AI-powered command-line interfaces (CLIs) have exploded in popularity, giving developers superpowers to write, edit, and manage code more efficiently than ever. But as tools like Google’s Gemini CLI , Anthropic’s Claude Code CLI , and OpenAI’s Codex CLI rise to prominence, many developers are hitting a wall. The flashy feature lists don’t always reflect the real-world experience.
READ NEXT BLOG HERE: https://glaxit.com/blog/future-of-it-online-courses-in-pakistan-2026/
If you’ve ever been frustrated by one of these tools or found yourself asking “Is this really the best AI can do?” you are not alone. Let’s cut through the marketing hype and get real about what’s working, what’s not, and what you need to know.
Surface-Level Comparisons Are Misleading
Most blogs throw together the same checklist: coding speed, supported languages, free tier limits. But they ignore usability, reliability, and actual developer workflows.
Real Issue:
You don’t just want features. You want something that works consistently, adapts to your workflow, and doesn’t hallucinate code into oblivion.
🔧 Solution:
In this blog, we go beyond checklists and dig into:
- Actual CLI commands and user flows
- Real-world frustrations
- Honest model behavior
- Setup hurdles no one tells you about
Developer Workflows Matter (And They’re Often Ignored)
Setup Friction:
- Gemini CLI: Cross-platform, easy install, but requires Google sign-in
- Claude Code: Mac-only for now (Linux unofficially works), easy onboarding
- Codex CLI: Linux/macOS only, Windows users must use WSL (a pain point!)
“Codex CLI made me install WSL. Took me 40 minutes just to get started.” — Developer comment on GitHub
Command Style:
- Claude uses commands/ folders for reusable slash commands
- Gemini uses a persistent GEMINI.md for memory
- Codex is prompt-only with no persistent config
This affects how fast and fluid your work feels. Claude’s command library saves tons of time on repeated tasks.
AI Behavior: When Smart Becomes Stubborn
Real Issue:
Gemini CLI users report frustrating behavior: over-cautious filtering, refusal to execute basic code, or generating incorrect results.
“Gemini refused to run a shell command that was completely safe. Then it suggested something nonsensical.”
Solution:
- Claude Code has better adherence to instructions and smoother task chaining
- Codex is hit or miss; fast but lacks context awareness
If you want consistent, high-fidelity results in multi-step coding tasks, Claude Code is currently the most reliable.
Privacy & Transparency: What Happens to Your Code?
Common Concern:
“If I use Gemini CLI for free, is Google training on my code?”
Answer:
- If you use your own API key: No, Google does not use your prompts for training
- If you use the free login: Terms are less clear; likely used for improvement, though anonymized
Claude Code:
- No free tier, but clearly privacy-focused. Paid only, and no training on user prompts
- Uses OpenAI API key. If you’re on ChatGPT Plus, it consumes monthly credits. Privacy settings depend on API terms
TIP: For any CLI, use a self-hosted or API-key version to ensure maximum data control.
Real Command Support: Not All CLIs Are Created Equal
Want to write a README instantly?
gemini chat -p "Write a README for this project"
Claude doesn’t yet support natural language prompts like this in the CLI without customization.
Free Tiers and Usage Limits: What They Don’t Tell You
Gemini CLI:
- 1,000 requests/day (Google login)
- BUT: May silently downgrade to lower-tier model if usage spikes
Claude Code:
- No free tier. Claude Pro/Max subscription required
Codex CLI:
- Uses your OpenAI API credits
“Why did Gemini suddenly get dumb halfway through my session?”
Likely a model downgrade after crossing a hidden usage threshold
Pro tip: Watch for quality dips. If Gemini starts making mistakes, re-authenticate or throttle your usage.
Multimodal & Non-Coding Use Cases: Underrated Strengths
Gemini CLI supports:
- Images
- PDFs
- Long-form text
This makes it useful for documentation, marketing copy, and debugging screenshots.
Example: gemini chat -p "Summarize this PDF" --file company_roadmap.pdf
Claude and Codex don’t support multimodal input in CLI (yet).
Final Thoughts: Which One Should You Use?
Recommendation:
- Use Claude Code if you’re a professional dev needing accuracy and flow.
- Use Gemini CLI if you’re multitasking across content and code.
- Use Codex CLI if you’re already invested in the OpenAI ecosystem.
Bonus: Real User Tips
- Use GEMINI.md to give Gemini memory for long-term tasks
- Build a commands/ folder with Claude for repeated prompts
- Always use CLI tools in a separate Git branch to review changes
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: Is Gemini CLI truly open source and can I trust it in my workflow?
Yes. Gemini CLI is Apache 2.0 licensed and fully open-source, offering transparency and extensibility.
Q2: What are the limits of the free usage for each CLI (and what happens if I exceed them)?
Gemini offers 1,000 free requests per day but may silently downgrade model quality. Claude has no free tier. Codex depends on OpenAI API credits.
Q3: Can these AI CLIs be used for non-coding tasks or integrated into automation?
Yes. Gemini and Codex CLI can be used in automation scripts. Gemini also handles non-code tasks like PDF summarization.
Q4: How do I ensure code quality and safety when using AI CLIs?
Always review AI-generated code in a separate Git branch, test changes thoroughly, and don’t blindly commit suggestions.
Q5: What if I already use ChatGPT or Copilot – do I need an AI CLI too?
Yes, if you want shell-level automation, project-wide control, or multimodal input. AI CLIs complement Copilot, not replace it.
Conclusion
Most AI CLI comparisons are surface-level. But if you’re serious about coding with AI, you need to know how these tools actually behave. Gemini CLI is flexible and open, but sometimes inconsistent. Claude Code is polished and reliable but locked behind a paywall. Codex CLI is aging, but still useful for terminal-first users. Pick the one that fits your daily grind and don’t be afraid to mix and match.
Top comments (0)