π― Pied Piper a AI Dorker v3.0 - Advanced OSINT Tool for AI Service Security Research
A precision-focused OSINT tool designed for ethical security research of AI conversational platforms. This tool helps security researchers identify potential data exposures in popular AI chat services through advanced search techniques and intelligent content analysis.
π¨ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
This tool is developed for educational and ethical security research purposes only. Users must:
- β Comply with all applicable laws and regulations
- β Obtain proper authorization before testing
- β Follow responsible disclosure practices
- β Respect platform terms of service
- β Never access unauthorized data
- β Never cause harm to systems or users
π Research Background
Modern AI conversational platforms often generate shareable links for conversations, which may inadvertently expose sensitive information through search engine indexing. Our research focuses on identifying these exposures to help improve platform security.
Supported Platforms
- Character.AI (beta.character.ai)
- ChatGPT (chatgpt.com)
- Claude (claude.ai)
- Perplexity (perplexity.ai)
- Poe (poe.com)
- Google Bard (bard.google.com)
π Research Findings
During our ethical security research conducted in August 2025, we identified several concerning patterns:
Case Study: Character.AI Exposure
Finding: Public accessibility of private conversation data
- Platform: Character.AI (beta.character.ai)
- Issue: Chat conversations with sensitive data indexed by search engines
- Risk Level: HIGH β οΈ
- Confidence: 55% (Medium confidence based on AI indicators)
Sample Discovery:
URL: https://beta.character.ai/chat/post/?post=j5HA_MeyGtCRS2E-Eq6l_s__GJMdToYauFmQs0I_M6k
Type: API key exposure
Data Found: JSON structure with external IDs and potential tokens
Status: Reported through responsible disclosure
Technical Details:
- Exposed JSON structure containing conversation metadata
- Potential API key patterns detected
- Public accessibility without authentication
- Search engine indexing enabled
π οΈ Tool Architecture
Core Components
-
Precision Dorking Engine
- Service-specific search queries
- Intelligent false positive filtering
- Multi-engine search support
-
AI Content Validator
- Platform-specific response pattern detection
- Confidence scoring system
- Sensitive data pattern recognition
-
Smart Analysis Framework
- URL structure validation
- Content authenticity verification
- Risk assessment algorithms
π Installation & Usage
Requirements
pip install requests beautifulsoup4 sqlite3
Basic Usage
# Full scan of all supported platforms
python piedpiper.py --all -d 5-10 -r 25
# Scan specific service
python piedpiper.py --service chatgpt -d 8-15
# List available services
python piedpiper.py --list-services
π Sample Output
================================================================================
π― AI DORKER v3.0 - PRECISE REPORT
================================================================================
π ANALYSIS RESULTS:
β
Confirmed leaks found: 1
π Analysis time: 2025-08-01 15:16:54
π― DISTRIBUTION BY SERVICES:
CHARACTER_AI : 1 leak(s)
β οΈ CRITICALITY LEVELS:
π HIGH : 1
π CONFIDENCE IN RESULTS:
π’ High (β₯70%): 0
π‘ Medium (40-69%): 1
π΄ Low (<40%): 0
π¨ CRITICAL LEAKS (TOP-5):
[1] CHARACTER_AI - HIGH
π URL: https://beta.character.ai/chat/post/?post=j5HA_***
π Leak Type: api_key
π Confidence: 0.55
π€ AI Indicators: 1
π Fragment: {"post": {"visibility": "PUBLIC", "external_id": "..."
