DEV Community

Cover image for Choosing the Right Logging Library: Winston vs Pino vs Log4js vs Morgan
Saikumar
Saikumar

Posted on

Choosing the Right Logging Library: Winston vs Pino vs Log4js vs Morgan

Logging is an essential part of any application, helping developers debug issues, monitor performance, and maintain system health. With multiple logging libraries available in the Node.js ecosystem, choosing the right one can be challenging. In this post, we’ll compare four popular logging libraries—Winston, Pino, Log4js, and Morgan—based on key features to help you make an informed decision.

1. Overview of the Logging Libraries

Each of these libraries serves different use cases:

  • Winston – A flexible and feature-rich logging library that supports multiple transports.
  • Pino – A high-performance JSON-based logger with built-in redaction and async logging.
  • Log4js – A logging framework inspired by log4j, supporting various transports and flexible formatting.
  • Morgan – A lightweight middleware specifically designed for HTTP request logging.

2. Feature Comparison

Feature Winston Log4js Morgan Pino
Log Levels ✅ Predefined + Custom ✅ Predefined + Custom ❌ Not supported ✅ Predefined + Custom
Custom Formats ✅ Flexible formatting ✅ Flexible formatting ✅ Custom formatting possible ✅ Highly customizable
Child Loggers ✅ Supported ✅ Supported ❌ Not supported ✅ Fully supported
HTTP Logging ❌ Not native ❌ Not native ✅ Built for HTTP ✅ Supports HTTP logging
JSON Output ✅ Default ✅ Default ❌ Middleware only ✅ Default JSON format
Redaction (Sensitive Data) ❌ Not built-in ❌ Not built-in ❌ Not built-in ✅ Built-in redaction
Async Logging ✅ Supported ✅ Supported ❌ Not supported ✅ Highly performant
Error Logging ✅ Supported ✅ Supported ❌ Not designed for errors ✅ Comprehensive error handling
Performance High Medium Medium Very High
Ease of Use Medium Medium High Medium
File Transport ✅ Supported ✅ Supported ❌ Not supported ✅ Supported
Console Transport ✅ Supported ✅ Supported ✅ Supported ✅ Supported
HTTP Transport ✅ Supported ✅ Supported ❌ Not supported ✅ Supported
MongoDB Transport ✅ Supported ✅ Supported ❌ Not supported ✅ Supported
CloudWatch Transport ✅ Supported ❌ Not supported ❌ Not supported ✅ Supported
Profiling ✅ Built-in (start/stop) ✅ Basic profiling ❌ Not supported ✅ Built-in profiling
Querying Logs ✅ Supported (Filters + Options) ✅ Supported (Filters + Options) ❌ Not supported ✅ Supported (Filters + Redaction)
Custom Metadata ✅ Fully supported ✅ Fully supported ✅ Limited support ✅ Fully supported

3. Choosing the Right Logging Library

Now that we have a comparison, let’s determine which logger is best suited for different use cases.

If You Need a General-Purpose Logger:

Winston is a great choice if you want a well-supported, flexible logger with multiple transports. It supports different log levels, file storage, and even remote transports like Elasticsearch and Redis.

If You Need High Performance:

Pino is the fastest logging library among the four. It’s optimized for async logging, supports JSON output by default, and includes built-in redaction for sensitive data.

If You Want Simplicity and Compatibility with log4j:

Log4js is inspired by log4j and provides flexible formatting, multiple transports, and easy configuration. If you’re coming from Java or using a log4j-like setup, Log4js is a good option.

If You Only Need HTTP Logging:

Morgan is purpose-built for HTTP request logging. If you’re looking for a lightweight middleware for Express or other frameworks, Morgan is the simplest choice.

4. Final Thoughts

  • Choose Winston if you need an all-in-one logging solution with multiple transports.
  • Choose Pino if performance is your top priority.
  • Choose Log4js if you want a familiar log4j-style configuration.
  • Choose Morgan if you only need HTTP request logging.

Each library has its strengths and weaknesses, so the best choice depends on your project’s needs. If performance is crucial, go with Pino. If flexibility is key, Winston is a solid choice. And if you only need HTTP request logging, Morgan is the simplest option.

Let us know which logging library you prefer and why in the comments below!

Image of Timescale

📊 Benchmarking Databases for Real-Time Analytics Applications

Benchmarking Timescale, Clickhouse, Postgres, MySQL, MongoDB, and DuckDB for real-time analytics. Introducing RTABench 🚀

Read full post →

Top comments (0)

Sentry image

See why 4M developers consider Sentry, “not bad.”

Fixing code doesn’t have to be the worst part of your day. Learn how Sentry can help.

Learn more

👋 Kindness is contagious

Explore a trove of insights in this engaging article, celebrated within our welcoming DEV Community. Developers from every background are invited to join and enhance our shared wisdom.

A genuine "thank you" can truly uplift someone’s day. Feel free to express your gratitude in the comments below!

On DEV, our collective exchange of knowledge lightens the road ahead and strengthens our community bonds. Found something valuable here? A small thank you to the author can make a big difference.

Okay