Introduction: Why Start Lean
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is one of the most exciting ways to build AI tools today. It allows large language models (LLMs) to use external knowledge, making their answers more accurate and up to date.
But there’s a catch: most guides and tutorials push you toward heavy setups, managed vector databases, planned frameworks, and lots of moving parts. That’s great if you’re running a large-scale system, but it’s overkill if you just want to test an idea or build a minimum viable product (MVP).
The truth is, you don’t need all that infrastructure to get started. You can build a simple RAG MVP with lightweight tools, keep your costs low, and still deliver something useful. This article will show you how to do exactly that, step by step.
The Minimal RAG Stack
Before writing any code, let’s get clear on what a lean RAG setup really needs. The good news is: not much. You only need a few building blocks to make it work.
Document ingestion & chunking: Take your text (like a PDF, article, or notes) and split it into smaller pieces so the model can understand it better.
Embeddings: Turn those text chunks into vectors (numbers) so they can be searched by meaning, not just keywords.
Lightweight storage: Instead of a big database, you can store vectors in memory, in a simple file, or with a tiny local vector store like FAISS or SQLite.
Retrieval + LLM query: When a user asks a question, find the most relevant chunks, send them to the LLM, and get a grounded answer back.
For this tutorial, we will use:
OpenAI API for embeddings and answers.
In-memory/FAISS for storage.
A simple backend (Node.js, Python, or anything lightweight) to glue it together.
That’s it. No complex frameworks, no external vector databases, no heavy infrastructure. Just the essentials to get a working MVP.
Step-by-Step: Building a Lean RAG MVP
Now let’s put the pieces together. We will go step by step and show how a lean RAG system works in practice. Each step has a small code snippet and a quick note on trade-offs.
1. Upload and Chunk a Document
The first step is to load your document and split it into smaller chunks. This helps the model process long text more effectively.
function chunkText(text, size = 500, overlap = 50) {
const chunks = [];
for (let i = 0; i < text.length; i += size - overlap) {
chunks.push(text.slice(i, i + size));
}
return chunks;
}
const text = "Your document content goes here...";
const chunks = chunkText(text);
console.log(chunks.slice(0, 3)); // preview first few chunks
👉 Trade-off: Smaller chunks = more precise search, but risk losing context.
2. Generate Embeddings and Store Them Locally
We’ll create embeddings for each chunk and store them in memory.
import OpenAI from "openai";
const openai = new OpenAI({ apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY });
const vectors = [];
for (const chunk of chunks) {
const emb = await openai.embeddings.create({
model: "text-embedding-3-small",
input: chunk,
});
vectors.push({ embedding: emb.data[0].embedding, text: chunk });
}
console.log("Stored vectors:", vectors.length);
👉 Trade-off: In-memory storage is fast but temporary. Use SQLite/FAISS if you need persistence.
3. Retrieve Top-k Matches for a Query
We’ll compare a query embedding to stored embeddings using cosine similarity.
const query = "What does the document say about pricing?";
const qEmb = await openai.embeddings.create({
model: "text-embedding-3-small",
input: query,
});
const results = vectors
.map(v => ({ text: v.text, score: cosineSimilarity(qEmb.data[0].embedding, v.embedding) }))
.sort((a, b) => b.score - a.score)
.slice(0, 3);
console.log("Top results:", results.map(r => r.text));
👉 Trade-off: More results give better context but cost more when sent to the LLM.
4. Pass Matches to the LLM and Get an Answer
const context = results.map(r => r.text).join("\n");
const prompt = `Answer the question using the context below:\n\n${context}\n\nQuestion: ${query}`;
const response = await openai.chat.completions.create({
model: "gpt-4o-mini",
messages: [{ role: "user", content: prompt }],
});
console.log("Answer:", response.choices[0].message.content);
👉 Trade-off: Larger prompts improve accuracy but increase token usage.
And that’s it! 🎉
With just these four steps, you have a working lean RAG MVP:
- Split text into chunks.
- Generate embeddings.
- Store and search locally.
- Retrieve context + ask the LLM. No heavy infra, no vector DB, no frameworks. Just the essentials.
Practical Tips for MVPs
Building a lean RAG MVP is simple, but keeping it useful and affordable takes a few smart choices. Here are some tips to help you along the way:
1. Control your costs
- Use smaller embedding models like text-embedding-3-small for prototyping.
- Limit how many chunks you send to the LLM (usually top 3 to 5 is enough).
- Add per-user quotas or rate limits if you’re testing with others.
2. Keep it lightweight
- Store vectors in memory or a small file/database while experimenting.
- Avoid adding too many libraries, simplicity is your friend at this stage.
- Run everything locally or on a small server (no need for cloud clusters yet).
3. Know when to scale
- If your dataset grows large, look into vector databases like Pinecone, Weaviate, or Qdrant.
- If your app needs workflows (summarization + Q&A + routing), tools like LangChain or LlamaIndex can help.
- But don’t jump there too early. Build something lean first, then expand when you hit limits.
The goal of an MVP isn’t to be perfect. It’s to prove your idea works. Once you have that, you can decide whether it’s worth investing in heavier infrastructure.
Conclusion
You don’t need heavy infrastructure to start with Retrieval-Augmented Generation. With just a few simple steps, chunking text, creating embeddings, storing them locally, and retrieving the right context. You can build a working RAG MVP in a single afternoon.
The lean approach keeps costs low, setup simple, and ideas easy to test. Once your prototype shows promise, you can always scale up with vector databases, orchestration tools, and more advanced setups.
But the key lesson is this: start small, learn fast, and build only what you need.
If you try building your own lean RAG MVP, share your experience. What worked for you, and what challenges you faced. The community grows when we share these lightweight but powerful experiments.
Top comments (0)