DEV Community

Ben Halpern
Ben Halpern Subscriber

Posted on

AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud

In the second post of this compare/contrast/debate series, I present the biggest cloud platforms.

You're welcome to pick your favorite and debate it out, but comments comparing the major differences are very welcome. ๐Ÿ™

Top comments (51)

Collapse
 
rrampage profile image
Raunak Ramakrishnan • Edited

I have used GCP and AWS so far... I favor AWS slightly over GCP.

GCP

Pros:

  • Cost
  • Browser SSH for quick debugging (cloud shell)
  • Instant resizing of disks, memory for the compute instances
  • Cloud Pub/Sub is great
  • Firebase is useful for prototyping

Cons:

  • Support. They need to improve this and be more customer focused.
  • Reliability - There have been a few incidents where their network was down. But they have been quite stable since.

AWS

Pros:

  • Reliability - The best among the major cloud provider
  • Support - They understand customer pain points very well. Even their free tier support is helpful.
  • Documentation - Comprehensive and generally up to date
  • They have never killed any existing service. Even deprecated ones are still around though customers are discouraged from using them.

Cons:

  • Cost - AWS is generally more expensive than GCP
  • Calculating costs - Sometimes I feel we need a PhD in Cloud Economics to calculate AWS bill especially with Lambda, API Gateway, Cloudwatch.
  • Too many services with weird names or acronyms. Keeping track of them can become cumbersome.
Collapse
 
vacom profile image
Vitor Amaral

This here "Sometimes I feel we need a PhD in Cloud Economics to calculate AWS bill " is so true. ๐Ÿ˜‚

Collapse
 
madebygps profile image
Gwyneth Peรฑa-Siguenza

If you're a Windows shop: Azure > AWS > GCP.
If you want to get started learning in order to get a job: AWS > Azure > GCP. There's just more jobs and documentation on AWS than the others, though Azure is catching up quickly.
My personal favorite is Azure, the UI and support has been way better to manage than AWS. GCP UI is overcomplicated.

Collapse
 
xowap profile image
Rรฉmy ๐Ÿค–

The AWS UI feels like a cold bath of austerity and hardships but in the Azure UI you replace water with liquid nitrogen... Every time I used it I got countless errors on literally everything I did.

Collapse
 
efrancis profile image
e-francis

I started with GCP,. Now Azure

Collapse
 
andrewbrown profile image
Andrew Brown ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

AWS > Azure > GCP

Collapse
 
simonhaisz profile image
simonhaisz

This certainly aligns with marketshare

Collapse
 
jacoby profile image
Dave Jacoby

Accepting this as the Codd's honest truth, I would like to hear more explanation about why. Capability? Complexity? Cost?

Collapse
 
somedood profile image
Basti Ortiz

Well, that was straightforward... ๐Ÿ˜‚

Collapse
 
decentgradient profile image
Joseph Friedman

Can you elaborate?

Collapse
 
filibit profile image
Filip Biterski

I've just published an app on AWS with cloudfront distribution. What I can say is, even though many claim it's very complicated, it's surprisingly well documented. I registered a domain, uploaded files for a static site on S3, and setup a cloudfront https distribution in a day.

Collapse
 
harveyhalwin profile image
Heinek Halwin

Also the caching capabilities of the cloudfront network at their edge locations. ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿป

Collapse
 
dtinth profile image
Thai Pangsakulyanont

I use both AWS and GCP.

On GCP I use:

  • Cloud Speech-To-Text. I donโ€™t see any competitor that gets it more accurately than Google.
  • Firebase Realtime Database. I donโ€™t see anything thatโ€™s more simple to use.
  • Cloud Run. I donโ€™t see anything like this on AWS. Tried Fargate before but the last time I tried, for a large container, it times out booting up. I donโ€™t see any real competitor for Cloud Run yet.

On AWS I use:

  • Cloud9. I like it that I can choose from a whole catalog of EC2 instance types and pay just for the EC2 price. Cloud9 auto-shutdowns the EC2 instance when unused, so an $80/mo machine ended up costing me just $20/mo. I also use Cloud9 to develop projects running on GCP. I tried Google Cloud Shell but for me itโ€™s not a good substitute.
  • Lambda. The last time I benchmarked it (by invoking simultaneously thousands compute-intensive functions) I found Lambda to be the most stable.
Collapse
 
geshan profile image
Geshan Manandhar

Cloud Run is amazing.

Collapse
 
xowap profile image
Rรฉmy ๐Ÿค–

AWS โ€” Does everything, super complex because super complete, state of the art

GCP โ€” Slightly simpler, full of Google-specific quirks

Azure โ€” Ow gawd will I ever manage to create an account? How many errors 500 can a mainstream cloud provider get per second? Does anything work in there?

Collapse
 
idoshamun profile image
Ido Shamun

A GCP fanboy right here. Their Kubernetes as a service (GKE) is #1. I think GCP is super under rated if you look at the cost and the services that you get. Also their dashboard is pretty straightforward compared to AWS and Azure where I can never navigate properly.

Collapse
 
vacom profile image
Vitor Amaral

You're right the GCP dashboard is the most simple and organized, but Azure is not far away, AWS is a mess

Collapse
 
efrancis profile image
e-francis

Can't agree less

Collapse
 
sirseanofloxley profile image
Sean Allin Newell

๐Ÿ‘ Let's ๐Ÿ‘ go ๐Ÿ‘ multi ๐Ÿ‘ cloud ๐Ÿ‘.

Collapse
 
tiannymonti profile image
Tatiana Barrios • Edited

Hi all!

I would say AWS > GCP

Favorite thing from AWS: Lambda, S3 + Cloudfront. There you can get a web app up and running in less than a day.
Favorite thing from GCP: Shell console and Kubernetes :)

I hate from AWS: Pricing... ugh
I hate from GCP: The UI is kind of complicated, it's like they are stashing a lot of stuff in little space.

I have never used Azure, even though I'm open to <3

Collapse
 
brianmcbride profile image
Brian McBride

I'm late to the conversation here.
The GCP FIrebase tools gives you a web app that offers WAY more features (like auto certs, HTTP2, etc...) and you can have a deployment going in about 15 minutes.

Seriously, check out the Firebase CLI tools. Just create a project with hosting and cloud functions and you have a simpler version of Lambda/S3/Cloudfront. HUGELY easier.

In the end, they both work. And Cloudfront has some better rules for things like IP filtering.

Last, I guess if you are used to AWS you might find it easier. I work with both daily, so I am used to both. GCP is sooooo much better in the UI. They also have APIs for everything and the GCLOUD command tool has full coverage. Someone new to the cloud providers, GCP is super easy.

Collapse
 
calvincty profile image
Calvin Chong

Agree with UI AWS > GCP, both navigation is mess but GCP make it worst. I use search which is much faster to locate what I want, AWS search result is straightforward

Collapse
 
sir_wernich profile image
Wernich ๏ธ

azure is by far the best one i've used so far*

*i've only used azure. :D

we use azure devops at work for source control with git and last week i decided to give the extra bits a whirl, so now i'm busy reading up on pipelines and deployment and so on (having tons of fun with their learning paths). also, i committed to doing a showcase this friday about using azure pipelines to build and deploy a docker container when a PR succeeds...

Collapse
 
vitale232 profile image
Andrew Vitale

Nice! Similar situation here. My company has a Visual Studio Pro account for each dev, which comes with $50 worth of monthly credit in addition to the DevOps pipelines/artifacts. Just started playing around with Blob Storage and their CDN. It's quite nice, but I do prefer AWS a little bit. First love, I guess ๐Ÿ˜