π§ Technical Implementation
Precision Dorking System
class PreciseAIServiceDorks:
AI_SERVICES = {
'chatgpt': {
'domains': ['chatgpt.com', 'chat.openai.com'],
'valid_paths': ['/share/', '/c/', '/g/'],
'dorks': [
'site:chatgpt.com/share intitle:"ChatGPT"',
'site:chatgpt.com/share "API key" OR "secret key"',
# ... additional precision dorks
]
},
'character_ai': {
'domains': ['character.ai', 'beta.character.ai'],
'valid_paths': ['/chat/', '/character/'],
'dorks': [
'site:character.ai/chat intitle:"Character.AI"',
'site:character.ai "private conversation"',
# ... character-specific dorks
]
}
}
Intelligent Content Analysis
class AIContentValidator:
AI_CHAT_INDICATORS = {
'chatgpt': [
"I'm ChatGPT", "As an AI", "OpenAI",
"I can help", "ChatGPT response"
],
'character_ai': [
"Character.AI", "*character name*",
"roleplay", "*actions*"
]
}
def validate_ai_chat_url(self, url: str, service: str) -> tuple[bool, float]:
# Implementation for URL validation with confidence scoring
pass
π‘οΈ Security Impact Analysis
Identified Risks
-
Personal Information Exposure
- Email addresses, phone numbers
- Personal conversations and private thoughts
- Professional and academic information
-
Technical Credentials
- API keys and access tokens
- Session identifiers
- Authentication credentials
-
Business Intelligence
- Internal communications
- Confidential project discussions
- Strategic planning conversations
Platform-Specific Vulnerabilities
Platform | Risk Level | Common Issues |
---|---|---|
Character.AI | HIGH β οΈ | Public chat links, JSON exposure |
ChatGPT | MEDIUM π‘ | Shared conversation links |
Claude | MEDIUM π‘ | Public conversation URLs |
Perplexity | LOW π’ | Limited exposure patterns |
π Responsible Disclosure Process
Timeline & Actions Taken
-
Discovery Phase (August 1, 2025)
- Identified exposure patterns using AI Dorker v3.0
- Confirmed findings through manual validation
- Assessed potential impact scope
-
Documentation Phase (August 1, 2025)
- Created detailed technical documentation
- Generated proof-of-concept evidence
- Prepared comprehensive security report
-
Disclosure Phase (Immediate)
- Contacted platform security teams
- Submitted findings through official channels
- Coordinating fix timeline and public disclosure
Recommended Platform Improvements
- Immediate Actions
- Audit all publicly accessible conversation URLs
- Implement proper access controls for shared links
- Add robots.txt restrictions for sensitive paths
- Review search engine indexing policies
- Long-term Security Enhancements
- Implement conversation privacy controls
- Add user consent for public sharing
- Regular security audits of exposed endpoints
- Enhanced monitoring for data exposure
π¬ Research Methodology
Ethical Framework
Our research follows established ethical guidelines:
- Minimal Impact: All testing performed with minimal system impact
- No Data Access: No attempt to access private user data
- Legal Compliance: Full compliance with applicable laws
- Responsible Disclosure: Coordinated disclosure with platform owners
Technical Approach
-
Automated Discovery
- Custom search engine integration
- Intelligent query construction
- Result validation and filtering
-
Manual Verification
- Human analysis of identified patterns
- False positive elimination
- Impact assessment
-
Documentation & Reporting
- Comprehensive finding documentation
- Technical proof-of-concept development
- Security recommendation generation
π Statistics & Impact
Research Scope
- Platforms Analyzed: 6 major AI services
- Search Queries: 50+ precision-crafted dorks
- Results Processed: 1,000+ individual findings
- Confirmed Exposures: Multiple high-confidence discoveries
False Positive Reduction
- v3.0: ~5% false positives β
π Academic & Professional Impact
Research Applications
-
Bug Bounty Research
- Systematic vulnerability discovery
- Automated reconnaissance for security researchers
- Enhanced OSINT capabilities
-
Corporate Security Auditing
- Internal AI service security assessment
- Data exposure monitoring
- Compliance verification
-
Educational Use
- Cybersecurity education and training
- AI security awareness programs
- Research methodology demonstrations
π€ Community Contribution
Open Source Benefits
- Transparency: Full source code availability for security review
- Collaboration: Community-driven improvements and updates
- Education: Learning resource for security researchers
- Standards: Promoting ethical research practices
Future Development
- [ ] Additional AI platform support
- [ ] Real-time monitoring capabilities
- [ ] Integration with security frameworks
- [ ] Enhanced reporting and visualization
- [ ] API for automated security testing
π References & Resources
Security Research Standards
AI Security Research
- AI/ML Security Testing Methodology
- Machine Learning Security Best Practices
- Conversational AI Security Patterns
π License & Usage
This project is released under the MIT License with additional ethical use requirements:
MIT License with Ethical Use Clause
Permission is granted for educational and authorized security research purposes only.
Commercial use requires explicit permission. Users must comply with all applicable
laws and follow responsible disclosure practices.
π Acknowledgments
- Security research community for ethical guidelines
- AI platform developers for building innovative services
- Open source community for collaboration and feedback
- Academic institutions supporting cybersecurity research
βοΈ Legal Notice
This tool is provided for educational and authorized security research purposes only. Users are responsible for ensuring their activities comply with applicable laws, regulations, and platform terms of service. The authors assume no liability for misuse of this tool.
Remember: With great power comes great responsibility. Use these capabilities ethically and help make the internet a safer place for everyone.
Last Updated: August 1, 2025
Version: 3.0
Top comments (3)
This is one of the most focused and advanced AI specific OSINT tools Iβve seen shared publicly. It strikes a strong balance between technical depth, ethical security research principles, and practical value.
Thanks! It's a pity that many vulnerabilities have already been covered up, but there are many AI assistants who are less protected and react to this vulnerability. by slightly changing the program code specifically for AI assistants, you can catch a lot of interesting personal data that has ever been published in them.
cool!