## DEV Community is a community of 718,146 amazing developers

We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.

dev.to staff

Posted on

# Daily Challenge #287 - 16+18=214

For this challenge, forget everything you know about adding two large numbers together. Like in this photo, you'll be adding two numbers together without carrying numbers. Write a function that will take two numbers as input and will add them together without carrying. Write down every value you get.

### Examples

`2 + 11 = 13`

`16 + 18 = 214`
1 + 1 = 2
6 + 8 = 14

`122 + 81 = 1103`
1 + 0 = 1
8 + 2 = 10
2 + 1 = 3

### Tests

`1222 + 30277`
`1236 + 30889`
`49999 + 49999`

Good luck!

This challenge comes from CodeChrisB on CodeWars. Thank you to CodeWars, who has licensed redistribution of this challenge under the 2-Clause BSD License!

Want to propose a challenge idea for a future post? Email yo+challenge@dev.to with your suggestions!

## Discussion (16) willsmart

A quickie in Typescript
Each digit is enumerated in turn by skimming off the ones digit off each number (using `num%10`, then dividing the number by 10) until there are no more digits.
The accumulated sum is simply a string with each sum added to its left-hand side.

``````function piecewiseAdd(addendA: number, addendB: number): number {
let sumString = '';
}
return +sumString;
}
``````

Testn

``````> piecewiseAdd(0,0)
< 0
< 31499
< 31101115
< 818181818
`````` willsmart

Thanks, that's a fair point. Here's the tweaked code:

``````function piecewiseAdd_numeric(addendA: number, addendB: number) : number {
let sum = 0, cursor = 1;
sum += cursor * digitSum;
cursor *= digitSum < 10 ? 10 : 100;
}
return sum;
}
``````

Benchmark here -- numeric method has it by a nose most of the time you run it, sometimes a bit more. For smaller inputs they're pretty much even.

In C or Rust or something closer to the metal Mihail's post is definitely the way to go (imo).
In JS strings are pretty quick and numbers are surprisingly slow to deal with (there's no support for integers, etc) and I find the language doesn't really reward that kind of close-knit optimization, so I felt it wasn't worth the additional complication. I wonder what the result with asm.js would be.
There are some claims that in the process of implementing asm.js V8 in particular just optimized normal code to the speed of corresponding asm.js, but some extra assertions might still help? Valts Liepiņš • Edited

EDIT:
I quite liked purely arithmetic solutions by @willsmart and @qm3ster , so I reimplemented same idea in Haskell:

``````import Numeric.Natural (Natural)

(^+^) :: Natural -> Natural -> Natural
(^+^) = reducer 1
where
reducer c 0 0 = 0
reducer c a b =
let sum = a `mod` 10 + b `mod` 10
delta = if sum < 10 then 10 else 100
in c * sum + reducer (c * delta) (shift a) (shift b)
shift x = floor \$ fromIntegral x / 10
``````

``````import Numeric.Natural (Natural)
import Data.Char (digitToInt)

(^+^) :: Natural -> Natural -> Natural
(^+^) n1 n2 = read \$ sumHead n1' n2' <> sumTail n1' n2'
where
sumHead x y = maybe "" reverse \$ zipRemain x y
sumTail x y = concat . reverse . fmap (show . add) \$ zip x y
add (x,y) = digitToInt x + digitToInt y
n1' = reverse \$ show n1
n2' = reverse \$ show n2

zipRemain :: [a] -> [a] -> Maybe [a]
zipRemain [] [] = Nothing
zipRemain xs [] = Just xs
zipRemain [] ys = Just ys
zipRemain (_:xs) (_:ys) = zipRemain xs ys
``````

Essentially `zip`s up digit by digit in reverse order, sums and concats the result. `zipRemain` utility function helps retrieving leftover part of the longer of two zipped lists.

