DEV Community

Cover image for 🧠 Git Fork vs Git Clone — What’s the Real Difference?
Latchu@DevOps
Latchu@DevOps

Posted on

🧠 Git Fork vs Git Clone — What’s the Real Difference?

If you're new to Git and GitHub, it's super common to get confused between forking and cloning a repo. Here's a simple breakdown that helped me early on:


🪝 Fork = Copy on GitHub

When you fork a repo, you're making a copy of someone else’s project into your GitHub account.

It's like saying: “I want my own version of this project in the cloud.”

You’ll use this when:

  • You want to contribute to open-source but don’t have write access.
  • You want to try something without touching the original repo.
  • You're collaborating on projects outside your organization.

📍 Happens on GitHub (or GitLab)
📍 Used to submit Pull Requests


💻 Clone = Copy on Your Computer

When you clone a repo, you’re downloading the code to your local machine so you can edit, run, and test it.

It's like saying: “I want this code on my laptop so I can work on it.”

You’ll use this when:

  • You want to start developing locally.
  • You need to make code changes, test, or explore the repo.

📍 Happens on your terminal
📍 Used for local development


🛠 Example Workflow

# Step 1: Fork the repo on GitHub
# You now have a copy under your username

# Step 2: Clone your fork locally
git clone https://github.com/your-username/project-name.git

# Step 3: Work on code, commit, push, and open a pull request!

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

⚡ Summary

Action What it Does Where it Happens Use Case
Fork Copies repo to your GitHub GitHub UI Contribute to open source
Clone Copies repo to your PC Terminal / CLI Develop locally

If you're contributing to a project you don’t own — always fork first, then clone your fork.


🔁 When I Used git fork Instead of git clone — A Real Example

If you're just getting into Git and GitHub, you might wonder:

“Why do I need to fork a repo? Can’t I just clone it?”

Let me share a real-world situation where forking was the only way I could contribute to a project 👇


💡 The Situation

I wanted to fix a small bug in a DevOps project hosted on GitHub — it had an issue in its Helm chart for Kubernetes.

But… I didn't have write access to the original repo. I couldn’t push changes or create a new branch there.


✅ The Solution: Fork First, Then Clone

So I did this:

Step - 1: Forked the repository to my GitHub account using the Fork button.

Now I had my own personal copy on GitHub.

Step - 2: Cloned my fork to my local machine:

git clone https://github.com/my-username/devops-helm-project.git
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Step - 3: Created a new branch and made my bug fix:

git checkout -b bugfix-helm-values
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Step - 4: Committed the changes and pushed to my fork:

git push origin bugfix-helm-values
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Step - 5: Opened a Pull Request to the original project (called the “upstream” repo).


🤔 Why Not Just Clone?

Cloning only gives you a read-only copy of someone else’s repo.
You can’t push to it or open a pull request unless you're a collaborator.

Forking, on the other hand, gives you full control of your own copy — and lets you contribute back through pull requests.


📌 Summary

Action Why I Did It
Fork Needed write access to my own copy
Clone Needed code locally to make changes
Pull Request To propose changes back to original repo

🧠 Lesson Learned:

If you don’t have push access, always fork first. Clone second. Contribute third.

Let me know your first fork + PR story in the comments! 👇

Top comments (1)

Collapse
 
vidakhoshpey22 profile image
Vida Khoshpey

Most of the time, it's easier to fork. . 🤞🏻😁😍So great