DEV Community

Cover image for Agent Workflows and Tool Design for Edge MCP Servers
Om Shree
Om Shree

Posted on • Originally published at glama.ai

Agent Workflows and Tool Design for Edge MCP Servers

#discuss #programming #ai #tutorial

As organizations embrace the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to enable AI-powered IoT agents, the core challenge becomes not just deploying MCP servers, but doing so thoughtfully. How do we define lightweight, composable tools for sensor–actuator workflows? How should agents discover, plan, and continuously manage these tools while responding to dynamic inputs? This article fills that gap, bridging deployment and real-world use with practical tool design patterns and agent workflow strategies optimized for edge servers.

Understanding MCP Tools and Workflows

What Are MCP Tools?

Tools in MCP are schema-defined actions or operations, exposed by servers so that LLMs (agents) can discover and execute them via JSON-RPC 2.0. A typical tool definition includes:

  • name: Unique identifier
  • description: Natural language explanation
  • inputSchema: JSON Schema for valid parameters
  • annotations (optional): Hints such as readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, or idempotentHint to assist both LLM and users in understanding side effects and safety considerations1

These schemas ensure tool invocations are predictable, safe, and explainable, enabling agents to reason effectively about tool selection.

Agent Workflow: Discover → Plan → Execute

AI agents powered by MCP typically follow this loop:

  1. Discovery: Agents query tools/list to retrieve available tool interfaces and metadata.
  2. Planning: Based on user intent and tool metadata, the agent selects and sequences tool calls (e.g., readTemp, then adjustFan, then logStatus).
  3. Invocation: Through tools/call, execution is delegated to the MCP server, which validates inputs and performs the operation.
  4. Feedback: Results are returned to the agent to guide next steps or report outcome.
  5. Loop or Conclude: Proceed with further tool use or conclude with a user-facing response.

This structured control loop empowers agents with both flexibility and safety23.

Tool Design Best Practices for IoT Workflows

Designing robust tools for edge MCP servers is as much about clarity and safety as it is about functionality. The following principles help ensure that tools remain predictable, reusable, and agent-friendly in dynamic IoT environments:

Image

1. Atomic and Composable Tools

Each tool should do one thing well. Keep operations minimal (e.g., read_temperature, set_fan_speed), and let the agent orchestrate sequences of calls.

@mcp.tool(
  inputSchema={"type":"object","properties":{}},
  annotations={"readOnlyHint": True}
)
def read_temperature() -> float:
    return sensor.read_temp()

@mcp.tool(
  inputSchema={
    "type":"object",
    "properties":{"speed":{"type":"integer","minimum":0,"maximum":5}},
    "required":["speed"]
  },
  annotations={"destructiveHint": True}
)
def set_fan_speed(speed: int) -> str:
    fan.set_speed(speed)
    return f"Fan speed set to {speed}"
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

2. Strong Typing and Validation

Define strict JSON Schemas to prevent misconfiguration or prompt misuse. Enforce ranges and types wherever possible.

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "target": { "type": "number", "minimum": 18, "maximum": 30 }
  },
  "required": ["target"]
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This ensures an agent cannot accidentally request a temperature of -10°C or 100°C.

3. Annotations for Safe Use

Use MCP annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint) to signal intent and risk. This helps agents choose tools more safely when uncertain.

@mcp.tool(
  inputSchema={"type":"object","properties":{}},
  annotations={"idempotentHint": True, "readOnlyHint": True}
)
def get_status() -> dict:
    return {"temp": read_temperature(), "fan": fan.get_speed()}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

4. Error Reporting and Timeouts

Tools should fail gracefully. Return structured error messages and enforce execution timeouts to avoid stalls in resource-constrained environments.

try:
    value = sensor.read_temp(timeout=3)  # 3s timeout
except TimeoutError:
    return {"error": "TEMP_SENSOR_TIMEOUT", "message": "Temperature sensor unresponsive."}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

5. Modular Design

Group related tools under logical namespaces for clarity and scalability.

climate.read_temperature  
climate.set_target_temp  
climate.get_status  

lighting.turn_on  
lighting.turn_off  
lighting.dim
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This makes tool discovery easier for agents and humans alike.