Example for the zipping problem:

``````a = ["1", "2", "3", "4", "5"]
b = ["a", "b", "c"]
zipAB = zip a b -- [("1","a"), ("2","b"), ("3","c")]
zipRemainAB = zipRemain a b -- ["4", "5"]
`````` Solution in Bash and some general commands:

``````#!/bin/bash
p=\$(( \$1 > \$2 ? \$1 : \$2 ));
eval paste '<(printf "%\${#p}d" \$'{1,2}' | grep -o .)' |
awk '{printf \$1+\$2}' | awk 4
}

noCarryAddition 2 11   # => 13
noCarryAddition 16 18  # => 214
noCarryAddition 122 81 # => 1103
`````` Petros Apotsos

This reminds me of the quote: "Whatever you do, there is an asian doing it better."
Nice solution!! Sooraj
``````const noCarryAddition = (num1, num2) => {
let result = [];
if (num1.length >= num2.length) {
num1.toString().split('').reverse().map((n1, index) => result.push(+n1 + +(num2.toString().split('').reverse()[index] || 0)));
} else {
num2.toString().split('').reverse().map((n2, index) => result.push(+n2 + +(num1.toString().split('').reverse()[index] || 0)));
}
return result.reverse().join('');
}
``````

Took a slightly bigger approach, but it works :) Lorraine Lee

Ruby, because Ruby has built-in `divmod`, because you need both at least as often as you need either.

``````def piecewise_add(n1, n2)
return n1+n2 if n1*n2 == 0
d1, m1 = n1.divmod(10)
d2, m2 = n2.divmod(10)
m3 = m1+m2
mult = m3 > 9 ? 100 : 10
end
`````` Rafael Acioly

Python 🐍

Not the solution i like but it does the job.

``````
def sum_(first: int, second: int) -> int:
first_mapped = str(first)
second_mapped = str(second)

# Fill the smallest list with '0' on left
if len(first_mapped) > len(second_mapped):
second_mapped = second_mapped.zfill(len(first_mapped))
elif len(second_mapped) > len(first_mapped):
first_mapped = first_mapped.zfill(len(second_mapped))

result = ''
for x, y in zip(first_mapped, second_mapped):
result += str(int(x) + int(y))

return int(result)
`````` # Rust

(without stringification)

``````fn euthanize(mut a: u64, mut b: u64) -> u64 {
let mut out = 0;
let mut cursor = 1;
loop {
let sum = a % 10 + b % 10;
out += sum * cursor;
cursor *= if sum < 10 { 10 } else { 100 };
a /= 10;
b /= 10;
if a == 0 && b == 0 {
return out;
}
}
}
``````

## // test

``````fn main() {
assert_eq!(euthanize(2, 11), 13);
assert_eq!(euthanize(16, 18), 214);
assert_eq!(euthanize(122, 81), 1103);
dbg!(euthanize(1222, 30277));
dbg!(euthanize(1236, 30889));
dbg!(euthanize(49999, 49999));
}
``````

(look at it go) peter279k

Here is my simple solution with Python:

``````def add(num1, num2):
num_string1 = str(num1)
num_string2 = str(num2)

is_done = False
if len(num_string1) > len(num_string2):
length = len(num_string1) - len(num_string2)
num_string2 = '0' * length + num_string2
is_done = True
if len(num_string1) < len(num_string2) and is_done is False:
length = len(num_string2) - len(num_string1)
num_string1= '0' * length + num_string1

ans = ''
index = 0

while index < len(num_string1):
ans += str(int(num_string1[index]) + int(num_string2[index]))
index += 1

return int(ans)
`````` Anders

Old school JS version, not super optimized, but should be faster than, map, join, split etc

``````function noCarryAddition(n0, n1) {

var a = n0.toString();
var b = n1.toString();
var maxLength = Math.max(a.length, b.length);
var s = '';

for (var i = maxLength - 1; i >= 0; --i) {

var indexA = a.length - (i + 1);
var indexB = b.length - (i + 1);

var valueA = (indexA >= 0)? parseInt(a[indexA]) : 0;
var valueB = (indexB >= 0)? parseInt(b[indexB]) : 0;

s += (valueA + valueB);
}

return s;
}
`````` Hardcore? Yeah, I'm diggin' into that.

``````def add(n1, n2):
nums = [str(n1), str(n2)]
nums = list(map(lambda s: s.zfill(max(map(len, nums))), nums))

result = [str(int(v1) + int(v2)) for v1, v2 in zip(*nums)]

return int(''.join(result))
`````` ItsASine (Kayla)

Technically correct, but I tended to think of the solution backward, so it does way more reversing then it should to get things back in place to finish it.