, great to hear! Glad you enjoyed it. :)

giorgosk profile image
Giorgos Kontopoulos 👀 • Edited

Very inspirational.

I wish I was able to start my open source ideas but I never seem to find the time. There so little time and so many things to do ...

florimondmanca profile image
Florimond Manca

True that it can be hard to find the time. That said, open source doesn’t have to take a lot of time. :) A few hours here and there or on weekends can go a long way. As I said in the article, it’s not a sprint! A lot of the work is deciding and clarifying what you want to do, and mapping out what your project should do. Then you can work towards that in small steps. :)

buet17 profile image

I have a tense about your write up. I am learning oon Python.
Please feel free contact with me at

luishck profile image
Luis J. Centeno

As a Spanish speaker I feel hungry when read Bocadillo.
I loved reading your post!

florimondmanca profile image
Florimond Manca

Thanks! The Spanish translation is exactly the origin of the name. 🥪