As a developer I've been using Git and Github for the past few years. To me, it's such a breath of fresh air compared to SVN and gasp CVS. I also find that Github has the most mature integrations and tooling compared to Gitlab and Bitbucket. I'm interested to hear what others use, and more importantly, why.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Top comments (26)
Disclaimer: I worked for Atlassian for many years and I lead the launch of Bitbucket Pipelines.
I'm curious to know what you think is missing from it compared to Github. I still use Bitbucket now (obviously 😊) but I use Github for open source things.
Personally I don't see any missing tooling from BitBucket, especially now that they have added .NET Core to Pipelines. I prefer BitBucket for private, company repos but keep my own personal OSS stuff in GitHub.
Code snippets could use a workover in BitBucket. I find them hard to keep organized. It would be nice if BitBucket could add tags (e.g. language) and make snippets searchable.
I like Bitbucket really much. I'm only using GitHub, because it's so common. Companies and people are looking for your GitHub account and not for any kind of account in this direction. That's the only reason I didn't moved everything to Bitbucket. But it's awesome and I understand people using it.
I honestly haven't given Bitbucket a try in a couple years, but yeah, I just find the amount on integrations with Github, the API, the UX and the whole package that Github has hard to beat.
I use Git for everything, but I only use GitHub for running personal projects. For development teams, I like Phabricator - it's got one of the most robust set of collaborative tools I've seen!
Phabricator is pretty great for organizations.
I clicked in with the mindset of "I use GitHub but am not especially enamored with its collaboration tools". Glad to have found out about Phabricator. I don't have a burning need to change any time soon though (which I'd say is the biggest hurdle in competing with a GitHub)
As an employee of a corporation, we can't risk letting our code getting out.
Remember the other day how GitHub reported x security flaws in the repositores they hold? I'm pretty sure that means they parsed all the source code from all the users :D
We have a tool similar to Jira, but for smaller projects we use gitlab + youtrack with local repositories.
Here's their policy:
"When GitHub receives a notification of a newly-announced vulnerability, we identify public repositories (and private repositories that have opted in to vulnerability detection) that use the affected version of the dependency. Then, we send security alerts to owners and people with admin access to affected repositories."
It looks like they operate an opt-in for security scanning.
foreach (code in codebase) {
..analyze();
....if(wantNotification){
..sendNotification();
..}
}
:D
Surely the optimizer can fix this?
I use Github for open source stuff, because it's still kind of default tool there and it would be weird to use anything else. But for as much as possible (e.g. example projects using open source stuff, my personal private projects etc.) I prefer Gitlab. Why? Gitlab has the best UX/UI from the triad (Github, Gitlab, Bitbucket) and offers a lot for free. It's also open source, so you really know what's happening under the hood. They have very fast response times for issues too.
I used BitBucket for that, but it has its shortcomings. For example, it does not support signed commits. And lately it fails a lot for a long time.
However, it's never and obvious choice as each of those platforms excels at something:
I use mainly Team Foundation Server. But that will be used only for projects cate repos. It gives me the ability to create a complete Devops solution. And yes... It support git very well as long with pull requests and so on.
For personal projects where I just want SCM and no integrations, I use AWS' CodeCommit. It's free up to 5 contributors.
For projects that are for clients where the source is closed, but need CD integration with services like Netlify, I'll use BitBucket.
For work, personal site and code that I share socially, it all goes to Github. Mostly for pull requests, social aspects and integrations.
I discovered Gitlab a year ago and I've fallen in love with it. I've used it professionally as a self hosted instance and also on Gitlab.com.
Their CI tools are powerful and really easy to set up.
Anyhow I have the impression that GitHub is better for open source project since most of the potential contributors use it and already have an account on it.
I mainly use gitlab.
I like that all the features are free (private repositories as the prime example).
My laptop broke recently. Because I used Gitlab systematically for every project I create, when I got the new laptop I was amazed how quickly I started working!
I remember when I started, any problems with my computer would set me back in a major way.
I moved from bitbucket to gitlab because organising repositories into folders was very attractive.
I have started using github as an open portfolio
I use Bitbucket for my personal projects and GitHub for OSS. If I had to make the decision now I'd probably use GitHub for everything, but at the time GitHub charged you depending on the number of repositories in your account.
I like to have all my repos in one place and I keep all my old stuff around as kind of an archive, so GitHub would've been crazy expensive back then. Nowadays their pricing is reasonable, but switching everything isn't worth the hassle for me and honestly, Bitbucket is really great too! GitHub has slightly better issue management but overall I really enjoy Bitbucket.
Git on TFS(planned to migrate to VSTS). Why? Our whole estate is based on Microsoft tools and everything integrates quite well.
You have Git for source control, it has forking, pull requests, good search, plays quite well with active directory and permissions. Build and release tools are right in place and is extendable with plug-ins.