Not to say that remote work is a flawless solution, but it is certainly a trend gaining in popularity.
I imagine there will always be a purpose for offices and hubs to an extent, but could we see a reality where the normal way software is built is from wherever the developer happens to be located and meeting up IRL is not an everyday norm?
Top comments (44)
Personally, I don't want the industry to go fully-remote. I like the experience of working in the same physical space as my team members. Coworking spaces aren't bad, but they're still not the same, socially, as working in the same room as members of your own company/team.
At one point in my life, I thought I would enjoy working remotely. But in the years since, I've come to realize that I just wouldn't be happy working fully remotely. Flexibility to work remotely when needed is pretty much a must for me, but even the benefit of getting 2+ hours of commute time back isn't enough for me to do it full-time.
I did remote work for 2 years and eventually came to a similar conclusion. I like the passive ambience of an office space of people getting work done. But sometimes I need to get deep work done and the office is just not conducive for that (unless you're given an office with a door).
Similar experience. After a year of living the dream of going to work unshaven in my underwear I realized that dream sucked; for me. โThe Perfect Work Commuteโ by Frank Font link.medium.com/ZQ6bUOdOr4
Same here. Never worked fully remote, but one day a week was already enough for me. I like to meet people in the office, have a chat and go out for lunch with others.
Give people a choice, the ones who want remote let them do remote, the ones who prefer to work in an office let them do so. And a mix is of course also very well possible.
I don't think it can go 100%. But yes it's certainly on the rise.
Many people (a substantial number I'd say) still believe that people don't work unless you make them. I guess that ideology alone makes thousands of people go to office everyday.
Then there's also the kind which believe in the very foundation of offices as institutions. They'd go in every day regardless of productivity and expect others to come too.
May be things might change when millenial population gains leadership or upper management positions.
This. I agree here, the core issue is rather the work ethics and that productiveness is individual.
For example, I work two days of the week at home and three at the office. This is how I found myself best to balance productivity with my personal demands.
Now everyday due to corona and I already get performance decrease :-(
When organizations leave the culture of micromanagement that is when the industry will be 100% ready to become remote friendly. Real Estate will get a hit for sure if IT embraces 100% remote culture. So existing orgs who have invested in their infrastructure will tend support in-office culture. It is good one for upcoming organizations.
Yeah real estate agents for sure won't be happy with remote ...
I think it is important to give your employee a choice.
Remote work is not for everyone, I'd be happy to work from home and avoid my daily commute but some of my colleagues prefer an office environment. Some of them may enjoy a coworking space, but other may prefer working with their team at the same office.
I don't think the entire industry will become remote first, but I expect the majority of companies to allow some kind of remote work in the near future, maybe just once or twice a week, or giving the choice between fully remote or office.
I'll base my future career decision on that, trying to exclude companies hostile to remote work.
In order to contain the spreading of corona virus many firms in Italy are allowing people to work from home this days, in some cases people are forced to work remotely as some cities are in lockdown.
Let's see how it goes, unfortunately I'm still coming to the office but trains are almost empty and there is way less traffic than usual.
I'm trying to see the glass half full, I hope firms will start considering remote work after this experimentation period in order to improve their employee's lives and to reduce pollution.
While there are a lot of people against this idea or think it wonโt happen, I would like to provide some counterpoints.
corporations can drive down operational costs by closing satellite offices. This is usually the case when times are rough, revenue is down. That doesnโt have to be the only case though. Decisions to allow 100% remote are not altruistic and probably have more to do with the corporationโs balance sheet.
when working remote, I had to fill my schedule with meetups to get that in person connectivity I was yearning for. There are other ways.
at one point most web software was tied to locale, like the mythical server in a closet. Nowadays not so much with the cloud.
flu spreads in office environments.
as cities become more adept at coping with climate change, they can incentivize remote work. Turns out it never was a good idea for everyone to drive to the office at the same time ๐คทโโ๏ธ. Corporations are incentivized to purchase realty by local governments though, so many are correct it will never be 100% remote.
SpaceX Starlink bas been in the headlines recently for being the bane of every astromerโs existence, but eventually there will be satellite internet everywhere at reliable enough speeds to develop.
I love remote work. Been working this way for years now. Kids come home from school early, so I can spend time with them. Work when I feel productive, not according to a pointless 9-5 regimen. I don't get monthly colds or flus. I can dress how I feel. I pop out in the summer afternoons to the nearby lake for a swim, or walk in the pine forests. And office chat goes on as normal....via email and IM.
I think 100% remote is certainly possible, but not ideal. I would hope the office environment would be available for a portion of the workforce that really thrives in the office, and available for part-time in-office work, but that a remote-first culture would become the normal (no water-cooler decisions). Other means of getting people together should be employed as well, maybe quarterly or biannually. Maybe monthly team lunches when teams are in the same city, while working remote.
I see a bright future for remote-first work:
I donโt think it will go 100% remote and I donโt think it should. Iโve worked remotely for 4 years and itโs a solution that works really well for me as someone who doesnโt live in a major city. Remote work is great for companies who want to tap into larger talent pools and for workers who want to work at amazing companies without needing to uproot their lives. Remote is also great from an accessibility standpoint and remote friendly companies tend to offer in-office colleagues flexibility when they need it, too.
Remote work isnโt for everyone and the reasons why people may prefer in-office work are very valid! I think what matters is that we see more companies to attract people who prefer remote work versus force in-office employees to adopt a remote work situation that doesnโt fit with their wants or needs. ๐
A nearshore company selling services around the world could have all the employees working remotely.
In nearsure.net/ all the employees work remotely.
but if you are talking about a startup or a company selling their own product, this changes. I think it's very important to create a synergy between the Teams and build bridges between people and you only can achieve this working face to face at least some days per week.
South American devs are hard core and underrated. Propers to you and yours.
I am glad to hear that. I really enjoy working with devs from Ukraine and Eastern Europe I think they underrated as well.
Currently, we have enough tools and documentation to improve our skills no matters where you are living.
Technologically? Yep. No question. In fact, there are solid business cases for why there has to be a certain amount of remote capability for pretty much all companies.
What would stop it is the human factor and culture. Many people don't want to work remotely, and that's okay. Many managers don't want people to work remotely, because they don't like the loss of control (that's not okay).
Does this mean that companies won't have offices? Not necessarily. You can still be nearly 100% remote and still have some offices, especially if your niche has a large hardware component. "Remote" doesn't mean "only ever meet over video chat."