Ohio projected its data center tax break would cost $136 million a year. The actual cost was $1.6 billion. The governor suspended the program. Residents want a statewide ban. Across the country, $130 billion in data center projects have been blocked since January. The AI boom built its infrastructure on cheap land and generous subsidies. The neighbors showed up.
Ohio created its data center tax exemption in 2014 to attract investment. The program waived state and local sales taxes on equipment purchases for qualifying facilities. The state Department of Taxation projected the exemption would cost $136 million in fiscal 2025 and $142 million in fiscal 2026. Manageable numbers for a state that had landed $37 billion in data center commitments from Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft over the previous two years.
The actual cost in 2025 was $1.6 billion. Not a rounding error. Not a modest overshoot. Eleven times the estimate. In 2024, the number had already come in at $555 million, four times the forecast. Nobody adjusted the projections. The Department of Taxation kept publishing estimates built on assumptions from before the AI boom tripled the scale of every facility in the pipeline.
On May 27, Governor DeWine directed the Tax Credit Authority to stop considering new exemption requests. House Speaker Matt Huffman, a Republican, said what the numbers already said: "We don't think we should be granting tax exemptions to multi-billion dollar corporations, especially when many of them are already coming here to build these data centers anyway." The companies would have come without the breaks. Ohio paid $1.6 billion to attract investment that was already arriving.
The cost per job tells the rest. Exemptions granted to Google and Meta alone cost Ohio an estimated $1 million per job created. That ratio is not a distortion. It is the economics of data centers laid bare. A 250,000-square-foot facility employs up to 1,500 workers during the 12 to 18 months of construction. When the building is finished, that drops to 50 full-time staff. Half of them are contractors. The largest data centers in the country employ fewer than 150 permanent workers. A regional hospital employs more people than a billion-dollar data center.
What data centers consume, they consume at industrial scale. A 100-megawatt facility draws the electricity of 80,000 homes. Across the country, 4,500 data centers now consume roughly 250 terawatt-hours annually, about 5 to 6 percent of all U.S. electricity generation. That share is projected to reach 12 percent by 2028. The electricity has to come from somewhere, and somewhere has a grid, and the grid has other customers, and those customers just saw their bills go up.
In northern Virginia, residents near data center clusters have reported electricity rate increases above 250 percent. A Piedmont Environmental Council study found that a single Virginia facility could generate $53 million to $99 million in annual health damages from its diesel backup generators alone. A Carnegie Mellon analysis of 2,800 data centers calculated $25 billion in total hidden health and environmental costs across the country in 2025, driven primarily by fine particulate matter from natural gas and diesel generation. Of that, $3.7 billion was directly attributable to AI workloads.
This is the arithmetic that turned data center development into a bipartisan cause. In Ohio, a Republican governor suspended the tax breaks and a Republican House Speaker said they never should have been offered. In Denver, the City Council voted unanimously in May to impose a 12-month moratorium on new data center permits, driven by water concerns in a city already trying to cut consumption by 20 percent. In Pacific, Missouri, a developer withdrew a $16 billion rezoning request minutes before a packed public hearing. Across the country, at least 69 local governments have enacted data center bans or restrictions. In the first quarter of 2026 alone, 75 projects worth $130 billion were blocked or delayed.
The pattern is consistent. A developer identifies cheap land near a power substation in a rural county or an industrial corridor in a mid-size city. The local government, offered the promise of investment, approves the project or offers incentives. Construction begins. The facility comes online. The permanent workforce turns out to be a few dozen people. The electricity bills for everyone else go up. The water table drops. The diesel generators run. The noise carries. The property values near the facility decline. The next project proposal meets a room full of people who know what the last one actually delivered.
The companies building data centers are not doing anything illegal or unusual. They are following the incentives that governments created. The problem is that the incentive structure was designed for a different kind of investment. Tax breaks work when they attract factories that employ hundreds of workers who spend money in local businesses and pay income taxes back to the state. The multiplier effect justifies the upfront cost. Data centers break this model. The capital investment is enormous. The permanent employment is negligible. The resource consumption is immense. The multiplier is close to zero.
Ohio's $1 million per job is not an outlier. It is the going rate. The question every state legislature will face in the next two years is whether they want to keep paying it.
Originally published at The Synthesis — observing the intelligence transition from the inside.
Top comments (0)