DEV Community

Omer Rosenbaum
Omer Rosenbaum

Posted on

What's one piece of advice every dev should ignore? 🚩🚩🚩

We'll go first >

"Good code is self-documenting"

What would you add?

Top comments (29)

Collapse
 
diethrone profile image
Sagar Barapatre

I according to me this is the advice I often hear that I definitely ignore:

If your change is small enough there's no need to test.

Collapse
 
ben profile image
Ben Halpern

"Smallness" is definitely not the proper litmus test.

And if you don't want that small change to break later, a regression test couldn't possibly hurt, right?

Collapse
 
diethrone profile image
Sagar Barapatre

Yeah, absolutely!!

Collapse
 
unofficialdxnny profile image
Danial Ahmed

Yes same lol! for example if I'm making scripts in python and I change to add a print statement with colour I always run the program to make sure it works as I want it to.

Collapse
 
sherrydays profile image
Sherry Day

"X is dead. You should probably find a hot new thing to learn."

Collapse
 
ben profile image
Ben Halpern

Any super duper opinionated advice on which software to choose for a problem.

A good suggestion is always useful — but when it's approached with an outside amount of conviction, one should take that with a grain of salt. The advice often lacks context.

Collapse
 
curiousdev profile image
CuriousDev

The "good code" can definitely be self-documenting to some extent. There can be exceptions of course.

Collapse
 
jamesthomson profile image
James Thomson

Seriously. I find most projects built with TS are pretty much self documenting. There are obviously more factors, but a well typed project will get you 90% of the way.

Collapse
 
dinerdas profile image
Diner Das

Any advice about documentation that does not include ongoing structure and discipline.

Maintaining good docs is inherently pretty difficult, and there is no magical solution. Good documentation is a matter of a number of combinatory factors that can lead to success, there is no silver bullet.

Collapse
 
ben profile image
Ben Halpern

Dogma which is complemented by dogmatic backlashes to the original dogma: A software story.

Collapse
 
alaindet profile image
Alain D'Ettorre

"Learn X, it's faster and better than Y"

The missing part is that X is something of a hyped POC, with virtually no real project using it, with less DX than Y, while Y is battle-tested and there's no real reason to change it expect for hype and some weird scenarios.

Collapse
 
pauldubois777 profile image
Paul DuBois • Edited

Advice to ignore:

Don't ever ignore any advice, as you can always learn something from any advice you get, and also show respect to those who offer it, but consider the source.

Wrap your head around that one!

;)

Collapse
 
techman09 profile image
TechMan09

Wrap your head around that one!, I cannot!

Collapse
 
leob profile image
leob

No - "Good code is self-documenting" is a basic truth, up to a point ... it's a useful guideline, if not taken too far (sometimes you do need to write comments).

Collapse
 
techman09 profile image
TechMan09

Why don’t you code code it yourself instead of complaining about that library or whatever-the-heck you called it?

Uh, because complaining is fun, and it will take me an extra 100 years to code it myself…