Why HTML has both <b / i> and <strong / em>?

TLDR;

• The b and i tags are from HTML's past, focusing on appearance.
• The strong and em tags represent HTML's present and future, focusing on meaning.

---

As a web developer, you might have noticed something puzzling. There seem to be two sets of tags that do very similar things:
1 The b tag makes text bold, and the i tag makes it italic.
2 The strong tag also makes text bold, and the em tag makes it italic.

So why does HTML have both? Aren't they doing the same job? Well, not exactly. Let's uncover the story behind these seemingly redundant pairs.

A Brief History Lesson

To understand why we have both sets of tags, we need to take a quick trip back in time. When HTML was first created in the early 1990s, it included the b and i tags. These tags were straightforward: b made text bold, and i made it italic. Simple, right?

But as the web evolved, developers and designers realised something important: HTML shouldn't just be about how things look. It should also be about what things mean.

Enter Semantic HTML

This realisation led to the concept of "semantic HTML”. The word "semantic" refers to the meaning of something. In the context of HTML, it means using tags that describe what the content is, not just how it looks.

This is where strong and em come in. These tags were introduced to give meaning to the text, not just change its appearance:

• strong indicates that the text is important or urgent.
• em (short for emphasis) suggests that the text should be stressed when read.

So, here's the big difference:

• b and i are about appearance. They tell the browser, "Make this text bold" or "Make this text italic."
• strong and em are about meaning. They tell the browser, "This text is important" or "This text should be emphasised”.

Why Does It Matters

You might be thinking, "Okay, but they still look the same on the page. Why should I care?”.
Well, I see two main reasons why this distinction is important:

• Accessibility: Screen readers (software that reads web pages aloud for visually impaired users) can interpret strong and em tags to add the right tone or emphasis when reading the text. They might just skip over b and i tags.
• Search engines: Some search engines might give more weight to text within strong tags, considering it more important.

When to Use Which?

Let's look at an example to make this clearer:

The zoo's new panda, named Mei Lan, will make her
<strong>public debut next Tuesday, July 16</strong>. 
Visitors are advised to arrive <em>early</em> as large 
crowds are expected. 

<b>Note:</b> Her favorite food is <i>bambusa vulgaris</i>,
a type of bamboo.

In this example:

• strong is used for the important information about the debut date.
• em emphasises that visitors should arrive early.
• b is used for a note that's visually distinct but not necessarily more important.
• i is used for the scientific name of the bamboo species.

The Bottom Line

While b/i and strong/em might look the same on a webpage, they serve different purposes.

• The b and i tags are from HTML's past, focusing on appearance.
• The strong and em tags represent HTML's present and future, focusing on meaning.

As a general rule, it's best to use strong and em in your HTML. They provide more information about your content's meaning and can improve accessibility and search engine optimisation.

However, b and i still have their places for purely visual styling or in specific situations where you don't want to imply extra importance or emphasis. That said, for simple visual styling, you can use a span elements with CSS classes, as it offers more flexibility and maintains a clearer separation between content and presentation.

Good HTML isn't just about making pages look right — it's about making them mean right too ;)

Comments

[Wizard]

Thanks for sharing this, I had same questions

[Kom Senapati]

Informative. I didn't know the differences between them.

[Best Codes]

Nice article. :) Very informative.

[It's Just Nifty]

What a great explanation!

[Mustapha Aouas]

Thank you!

[Eckehard]

For a truely modern formatting, these tags are just small drops on a very hot stone. So we could also ask, why the very few tags the history of HTML provided for formatting should be used at all, while 99% of the formatting is done in CSS.

[João Angelo]

Hi Mustapha Aouas,
Top, very nice and helpful !
Thanks for sharing.