6. Logging and Observability

Every tool should log inputs, outputs, and errors. Logs provide traceability and support debugging when agents behave unexpectedly.

import logging
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO)

@mcp.tool(inputSchema={...})
def set_target_temp(target: float) -> str:
    logging.info(f"set_target_temp called with target={target}")
    thermostat.set(target)
    return f"Target temperature set to {target}°C"
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

7. Security-Conscious Defaults

Apply the principle of least privilege. Do not expose admin or debug tools unless explicitly required. Add access policies where necessary.

@mcp.tool(
  inputSchema={...},
  annotations={"destructiveHint": True},
  secure=True  # hypothetical flag in custom implementation
)
def reboot_device() -> str:
    return system.reboot()
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Image

Together, these practices create a foundation of trust, safety, and composability, allowing IoT agents to execute real-world workflows with confidence.

Example: Sensor–Actuator Pipeline on Raspberry Pi

Below is a refined example showcasing modular, annotated tools for a smart thermostat agent:

from mcp.server.fastmcp import FastMCP
import datetime

mcp = FastMCP("Edge Thermostat MCP")

@mcp.tool(
  inputSchema={"type":"object","properties":{"":"temperature"},"required":["temperature"]},
  annotations={"idempotentHint": True}
)
def read_temp() -> float:
    # Example sensor read
    return sensor.read()

@mcp.tool(
  inputSchema={"type":"object","properties":{"target": {"type":"number","minimum":15,"maximum":30}},"required":["target"]},
  annotations={"destructiveHint": True}
)
def set_target_temp(target: float) -> str:
    thermostat.set(target)
    return f"Target temperature set to {target} °C."

@mcp.tool(
  inputSchema={"type":"object","properties":{}},
  annotations={"readOnlyHint": True}
)
def status() -> dict:
    return {"temp": read_temp(), "target": thermostat.get_target(), "time": datetime.datetime.now().isoformat()}

if __name__ == "__main__":
    mcp.run(transport="sse", host="0.0.0.0", port=8000)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This setup allows agents to dynamically:

  • Check current temperature
  • Adjust target settings within safe bounds
  • Fetch consolidated status reports With type safety, metadata, and clear boundaries for action.

Real-World Extensions: Dynamic Tool Discovery and Secure Execution

As real-world deployments scale, MCP ecosystems benefit from adaptive tool registries and trust-aware execution. Frameworks like ScaleMCP extend the protocol with dynamic tool registration and runtime discovery, enabling AI agents to automatically detect newly available tools without requiring redeployment or static configuration4. This facilitates flexible orchestration in environments where capabilities evolve such as modular smart factories or home automation hubs.

Image

To address the trust and integrity of such dynamic systems, architectures like ETDI (Encrypted Tool Description Interface) implement cryptographic signing, origin verification, and policy enforcement on tool metadata. These safeguards ensure that agents execute only vetted and authorized tools, mitigating risks from compromised hardware or unauthorized tool injection5. Such trust models are critical for high-stakes domains like critical infrastructure, industrial robotics, and healthcare automation.

My Thoughts

Deploying MCP at the edge is not merely about connecting agents to devices, it’s about engineering trust, adaptability, and resilience into the workflows themselves. Thoughtfully designed tools, annotated with safety metadata and structured around schema-driven principles, give agents the clarity to make reliable decisions under uncertainty. Layered extensions such as dynamic discovery and cryptographic safeguards push MCP beyond basic automation, enabling systems that not only execute tasks but also reason, adapt, and evolve alongside changing environments. The future of edge AI lies in this shift, from static integrations toward living, agentic ecosystems where safety, flexibility, and intelligence co-exist by design.

References

  1. "Tools – Model Context Protocol" ↩

  2. "How Model Context Protocol works: connect AI agents to tools" ↩

  3. "Model Context Protocol: A Deep Dive – Monster API" ↩

  4. "ScaleMCP: Dynamic and Auto‑Synchronizing Model Context Protocol Tools for LLM Agents" ↩

  5. "ETDI: Mitigating Tool Squatting and Rug Pull Attacks in Model Context Protocol (MCP) by using OAuth‑Enhanced Tool Definitions and Policy‑Based Access Control" ↩

Top comments (2)

Collapse
 
thedeepseeker profile image
Anna kowoski •

Great!

Collapse
 
om_shree_0709 profile image
Om Shree •

Thanks Anna!