DEV Community

Cover image for LeetCode Meditations: Maximum Depth of Binary Tree
Eda
Eda

Posted on • Originally published at rivea0.github.io

LeetCode Meditations: Maximum Depth of Binary Tree

The description for Maximum Depth of Binary Tree says that:

Given the root of a binary tree, return its maximum depth.

A binary tree's maximum depth is the number of nodes along the longest path from the root node down to the farthest leaf node.

For example:

Example image

Input: root = [3, 9, 20, null, null, 15, 7]
Output: 3
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The word depth in the title (kind of) hints at a depth-first search approach. One way to do it is with recursion:

/**
 * Definition for a binary tree node.
 * class TreeNode {
 *   val: number
 *   left: TreeNode | null
 *   right: TreeNode | null
 *   constructor(val?: number, left?: TreeNode | null, right?: TreeNode | null) {
 *     this.val = (val === undefined ? 0 : val)
 *     this.left = (left === undefined ? null : left)
 *     this.right = (right === undefined ? null : right)
 *   }
 * }
 */

function maxDepth(root: TreeNode | null): number {
  if (root === null) {
    return 0;
  }

  return 1 + Math.max(maxDepth(root.left), maxDepth(root.right));
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

It looks elegant and simple: what we're doing is calculating the depth of left and right subtrees from the root node's perspective, and returning the larger one of them plus 1 (for the root node).

Time and space complexity

The time complexity is O(n)O(n) as we visit each node in the tree. The space complexity can be said to be O(h)O(h) where hh is the height of the tree (because each recursive call creates a new stack frame). However, in the case of an unbalanced tree, it is going to be O(n)O(n) .


Depth-first search doesn't always have to be recursive, so let's look at an iterative version, as shown by NeetCode (but let's write it in TypeScript):

/**
 * Definition for a binary tree node.
 * class TreeNode {
 *   val: number
 *   left: TreeNode | null
 *   right: TreeNode | null
 *   constructor(val?: number, left?: TreeNode | null, right?: TreeNode | null) {
 *     this.val = (val === undefined ? 0 : val)
 *     this.left = (left === undefined ? null : left)
 *     this.right = (right === undefined ? null : right)
 *   }
 * }
 */

function maxDepth(root: TreeNode | null): number {
  // Keep the current node and current depth in stack
  let stack: [TreeNode | null, number][] = [[root, 1]];
  let result = 0;

  while (stack.length > 0) {
    let [currentNode, depth] = stack.pop();
    if (currentNode !== null) {
      result = Math.max(result, depth);
      stack.push([currentNode.left, depth + 1]);
      stack.push([currentNode.right, depth + 1]);
    }
  }

  return result;
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Here, we use a stack where we keep the current node and current depth — starting with the root node, and depth of 1.
We pop the last item and continue pushing its left and right children, also incrementing depth as we do so. result is keeping track of the maximum depth, so at the end when our stack is empty, we just return it.

Time and space complexity

The time and space complexity are both O(n)O(n) — we go through each node; and keep a stack whose size will grow as the number of nodes in the tree grows.


The next problem is what seems to be an easy one, called Same Tree. Until then, happy coding.

Top comments (0)